Connect with us

Wyoming

New laws complicate Wyoming’s abortion situation as bans set to be argued in state Supreme Court | CNN

Published

on

New laws complicate Wyoming’s abortion situation as bans set to be argued in state Supreme Court | CNN



Casper, Wyoming
AP
 — 

When a Wyoming woman phoned the state’s only abortion clinic recently to make an appointment to end her pregnancy, she received news that complicated her life even more.

Wellspring Health Access had stopped providing abortions that same day, responding to a slew of new requirements for the Casper clinic to become a licensed surgical center.

“It was kind of really bad timing on my part,” said the woman, who declined to be named because of abortion’s stigma in her community.

Advertisement

Though abortion remains legal in Wyoming, it has become increasingly difficult because of new requirements for abortion clinics and women seeking abortions. In this case, the woman had to go to Colorado, which partially borders southern Wyoming.

On Wednesday, the Wyoming Supreme Court is set to hear arguments over state abortion bans that a lower court judge has suspended and struck down as unconstitutional. But even if the state high court agrees with those rulings, access to abortion in Wyoming stands to remain uncertain.

One new law targets Wellspring Health Access as Wyoming’s only abortion clinic, requiring licensure as an outpatient surgical center at a cost of up to $500,000 in renovations, according to the clinic.

The law also requires the clinic’s physicians to get admitting privileges at a hospital within 10 miles. A hospital three blocks from the clinic is under no obligation to admit its doctors, however.

“This is an abortion ban without banning abortion,” said Julie Burkhart, founder and president of Wellspring Health Access.

Advertisement

A second new law requires women to get ultrasounds at least 48 hours before a medication abortion, costing them $250 or more plus gas money and travel time in a state where ultrasounds are unavailable in many rural areas.

The Wyoming Legislature is well within its rights to regulate abortion to protect women from even the small chance of an abortion mishap, argued an attorney for the state, John Woykovsky, at a recent court hearing on the new laws.

In most cases, a transvaginal ultrasound is required to obtain a fetal image in the earliest stages of pregnancy, when most abortions are done. That invasiveness, especially for victims of rape and abuse, caused Gov. Mark Gordon, a Republican, to veto the ultrasound bill a few days after he signed the surgical center requirement into law Feb. 27.

The Republican-dominated Legislature overrode his veto, leading Wellspring Health Access, the Wyoming abortion access advocate Chelsea’s Fund and others to sue over it and the licensing law.

Meanwhile, the legal uncertainty caused Wellspring Health Access, which opened in 2023 after an arson attack delayed the original date by almost a year, to halt both medication and surgical abortions.

Advertisement

Several dozen abortion opponents attended a Tuesday hearing in Casper on whether to suspend the laws while the lawsuit moves ahead. If that happens, clinic abortions will resume, to the dismay of opponents, said Ross Schriftman, president of the local Wyoming Right to Life chapter.

“No inspections, no confirmation of whether the people committing the abortions are licensed doctors for Wyoming and no continuity of care to the hospital,” Schriftman said by email.

A former Wyoming resident who, in 2017, got an abortion in neighboring Colorado, her closest option at the time, sympathized with rural Wyoming women seeking abortions now.

“God forbid it’s the winter,” said Ciel Newman, who now lives in New Mexico. “Wyoming’s a huge, rural state without much interstate coverage.”

The amount of business at Wellspring Health Access shows that the lawmakers who passed the abortion laws are out of step with their constituents, Burkhart said.

Advertisement

“We have had people coming in our doors each and every week that we’ve been open,” Burkhart said. “If people who come from Republican states, or more traditional-leaning states, didn’t approve of abortion, we would go out of business because people just wouldn’t show up.”

In the case about to be argued before the state Supreme Court, the same groups and women are suing over laws banning abortion that Wyoming has passed since 2022. They include the first explicit ban on medication abortions in the US.

In November, a judge in Jackson ruled the bans violated a 2012 constitutional amendment guaranteeing the right of competent adults to make their own health care decisions.

Even if the justices agree, Wellspring Health Access stands to suffer. Before the new laws, the clinic saw as many as 22 patients a day, 70% of whom were there for abortions: half surgical, half by pills.

Now, Wellspring Health Access doesn’t offer abortions and sees about five patients a day, all of whom are transgender people receiving hormone replacement therapy, according to the clinic.

Advertisement

Twenty-three other states, including 14 that have not totally banned abortion, have passed requirements similar to Wyoming’s that opponents call “targeted regulation of abortion providers,” or TRAP, laws. Surgical center licensing and hospital admitting privileges are typical requirements, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a research group that advocates for abortion access.

Few states have passed TRAP laws since the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, but abortion remains an unsettled issue in several. A licensing law in Missouri stood to curtail abortions until it was blocked by a judge, pointed out Kimya Forouzan, state policy advisor for the Guttmacher Institute.

“They still have a major impact on the ability to provide care,” Forouzan said in an email.

The Wyoming woman recently seeking a surgical abortion at Wellspring Health Access had to drive more than twice as far from her hometown, more than four hours each way, to have the procedure at the Planned Parenthood in Fort Collins, Colorado.

“Even though I support abortion fully, it’s not something that I thought I personally would ever do,” the woman said, adding that Wellspring Health Access helped cover her costs.

Advertisement

“It was a humbling experience,” she said. “It just gave me a lot more compassion for people who have experienced abortions as well as people who aren’t able to take that route.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Wyoming

Wyoming Water Development Commission Notice of Public Meeting for the Hudson Water Master Plan Level I Study

Published

on

Wyoming Water Development Commission Notice of Public Meeting for the Hudson Water Master Plan Level I Study


Date: Wednesday, June 18, 2025Time: 6 p.m. – 7:30 p.m. MTLocation: Hudson Town Hall333 South Main StreetHudson, WY 82515 The Wyoming Water Development Office (WWDO), in conjunction with the Town of Hudson, will hold a public meeting to present the draft results of the Hudson Water Master Plan and to solicit public comment. A brief […]



Source link

Continue Reading

Wyoming

(LETTERS) Americans culpable for Israeli atrocities; Casper council senseless on nuclear waste; 'Affordable' entertainment at Wyoming Ford Center?; Bloated billionaire bill

Published

on

(LETTERS) Americans culpable for Israeli atrocities; Casper council senseless on nuclear waste; 'Affordable' entertainment at Wyoming Ford Center?; Bloated billionaire bill


Oil City News publishes letters, cartoons and opinions as a public service. The content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of Oil City News or its employees. Letters to the editor can be submitted by following the link at our opinion section.


Dear Casper,

I just watched the 1942 movie “Flying Tigers,” starring John Wayne. An early scene shows Chinese children receiving and eating U.S. food aid. Without warning, Japanese planes swoop down and bomb them. The final image of this scene is of a soot-covered child crying amid destruction. The message is clear: an immoral enemy that deliberately attacks children deserves merciless resistance.

Advertisement

My mind leapt to Gaza today. Instead of fighting like John Wayne against such horrific acts, we Americans are providing the means to the Israelis to commit even worse atrocities, specifically the targeting of children and healthcare workers. Without American military and economic aid, and our carte blanche diplomatic support, the Israelis would not be able to perpetrate what they are doing. This makes all of us Americans equally culpable for their atrocities.

Israel is working hard to control the narrative of their actions in Gaza, notably denying media access. Unfortunately, the label of antisemite is now often attached to those who are critical of Israel. But being outraged at intentional mass killings of civilians, especially children and healthcare workers, doesn’t make someone an antisemite. It means they are a person with some semblance of a moral compass.

We live in a world saturated with extreme media bias. Some may discount my views as regurgitated propaganda. But even staunch allies of Israel are publicly recognizing that Israeli actions in Gaza go far beyond any degree moral acceptability.

Yes, there is so much going on in the world that may anger and shock us. How do we decide which causes are worth fighting for? See if you can find some reputable information on Israeli drones deliberating shooting young children. If you can, then were does this particular cause fall on your priority list now?

We are currently taking hard looks at how the U.S. government spends its money. This involves asking some very hard questions. I would ask, are we OK with cutting healthcare funding for the most vulnerable Americans, while at the same time continuing to bankroll the morally indefensible, systemic actions of Israel? Which side of the moral compass do we want to be on? And how do we square ourselves to the legacy of the Greatest Generation who sacrificed so much to stop the strong from exterminating the weak?

Advertisement

Tom Smyth
Casper


Dear Casper,

Nice to know the City Council is senseless. You obviously don’t care about human life at all. You make decisions like you are the only people that matter. You neglect your duties as a council when you risk the health and welfare of everyone that lives in Bar Nunn with nuclear waste.

Thank you for serving the public and ignoring the people that elected you. I hope come voting time you are all getting an eye opener. Every person on that council will be sued for what you do when the people in our town start getting sick we can hold you all responsible because you failed the people.

Just like with Coates Road, you don’t give two iotas about the people you’re supposed to be serving.

Advertisement

It is blatant disregard for the folks who bought and paid for their property and we pay taxes. Your overall conduct is abhorrent in these matters.

I think you all should quit disrespecting our rights as citizens to live a healthy life safely in our homes. I have lost all hope that you folks care for anything but lining your pockets and building needless tennis courts. Not in our town.

Not our children and grandchildren shouldn’t be at risk. Let’s put the nuclear plant next to your homes. Let’s see how you like it.

Amber Sparks
Bar Nunn


Dear Casper,

Advertisement

In 2016, when the City of Casper entered into an agreement with Spectra Venue Management to oversee operations at then the Casper Events Center, residents were promised more affordable and accessible entertainment — all while reducing the city’s subsidy to the facility.

Further revenue-generating deals followed: a partnership with Sinclair Oil in 2017 to modernize the ticket-buying process, and naming rights sold to Ford dealerships in 2021.

Today, the facility is called the Ford Wyoming Center and is managed by OVG360, which acquired Spectra in 2021. The City of Casper renewed its agreement with OVG360 for another 10 years in 2022, continuing to promise lower subsidies and accessible entertainment for families.

However, my wife and I took our youngest daughter to “Sesame Street Live” recently, and we spent $200 for three tickets and another $14 on stale popcorn and warm soda. This is a steep price for a children’s show.

This raises an important question: Is the original goal of affordability still being met? This wasn’t a Metallica concert — the glory days of cool concerts in Casper are dead and gone. This was Sesame Street — the kind of event that should be packed with toddlers, parents and grandparents. It is a family-oriented show built on characters designed to reach children — many of whom come from underprivileged backgrounds. And when families have to think twice or go into debt to attend something as basic as Sesame Street, something is broken.

Advertisement

I’m not writing this to complain for the sake of complaining. I’m writing as someone who remembers the promises made to this community. While I understand that national tours come with associated costs, $200 for three tickets feels out of reach for many working families in our area. And if pricing families out of a children’s show is the new normal, then those promises have fallen flat.

The clearest evidence that prices were too high wasn’t a statistic — it was the rows of empty seats in a venue less than half full. This should have been a sold-out show but the luxury price the management company had set for this show kept families away.

The city leaders and venue management need to do better. A half empty arena should be a wake-up call and they clearly need to rethink how accessibility is being defined. Casper families deserve access to community events without feeling like they have to take out a loan to enjoy them.

Alan Corey
Casper


Dear Casper,

Advertisement

When President Donald Trump unveiled his One Big Beautiful Bill earlier this year, the fanfare focused on slashing regulations and delivering tax cuts. What got buried, first by design, then by damage control, was who would be footing the bill: working-class Americans.

The original version didn’t include eliminating home heating aid, cutting food assistance or slashing Medicaid. Those were last-minute additions made to appease Republican deficit hawks in the House who were alarmed by the cost. And they had reason to worry. The bill would add nearly a trillion dollars a year to the national deficit, mostly to pay for massive tax breaks for corporations and high-income earners.

Nobody proposed smaller tax cuts. Instead, they demanded more spending cuts, all on the backs of seniors and working people, especially the working poor. Defense spending stayed intact. Subsidies for big oil and Wall Street giveaways stayed intact. But if you’re poor and trying to stay warm, feed your kids or afford basic healthcare, you were the first to be thrown overboard.

LIHEAP, the heating assistance program that helps more than 6 million low-income households — including thousands in Wyoming — was zeroed out. Not reduced. Eliminated. No more federal help heating your home in the middle of a Wyoming winter.

Medicaid, which covers more than 70 million Americans, including low-wage workers, children, seniors in nursing homes and people with disabilities, faces billions in cuts. Millions will lose care. Many will die. And the rest of us will still pay for it, only now through higher emergency room costs and local hospital bailouts.

Advertisement

Food assistance is also on the chopping block. Fewer groceries, more hunger.

And if all that weren’t enough, the bill quietly raises taxes on people making under $30,000 per year by phasing out deductions and tightening eligibility for refundable credits. The people with the least will pay more and get less, so the people with the most can pay less and get more.

This reverse-Robin Hood bill has been called by The Nation and The Atlantic the largest transfer of wealth in U.S. history.

These cuts weren’t in Trump’s original proposal. They were added to make the math appear to work, or at least to let House Republicans pretend it did. What passed the House is not just cruel. It is dishonest.

Now Senate Majority Leader John Thune says the only way this bill will pass is with even more cuts. More cuts?

Advertisement

Wyoming may be a red state, but we are also a working-class state. Many of us live paycheck to paycheck or survive on modest Social Security checks. These cuts are not abstract here. They are personal.

It’s time for Sens. Barrasso and Lummis to stop hiding behind slogans and stand with Wyoming families.

They must vote no. No to tax hikes on the working poor. No to gutting Medicaid and food aid. No to freezing out Wyoming just to pad the yachts of billionaires.

Senators, Wyoming is watching. Don’t betray us.

Gina Douglas
Casper

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Wyoming

Wyoming Outdoor Recreation Grants Generate Over $36 Million in Economic Activity Statewide

Published

on

Wyoming Outdoor Recreation Grants Generate Over  Million in Economic Activity Statewide


A new report released this month by the Jay Kemmerer WORTH Institute and the Center for Business and Economic Analysis at the University of Wyoming reveals the impressive economic impact of the Wyoming Outdoor Recreation Grant Program.

The program, which distributed more than $20 million in federal American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds — along with an additional $3 million in local matching contributions — has spurred more than $36 million in economic activity across the state.

The study, conducted in collaboration between the Wyoming Office of Outdoor Recreation and WORTH (Wyoming Outdoor Recreation, Tourism and Hospitality), shows that these infrastructure investments supported 211 jobs, generated $12.2 million in labor income and contributed $19.8 million to Wyoming’s gross domestic product (GDP). These impacts include both direct construction activity and long-term economic gains from increased outdoor recreation and tourism.

“Wyoming has long been known for its wide-open spaces and outstanding recreation opportunities,” says Dan McCoy, director of UW’s WORTH Institute. “This report confirms that investing in recreation infrastructure is not only good for quality of life, but it is a sound economic strategy.”

Advertisement

Using economic modeling tools IMPLAN and REMI, the report details how trailhead improvements, bike parks and other amenities are already boosting visitation and creating ripple effects throughout the state’s economy. By 2036, permanent impacts are projected to include up to 3.96 new jobs annually, $319,000 in labor income and $653,000 in annual economic output each year.

“Outdoor recreation is one of the cornerstones of the state’s economy. These grants bolster outdoor recreation projects which, in turn, create jobs, stimulate local economies and improve access,” says Mark Tesoro, manager of the Wyoming Outdoor Recreation Office. “This report is a clear demonstration of the value outdoor recreation brings to communities across the state.”

The report also highlights the geographic diversity of the grant awards, with funded projects in Albany, Fremont, Laramie, Lincoln, Natrona and Sweetwater counties. From the Pilot Hill trailhead in Laramie to trail and campground improvements on the Wind River Indian Reservation, these investments are making lasting differences in both rural and urban communities, McCoy says.

To view the full economic impact report, visit: https://doi.org/10.15786/wyoscholar/10085.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending