Connect with us

World

EU border agency Frontex ‘covered up illegal migrant pushbacks’

Published

on

EU border agency Frontex ‘covered up illegal migrant pushbacks’

Senior workers at EU border company Frontex had been concerned in overlaying up the unlawful pushbacks of migrants from Greece to Turkey in violation of their “basic rights”, a report has concluded.

The report — from OLAF, the EU’s anti-fraud watchdog — stated high managers dedicated “severe misconduct and different irregularities” in overlaying up pushback incidents, not investigating them or dealing with them appropriately. Names throughout the report had been redacted.

“In doing so, they hindered the capability of Frontex to completely adjust to its obligations, particularly guaranteeing the safety and promotion of basic rights,” the report learn.

Frontex coordinates search-and-rescue and border interception operations on behalf of the 27 EU nations.

Pushbacks, the forcible return of individuals throughout a global border with out an evaluation of their rights to use for asylum or different safety, violate each worldwide and EU regulation.

Advertisement

OLAF investigators poured over data from open sources and media stories, sought paperwork from Frontex and the European Fee and interviewed 20 witnesses to research accusations of potential involvement or overlaying up of unlawful pushbacks and accusations of misconduct or irregularities.

The report particulars how pushback accusations, which embody stories of migrants being put in life rafts and left adrift at sea and proof of them being mishandled, and infrequently not reported or not investigated based on Frontex’s personal guidelines.

In April, Fabrice Leggeri resigned as the pinnacle of Frontex after stories of misconduct and human rights violations towards migrants.

Worry of reprisals

Frontex officers might also have didn’t report alleged pushbacks on account of concern of repercussions from Greece, the report stated. 

In a single case, the report stated the EU border company’s surveillance airplane flew away from the scene of an alleged pushback “to keep away from witnessing incidents within the Aegean Sea”.

Advertisement

Nonetheless, on August 5, 2020, a member of Frontex reported his considerations in an electronic mail after a Frontex airplane witnessed Greek authorities forcing a flimsy migrant boat again into Turkish waters.

EU investigators additionally stated Frontex shared incorrect or biased data with EU establishments, together with members of the European Fee and Parliament, who’re liable for holding the company accountable, in addition to OLAF investigators.

“I welcome that the OLAF report is lastly public, because it ought to have been from the very starting,” stated Cornelia Ernst, an MEP from the European Parliament’s Left grouping, who confirmed the report’s authenticity.

“It once more proves black on white what we have now been saying for a few years: Frontex is systematically concerned in human rights violations and their coverup on the EU’s exterior borders.” 

Different lawmakers had been much less essential.

Advertisement

“There was misconduct throughout the company regarding three folks,” stated Lena Düpont, a lawmaker with the European Folks’s Social gathering.

“The best way the company was structured by them was not useful, the best way they handled the allegations was additionally not useful.”

The OLAF report raises questions on how Frontex will proceed working in Greece.

How has Frontex responded?

“These had been practices of the previous,” the company stated in an announcement to Euronews. “As a method of systematically addressing shortcomings, the Company and its Administration Board have agreed to take a variety of remedial measures, addressing amongst others the above-mentioned findings.

“The Company takes the findings of investigations, audits and different types of scrutiny critically and makes use of them as alternatives to make modifications for the higher. 

Advertisement

“It’s dedicated to delivering a well-functioning and legally compliant Company that adheres to the perfect practices of excellent governance. In troubled occasions because the as soon as Europe and its neighbours are dealing with proper now, that is extra vital than ever.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

TVLine Items: My Life With the Walter Boys Adds 5, Carrie Underwood Concert Special and More

Published

on

TVLine Items: My Life With the Walter Boys Adds 5, Carrie Underwood Concert Special and More


‘My Life With the Walter Boys’ Season 2 Cast Adds 5 Actors



Advertisement





















Advertisement






Advertisement

Advertisement

ad



Advertisement






Advertisement


Quantcast



Continue Reading

World

Putin signs revised doctrine lowering threshold for nuclear response if Russia is attacked

Published

on

Putin signs revised doctrine lowering threshold for nuclear response if Russia is attacked

Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a revised nuclear doctrine on Tuesday stating that any attack on Russia supported by a country with nuclear power could be grounds for a nuclear response.

Putin signed the new policy on the 1,000th day of the war with Ukraine and the day after President Biden authorized Ukraine to use U.S.-supplied longer-range missiles to strike inside Russia.

The doctrine also states that Russia could respond to aggression against its ally Belarus with nuclear weapons, The Associated Press reported.

Though the doctrine doesn’t specify that Russia will definitely respond to such attacks with nuclear weapons, it does mention the “uncertainty of scale, time and place of possible use of nuclear deterrent” as key principles of deterrence.

BIDEN AUTHORIZES UKRAINE TO USE US LONG-RANGE MISSILES TO STRIKE INSIDE RUSSIA

Advertisement

Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a revised doctrine stating that an attack on Russia supported by a country with nuclear power could potentially trigger a nuclear response during a Nov. 18 meeting at the Kremlin in Moscow. (Vyacheslav Prokofyev, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP)

When asked if the updated doctrine comes in response to Biden’s decision to ease restrictions on how Ukraine can strike Russia, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told the AP that the doctrine was published “in a timely manner.” 

Peskov also said Putin told the government to update it earlier this year so that it’s “in line with the current situation” – the Russian president led a meeting in September to discuss these proposed revisions to the doctrine.

Joe Biden with his arm around Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelenskiy

The Kremlin said the revision was published “in a timely manner” when asked if it was done in response to President Biden authorizing Ukraine to use U.S. long-range missiles in Russia. (REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque )

TRUMP ALLIES WARN BIDEN RISKING ‘WORLD WAR III’ BY AUTHORIZING LONG-RANGE MISSILES FOR UKRAINE

Revealed in September, the doctrine now officially states that an attack on Russia by a nonnuclear power with the “participation or support of a nuclear power” will be seen as a “joint attack on the Russian Federation.”

Advertisement
Russian intercontinental ballistic missile

A Yars intercontinental ballistic missile is test-fired from the Plesetsk launchpad in northwestern Russia in October 2024. (Russian Defense Ministry Press Service via AP)

It also contains a broader range of conditions that would trigger the use of nuclear weapons, noting that they could be used in response to an air attack involving ballistic and cruise missiles, aircraft, drones and other flying vehicles.

The previous document threatened the use of Russia’s arsenal if “reliable information is received about the launch of ballistic missiles targeting the territory of Russia or its allies.”

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Damage to underwater cables was 'sabotage', German minister says

Published

on

Damage to underwater cables was 'sabotage', German minister says

Two underwater fibre-optic communications cables running between Finland and Germany were discovered cut on Monday, an incident both countries said was under investigation.

ADVERTISEMENT

German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius has said that damage done to two underwater data transmission cables running between Germany and Finland was deliberate.

“No one believes that these cables were accidentally cut,” Pistorius said in remarks made on the sidelines of a meeting of EU defence ministers in Brussels.

“We also have to assume, without knowing it yet, that it is sabotage,” he declared, adding that neither Germany nor Finland yet knows who was responsible for damage.

Germany and Finland announced on Monday that they had discovered a severed fibre-optic undersea data cable between the two countries, and that an investigation into the incident is underway.

In a joint statement, they said they did not know who was responsible for the damage, but that the incident came at a time when “our European security is not only under threat from Russia‘s war of aggression against Ukraine, but also from hybrid warfare by malicious actors”.

Advertisement

Pistorius also pointed to so-called “hybrid actors” as being potentially responsible for the damage.

“We have to state, without knowing specifically who it came from, that it is a ‘hybrid’ action” Pistorius said — implying that Russia, often considered responsible for acts of “hybrid warfare”, could be at least in part to blame for the incident.

Both Germany and Finland said that it was important that “critical infrastructure” such as data cables can be safeguarded.

“The fact that such an incident immediately raises suspicions of intentional damage speaks volumes about the volatility of our times,” the two countries said in their joint statement.

Finnish state-controlled data services provider Cinia said the damage to the data cable, which runs almost 1,2000 kilometres from the Finnish capital Helsinki to the German port of Rostock, was detected on Monday.

Advertisement

The incident is not the first to involve damage to underwater infrastructure in the Baltic Sea. On Sunday morning, a 218-kilometre internet link running between Lithuania and Swedish island of Gotland also lost service, according to a Swedish telecommunications company.

In 2022, Nord Stream gas pipelines under the Baltic Sea exploded, leading to several conspiracy theories around who could be responsible for the attack. Unconfirmed rumours have variously said that the US, Ukraine and Russia could have all played a role.

Continue Reading

Trending