Connect with us

World

Climate change gets ‘highest priority’ in US, Pacific agreement

Published

on

Climate change gets ‘highest priority’ in US, Pacific agreement

New partnership deal signed by 14 nations follows historic summit on the White Home and comes as China extends affect within the area.

The US and Pacific island nations have signed as much as a brand new period of cooperation, making local weather change the “highest precedence” and promising to work collectively to make sure a peaceable area the place “democracy is allowed to flourish”.

The Declaration on US-Pacific Partnership, signed by 14 Pacific island nations, got here on the finish of an unprecedented two-day summit in Washington, DC, which passed off 5 months after a safety deal between the Solomon Islands and China raised concern about Beijing’s rising affect within the area.

“We honored the historical past and values that our nations share and expanded our cooperation on key areas that can profit our folks for years to return,” US President Joe Biden wrote on Twitter after the summit concluded.

The 11-point declaration included a dedication to financial and infrastructure growth, strengthening regional cooperation — with the US promising to deepen ties with the Pacific Islands Discussion board — in addition to maritime safety and “the sustainable use of the Pacific Ocean primarily based on the rule of regulation”.

Advertisement

Of explicit concern to the Pacific Islands, which danger being submerged beneath rising seas, was an specific dedication to tackling local weather change.

“We take the local weather disaster as the very best precedence of our partnership, for it stays the only best existential menace to the livelihoods, safety, conventional and customary practices, and wellbeing of individuals within the Pacific area,” the declaration stated.

Leaders and representatives endorsing the declaration included Solomon Islands Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare, who had been reported earlier to not be planning to signal. Kiribati, a state of 115,000 which didn’t ship a consultant, was not on the record. It was certainly one of two Pacific international locations, the opposite being the Solomon Islands, that switched diplomatic relations from Taipei to Beijing in 2019.

The US is courting the Pacific island nations as Beijing turns into more and more lively within the area. Some leaders have expressed concern about Beijing, which was unable to safe a regional safety settlement, however they’re additionally apprehensive they could be caught in the course of the growing rivalry between the 2 superpowers.

The declaration agreed on the summit was signed by leaders and representatives from 14 Pacific island states [Jonathan Ernst/Reuters]

As leaders gathered in Washington, DC, the US introduced it could make investments greater than $810m in expanded programmes to assist the islands, on prime of greater than $1.5bn offered over the previous decade.

Advertisement

The renewed largesse from the US, which has been criticised for neglecting the area, was largely welcomed.

“It’s true that the USA is just a little late,” Robert Bohn, adviser to Vanuatu’s international minister and a former legislator within the island nation, advised Al Jazeera. “That being stated, monetary help is rarely too late. Our primary want is infrastructure. Australia and New Zealand are our associates, however they’ve been concentrating on the mushy components of presidency. We want roads, airports, maritime infrastructure.”

The declaration additionally addressed US atomic testing within the Marshall Islands from 1946-1958, saying Washington would take care of the islanders’ environmental and public well being issues.

Per week in the past, the Marshall Islands suspended talks with the US on renewing the 2 international locations’ strategic partnership, often called the Compact of Free Affiliation Settlement, over the difficulty.

“World Struggle II ended practically 80 years in the past, however its scars stay within the Pacific,” the declaration stated. “We, too, acknowledge the nuclear legacy of the Chilly Struggle.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Gold surges past $3,100 as US tariffs, uncertainty propel safe-haven flows

Published

on

Gold surges past ,100 as US tariffs, uncertainty propel safe-haven flows
Gold prices on Monday soared above $3,100 per ounce for the first time as concerns around U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs and the potential economic fallout, combined with geopolitical worries, drove a fresh wave of investments into the safe-haven asset.
Continue Reading

World

Trump threatens to bomb Iran unless they end nuclear weapons program and begin talks on new deal

Published

on

Trump threatens to bomb Iran unless they end nuclear weapons program and begin talks on new deal

JERUSALEM—President Donald Trump’s overtures via a letter to the Islamic Republic of Iran’s supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, to jump-start talks on dismantling Tehran’s illicit nuclear weapons program, were met with rejection by the theocratic state on Sunday, following Trump’s latest threat to the regime.

Trump told NBC on Saturday that “If they don’t make a deal, there will be bombing,” he said. “But there’s a chance that if they don’t make a deal, that I will do secondary tariffs on them like I did four years ago.”

Trump added the U.S. and officials from the Islamic Republic are “talking.”

Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian said on Sunday “We don’t avoid talks; it’s the breach of promises that has caused issues for us so far,” according to the Associated Press. He added, “They must prove that they can build trust.” The White House did not immediately respond to Iran’s rejection of the talks, the AP reported. 

Pezeshkian still noted that in Iran’s response to the letter that indirect negotiations with the Trump administration were still possible.

Advertisement

WALTZ TELLS IRAN TO GIVE UP NUCLEAR PROGRAM OR ‘THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES’

Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei addresses the media during elections in Tehran, Iran, on May 10, 2024. (Fatemeh Bahrami/Anadolu via Getty Images)

The apparent return of Iran’s regime to its standard playbook of opaque indirect talks between the U.S. and Tehran’s rulers raises questions about whether Trump would greenlight military strikes to eradicate Iran’s vast nuclear weapons program. 

After Iran launched two massive missile and drone attacks on Israel last year, Trump could also aid the Jewish state in knocking out Iran’s nuclear weapons apparatus. 

Indirect talks between the U.S. and the world’s worst state-sponsor of terrorism, according to Democratic and Republican administrations, have not compelled Iran to abandon its pursuit of nuclear weapons.

Advertisement

Jason Brodsky, the policy director of United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI), told Fox News Digital that the Iranians “do not want to provide President Trump with a casus belli to strike Iran’s nuclear program. There may be indirect and non-public responses through various intermediaries. I think some Iranian officials perceive a fissure among President Trump’s national security team on Iran. This explains Iran’s foreign minister’s comment in recent days that President Trump’s letter to the supreme leader poses challenges as well as opportunities.”

TRUMP VINDICATED AS EXPLOSIVE REPORT CONFIRMS IRAN SUPERVISES HOUTHI ‘POLITICAL AND MILITARY AFFAIRS’

Iran nuclear power plant

Iran’s first functioning nuclear power plant in Bushehr, Iran, on April 28, 2024. (Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

Brodsky said, “These Iranian officials seek to bypass experienced hands like President Trump’s national security advisor and secretary of state, who have been demanding the dismantlement of Iran’s entire nuclear program in keeping with President Trump’s long-standing and rightful position on this issue, and cultivate individuals around President Trump who do not have experience with Iran or are considered non-traditional conservatives who would be more receptive to their entrees.”

Trump promised that “bad things” would happen to Iran if the regime does not come to the table for nuclear negotiations.  “My big preference is that we work it out with Iran, but if we don’t work it out, bad things are gonna happen to Iran,” he said on Friday. 

Iran is enriching uranium to 60%, just shy of the 90% weapons-grade. Experts say it could have a nuclear weapon within weeks if it were to take the final steps to building one. Fox News Digital reported in late March that Iran’s regime has enriched enough uranium to manufacture six nuclear weapons, according to a U.N. atomic agency report.

Advertisement
Iran UN

Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian at U.N. headquarters in New York, Sept. 24, 2024. (Reuters/Caitlin Ochs)

Alireza Nader, an Iranian-American expert on Iran, told Fox News Digital, “Khamenei may be signaling that he’s not interested in negotiations, but his regime desperately needs economic relief. Otherwise, another popular uprising against him could start. Khamenei doesn’t have the cards.”

There is widespread discontent among Iranians against the rule of 85-year-old Khamenei.

TRUMP REINSTATES ‘MAXIMUM PRESSURE’ CAMPAIGN AGAINST IRAN 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Donald Trump sit in the Oval Office

President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu meet at the White House, Feb. 4, 2025. (Reuters/Elizabeth Frantz)

Iran’s has upped the ante ever since Trump told FOX Business he sent a letter to Khamenei. Iran has disclosed video footage of its underground “missile city.”

Trump also told FOX Business, “I would rather negotiate a deal.”

Advertisement

He continued, “I’m not sure that everybody agrees with me, but we can make a deal that would be just as good as if you won militarily. But the time is happening now, the time is coming up.

“Something is going to happen one way or the other. I hope that Iran, and I’ve written them a letter, saying I hope you’re going to negotiate because if we have to go in militarily, it’s going to be a terrible thing for them.”

Brodsky said, “That means the Islamic Republic may dangle a JCPOA-like deal, with minor modifications from the previous 2015 agreement. Iranian media has been hyping such an arrangement.”

In 2018, Trump withdrew from the Obama-negotiated Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action deal because, he argued, that the agreement failed to ensure Iran would not build nuclear weapons and did not codify restrictions against Tehran’s missile program and sponsorship of Islamist terrorism.

IRAN’S LEADER WARNS US COULD RECEIVE ‘SEVERE SLAPS’ FOLLOWING TRUMP’S THREATS TO HOUTHIS

Advertisement
Iran nuclear

The Foundation for Defense of Democracies has analyzed where Iran’s nuclear infrastructure is located. (Image provided by the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) )

Brodsky said, “These Iranian officials believe they can lure the Trump administration into this arrangement and then President Trump will wave a magic wand and bring the entire Republican Party along with Democrats to support the deal and make it more politically durable than the 2015 JCPOA. This is all despite President Trump’s consistent and strong record in rejecting the JCPOA framework. It reflects desperation in Tehran and a desire to buy time with another failed diplomatic gambit. But it’s important to have eyes wide open here as to the games the Iranians will (and are already) playing.”

While Trump’s director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, testified on Tuesday before the Senate Intelligence Committee that the intelligence community “continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamanei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003,” she did note that Iran increased its enriched uranium stockpile.

In sharp contrast to U.S. intelligence since 2003, Fox News Digital has previously reported that European intelligence agencies believe Iran is working toward testing an atomic weapon, and sought illicit technology for its nuclear weapons program. 

Counter-proliferation experts, like the prominent physicist and nuclear specialist David Albright, have told Fox News that European intelligence institutions use an updated definition of construction of weapons of mass destruction to assess Iran’s progress in contrast to America’s alleged obsolete definition.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Fox News Digital sent press queries to the U.S. State Department and the National Security Council.

Fox News Digital’s Morgan Phillips and the Associated Press and Reuters contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Trump insists he is ‘not joking’ about seeking a third term as president

Published

on

Trump insists he is ‘not joking’ about seeking a third term as president

Donald Trump hints at exploring paths to a third term as United States president despite constitutional limits.

US President Donald Trump has said he is “not joking” about seeking a third term in office, which is barred by the United States Constitution.

Speaking in a phone interview with NBC News on Sunday, Trump directly addressed speculation over a potential third term, saying, “No, I’m not joking. I’m not joking,” but added, “It is far too early to think about it.”

“There are methods which you could do it, as you know,” he said, without elaborating on potential legal or political avenues.

The US Constitution’s 22nd Amendment limits presidents to two four-year terms, whether consecutive or not.

Advertisement

The 22nd Amendment says that “no person shall be elected to the office of the president more than twice”.

Trump was asked in the NBC interview about a scenario where his running mate, Vice President JD Vance, could assume office before stepping aside to allow him to take over. Trump acknowledged the possibility, stating, “That’s one” approach.

“But there are others, too,” he added, without elaborating further.

‘We’re working on it’

Overturning the 22nd Amendment would require a two-thirds majority in both houses of Congress and ratification by three-quarters of the 50 US states.

Trump, who began his second, non-consecutive term in January, has repeatedly alluded to extending his time in office.

Advertisement

Some of his allies have also floated the idea of keeping him in power beyond 2028, while Trump himself has occasionally teased about the possibility, often in ways that taunt his political opponents.

If he were to pursue another term in the 2028 election, Trump, who was the oldest president to be inaugurated in the US in January 2025, would then be 82 years old.

The precedent of a two-term limit dates back to 1796, when George Washington voluntarily stepped down after two terms.

This tradition remained largely unchallenged for more than 140 years until Franklin D Roosevelt won a third term in 1940 amid the Great Depression and World War II. Roosevelt died months into his fourth term in 1945, prompting Congress to formalise term limits with the 22nd Amendment in 1951.

Longtime Trump adviser Steve Bannon suggested in a March 19 interview with NewsNation that Trump may seek re-election in 2028.

Advertisement

“We’re working on it,” Bannon said, adding that his team was exploring ways to reinterpret the definition of term limits to facilitate a third term.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending