Connect with us

World

‘A total mess’: Opposition mounts against the EU’s gas reduction plan

Published

on

‘A total mess’: Opposition mounts against the EU’s gas reduction plan

Opposition is rising towards the European Fee’s proposed plan to voluntarily cut back fuel consumption by 15% from now till subsequent spring, with Southern international locations main the cost.

Nationwide ministers are set to satisfy tomorrow in Brussels to debate the plan, which is definite to be topic to a number of amendments coming from completely different fronts.

“The Fee’s proposal is just not essentially the simplest nor probably the most environment friendly nor probably the most simply,” mentioned Teresa Ribera, the Spanish minister for the ecological transition.

“Spain is a pro-European nation,” she added. “So it’s due to this fact with the deepest remorse that I say Spain would not assist this proposal.”

Her Greek counterpart, Kostas Skrekas, additionally raised considerations, specifically in regards to the horizontal 15% discount goal, whereas João Galamba, Portugal’s secretary of state for atmosphere and power, referred to as the plan “unsustainable” and “disproportionate.”

Advertisement

For the reason that Kremlin launched the invasion of Ukraine, 12 EU international locations have suffered complete or partial interruptions of fuel provides by Gazprom, the state-owned power multinational that enjoys unique rights over Russia’s pipeline infrastructure.

The cut-offs are seen as retaliation for the growing variety of Western sanctions slapped on Russia.

With costs spiralling uncontrolled and provides dwindling with every passing day, the Fee final week unveiled a plan to lower fuel consumption throughout the bloc by 15% between August and March in a bid to stop the worst injury from Russia’s continued manipulation of power provides.

Companies, public buildings and personal households will all be requested to contribute to the collective endeavor, which may assist save as much as 45 billion cubic metres (bcm) of fuel.

This primary part might be voluntary, based mostly on coordination, gas switching, temperature limits and knowledge campaigns. However within the occasion of a drastic or full discount in Russian fuel, the 15% goal will develop into necessary beneath a “Union Alert” system.

Advertisement

This may open the door for rationing throughout the bloc, forcing hand-picked energy-intensive factories to close down for a sure time period. Households and important companies, equivalent to hospitals and colleges, will stay spared – until the disaster turns determined.

“Russia is blackmailing us. Russia is utilizing power as a weapon,” mentioned EU Fee President Ursula von der Leyen whereas unveiling the proposal, dubbed “save fuel for protected winter.”

Von der Leyen’s crew is attempting to approve the plan beneath a fast-tracked process that utterly bypasses the European Parliament and easily requires a professional majority by member states.

However her blueprint is now beneath intense scrutiny by capitals and dangers being buried beneath an avalanche of amendments and tweaks geared toward curbing what many see as an influence seize by Brussels.

‘Cacophonic scenario’

Chatting with Euronews beneath the situation of anonymity, diplomats and officers paint an image of rushed and tense behind-the-scenes negotiations within the lead-up to Tuesday’s assembly, the place ministers will attempt to discover a delicate compromise among the many diverging positions.

Advertisement

“Over the weekend, it was a cacophonic scenario,” mentioned a diplomat from a Southern nation who’s “fairly essential” in regards to the Fee’s proposal. “However we’re nonetheless optimistic and optimistic.”

“With regards to the overall temper, I can describe it as a complete mess,” mentioned one other diplomat from an Jap member state. “The scenario is dynamic.”

The 2 important sticking factors look like the 15% discount goal and the Union Alert system.

On the primary one, a bunch of nations, led by the South, complain the quantity fails to bear in mind nationwide circumstances. The EU’s power combine is way from homogenous: international locations use renewables, nuclear energy and fossil fuels in various levels in keeping with their geography, economic system and political priorities.

For instance, Spain has a large community of terminals alongside its shoreline that enables for larger imports of liquefied pure fuel (LNG) from a wide range of suppliers, whereas Germany continues to be overly depending on Nord Stream 1, the huge pipeline that feeds Russian fuel straight into the nation.

Advertisement

A diplomat from a rustic that’s in the same scenario to Germany’s careworn the significance to discover a “widespread joint strategy” and mentioned no member state was towards the precept of solidarity, which underpins the Fee’s total plan.

The manager argues lowering fuel consumption is an expression of solidarity as a result of the one market – and, by extension, all 27 EU international locations – are threatened by the Kremlin’s power manipulation.

This is the reason, the reasoning goes, every state ought to pursue the identical uniform 15% discount goal.

A Nordic official mentioned the 15% goal was acceptable however will in all probability develop into extra “versatile” to raised replicate every nation’s peculiarities.

The Fee’s plan additionally envisions solidarity measures to assist out neighbouring states which might be beneath pressure, though this might be contingent upon bilateral preparations between governments.

Advertisement

Germany has already signed so-called solidarity agreements with Austria, the Czech Republic and Denmark, and urged others to observe go well with.

“European solidarity is extra essential than ever in these instances,” Robert Habeck, Germany’s vice-president in control of local weather motion, said last week in response to the Fee’s plan, which he welcomed. “All of us have to work on this with all our would possibly.”

However not everyone is on the identical web page.

“Whereas coordination within the spirit of solidarity is indispensable, it can’t be used as a instrument for ‘mutualising the results’ of extended, systematic over-dependence of some international locations on Russian fuel and lack of investments in diversification,” mentioned the Jap European diplomat.

The feedback echo these voiced final week by Spain’s Teresa Ribera.

Advertisement

“Not like different international locations, the Spanish inhabitants has not lived above our means from an power standpoint,” the minister mentioned.

A larger say

The second important sticking level in negotiations is the Union Alert system, beneath which the Fee might be empowered to show the voluntary 15% discount into obligatory motion throughout the bloc within the occasion of a extreme fuel scarcity or exceptionally excessive demand.

The manager needs to activate the unprecedented mechanism at its personal initiative or following the request of three member states. It’s going to seek the advice of the EU Council however with out requiring its endorsement.

This activation process seems to be lifeless on arrival, diplomats mentioned.

Numerous international locations is pushing again to make sure the Council has a larger say. The newest proposal suggests ministers must approve by a professional majority the activation of the Union Alert system. The minimal variety of international locations who can request the set off might be elevated from three to 5.

Advertisement

Some governments are additionally attempting to safe exemptions and carve-outs from the binding system to guard delicate industries which may fall beneath rationing. Coastal international locations endowed with LNG terminals argue they need to be utterly excused from any necessary or solidarity measure.

Greek Vitality Minister Kostas Skrekas has already warned many of the fuel utilized by his nation goes into electrical energy era and that any additional cuts would seemingly hit personal households, even when Brussels insists they are going to stay protected.

“Some member states aren’t actually blissful in regards to the exemptions,” mentioned an official from a Western European nation, with out naming them. “Discussions are constructive. The plan is a crucial political sign.”

Regardless of the mounting criticism, diplomats mentioned an outright rejection of the Fee’s proposal was off the desk and the pressing have to have a coordinated plan of motion will finally prevail.

“We’re open to options,” mentioned the Southern European diplomat.

Advertisement

The burden now falls on the Czech Republic, who, as the present holder of the EU Council’s rotating presidency, might be tasked with steering the discussions and discovering an settlement that addresses everyone’s considerations, whereas ensuring the ultimate watered-down product doesn’t render the entire plan ineffective.

The Czech presidency intends so as to add exemptions and carve-outs to the 15% goal that “make sense” and are based mostly on broad industrial sectors, quite than on nationwide considerations, Euronews understands.

Ambassadors have been discussing the Fee’s draft because it was offered on Wednesday and have gathered a number of instances to change views. Amendments had been nonetheless being launched on Monday afternoon.

“We wish to hold the ambition to the utmost potential extent,” mentioned a EU official with information of the continued negotiations. “There isn’t a Plan B. We’re going all in.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Why These Chinese Working Mothers Don’t Want More Babies

Published

on

Why These Chinese Working Mothers Don’t Want More Babies

One leads a team at a financial firm and earns more than her husband. Another is pursuing her dream of becoming a civil servant. A third is a budding influencer who aspires to be the family breadwinner.

Each woman is raising one young child and doesn’t want another — no matter what their husbands say, or what incentives the Chinese government, worried about an aging population, is dangling.

Gone are the days of China’s one-child policy. At a recent political forum, President Xi Jinping urged women to take on greater familial responsibilities and “play their unique role in carrying forward the traditional virtues of the Chinese nation.”

These women see a different role for themselves. This generation was born into small families, with many girls growing up as only children — and getting opportunities that used to be given only to boys. Their own mothers, who didn’t have multiple children to care for, typically worked outside the home and set examples for their daughters to do the same.

“I must have my own career.”

Advertisement

Joyce Zhao, 29, Project manager

Joyce Zhao had worked for three years as a project manager at a small tech company in Beijing and was expecting a promotion. But when she became pregnant with her son, Ming, her prospects dimmed.

Her boss, a woman who had been advocating for her to be given a leadership role, left the team while Ms. Zhao was on a five-month maternity leave. When she returned to work, her new boss told her that she was behind and needed to work harder.

I was drowning in self-doubt, wondering whether having a child at this point in time was the wrong thing to do,” Ms. Zhao said.

Advertisement

But, she said, she never once thought about quitting her job and staying at home.

“I only have myself to rely on,” Ms. Zhao. “I must have my own career and not give it up for anything.”

A few months after Ming’s first birthday, Ms. Zhao, who is 29, decided to leave her company, and landed a job at one of the biggest tech companies in China.

Her husband would like a second child, but Ms. Zhao is not interested. Her days are already grueling enough. Her four-hour commute to work and long hours mean she gets home way past Ming’s bedtime. She rises at 6:30 a.m. to have one hour to herself to read and exercise, and one hour to play and have breakfast with her son.

After college, Ms. Zhao set aside her dream of becoming a civil servant to pursue a higher-paying job. Now, having checked off marriage and childbearing, she plans to study for the notoriously difficult civil servant exam.

Advertisement

“I divide my time, energy and money into different parts, saving the biggest part for myself, then the rest go to my parents, husband and son,” Ms. Zhao said. “I can’t let them take all of me.”

“I see no benefits to having two children.”

Guo Chunlei, 32, Influencer

Before Guo Chunlei got married, she worked at a bank in the eastern city of Hangzhou, making about $2,000 a month, decent by Chinese standards. Her parents bought her a small apartment and a car, so she spent most of her paycheck on beauty, fashion and traveling.

Advertisement

When she decided to have a baby in 2022, her husband and in-laws, who ran a booming family business in construction, encouraged her to switch to a less demanding job to have more time for the child. Ms. Guo agreed and joined a publicly traded company as an accountant. But the work was repetitive and unfulfilling, and she was earning only about a third of what she used to make.

The steep pay cut became a bigger and bigger problem. As her daughter, Tianyi, grew up, expenses began soaring. Early education classes alone ate up a third of her salary.

Seeking extra money, and a sense of purpose, Ms. Guo started a mom-influencer account on the lifestyle app Xiaohongshu last year. A post she composed about planning a traditional Chinese birthday party for her daughter got tens of thousands of views and opened the door to brand collaborations.

She now spends weekday evenings writing captions, editing photos and doing product research. Photo shoots with Tianyi in nearby parks have become a weekend family activity.

Ms. Guo’s account has amassed more than 10,000 followers and brings in more money from product sponsorships than her day job. She’s considering becoming an influencer full time, and would like to take over as her family’s main provider.

Advertisement

Ms. Guo recalls her own parents sacrificing to provide for her and her younger brother. It made her determined to follow a different path.

“I see no benefits to having two children, for either myself or for Tianyi,” she said.

I want to make something of myself.”

Tang Pingjuan, 36, Financial manager

Advertisement

Like many working women in China today, Tang Pingjuan, 36, has higher expectations than did many of the women who came before her.

Growing up under the old one-child policy, she got the undivided attention of her father, a train driver, and her mother, a teacher, she recalls. And like many girls in her generation, she was given opportunities that had once been reserved for boys.

When it came time to attend college, Ms. Tang went hundreds of miles away from home to pursue a degree in mathematics, a field dominated by men. (Nearly a third of Chinese women have college degrees now, up from fewer than 1 percent in 1990.)

After graduating, Ms. Tang landed a job in finance and then, at age 25, took a year off and used her savings to travel to more than a dozen countries. Now 36, she leads a team at a private financial company in Guangzhou, the bustling metropolis where she lives with her husband and 4-year-old daughter, Ning.

Ms. Tang earns more than her husband and makes investment decisions for the family.

Advertisement

Six months after Ning was born, Ms. Tang returned to her office, leaving the baby in the care of a grandmother. On weekends, the family likes splurging on “staycations” at luxury hotels.

Lately, she has been considering a promising job opportunity in the nearby city of Shenzhen, which could mean being separated from her family. Her husband and in-laws oppose the move, but Ms. Tang doesn’t want to be held back. She has not ruled out a second child altogether, she said, but it is not something she is considering now.

“I feel selfish for putting myself before my family, but life is long and I want to make something of myself,” she said.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Greece denies report alleging coast guard's widespread abuse of migrants

Published

on

Greece denies report alleging coast guard's widespread abuse of migrants

Greece on Monday denied a new report that accused its coast guard of brutally preventing migrants from reaching Greek shores, which also alleged that the practice had resulted in dozens of deaths.

A BBC report said it had been ascertained that 43 migrants drowned — including nine who were thrown into the water — in 15 incidents off Greece’s eastern Aegean Sea islands in 2020-2023. It cited interviews with eyewitnesses, following reports from media, charities and the Turkish coast guard.

Greek government spokesman Pavlos Marinakis insisted that there was no evidence to support the allegations.

64 MISSING, AT LEAST 11 DEAD, AFTER 2 SHIPWRECKS OFF ITALIAN COAST

“Our understanding is that what is reported is not proved,” he told a regular press briefing when asked about the claims. “Every complaint is looked into, and in the end, the relevant findings are made public.”

Advertisement

Greece is a major gateway for migrants from the Middle East, Africa and Asia seeking a better life in the affluent European Union. Thousands slip into the country every year, mostly in small boats from neighboring Turkey. Relations with Turkey are often tense, and the two countries’ coast guards have repeatedly traded accusations of mistreating migrants.

The Greek flag is photographed cast against a clear sky. (Nicolas Economou/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

Migrant charities and human rights groups have repeatedly accused Greece’s coast guard and police of illegally preventing arriving migrants from seeking asylum by surreptitiously returning them to Turkish waters. Greece has angrily denied that, arguing its border forces have saved hundreds of thousands of migrants from sinking boats.

The country’s reputation took a further knock in June 2023, when a battered fishing vessel with an estimated 750 people on board sank off southwestern Greece. Only 104 people survived, despite the Greek coast guard having shadowed the vessel for hours, and survivors claimed the trawler sank after a botched attempt by the coast guard to tow it. Greek authorities again denied these allegations.

The new BBC report included a claim by a Cameroonian man that he and two other migrants were picked up by masked men, including policemen, just after landing on the island of Samos.

Advertisement

The man claimed all three were put in a coast guard boat and thrown into the sea, and that the other two men drowned as a result.

The report also quoted a Syrian man who said he was part of a group picked up at sea by the Greek coast guard off Rhodes. He said the survivors were put in life rafts and left adrift in Turkish waters, where several died after one life raft sank before the Turkish coast guard came to pick them up.

Marinakis said “it is wrong to target” the Greek coast guard. “In any case, we monitor every report and investigation, but I repeat: What is mentioned (in the BBC report) is in no case backed up by evidence,” he said.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Concentration camp museum director joins campaign to ban AfD

Published

on

Concentration camp museum director joins campaign to ban AfD

The German far-right party AfD finished well in the European elections, but has also suffered serious legal setbacks.

ADVERTISEMENT

The director of the Buchenwald concentration camp memorial has warned that the far-right party Alternative for Germany (AfD) is too dangerous to be allowed to continue in German politics, citing lessons from the rise of the Nazi Party as a warning.

“AfD repeats the terminology of Nazis,” German historian Jens-Christian Wagner said on Monday during a press conference calling for a ban on far-right party.

“The party, i.e. the AfD and its officials and functionaries, represent positions against human dignity,” said Wagner. “They repeatedly make ideological and terminological use of the programmes and practices of historical National Socialism.”

His remarks came after the AfD finished second in the European Parliament elections in early June with around 15.9% of the vote. That put the party ahead of Germany’s ruling Social Democrats, who reached just 13.9% — their worst post-World War II result in a nationwide vote.

“The fact that the Nazis were able to come to power at all was due to the Weimar Republic allowing them to abuse democracy in order to bring down democracy according to their own rules,” Wagner explained. “Anti-constitutional parties must be deprived of the opportunity to use the means of democracy to abolish it.”

Advertisement

While the AfD’s strong performance in the European elections has alarmed its opponents, the party has also faced major setbacks over its alleged links to the extreme right. Regional leader Björn Höcke was recently fined for using a Nazi slogan at a party event, while a court upheld the party’s designation as a “suspected extremist organisation“.

The AfD was also ejected from its European Parliament group, Identity and Democracy, after former candidate Maximilian Krah told an Italian newspaper that not all members of Hitler’s SS were war criminals.

“The warnings, demonstrations and actions against the AfD have not helped so far,” said Julia Dück, a campaigner from the group AfD Ban Now. “That’s why we need an AfD ban procedure that hinders and stops this party.

“We are at a turning point that could tip authoritarian. Once the AfD has reached a position where it can translate its inhuman goals into state policy, it will no longer be so easy to turn it around. In other words, time is pressing. That means we have to act now,” she said.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending