Connect with us

News

As Nancy Guthrie’s disappearance nears one month, other Tucson families have been waiting decades for answers | CNN

Published

on

As Nancy Guthrie’s disappearance nears one month, other Tucson families have been waiting decades for answers | CNN

June 12, 1991, is a day Tammy Tacho will never forget. It was the last day she ever saw her 12-year-old little brother before he disappeared as she and her mother pulled out of the driveway.

James Hendrickson – known as Jimmy to his family – had reached into the car to kiss his mother goodbye, Tacho recalled.

“To me and my mom, that’s a horror movie to us, because that’s the last peck, or that’s the last kiss, and that’s the last hug, and that’s the last touching his hair that she got to do,” she told CNN.

More than three decades later, Jimmy has never been found, with his missing person case still open and cold.

Jimmy is just one of several people in the Tucson area who have been missing for over a decade without answers.

Advertisement

A more recent disappearance in the area has drawn national attention: that of Nancy Guthrie, the 84-year-old mother of “Today” anchor Savannah Guthrie.

Nancy Guthrie vanished from her affluent neighborhood in the Catalina Foothills on February 1, and nearly a month after she disappeared, officials have yet to find the missing woman or charge someone in connection to her apparent kidnapping.

President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social he was “deploying all resources” to find her, and the Pima County Sheriff said he had “over 400 cops out here working every minute of the day” on the case. Her family on Tuesday announced they are offering up to $1 million for information leading to her recovery, and Savannah Guthrie also announced a $500,000 donation to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, saying she hopes the attention given to her family will extend to others still in limbo.

As the search for Nancy Guthrie stretches into its fourth week, families like Jimmy’s have been waiting years for any new information about their loved ones.

A ‘mama’s boy’ who loved church and playing outdoors

On that summer day in Tucson, Tacho and her mother were heading to Douglas, Arizona, to meet her then-boyfriend’s family, she said. Jimmy didn’t want to go.

Advertisement

“He was at that age. It was summer, he wanted to be out there playing and doing what boys do, and so he stayed behind,” she said.

Tacho remembers her brother as a “mama’s boy” who loved going to church, playing outside and was usually sporting red sweatpants — his favorite color.

“The worst thing is to drive out and watch him just wave at us,” Tacho said.

They left him with a family friend they had known since they moved to Tucson in 1987, Tacho said, and their two-day trip stretched into three after the car broke down.

When they finally got back into town, that’s when “the nightmare begins,” Tacho said.

Advertisement

Jimmy’s mother filed a police report immediately when she found out her son was missing, but Tacho said the case wasn’t taken seriously right away. She recalled police thought Jimmy was just a runaway, but she said her family knew that wasn’t true. It took several weeks for her brother to be recognized as a missing person, she said.

“It’s been brought up during the initial investigation and subsequent theories, and that was that Jimmy walked away of his own free will and just was a runaway. That’s absolutely not what happened in this case. He didn’t leave his family of his own free will. He had no money to provide for himself, no transportation,” Tucson Police Department Detective David Miller told CNN affiliate KOLD last year.

There are several stories about what happened the night of June 11 and the next morning, Tacho said, which has left her family with more questions than answers.

The family friend watching Jimmy let him and another child go to her relative’s house to fix a fence, Tacho said. The other child told police that Jimmy was playing video games when he went to bed and heard noises during the night, but didn’t think anything of it, according to Tacho. The adult at the house said Jimmy left in the morning to go eat breakfast at a nearby school, she said, which was not unusual for her and her siblings to do.

Now, nearly 35 years later, Tacho is still pushing for answers. She still calls the police department and has hosted vigils and events to bring attention to her brother’s case, she said.

Advertisement

“I worked at the job my mom worked at and hope that one day Jimmy would walk in there,” Tacho said. “I’ve come to accept … I’m not going to find him alive, but we need to find him.”

When her mother died a few years ago, she “left not knowing” what happened to Jimmy. “I don’t want to leave this world not knowing,” Tacho said.

She said she still lives in Tucson, just in case Jimmy ever comes back.

It’s a heavy burden the family of Karen Grajeda, who was 7 years old when she disappeared from her apartment complex in Tucson in 1996, is bearing too: The balancing of hope and trying to grieve.

“I still hang our Christmas picture every year,” her younger sister, Alejandra, wrote in a message to Karen posted by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. “My daughter is named after you. If you’re out there, if you’re alive, we’re here. Your whole family loves you and if you can come home, please do. We’ll always be waiting for you.”

Advertisement

Karen was last seen playing outside her home on January 11, 1996, according to CNN affiliate KOLD.

The FBI and Tucson Police Department began searching for her right away, and family and community members joined the effort, but after months with few leads, there is still no trace of what happened, the NCMEC said. The organization works with law enforcement and other officials to find missing children, including publishing age-progression images.

“She was just an innocent child. That’s the memory I have of her, an innocent child who was always smiling. As her father, that’s the image I hold onto,” Karen’s father, Andres, told the organization.

Karen’s case is “in long-term missing person status,” the Tucson Police Department told CNN, and law enforcement continues to investigate the case as a non-family abduction and asks people to come forward with information, according to NCMEC.

“There’s nothing more innocent than a child, and they’re the most vulnerable people that had everything in front of them to be happy about, and it was all taken away from them, from their families,” Miller, the Tucson detective, told KOLD of the case in 2023. “Anybody who has kids probably feels the same way and that level of trust, I think, in a community when something like that happens, it diminishes it.”

Advertisement

Nearly 30,000 children were reported missing in 2024, according to NCMEC.

Adults in the 20-39 age group are also at risk for abductions and kidnappings in the United States, according to data from the FBI. From February 2025 to February 2026, 53% of all abductions were of people in that age range. Nearly half of all abductions happened between current or former romantic partners, the data shows.

Marlana McElvaine’s family believes she’s no longer alive but is still asking the public to come forward to help them lay her to rest.

The 28-year-old and mother of two was in a relationship where she experienced domestic abuse when she went missing in 2010, her sister told CNN affiliate KGUN. Her boyfriend, whom she was living with at the time of her disappearance, is in prison on unrelated charges, KOLD reported.

“It’s a matter of someone coming forward and being brave and giving information. We ask that if it was their sister, their daughter, their child’s mother, that they put themselves in our shoes,” Janean McElvaine, her sister, told KOLD in 2023.

Advertisement

Marlana McElvaine’s car was found abandoned, with her keys and work badge still inside, the station reported.

“You have no closure and there’s just this void in our hearts. We go on, we do the things we have to do, but we have no answers and we’re just hoping that someday … we can give her the proper goodbye that she deserves,” her mother Dian McElvaine told KOLD.

Dian McElvaine said in 2023 the family was working on getting a death declaration to help with the grieving process. Tucson police told KOLD at the time that once it is signed, the case will change from a missing person case to homicide.

Tucson police told CNN that the case is still currently classified “in long-term missing person status.”

People do go missing, Tucson Police Detective Doug Musick told KOLD at the time of her disappearance, but “it’s pretty rare for people to just abandon their children, their job, their family, their life.”

Advertisement

Marlana McElvaine’s family thinks so, too.

“I knew from that moment that I got that call, I knew she was gone. Because I knew she wouldn’t have walked away from her life, she wouldn’t have walked away from her kids, she wouldn’t have left us — we’re all so close. I knew from that moment, I started grieving from that point forward because you know what, there’s no way she would have just left,” Dian McElvaine told KOLD.

Her family still talks about her and celebrates her birthday, her sister told KOLD. They also planted a tree in her honor.

The families, including the Guthries, are going through trauma that only other families who have been waiting for answers can understand, said Jimmy’s older sister Tacho, seeking some kind of closure.

“Nobody knows how we feel unless we’re going through it,” she said. “It’s so much pain and ache.”

Advertisement

“I look for answers like if it was the first day, the second day, six months, a year, you know — we’re just never going to give up. We’re never going to give up,” Tacho said.

News

California’s primary for governor is undecided as candidates vie to be in the top two

Published

on

California’s primary for governor is undecided as candidates vie to be in the top two

Xavier Becerra, Democratic gubernatorial candidate for California, and Steve Hilton, Republican gubernatorial candidate for California, shake hands while arriving for a gubernatorial debate at KRON Studios in San Francisco in April.

Jason Henry/Getty Images North America


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Jason Henry/Getty Images North America

SAN FRANCISCO — The primary election for California governor is too close to call, with vote counting continuing Wednesday. Democrat Xavier Becerra and Republican business executive Steve Hilton lead the field with Democrat Tom Steyer in third place.

In California’s unusual primary system, all candidates, regardless of party, appear on a single ballot open to any registered voter. The top two candidates then move on to the general election, even if they’re from the same party. This year, voters had 60 names for governor to choose from.

Advertisement

The winner will lead the country’s most populous state, where leaders often take on national political prominence. Incumbent Gov. Gavin Newsom is at his two-term limit and could be a Democratic contender for president.

Becerra, former Health and Human Services secretary under President Joe Biden, pitched himself to voters as an experienced political leader who isn’t afraid of President Trump, but his lead caps one of the most surprising and dramatic comebacks in recent state political history. As recently as April, polls were showing Becerra — also a former member of Congress and California attorney general — languishing in single digits in a crowded field.

In his remarks at his watch party in Los Angeles, Becerra noted his underdog status.

“Here in Hollywood’s hometown, we love a good underdog success story,” he said, drawing parallels between his campaign and his immigrant parents’ success story in California. “Guess what? The underdog stayed in the fight. Like my parents, I never gave up. Never stopped putting one foot in front of the other. Never stopped believing in the beacon-like goodness of California. And thankfully, neither did you.”

Hilton is a former Fox News commentator who also served as a political adviser to former British Prime Minister David Cameron. He was endorsed by President Trump in April, helping him to pull ahead of Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, the other major Republican in the race. Hilton has campaigned on the idea that California needs change after 16 years under total Democratic control.

Advertisement

The race is narrowing down after a tumultuous campaign

At his watch party in Huntington Beach, the British-born candidate — who became an American citizen five years ago — said it was the “honor of his lifetime” to receive over 1 million votes so far.

“Change is coming to California and it’s long overdue,” Hilton said. “We’re not there yet, but it’s looking good. It looks very much as if Californians really will have the chance to vote for change in November and take our state in a new direction.”

Democratic billionaire activist Steyer spent more than $213 million of his own money to boost his candidacy and push a progressive, populist message. While he was trailing Becerra and Hilton on Tuesday night, he said at his watch party in San Francisco that he remains confident he can close the gap in the days ahead.

“Together, we’ve scared the hell out of the corporate interests used to getting their way,” Steyer said. “It might take some time to figure out where this is going. We’re going to wait until every ballot is counted. We’re gonna give democracy a time to work. And we know we finished really strong.”

The early results are not certain to hold, in part because of unusual voting patterns in this primary election: Ballot-tracking data heading into Tuesday evening showed that Republicans were more likely to vote early by mail, while Democratic voters in this deep-blue state held onto their mail-in ballots or chose to vote in person. That’s the reverse of recent elections, which saw more Democrats voting by mail and Republicans tending to vote in person on Election Day.

Advertisement

The uncertainty on election night capped a race that remained crowded and unsettled to the end. To some extent, the race was defined by who wasn’t running.

Some of the state’s most high-profile Democrats — former Vice President Kamala Harris, U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla and California Attorney General Rob Bonta — all passed on a potential bid to succeed Newsom.

The race was disrupted in April when then-U.S. Rep. Eric Swalwell’s campaign for governor imploded amid allegations of sexual assault and harassment. Swalwell resigned from Congress shortly after the accusations surfaced and has denied assault allegations.

Swalwell had been gaining in polls and racking up high-profile endorsements, and his exit seemed to primarily benefit Becerra, who had been stuck in single digits in many polls. Ultimately, it quieted fears among Democrats who worried that the messy Democratic field could result in Bianco and Hilton winning the top spots in the June primary.

Marisa Lagos covers California politics at KQED and co-hosts the Political Breakdown show and podcast.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Supreme Court reinstates Republican-favored Alabama congressional districts

Published

on

Supreme Court reinstates Republican-favored Alabama congressional districts

The U.S. Supreme Court

Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images

The Supreme Court on Tuesday cleared the way for Alabama to use a congressional district map favored by Republicans.

The court, in an unsigned order, overturned a three-judge district court panel that found that the map is “tainted by intentional race-based discrimination.” The court’s three liberals publicly dissented.

The ruling means that Alabama’s 2026 midterm elections will feature six Republican-leaning districts and one Democratic-leaning one, as opposed to a map with only five safe Republican seats. Democrat Shomari Figures, who represents Alabama’s Second District, will likely lose his seat as a result of the high court’s ruling.

Advertisement

The story of Alabama’s congressional map is long and tortured. It began in 2021, when the state implemented a new map to account for population changes in the census. The map featured only one majority-black district out of seven, even though the state is more than one-quarter Black.

Voters immediately sued, claiming the map illegally diluted minority votes in violation of the Voting Rights Act and the Constitution. Lower court judges agreed, ruling that the state must draw a map with two districts where Black voters have a realistic chance of electing their candidate of choice. The Supreme Court more than once has ordered Alabama to draw a compliant map.

But the state has refused and instead continued to litigate the case. On Tuesday, that tactic paid off.

What changed? In April, the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority all but gutted what remains of the Voting Rights Act, ruling that states cannot purposefully draw districts that are majority-minority.

Alabama then asked the high court to reinstate the state’s old map, under the theory that this new ruling meant that it was permissible to use a map with only one majority-Black district. In an unsigned, unexplained order in May, the high court essentially reversed its previous opinions, and allowed Alabama to use the old map for the upcoming midterm elections.

Advertisement

This set off a flurry of activity in Alabama. By the time the Supreme Court issued its May order, absentee balloting had already begun, using the court-drawn map. So Republican Governor Kay Ivey cancelled elections and scheduled a special primary for August for the affected congressional races.

The case, however, was not over.

In its ruling, the Supreme Court had ordered a lower court panel to continue evaluating Alabama’s map in light of its recent Voting Rights Act decision. And just 15 days after that order, the panel, composed of three Republican judges—two of them Trump appointees—concluded unanimously that even under the Supreme Court’s new standards, the plan for a single black district was “intentionally discriminatory.”

So, once again, Alabama returned to the Supreme Court, arguing that the map was partisan, not racially discriminatory. In short, that the Republican legislature simply drew the map to elect more Republicans. And that under the Supreme Court’s new interpretation of the Voting Rights Act, the GOP map should be allowed to stand.

The court’s conservative agreed, writing that the lower court “did not heed the presumption of legislative good faith.”

Advertisement

The court’s three liberals publicly dissented, castigating the conservative majority for failing to abide by its 2006 decision in the case of Purcell v. Gonzalez. That decision declared that courts should not change election rules too close to an election.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in her dissent, said the court “debases the democratic process” and “corrodes the rule of law by rewarding Alabama’s gamesmanship and outright defiance of court orders.”

Tuesday’s decision is the latest in a series of Supreme Court rulings that could well reshape the 2026 midterm elections, making it much harder for Democrats to prevail.

Continue Reading

News

Map: 3.7-Magnitude Earthquake Shakes the San Francisco Bay Area

Published

on

Map: 3.7-Magnitude Earthquake Shakes the San Francisco Bay Area

Advertisement

Note: Map shows the area with a shake intensity of 3 or greater, which U.S.G.S. defines as “weak,” though the earthquake may be felt outside the areas shown.  All times on the map are Pacific time. The New York Times

Advertisement

A minor, 3.7-magnitude earthquake struck in the San Francisco Bay Area on Tuesday, according to the United States Geological Survey.

The temblor happened at 9:44 a.m. Pacific time about 4 miles southeast of Cloverdale, Calif., data from the agency shows.

Advertisement

U.S.G.S. data earlier reported that the magnitude was 3.6.

As seismologists review available data, they may revise the earthquake’s reported magnitude. Additional information collected about the earthquake may also prompt U.S.G.S. scientists to update the shake-severity map.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Aftershocks detected

Subsequent quakes have been reported in the same area. Such temblors are typically aftershocks caused by minor adjustments along the portion of a fault that slipped at the time of the initial earthquake.

Advertisement

Quakes and aftershocks within 100 miles

Aftershocks can occur days, weeks or even years after the first earthquake. These events can be of equal or larger magnitude to the initial earthquake, and they can continue to affect already damaged locations.

Advertisement

When quakes and aftershocks occurred

 All times are Pacific time. The New York Times

Advertisement

Advertisement

Sources: United States Geological Survey (epicenter, aftershocks, shake intensity); LandScan via Oak Ridge National Laboratory (population density) | Notes: Shaking categories are based on the Modified Mercalli Intensity scale. When aftershock data is available, the corresponding maps and charts include earthquakes within 100 miles and seven days of the initial quake. All times above are Pacific time. Shake data is as of Tuesday, June 2 at 12:59 p.m. Eastern. Aftershocks data is as of Tuesday, June 2 at 1:59 p.m. Eastern.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending