World

As U.S. Tariffs Become Reality, Canadians Prepare for Economic Pain

Published

12 months ago

March 5, 2025

As U.S. Tariffs Become Reality, Canadians Prepare for Economic Pain

The trucks that carry about $300 million worth of auto parts each day over the bridge from Windsor, Ontario, to Detroit are still rolling as usual. But in the aftermath of President Trump’s decision to impose 25 percent tariffs on most categories of Canadian exports, the mood in Windsor, like all of Canada, was transformed.

Mr. Trump’s move has ignited a sense of economic anxiety and anger among Canadians about how they are being treated by their neighbor, ally and best customer. Most are still puzzling over Mr. Trump’s motivations and objectives for the tariffs, as well as his comments about annexing Canada as the 51st state.

And as they turned their attention to getting the potentially crippling tariffs, and a 10 percent levy on Canadian oil and gas and some minerals, lifted, politicians, business people and ordinary Canadians say that the relationship between the two countries will never return to what it once was.

Flavio Volpe, the head of a Canadian auto-parts maker trade group, said that his members could start shutting down factories in days, and that he feels betrayed by the United States.

“We’ve built two societies on the same values,” said Mr. Volpe, who is also a member of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s Council on Canada-U.S. Relations. “The man in the White House did a U-turn and drove right over us.”

Mr. Trudeau and anxious business leaders throughout Canada said that their country’s focus must be on ending the tariffs as quickly as possible.

Most forecasts project that Canada’s export-dependent economy will be sent into a recession, although they differ on timing and its initial severity.

“We have a limited experience for this magnitude of a trade shock,” the Royal Bank of Canada, the country’s largest financial institution, said this week. Some Canadians reached back for comparison to the Smoot-Hawley tariffs of 1930, which raised the average U.S. import duty to a staggering 59.1 percent. Many economists believe that they worsened the Great Depression, but the two countries’ economies were far less integrated at that time.

Aside from oil and gas, Canada’s largest export sector is the auto industry. On Tuesday, Mr. Trump suggested that the only way out of tariffs for the sector is to move all of its production to the United States. Aside from abandoning a skilled work force, that would require billions of dollars in new investments.

Historically, automotive trade has been largely balanced between the United States and Canada. Parts often swirl around between Canada, the United States and Mexico, sometimes crossing borders repeatedly before winding up in vehicles in a dealer’s showroom.

Mr. Volpe, of the Automotive Parts Manufacturers’ Association in Canada, said that, aside from the tariffs, trade remained unchanged on Tuesday, an assessment backed up by the usual migration of trucks to the Ambassador Bridge.

The 25 percent tariffs are being paid by the importers, either other parts makers or automakers. Most contracts allow an automaker to deduct tariffs it pays when settling a parts company’s bill.

Mr. Volpe said that those deductions will make parts suppliers, which have generally have single-digit profit margins, instantly and deeply unprofitable.

He expects that most of his members can cover those losses from their cash reserves for about a week. After that, they will be forced to stop shipments.

“No one is going to burn up their cash reserve for the president of the United States,” he said.

For more parts, automakers usually have no alternative suppliers, let alone ones in the United States. Setting up new suppliers would take time and substantial investment. The result, experts say, will be a parts shortage that rapidly cascades into assembly-line shutdowns. Thousands of workers in Canada, the United States and Mexico would be left idle.

Some industries began idling small numbers of workers before the tariffs came into effect.

Bill Slater, the president of a United Steelworkers local in Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, said that Algoma Steel laid off about 20 of his members who are salaried employees, citing the tariffs. He said that a number of probationary hourly workers were also let go by the mill.

Truck drivers had a mixed experience. Stephen Laskowski, the president of the Ontario Trucking Association, said that some had a surge in business as companies moved to get products into the United States before the tariffs came into effect, while others were laying off drivers because customers were canceling shipments.

Canada’s forestry industry knows tariffs all too well. Special U.S. duties on softwood lumber go back decades and were a factor in Canada seeking the 1989 free trade agreement with the United States, which was later expanded to include Mexico. (Canada has repeatedly failed to get an exemption from the U.S. trade complaints system that imposes the softwood lumber tariffs.)

But Kurt Niquidet, the president of the British Columbia Council of Forest Industries, said that adding the 25 percent tariff “really puts us into unprecedented territory.”

Lumber mills in the western province are facing a dizzying array of tariffs. This week’s 25 percent tariff is on top of a 14.4 percent tariff that the U.S. government expects to raise this summer, to more than 27 percent. Then Mr. Trump announced last weekend that he’s opened an investigation into lumber imports that could result in even more tariffs.

While the United States supplies about 70 percent of its own lumber, Mr. Niquidet, an economist, said that American forests and mills cannot replace all the lumber from Canada, nor can it be sourced from other countries.

“There will still be imports from Canada,” he said. “Prices in the U.S. will rise.” Some Canadian lumber mills, however, may not survive the trade assault, he added.

While Mr. Trudeau speculated that Mr. Trump was seeking a “total collapse of the Canadian economy, because that’ll make it easier to annex us,” Mr. Volpe said he was not sure it’s that complicated. “If it looks like he is dismantling the structure of the postwar economy, then he is,” Mr. Volpe said. “What are you going to do about it?” Some Canadians believe that their country is simply being used as part of Mr. Trump’s plan to fund substantial U.S. tax cuts with tariffs.

Jean Simard, the president of the Aluminum Association of Canada, fought a successful battle over the 10 percent tariff on Canadian exports of the metal Mr. Trump enacted in during his first administration. Now Mr. Simard is attempting to fend off additional tariffs that Mr. Trump has promised to put on top of Tuesday’s 25 percent. He said that he believes the president is telling the world: “This is what I’m able to do to my closest allies — think about what’s awaiting you.”

Mr. Simard added: “It’s an old barbarian approach to war.”

As the tariffs were rolled out, actions against American goods quickly came into play. Government-owned liquor stores, including in Ontario, pulled U.S. beer, wine and spirits from off their shelves, and that province canceled a 100 million Canadian dollar ($69 million) contract with Elon Musk’s Starlink satellite service to provide internet in rural areas.

Some Canadians are also vowing not to travel south, a decision perhaps also informed by the decline of the Canadian dollar brought on by the tariffs.

Most winters, Lee Miller, a retired electrician from Saint John, New Brunswick, would be traveling in his motor home through sunny warm states, including Florida.

“As soon as Trump started talking tariffs, I said, ‘Nope, not going,’” Mr. Miller said. After canceling this year’s trip, he plans not to enter the United States as long as Mr. Trump is president. That will, however, mean missed visits with friends and family who live across the border.

“This is one of those things that tears families apart,” he said.

Click to comment

World

Trump says he is directing federal agencies to cease use of Anthropic technology

Published

5 hours ago

February 27, 2026

Press Room

Trump says he is directing federal agencies to cease use of Anthropic technology

U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday said he was directing every federal agency to immediately cease all use of Anthropic’s technology, adding there would be a six-month phase out for agencies such as the Defense Department who use the company’s products.

World

UN Human Rights Council chief cuts off speaker criticizing US-sanctioned official

Published

6 hours ago

February 27, 2026

Press Room

UN Human Rights Council chief cuts off speaker criticizing US-sanctioned official

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) abruptly cut off a video statement after the speaker began criticizing several United Nations officials, including one who has been sanctioned by the Trump administration. The video message was being played during a U.N. session in Geneva, Switzerland, Friday morning.

Anne Bayefsky, director of the Touro Institute on Human Rights and the and president of Human Rights, called out several U.N. officials in her message, including U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk and special rapporteur Francesca Albanese, who is the subject of U.S. sanctions.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced sanctions against Albanese July 9, 2025, saying that she “has spewed unabashed antisemitism, expressed support for terrorism and open contempt for the United States, Israel and the West.”

“That bias has been apparent across the span of her career, including recommending that the ICC, without a legitimate basis, issue arrest warrants targeting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant,” Rubio added.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Francesca Albanese (Getty Images)

“I was the only American U.N.-accredited NGO with a speaking slot, and I wasn’t allowed even to conclude my 90 seconds of allotted time. Free speech is non-existent at the U.N. so-called ‘Human Rights Council,’” Bayefsky told Fox News Digital.

Bayefsky noted the irony of the council cutting off her video in a proceeding that was said to be an “interactive dialogue,” an event during which experts are allowed to speak to the council about human rights issues.

“I was cut off after naming Francesca Albanese, Navi Pillay and Chris Sidoti for covering up Palestinian use of rape as a weapon of war and trafficking in blatant antisemitism. I named the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, Karim Khan, who is facing disturbing sexual assault allegations but still unaccountable almost two years later. Those are the people and the facts that the United Nations wants to protect and hide,” Bayefsky told Fox News Digital.

“It is an outrage that I am silenced and singled out for criticism on the basis of naming names.”

Bayefsky’s statement was cut off as she accused Albanese and Navi Pillay, the former chair of the U.N. Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory; and Chris Sidoti, a commissioner of the U.N. Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory. She also slammed Khan, who has faced rape allegations. Khan has denied the sexual misconduct allegations against him.

Had her video message been played in full, Bayefsky would have gone on to criticize Türk’s recent report for not demanding accountability for the “Palestinian policy to pay to kill Jews, including Hamas terror boss Yahya Sinwar who got half a million dollars in blood money.”

When the video was cut short, Human Rights Council President Ambassador Sidharto Reza Suryodipuro characterized Bayefsky’s remarks as “derogatory, insulting and inflammatory” and said that they were “not acceptable.”

“The language used by the speaker cannot be allowed as it has exceeded the limits of tolerance and respect within the framework of the council which we all in this room hold to,” Suryodipuro said.

The Human Rights Council at the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland, Feb. 26, 2025. (Denis Balibouse/Reuters)

MELANIA TRUMP TO TAKE THE GAVEL AT UN SECURITY COUNCIL IN HISTORIC FIRST

In response to Fox News Digital’s request for comment, Human Rights Council Media Officer Pascal Sim said the council has had long-established rules on what it considers to be acceptable language.

“Rulings regarding the form and language of interventions in the Human Rights Council are established practices that have been in place throughout the existence of the council and used by all council presidents when it comes to ensuring respect, tolerance and dignity inherent to the discussion of human rights issues,” Sim told Fox News Digital.

When asked if the video had been reviewed ahead of time, Sim said it was assessed for length and audio quality to allow for interpretation, but that the speakers are ultimately “responsible for the content of their statement.”

“The video statement by the NGO ‘Touro Law Center, The Institute on Human Rights and The Holocaust’ was interrupted when it was deemed that the language exceeded the limits of tolerance and respect within the framework of the council and could not be tolerated,” Sim said.

“As the presiding officer explained at the time, all speakers are to remain within the appropriate framework and terminology used in the council’s work, which is well known by speakers who routinely participate in council proceedings. Following that ruling, none of the member states of the council have objected to it.”

Flag alley at the United Nations’ European headquarters during the Human Rights Council in Geneva, Switzerland, Sept. 11, 2023. (Denis Balibouse/File Photo/Reuters)

UNRWA OFFICIALS LOBBY CONGRESSIONAL STAFFERS AGAINST TRUMP TERRORIST DESIGNATION THREAT

While Bayefsky’s statement was cut off, other statements accusing Israel of genocide and ethnic cleansing were allowed to be played and read in full.

This is not the first time that Bayefsky was interrupted. Exactly one year ago, on Feb. 27, 2025, her video was cut off when she mentioned the fate of Ariel and Kfir Bibas. Jürg Lauber, president of the U.N. Human Rights Council at the time, stopped the video and declared that Bayefsky had used inappropriate language.

Bayefsky began the speech by saying, “The world now knows Palestinian savages murdered 9-month-old baby Kfir,” and she ws almost immediately cut off by Lauber.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“Sorry, I have to interrupt,” Lauber abruptly said as the video of Bayefsky was paused. Lauber briefly objected to the “language” used in the video, but then allowed it to continue. After a few more seconds, the video was shut off entirely.

Lauber reiterated that “the language that’s used by the speaker cannot be tolerated,” adding that it “exceeds clearly the limits of tolerance and respect.”

Last year, when the previous incident occurred, Bayefsky said she believed the whole thing was “stage-managed,” as the council had advanced access to her video and a transcript and knew what she would say.

Rachel Wolf is a breaking news writer for Fox News Digital and FOX Business.

World

Did the EU bypass Hungary’s veto on Ukraine’s €90 billion loan?

Published

7 hours ago

February 27, 2026

Press Room

Did the EU bypass Hungary’s veto on Ukraine’s €90 billion loan?

A post on X by European Parliament President Roberta Metsola has triggered a wave of misinformation linked to the EU’s €90 billion support loan to Ukraine, which is designed to help Kyiv meet its general budget and defence needs amid Russia’s ongoing invasion.

Hungary said earlier this week that it would block both the loan — agreed by EU leaders in December — and a new EU sanctions package against Moscow amid a dispute over oil supplies.

Shortly afterwards, Metsola posted on X that she had signed the Ukraine support loan on behalf of the parliament.

She said the funds would be used to maintain essential public services, support Ukraine’s defence, protect shared European security, and anchor Ukraine’s future within Europe.

The announcement triggered a wave of reactions online, with some claiming Hungary’s veto had been ignored, but this is incorrect.

Metsola did sign the loan on behalf of the European Parliament, but that’s only one step in the EU’s legislative process. Her signature does not mean the loan has been definitively implemented.

How the process works

In December, after failing to reach an agreement on using frozen Russian assets to fund Ukraine’s war effort, the European Council agreed in principle to provide €90 billion to help Kyiv meet its budgetary and military needs over the next two years.

On 14 January, the European Commission put forward a package of legislative proposals to ensure continued financial support for Ukraine in 2026 and 2027.

These included a proposal to establish a €90 billion Ukraine support loan, amendments to the Ukraine Facility — the EU instrument used to deliver budgetary assistance — and changes to the EU’s multiannual financial framework so the loan could be backed by any unused budgetary “headroom”.

Under EU law, these proposals must be adopted by both the European Parliament and the European Council. Because the loan requires amendments to EU budgetary rules, it ultimately needs unanimous approval from all member states.

Metsola’s signature therefore does not amount to a final decision, nor does it override Hungary’s veto.

The oil dispute behind Hungary’s opposition

Budapest says its objections are linked to a dispute over the Druzhba pipeline, a Soviet-era route that carries Russian oil via Ukraine to Hungary and Slovakia.

According to the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA), Hungary and Slovakia imported an estimated €137 million worth of Russian crude through the pipeline in January alone, under a temporary EU exemption.

Oil flows reportedly stopped in late January after a Russian air strike that Kyiv says damaged the pipeline’s southern branch in western Ukraine. Hungary disputes this, with Prime Minister Viktor Orbán accusing Ukraine of blocking it from being used.

Speaking in Kyiv alongside European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President António Costa, Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said the pipeline had been damaged by Russia, not Kyiv.

He added that repairs were dangerous and could not be carried out quickly without putting Ukrainian servicemen in danger.

Tensions escalated further after reports that Ukraine struck a Russian pumping station serving the pipeline. Orbán responded by ordering increased security at critical infrastructure sites, claiming Kyiv was attempting to disrupt Hungary’s energy system.