World

EU states have relocated just 117 asylum seekers out of 8,000 pledges

Published

2 years ago

November 15, 2022

EU states have relocated just 117 asylum seekers out of 8,000 pledges

The EU-wide relocation system launched in June and touted as a significant step ahead within the reform of migration coverage has thus far resulted in 117 asylum seekers being transferred throughout the bloc – out of an annual goal that envisions 8,000 pledges.

“We’re working very carefully with all member states to make sure that now we have in place a typical answer,” a European Fee spokesperson stated on Monday whereas asserting the numbers.

“I do know this quantity would not look like lots however we have to take into account that now we have 8,000 pledges as such.”

The low figures come as asylum purposes attain highs not seen for the reason that 2015 migration disaster. August alone noticed 84,500 requests lodged, with Afghans and Syrians main the depend.

The gradual rise in border crossings is fuelling tensions between EU nations, who proceed to disagree on a typical migration coverage to handle new arrivals.

Relations between France and Italy have deteriorated over the disembarkation of the Ocean Viking, a ship that Rome didn’t permit to disembark regardless of its obligation beneath worldwide regulation.

The vessel, operated by the humanitarian organisation SOS Méditerranée, had 234 individuals on board, together with 57 youngsters. A few of them had been stranded on the vessel for 19 days, elevating fears of lack of life.

French Inside Minister Gérald Darmanin known as Italy’s actions “inhumane” and “incomprehensible,” arguing the vessel was in Italian waters and was due to this fact required to disembark someplace in Italy.

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni stated she was struck by the “aggressive response” from Paris, which she deemed “incomprehensible and “unjustified.”

Beneath present EU guidelines, asylum purposes must be processed by the primary nation of entry. By refusing arrival, a state can forgo such duty and go it on to a different nation.

In a bid to strike a extra balanced and predictable system, 18 EU nations, along with Norway, Switzerland and Liechtenstein, signed in late June a declaration launching the Voluntary Solidarity Mechanism (VSM).

Austria, Denmark, Poland and Hungary had been amongst those that turned down the initiative.

The joint assertion lays out a brand-new scheme to allow the switch of asylum seekers from Southern nations to different states throughout the bloc.

It solely applies to individuals in want of worldwide safety who arrive through the Mediterranean route, giving precedence to these thought-about “most weak.” This is able to exclude sure nationalities, comparable to Indian, Moroccan and Turkish, whose purposes have damaged information in current months.

‘Unequal notion of solidarity’

Upon its signature, the voluntary mechanism, promoted by France throughout its six-month presidency of the EU Council, was hailed as a “historic settlement” and a possible prelude to a everlasting and environment friendly relocation system, one of many most important priorities pursued by the European Fee and southern EU nations.

The mechanism works on the premise of nationwide pledges, that are designed based on inhabitants, GDP and political priorities.

Every nation commits to both host asylum seekers or present monetary help to those that do.

Out of the 21 nations who take part within the scheme, 13 have made relocation pledges, with the bulk coming from France and Germany, whereas the others have chosen to supply monetary help as an alternative.

In complete, nations have dedicated to relocating 8,000 asylum seekers between June 2022 and June 2023.

An inside doc leaked by the analysis NGO State Watch revealed {that a} “political objective” that originally sought to relocate 3,000 individuals by the top of the 12 months had been downgraded to a extra possible goal of 1,000 individuals. A European Fee spokesperson refused to remark on the targets however didn’t deny them.

However based on the EU govt’s newest replace, simply 117 relocations have been accomplished by mid-November, amounting to a mere 1.46% of the annual 8,000 goal.

Because the mechanism is totally voluntary and never legally binding, the European Fee is unable to implement the compliance of nationwide pledges. The European Parliament and the European Courtroom of Justice are equally excluded from finishing up oversight.

The system additionally has an opt-out clause that nations can invoke to halt relocations in the event that they contemplate their migration programs to be beneath “disproportionate stress.”

Specialists have criticised the scheme for its absence of authorized foundations and the selectiveness inherent within the relocation course of, which permits states to determine who to welcome and who to reject.

An evaluation by the Centre for European Coverage Research (CEPS) stated the scheme was fraught with a “profound lack of foreseeability and predictability” and gave choice to an “intergovernmental, uneven and unequal notion of solidarity.”

Regardless of the criticism and the low outcomes achieved thus far, the European Fee defends the mechanism as a short lived answer to ease the burden of southern EU nations and handle the problem of disembarkations.

Following the Ocean Viking incident, French Inside Minister Gérald Darmanin stated 9 European nations had dedicated to internet hosting two-thirds of the rescued migrants, with the remaining third staying in France.

“France has launched a name of solidarity to member states and others have responded positively,” stated a Fee spokesperson.

“That is working. And we’ll make sure that we put all efforts into the voluntary solidarity mechanism.”

Click to comment

World

Chrystia Freeland, Justin Trudeau’s ‘Minister of Everything,’ Enters Race to Replace Him

Published

3 hours ago

January 17, 2025

Press Room

Chrystia Freeland, Justin Trudeau’s ‘Minister of Everything,’ Enters Race to Replace Him

Chrystia Freeland, Canada’s former deputy prime minister, whose sudden resignation in December helped set the stage for Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s decision to step down, said on Friday that she was running to replace him.

She posted her announcement on X with a six-word sentence: “I’m running to fight for Canada.”

Ms. Freeland, 56, once a close ally of Mr. Trudeau who was often called his “minister of everything,” had served as deputy prime minister since 2019, and had long been viewed as a possible successor.

But the two had a bitter rift when Mr. Trudeau moved to demote her over a Zoom call in December, offering her a minister-without-portfolio role. Instead, she opted to resign and delivered a strong rebuke of Mr. Trudeau’s leadership as Canada prepares to deal with President-elect Donald J. Trump. Mr. Trump has threatened to apply a tariff on Canadian exports to the United States.

Her stinging departure destabilized Mr. Trudeau’s shaky grip on power. Three weeks later, on Jan. 6, he announced he would step down as Liberal Party leader and as prime minister once a new leader was in place.

Candidates for the leadership post will campaign ahead of a national vote among party members in March. The new Liberal Party leader will also become Prime Minister of Canada and lead the party in a general election expected to take place in the spring.

Ms. Freeland said she would officially launch her campaign in person on Sunday, which could take place in Toronto, the electoral district she represents in Parliament. She will face a stiff challenge persuading Canadians that she is the candidate best suited to take on the Conservative Party and its leader, Pierre Poilievre.

The Conservatives, who have a 25 percentage point lead over the Liberals in polls, have sought to portray Ms. Freeland as part of the problem given her once-close relationship with Mr. Trudeau and her key role in his governments since 2015, when he first became prime minister.

Mr. Trudeau’s popularity has nose dived in recent years as Canadians have become increasingly frustrated with persistently high cost-of-living on everything from housing to grocery bills.

Many Canadians have also started pushing back against the government’s immigration policy, which has resulted in 2.3 million people arriving in the country in the past two years. While the government said migrants were necessary to help fill gaps in low-skilled jobs, many Canadians say the new arrivals have contributed to rising housing costs and strains on the public health care system.

Ms. Freeland had accused Mr. Trudeau of engaging in political gimmickry after her ministry clashed with his office about a temporary sales-tax break during the end-of-year holidays.

The government estimated that the tax break, which covered items like restaurant bills and some toys and clothing, would cost about 1.6 billion Canadian dollars, or $1.1 billion, which Ms. Freeland said that Canada could “ill afford” at a time when Mr. Trump is raising the specter of tariffs.

“We need to take that threat extremely seriously,” Ms. Freeland said in her resignation letter. “That means keeping our fiscal powder dry today, so we have the reserves we may need for a coming tariff war.”

Ms. Freeland was born and raised in Alberta and is of Ukrainian ancestry. She has been a staunch supporter of Ukraine on the global stage, denouncing Russia’s invasion.

She attended Oxford University as a Rhodes Scholar, and worked as a journalist and newsroom leader at a number of news organizations, including the Financial Times and Reuters, before joining the Liberal Party in 2013. She is married to a reporter on the Culture desk of The New York Times and has three children.

During Mr. Trump’s first term, Ms. Freeland steered Canada’s renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement with the United States and Mexico, portraying steely confidence during the tense talks with the odd moment of levity. (Ms. Freeland was photographed arriving in Washington in 2018 wearing a white T-shirt that read “Keep Calm and Negotiate NAFTA.”)

But she also angered Mr. Trump during the negotiations and his animosity has apparently not waned.

When Ms. Freeland resigned in December, Mr. Trump posted triumphantly: “Her behavior was totally toxic, and not at all conducive to making deals which are good for the very unhappy citizens of Canada. She will not be missed!!!”

Ms. Freeland, in an opinion piece published on Friday, hinted that Canada would retaliate in “the single largest trade blow the U.S. economy has ever endured.”

As finance minister, she spearheaded popular government programs to reduce the cost of day care for parents and to tackle childhood poverty.

Her announcement on Friday marks the second entry of a top contender in the Liberal Party leadership race. She will face off against Mark Carney, a former head of the central banks in Canada and England, who declared he was running on Thursday.

Mr. Carney is close friends with Ms. Freeland and is the godfather to one of her three children. He was being recruited by Mr. Trudeau’s team to take Ms. Freeland’s place in the government in December, but declined the job.

World

Pakistani court sentences ex-PM Imran Khan and his wife to 14 and 7 years in prison in graft case

Published

4 hours ago

January 17, 2025

Press Room

Pakistani court sentences ex-PM Imran Khan and his wife to 14 and 7 years in prison in graft case

A Pakistani court on Friday sentenced the country’s already-imprisoned former Prime Minister Imran Khan and his wife to 14 and seven years in jail after finding them guilty of corruption, officials and his lawyer said.

It’s yet another blow for the former premier who has been behind the bars since 2023.

The couple are accused of accepting a gift of land from a real estate tycoon in exchange for laundered money when Khan was in power.

Prosecutors say the businessman, Malik Riaz, was then allowed by Khan to pay fines that were imposed on him in another case from the same laundered money of 190 million British pounds ($240 million) that was returned to Pakistan by British authorities in 2022 to deposit with the national exchequer.

6 DEAD AS PROTESTS ERUPT IN PAKISTAN OVER JAILED FORMER PRIME MINISTER IMRAN KHAN

Former Prime Minister of Pakistan Imran Khan addresses the media in Lahore, Pakistan. (AP Photo/K.M. Chaudary, File)

Khan has denied wrongdoing and insisted since his arrest in 2023 that all the charges against him are a plot by rivals to keep him from returning to office.

According to Khan’s legal team, Khan laughed and his wife, Bushra Bibi, smiled when judge Nasir Javed read the verdict.

Later, Khan and Bibi were taken into custody by prison officials after the announcement of the verdict, according to officials. She had earlier served a prison sentence in another graft case until she was freed on bail by a court in October. She recently led a rally to demand her husband’s release.

Later, a post from Khan’s account on the X platform urged his supporters not to panic over the verdict, under which the al-Qadir University built by his wife’s charity will also be taken over by authorities in the Punjab province.

“I will never accept this dictatorship and I will stay in the prison cell for as long as I have to in the struggle against this dictatorship, but I will not compromise on my principles and the struggle for the true freedom of the nation,” Khan wrote. Khan’s family has said such posts are shared with his consent.

Faisal Chaudhry, a defense lawyer, said the court verdict could be challenged in the superior courts.

Shortly after the announcement of the verdict, lawmakers from Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, or PTI, party rallied outside the parliament in the capital, Islamabad, saying the former premier had been wrongly punished.

INDIA STEPS UP DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS WITH THE TALIBAN AS RIVAL PAKISTAN LOSES INFLUENCE IN AFGHANISTAN

Security standing guard in front of a vehicle.

Guards protecting a vehicle outside of a compound in Rawalpindi, Pakistan. (AP Photo/W.K. Yousufzai)

“This is a bogus case, and we will approach an appeals court against this decision,” said Omar Ayub Khan, a senior party leader who is not related to the former premier.

Imran Khan was ousted in a no-confidence vote in parliament in April 2022, had previously been convicted on charges of corruption, revealing official secrets and violating marriage laws in three separate verdicts and sentenced to 10, 14 and seven years respectively. Under Pakistani law, he is to serve the terms concurrently — meaning, the length of the longest of the sentences.

Some of Khan’s supporters were also present outside the Adiala prison in the city of Rawalpindi, and they chanted slogans against the government, demanding the release of their leader.

On Thursday, Information Minister Attaullah Tarar told reporters in Islamabad that there was “irrefutable evidence” against Khan and his wife in the “mega corruption scandal.” Tarar said that Khan even did not tell his own Cabinet members about the money that was returned to Pakistan by Britain.

Tarar also claimed that Khan built a new sprawling house in the eastern city of Lahore after giving benefits to the business tycoon, and that he was unable to prove that from where he got the money from to build it.

The latest development came a day after Khan’s PTI party held a crucial round of talks with representatives of the government of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif to demand the release of all political detainees, including Khan and other party leaders.

Sharif became prime minister following the February 2024 election, which PTI claims was rigged.

World

Commission claims slashing of foreign offices still under negotiation

Published

5 hours ago

January 17, 2025

Press Room

Commission claims slashing of foreign offices still under negotiation

The European Commission said that ‘reflections are ongoing’ over the downsizing of the international hubs under the department for international partnerships.

Plans to slash EU international partnerships from more than four in five hubs worldwide revealed today by Euronews remain under negotiation, a Commission spokesperson said today.

Euronews reported that Directorate-General for International Partnerships (DG INTPA) presence in 100 delegations worldwide is set for reduction to 18 hubs on the basis of an internal planning document seen by this news service.

“Reflections are ongoing within the Commission and no decision has been taken [on the issue],” European Commission spokesperson for Foreign Affairs Anitta Hipper said when asked for details of the savings and staff moves that the plans entailed, declining to comment further on the document.

Hipper insisted that the EU presence on the ground in foreign offices would be maintained, and said that work is ongoing to see how effectively delegations can deliver on all EU policies, taking into account “budget realities and political priorities”.

DG INTPA is planning slashing more than four in five of its hubs worldwide – reducing from around 100 delegations to 18 hubs – according to a document seen by Euronews.

The DG will maintain 18 hubs in Africa, Asia and Latin American/Caribbean, according to the document, in strategic areas for the institution. You can see in this map where these hub offices will be located in detail:

“It is essential to move to portfolios that are more strategic and less fragmented and an optimised resource allocation across multiple countries,” the document said.

“The current INTPA operating model is based on the de-concentration process of 25 years ago, whereby INTPA staff are distributed across ‘cooperation sections’ within 100 Delegation worldwide,” the document said, adding: “This model no longer meets the needs for increased strategic focus and operation agility.”