Connect with us

World

Migration back on top of EU agenda but same old divisions remain

Published

on

Migration back on top of EU agenda but same old divisions remain

After years immersed in a deadly pandemic, a historic restoration fund, a devastating warfare, an power disaster and dizzying inflation numbers, EU leaders are able to convey again migration to the very prime of the political agenda.

The difficulty, accountable for opening deep fissures between EU nations, by no means really pale away. However a 64% surge in irregular border crossings – round 330,000 – and a 46% rise in asylum functions – almost 924,000 – final 12 months have sparked a brand new sense of urgency amongst politicians to offer the explosive matter one other go.

Austria is asking for EU funds to finance a brand new fence alongside the Bulgaria-Turkey border. Italy is pushing for an EU-wide code of conduct for rescue ships within the Mediterranean. And Denmark, a rustic that pursues a “zero-asylum” coverage, is in search of help to arrange reception centres exterior the bloc.

Brussels seems to have learn the room: a unprecedented two-day summit has been convened this week to handle migration and the management of exterior borders head-on.

The European Fee is making an attempt to grab the second to advance its long-stalled “New Pact on Migration and Asylum,” an intricate, holistic proposal that’s meant to piece collectively all varied points of migration coverage and change the present ad-hoc disaster strategy.

Advertisement

“Migration is a European problem which should be met with a European response,” European Fee President Ursula von der Leyen wrote in a letter to leaders forward of the February summit.

Crucially, the “New Pact” relies on the precept that has for years pitted member states in opposition to one another: truthful sharing of duty and solidarity.

‘Between a rock and a tough place’

Beneath the so-called Dublin Regulation, adopted for the primary time in 2013, the applying submitted by an asylum seeker turns into the duty of the primary member state of arrival.

This method has been extensively criticised by governments and civil society organisations alike as a result of it locations a disproportionate burden on frontline nations, equivalent to these within the Mediterranean, that are confronted with the large process of processing asylum claims from migrants who, very often, don’t wish to keep in that nation and like to journey north.

Right here is the place the large query on the core of the perennial debate emerges: How can the EU, as a political union with shared exterior borders, relocate and redistribute these tons of of 1000’s of candidates in a matter that’s thought of truthful and balanced?

Advertisement

Thus far, the reply has been: it simply cannot.

“The present migration is caught between a rock and a tough place, primarily. Migration flows, migration pressures proceed, however member states are discovering it very troublesome to agree on a set of efficient and customary options to that,” Andrew Geddes, the director of the Migration Coverage Centre on the European College Institute (EUI), advised Euronews.

“Some member states simply refuse and won’t take part in schemes that contain the relocation of migrants throughout the EU.”

‘A debate disadvantaged of recent energies’

The proposed “New Pact” gives one other reply to the relocation dilemma: an “efficient solidarity” mechanism.

The mechanism would current EU nations with three choices to help a fellow member state whose migration system is underneath stress on account of a surge in new arrivals: settle for plenty of relocated asylum-seekers, pay for the return of rejected candidates to their nation of origin, or finance an array of “operational measures,” equivalent to reception centres and technique of transport.

Advertisement

The pledges can be calculated based mostly on the nation’s GDP and inhabitants. As soon as agreed, the European Fee would then undertake an act to make the pledges legally binding.

It does not take too lengthy to grasp the system presents two circumstances which might be anathema to member states on opposing sides of the controversy.

For these pushing for extra relocation, equivalent to Germany, France, Italy and Greece, the system lets reluctant nations off the hook by providing two choices – return sponsorship and operational measures – that don’t entail taking in any particular person inside their borders.

For these pushing in opposition to relocation, equivalent to Poland, Hungary, Slovakia and Austria, the system introduces obligatory pledges that may pressure them to contribute whether or not they prefer it or not.

The clashing views have condemned the “New Pact” to a legislative limbo, with little to no progress since its presentation again in September 2020.

Advertisement

‘Nationwide pursuits and short-term political agendas’

“There isn’t any marvel drug or magic answer prepared at hand to the divisive challenge of responsibility-sharing,” Alberto-Horst Neidhardt, head of the migration programme on the European Coverage Centre (EPC), advised Euronews.

“For too lengthy, the migration debate has been disadvantaged of recent energies and very important oxygen, pressed right into a nook by nationwide pursuits and short-term political agendas.”

A voluntary relocation mechanism backed by 23 European nations has thus far resulted in 435 relocated asylum-seekers – out of 8,000 pledges anticipated to be fulfilled on an annual foundation.

The perpetual lack of consensus on the way to cope with migration internally “dangers translating into disproportionate consideration on return and readmission,” Neidhardt added.

“EU migration and asylum insurance policies are something however in a wholesome state.”

Advertisement

In reality, the discussions in Brussels have acquired a marked concentrate on the exterior dimension of migration, the relations between the EU and the quite a few nations of origin, reflecting a rising shift from managing to stopping arrivals.

All-time highs in asylum functions filed by nationals from nations historically thought of “protected,” like Turkey, Bangladesh, Morocco, Georgia, Egypt and Peru, have additional fuelled requires a extra forceful and persuasive worldwide engagement.

“Lots of the different nations which might be mentioned are removed from steady and they don’t seem to be ‘protected’ in any sense of the phrase,”  Catherine Woollard, director of the European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE) stated in a essential assertion, noting the “alarmism” throughout the bloc is being manufactured for political ends.

“Coverage-making in panic mode feeds an strategy based mostly on unfounded fears moderately than on wants, pursuits, useful resource issues or authorized obligations.”

EU to make use of ‘leverage’ in opposition to nations of origin

Consideration has additionally centred on the EU’s return charge of ineligible asylum-seekers.

Advertisement

The low determine (round 21%) has outraged hard-line governments, which have raised the spectre of invoking Article 25a of the EU’s Visa Code to slap restrictive measures on uncooperative nations.

Von der Leyen’s letter acknowledges this actuality and speaks of anti-smuggling initiatives, joint operations groups and expertise partnerships to hurry up returns and curb departures.

“Leverages from totally different coverage areas, together with visas, commerce, funding (…) and authorized migration alternatives ship clear alerts to companions about the advantages of cooperation with the EU and needs to be used to the complete,” the Fee chief wrote.

However consultants warn the externalisation of asylum coverage, also called “off-shoring,” ignores the basic causes that drive migration flows, equivalent to financial hardship, discrimination and local weather change, and may result in human rights violations and illegal detentions exterior of the EU.

“Asylum in search of is a symptom moderately than the trigger,” stated Andrew Geddes. 

Advertisement

“Clamping down on boats and smugglers and issues like which will have some results, might result in extra folks dying, after all, but it surely’s not doing something to deal with a few of the a lot deeper underlying causes of this displacement.”

This text has been up to date to incorporate new figures.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Are you in charge of a holiday feast? Follow these tips for food safety

Published

on

Are you in charge of a holiday feast? Follow these tips for food safety

Ready or not, the holidays are here. It’s a time when many Americans accustomed to preparing simple meals find themselves responsible for safely serving multi-dish feasts.

It’s no easy task. Outbreaks of some types of food poisoning tend to rise in November and December, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Tainted turkey, undercooked stuffing and germ-laced gravy from holiday buffets have all led to past illnesses — and even deaths — CDC investigators have found.

It can be tricky for occasional cooks to prepare big meals in a way that avoids the common hazards that can make people sick, said Donald Schaffner, a food science expert at Rutgers University.

“Cooking takes longer with big masses of food. Cooling takes longer with big masses of food,” said Schaffner, who co-hosts the food-safety podcast “Risky or Not?”

Together with podcast co-host Benjamin Chapman, a food scientist at North Carolina State University, Schaffner outlined common ways to keep holiday meals both festive and safe.

Advertisement

This article is part of AP’s Be Well coverage, focusing on wellness, fitness, diet and mental health. Read more Be Well.

Prepare the turkey

Nearly 90% of U.S. hosts plan to serve turkey on Thanksgiving this year, according to the turkey producer Butterball.

But raw turkey can harbor illness-causing bacteria such as salmonella, campylobacter and other germs. It must be handled safely to prevent those bugs from contaminating refrigerator surfaces, sinks and kitchen counters.

A frozen bird must be thawed first. There are several accepted methods, including in the refrigerator, in the microwave or in cold running water, Schaffner said.

“All of these methods pose risks,” he cautioned.

Advertisement

A frozen turkey needs about 24 hours for every 4 to 5 pounds of weight to thaw in a refrigerator, according to the Agriculture Department. If you use a microwave or the cold water method, the bird must be cooked immediately. For details about safe turkey handling, check out the thawing and cooking calculators created by the USDA.

And don’t wash the turkey. It’s a bad idea to rinse it in the sink, even though many cooks still insist on the practice, often out of habit, said Chapman.

“Anything that hits that surface and generates spray is going to basically spread contamination around your kitchen,” he said.

Instead, pat the turkey dry with paper towels and toss them, or use a kitchen towel and disinfect it in the laundry.

What about roasting?

Turkey needs to reach a cooked temperature of 165 degrees Fahrenheit before serving. The best way to tell if it’s cooked is to use a tip-sensitive digital thermometer inserted in the innermost section of the thigh, not touching the bone.

Advertisement

Don’t rely on the plastic pop-up thermometers stuck in some commercial turkeys. Chapman’s past research shows that those buttons can activate well before the bird is actually done.

At the same time, don’t determine doneness by relying on signs such as golden-brown skin, whether the meat is no longer pink or whether the juices run clear.

“None of those are great indicators of temperature,” Chapman said.

Side dishes and leftovers

How you handle the rest of the meal — mashed potatoes, gravy, green beans or yams — is just as important as the main dish. It’s crucial to avoid the so-called danger zone of temperatures between 40 degrees and 140 degrees Fahrenheit, where bacteria can easily grow.

The key is to keep hot foods piping hot and cold foods cold — and to refrigerate everything promptly, Schaffner said.

Advertisement

“The recommendation is that you get those leftovers into the refrigerator within two hours of when they came off of the stove,” he said.

Make sure to refrigerate dense foods like sliced turkey, cooked sweet potatoes or gravy in shallow containers to help them cool down fast. Schaffner’s recent research showed that foods cooled in containers at a depth of no more than 2 inches posed little risk of growing dangerous germs.

Keep it clean

One key way to avoid food poisoning is through scrupulous cleaning in the kitchen.

Wash your hands before preparing food and after touching raw poultry. Use separate cutting boards, knives and other utensils when handling raw meat and fresh foods such as vegetables and salads.

Pay close attention to any surface that may be contaminated. It’s important to clean first with soap and water and then sanitize with a disinfectant — a two-step process.

Advertisement

___

The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Science and Educational Media Group. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

Continue Reading

World

Uruguay ousts conservative government, elects leftist opposition candidate as turnout hits 90 percent

Published

on

Uruguay ousts conservative government, elects leftist opposition candidate as turnout hits 90 percent

Uruguay ousted its conservative government that had been in charge for the past five years, as leftist opposition candidate Yamandú Orsi claimed victory in a tight presidential runoff Sunday.

Even as the vote count continued, Álvaro Delgado, the presidential candidate of the center-right ruling coalition, conceded defeat to his challenger.

“With sadness, but without guilt, we can congratulate the winner,” he told supporters at his campaign headquarters in the capital of Montevideo. 

Orsi, 57, a working-class former history teacher and two-time mayor from Uruguay’s Broad Front coalition, was mentored by former President José “Pepe” Mujica, an ex-Marxist guerilla who became world renowned for driving Uruguay’s legalization of abortion, same-sex marriage and sale of marijuana a decade ago. Orsi thanked his supporters as crowds flocked to greet him.

JAVIER MILEI FIRST WORLD LEADER TO MEET WITH PRESIDENT-ELECT TRUMP: ‘GREATEST POLITICAL COMEBACK IN HISTORY’

Advertisement

Yamandu Orsi, candidate for the Broad Front (Frente Amplio) and running mate Carolina Cosse, right, celebrate after polls closed in the presidential run-off election in Montevideo, Uruguay, Sunday, Nov. 24, 2024.  (AP Photo/Natacha Pisarenko)

“The country of liberty, equality and fraternity has triumphed once again,” he said, vowing to unite the nation of 3.4 million people after such a tight vote.

“Let’s understand that there is another part of our country who have different feelings today,” he said. “These people will also have to help build a better country. We need them too.”

“I will be the president who calls for national dialogue again and again, who builds a more integrated society and country,” Orsi said.

“Starting tomorrow, I’ll have to work very hard, there’s a lot to do,” he told the Associated Press from the glass-walled NH Columbia hotel, thronged friends and colleagues embracing and congratulating him.

Advertisement

With nearly all the votes counted, electoral officials reported that Orsi won just over 49% of the vote, ahead of Delgado’s 46%. The rest cast blank votes or abstained in defiance of Uruguay’s enforced compulsory voting. Turnout reached almost 90%.

After weeks in which the rivals appeared tied in the polls, Delgado’s concession ushers in Orsi as Uruguay’s new leader and cuts short the center-right Republican coalition’s shot at governing. 

Delgado concession speech

Alvaro Delgado, presidential candidate for the ruling National Party, concedes defeat in Montevideo, Uruguay, Sunday, Nov. 24, 2024.  (AP Photo/Matilde Campodonico)

The 2019 election of President Luis Lacalle Pou spelled an end to 15 consecutive years of rule by the Broad Front.

“I called Yamandú Orsi to congratulate him as President-elect of our country,” Lacalle Pou wrote on social media platform X, adding that he would “put myself at his service and begin the transition as soon as I deem it appropriate.”

Orsi’s victory made the South American country the latest to rebuke the incumbent party in the wake of post-pandemic economic malaise.

Advertisement

The win contrasts with that of populist Javier Milei, who won the presidency in Argentina in 2023 by promising to overhaul the establishment to deal with soaring inflation and poverty. Milei reportedly has grown close to President-elect Trump. 

Orsi has been described as a moderate with no radical plans for change. He largely agrees with his opponent on key voter concerns like driving down the childhood poverty rate, now at a staggering 25%, and containing an upsurge in organized crime that has shaken the nation long considered among Latin America’s safest. 

ARGENTINA’S MILEI BLASTS UN OVER SUPPORT FOR COVID LOCKDOWNS, APPEASING ‘BLOODY DICTATORSHIPS’

Despite Orsi’s promise to lead a “new left” in Uruguay, his platform resembles the mix of market-friendly policies and welfare programs that characterized the Broad Front’s tenure from 2005-2020.

Mujica, now 89 and recovering from esophageal cancer, turned up at his local polling station before balloting even began on Sunday to praise Orsi’s humility and Uruguay’s proud stability.

Advertisement

“This is no small feat,” he said of his nation’s “citizenry that respects formal institutions.”

With inflation easing, and the economy expected to expand by some 3.2% this year, Delgado had promised to continue pursuing his predecessor’s pro-business policies. 

Frente Amplio supporters wave flag out of a car celebrating win

Supporters of the Broad Front (Frente Amplio) celebrate the victory of candidate Yamandú Orsi in Montevideo, Uruguay, Sunday, Nov. 24, 2024.  (AP Photo/Matilde Campodonico)

Lacalle Pou, who constitutionally cannot run for a second consecutive term, has enjoyed high approval ratings. But the official results trickling in on Sunday showed that mounting complaints in Uruguay about years of sluggish economic growth, stagnant wages and the government’s struggle to contain crime after five years helped swing the election against Delgado.

Specific proposals by Orsi include tax incentives to lure investment and revitalize the critical agricultural sector, as well as social security reforms that would lower the retirement age but fall short of a radical overhaul sought by Uruguay’s unions that failed to pass in the Oct. 27 general election during which neither front-runner secured an outright majority. 

Advertisement

He is also likely to put an end to a trade agreement with China that Lacalle Pou had pursued to the chagrin of Mercosur, an alliance of South American nations promoting regional commerce.

His government will take office on March 1, 2025.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

World

Scholz gets SPD's chancellor candidate nod after weeks of doubt

Published

on

Scholz gets SPD's chancellor candidate nod after weeks of doubt

Germany’s centre-left Social Democracts have chosen to officially nominate current Chancellor Olaf Scholz as their party’s candidate despite his low approval ratings.

ADVERTISEMENT

Olaf Scholz has been officially nominated by his Social Democratic Party (SPD) as its candidate for German chancellor in snap elections set for 23 February.

The incumbent chancellor’s nomination comes after weeks of tense discussions within the centre-left party over whether he was the right person for the job.

Some members of his party rallied around Defence Minister Boris Pistorius — who enjoys higher approval ratings — as a replacement for Scholz.

On Thursday, Pistorius said he was not “available” to run for chancellor, paving the way for Scholz to be at the top of the party’s ballot.

The SPD’s executive committee officially nominated Scholz on Monday, with Pistorius one of the 33 senior members of the party with the right to vote on the matter.

Advertisement

According to a recent poll by public broadcaster ZDF last week, only 37% of respondents thought Scholz was doing a good job in his current role as chancellor.

A separate survey showed a large majority (78%) thought the SPD would achieve a better result in February’s upcoming election with Pistorius as the candidate for chancellor. Only 11% said they thought the SPD would achieve victory in the election under Scholz.

Internal wrangling

At a meeting of SPD’s official youth branch this weekend, the party’s top was accused of leading the party to a disaster.

Two weeks of internal discussions over who should be the candidate have left their mark, according to younger members of the party.

One of the party’s leaders, Saskia Esken, said at a press conference that the party wasn’t portraying “a good picture in the nomination of our chancellor candidate.”

Advertisement

Scholz’s ruling “streetlight” coalition, which was comprised of the SPD, the Greens, and the liberal Free Democratic Party (FDP), collapsed earlier this month in public fashion after Scholz fired his Finance Minister Christian Lindner, who hails from the liberal centrist FDP.

Lacking a parliamentary majority, Scholz agreed to hold a no-confidence vote on 16 December, with general elections set for 23 February 2025.

Currently, the centre-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU) is leading in the polls with 32%. They have chosen Friedrich Merz as their candidate for chancellor.

The environmentalist Greens party picked Robert Habeck as their top choice, while the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) named Alice Weidel, which was the first time the party had nominated an official chancellor candidate.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending