Connect with us

World

Scottish independence at crossroads in testy SNP leader race

Published

on

Scottish independence at crossroads in testy SNP leader race

LONDON (AP) — The Scottish Nationwide Occasion is discovering Nicola Sturgeon a tough act to observe.

Scotland’s governing celebration is holding an acrimonious contest to exchange Sturgeon, a pacesetter who got here to dominate Scottish politics, however hit an deadlock in her battle for independence from the UK, and divided the celebration with a transgender rights regulation.

Sturgeon, 52, introduced her resignation in February after eight years as celebration chief and first minster of Scotland’s semi-autonomous authorities. Three members of the Scottish parliament are operating to exchange her: Finance Secretary Kate Forbes, 32; Well being Secretary Humza Yousaf, 37; and 49-year-old lawmaker Ash Regan. The winner of a vote by SNP members shall be introduced on March 27.

The marketing campaign has cracked open fissures throughout the celebration over political technique, social points and Sturgeon’s legacy.

Critics say a clique across the former first minister wields an excessive amount of energy within the SNP. These rivals scored a victory when celebration chief govt Peter Murrell — Sturgeon’s 58-year-old husband — resigned on Saturday over a kerfuffle concerning the celebration’s declining membership.

Advertisement

The SNP had publicly denied a newspaper report that its membership had fallen from greater than 100,000 to only over 70,000 up to now 12 months, earlier than admitting it was true. Murrell accepted accountability and give up, saying that “whereas there was no intent to mislead, I settle for that this has been the end result.”

Regan welcomed Murrell’s departure, saying it was “unacceptable to have the husband of the celebration chief because the CEO.” Forbes stated that the celebration grassroots felt disempowered as a result of “choices throughout the SNP have been taken by too few folks.”

Sturgeon’s resignation has unleashed a battle for the route of the SNP, which at the moment holds 64 of the 129 seats within the Scottish parliament and governs in coalition with the a lot smaller Greens.

In bad-tempered tv debates, Regan and Forbes have attacked Yousaf — a Sturgeon ally extensively thought to be the front-runner — as a continuity candidate in a celebration that badly wants change.

“Proper now, we’re at a crossroads,” Forbes instructed the BBC in an interview broadcast Sunday, arguing that the Scottish authorities must do extra to bolster an economic system weakened by Russia’s conflict in Ukraine, COVID-19 and Brexit. “We have to get severe about what’s labored and what’s not labored.”

Advertisement

Forbes’ message appeals to some celebration members, who assume that the SNP underneath Sturgeon spent an excessive amount of time specializing in divisive social points quite that the economic system and independence. Sturgeon’s departure was hastened by a backlash over laws she championed to make it simpler for folks in Scotland to legally change their gender.

The gender recognition invoice has been hailed as a landmark piece of laws by transgender rights activists, however confronted opposition from some SNP members who stated it ignored the necessity to defend single-sex areas for ladies, corresponding to home violence shelters and rape disaster facilities.

Forbes and Regan each oppose the laws, which has been handed by the Scottish parliament however blocked by the U.Okay. authorities. Yousaf helps it, and warns the celebration may swing to the fitting if led by Forbes, a socially conservative Christian who is taken into account his foremost rival.

Forbes, who belongs to the evangelical Free Church of Scotland, has been criticized for saying that her religion would have prevented her from voting in favor of permitting same-sex {couples} to wed. She wasn’t but a lawmaker when the Scottish Parliament legalized homosexual marriage in 2014.

The management contest has despatched the SNP’s ballot scores plunging — to the delight of the Labour Occasion and the Conservatives, which hope to achieve seats in Scotland through the subsequent U.Okay.-wide election, due by the tip of 2024.

Advertisement

The testy race additionally displays frustrations inside a celebration that, after 16 years in energy in Edinburgh, has but to attain its foremost ambition: independence.

Scottish folks voted to stay within the U.Okay. in a 2014 referendum that was billed as a once-in-a-generation choice. The SNP desires a brand new vote, however the central authorities has refused to authorize one, and the U.Okay. Supreme Courtroom has dominated that Scotland can’t maintain one with out London’s consent.

Regan desires to comb these obstacles apart by treating the subsequent election in Scotland as a “set off level” for independence, successfully daring the U.Okay. authorities to not acknowledge Scotland’s democratic option to secede.

Forbes and Yousaf are extra cautious. Forbes referred to as for extra effort to win over voters who again remaining within the U.Okay., whereas Yousaf says he desires to construct a “settled, sustained” majority for independence. Polls at the moment recommend Scottish voters are cut up about evenly on the problem.

Main Scottish historian Tom Devine stated that with independence receding as an instantaneous prospect, many citizens had extra pressing issues — and that poses a threat for the SNP.

Advertisement

“The notion is that the mainstream of Scottish public opinion is anxious mainly with the issues of the (well being system), instructional requirements, transport infrastructure and the broader economic system,” he instructed Scotland’s Herald newspaper. “Are components of the citizens now starting to really feel sidelined and concluding that the SNP authorities has did not ship on these very important issues?”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Wafa Al-Udaini, Palestinian Journalist, Told Story of Gaza That Was Full of Life

Published

on

Wafa Al-Udaini, Palestinian Journalist, Told Story of Gaza That Was Full of Life

Before the answers to life’s questions fit in our pocket, you used to have to turn a dial. If you were lucky, Phil Donahue would be on, ready to guide you toward enlightenment. In a stroke of deluxe good fortune, Dr. Ruth Westheimer might have stopped by to be the enlightenment. He was the search engine. She was a trusted result.

Donahue hailed from Cleveland. The windshield glasses, increasingly snowy thatch of hair, marble eyes, occasional pair of suspenders and obvious geniality said “card catalog,” “manager of the ’79 Reds,” “Stage Manager in a Chevy Motors production of ‘Our Town.’” Dr. Ruth was Donahue’s antonym, a step stool to his straight ladder. She kept her hair in a butterscotch helmet, fancied a uniform of jacket-blouse-skirt and came to our aid, via Germany, with a voice of crinkled tissue paper. Not even eight years separated them, yet so boyish was he and so seasoned was she that he read as her grandson. (She maybe reached his armpit.) Together and apart, they were public servants, American utilities.

Donahue was a journalist. His forum was the talk show, but some new strain in which the main attraction bypassed celebrities. People — every kind of them — lined up to witness other people being human, to experience Donahue’s radical conduit of edification, identification, curiosity, shock, wonder, outrage, surprise and dispute, all visible in the show’s televisual jackpot: cutaways to us, reacting, taking it all in, nodding, gasping. When a celebrity made it to the “Donahue” stage — Bill Clinton, say, La Toya Jackson, the Judds — they were expected to be human, too, to be accountable for their own humanity. From 1967 to 1996, for more than 6,000 episodes, he permitted us to be accountable to ourselves. 

What Donahue knew was that we — women especially — were eager, desperate, to be understood, to learn and learn and learn. We call his job “host” when, really, the way he did it, running that microphone throughout the audience, racing up, down, around, sticking it here then here then over here, was closer to “switchboard operator.” It was “hot dog vendor at Madison Square Garden.” The man got his steps in. He let us do more of the questioning than he did — he would just edit, interpret, clarify. Egalitarianism ruled. Articulation, too. And anybody who needed the mic usually got it.

The show was about both what was on our mind and what had never once crossed it. Atheism. Naziism. Colorism. Childbirth. Prison. Rapists. AIDS. Chippendales, Chernobyl, Cher. Name a fetish, Phil Donahue tried to get to its bottom, sometimes by trying it himself. (Let us never forget the episode when he made his entrance in a long skirt, blouse and pussy bow for one of the show’s many cross-dressing studies.) Now’s the time to add that “Donahue” was a morning talk show. In Philadelphia, he arrived every weekday at 9 a.m., which meant that, in the summers, I could learn about compulsive shopping or shifting gender roles from the same kitchen TV set as my grandmother.

Advertisement

Sex and sexuality were the show’s prime subjects. There was so much that needed confessing, correction, corroboration, an ear lent. For that, Donahue needed an expert. Many times, the expert was Dr. Ruth, a godsend who didn’t land in this country until she was in her late 20s and didn’t land on television until she was in her 50s. Ruth Westheimer arrived to us from Germany, where she started as Karola Ruth Siegel and strapped in as her life corkscrewed, as it mocked fiction. Her family most likely perished in the Auschwitz death camps after she was whisked to the safety of a Swiss children’s home, where she was expected to clean. The twists include sniper training for one of the military outfits that would become the Israel Defense Forces, maiming by cannonball on her 20th birthday, doing research at a Planned Parenthood in Harlem, single motherhood and three husbands. She earned her doctorate from Columbia University, in education, and spent her postdoc researching human sexuality. And because her timing was perfect, she emerged at the dawn of the 1980s, an affable vector of an era’s craze for gnomic sages (Zelda Rubinstein, Linda Hunt, Yoda), masterpiece branding and the nasty.

Hers was the age of Mapplethorpe and Madonna, of Prince, Skinemax and 2 Live Crew. On her radio and television shows, in a raft of books and a Playgirl column and through her promiscuous approach to talk-show appearances, she aimed to purge sex of shame, to promote sexual literacy. Her feline accent and jolly innuendo pitched, among other stuff, the Honda Prelude, Pepsi, Sling TV and Herbal Essences. (“Hey!” she offers to a young elevator passenger. “This is where we get off.”) The instructions for Dr. Ruth’s Game of Good Sex says it can be played by up to four couples; the board is vulval and includes stops at “Yeast Infection,” “Chauvinism” and “Goose Him.”

On “Donahue,” she is direct, explicit, dispelling, humorous, clear, common-sensical, serious, vivid. A professional therapist. It was Donahue who handled the comedy. On one visit in 1987, a caller needs advice about a husband who cheats because he wants to have sex more often than she does. Dr. Ruth tells Donahue that if the caller wants to keep the marriage, and her husband wants to do it all the time, “then what she should do is to masturbate him. And it’s all right for him to masturbate himself also a few times.” The audience is hear-a-pin-drop rapt or maybe just squirmy. So Donahue reaches into his parochial-school-student war chest and pulls out the joke about the teacher who tells third-grade boys, “Don’t play with yourself, or you’ll go blind.” And Donahue raises his hand like a kid at the back of the classroom and asks, “Can I do it till I need glasses?” Westheimer giggles, maybe noticing the large pair on Donahue’s face. This was that day’s cold open.

They were children of salesmen, these two; his father was in the furniture business, hers sold what people in the garment industry call notions. They inherited a salesman’s facility for people and packaging. When a “Donahue” audience member asks Westheimer whether her own husband believes she practices what she preaches, she says this is why she never brings him anywhere. “He would tell you and Phil: ‘Do not listen to her. It’s all talk,’” which cracks the audience up.

But consider what she talked about — and consider how she said it. My favorite Dr. Ruth word was “pleasure.” From a German mouth, the word conveys what it lacks with an American tongue: sensual unfurling. She vowed to speak about sex to mass audiences using the proper terminology. Damn the euphemisms. People waited as long as a year and a half for tickets to “Donahue” so they could damn them, too. But of everything Westheimer pitched, of all the terms she precisely used, pleasure was her most cogent product, a gift she believed we could give to others, a gift she swore we owed ourselves.

Advertisement

I miss the talk show that Donahue reinvented. I miss the way Dr. Ruth talked about sex. It’s fitting somehow that this antidogmatic-yet-priestly Irish Catholic man would, on occasion, join forces with a carnal, lucky-to-be-alive Jew to urge the exploration of our bodies while demonstrating respect, civility, reciprocation. They believed in us, that we were all interesting, that we could be trustworthy panelists in the discourse of being alive. Trauma, triviality, tubal ligation: Let’s talk about it! Fear doesn’t seem to have occurred to them. Or if it did, it was never a deterrent. Boldly they went. — And with her encouragement, boldly we came.

Wesley Morris is a critic at large for The New York Times and a staff writer for the magazine.

Continue Reading

World

Projectile from Yemen strikes near Tel Aviv, injuring more than a dozen: officials

Published

on

Projectile from Yemen strikes near Tel Aviv, injuring more than a dozen: officials

A projectile launched into Israel from Yemen overnight into Saturday struck Tel Aviv, resulting in mild injuries to 16 people, according to Israeli officials.

Israel’s military said after sirens sounded in central Israel that the projectile landed in Tel Aviv’s southern Jaffa area following failed attempts to intercept.

“Following the sirens that sounded a short while ago in central Israel, one projectile launched from Yemen was identified and unsuccessful interception attempts were made,” the military said on Telegram.

ISRAELI AIRSTRIKES TARGET YEMEN’S HOUTHI-CONTROLLED CAPITAL OF SANAA, PORT CITY OF HODEIDA

Israeli emergency services work at the scene of a missile strike that, according to Israel’s military, was launched from Yemen and landed in Jaffa, south of Tel Aviv, Israel, December 21, 2024. (Reuters)

Advertisement

Iranian-backed Houthi rebels have repeatedly launched missile attacks from Yemen against Israel since the war in Gaza began in October of last year, but the incident overnight represents a rare instance in which Israel failed to intercept.

Israel has retaliated by striking multiple targets in areas in Yemen controlled by the Houthis.

HAMAS’ GAZA DEATH TOLL QUESTIONED AS NEW REPORT SAYS ITS LED TO ‘WIDESPREAD INACCURACIES AND DISTORTION’

People gather at the scene of a missile strike

People gather at the scene of a missile strike that, according to Israel’s military, was launched from Yemen and landed in Jaffa, south of Tel Aviv, Israel, December 21, 2024. (Reuters)

“A short time ago, reports were received of a weapon falling in one of the settlements within the Tel Aviv district,” Israeli police said Saturday.

Advertisement

On Thursday, the Israeli military said it intercepted a missile launched from Yemen, with shrapnel resulting in extensive damage to a school near Tel Aviv.

Continue Reading

World

Scholz confirms 5 dead at Magdeburg Christmas market attack

Published

on

Scholz confirms 5 dead at Magdeburg Christmas market attack

A 50-year-old man was arrested at the scene of the attack in Magdeburg on Friday evening, but as of Saturday, the reason behind his actions remained unclear.

ADVERTISEMENT

At least five people, including a toddler, have been killed and dozens injured after a car ploughed into a crowd at a busy outdoor Christmas market in Magdeburg, a city in eastern Germany.

Authorities are describing the incident as a “deliberate attack.”

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and Federal Interior Minister Nancy Faeser are at the scene of the attack in Magdeburg. Faeser has confirmed that federal police are actively supporting the investigation into the tragedy.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending