Connect with us

West

Winery, brewery, bagel shop team up to call out Berkeley's permissiveness of homeless encampments

Published

on

Winery, brewery, bagel shop team up to call out Berkeley's permissiveness of homeless encampments

Several businesses in Berkeley, California, including a winery and a brewery, are suing the City of Berkeley for its failure to remove homeless encampments near them, which has hurt their profits.

The lawsuit was filed in Alameda County this week by eight businesses, including Covenant Winery, Emily Winston of Boichik Bagels and Fieldwork Brewing against the City of Berkeley.

The plaintiffs allege the case is about the City of Berkeley being required to follow the same nuisance laws private landowners must follow, while also owing an obligation to its citizens to maintain its streets and other public rights of way free from obstructions.

Over the past few years, the businesses claim, the city has allowed homeless encampments to remain on Harrison Street between Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth and Ninth Streets; along Codornices Creek; and in the Lower Dwight neighborhood.

NEWSOM CLEANS UP HOMELESS CALIFORNIA ENCAMPMENTS AFTER HE ALLOCATED BILLIONS OF DOLLARS WHILE CRISIS GREW

Advertisement

The City of Berkeley, California, is being sued by several businesses for failing to remove homeless encampments. (Superior Court of the State Of California County of Alameda)

The plaintiffs say in the lawsuit they believe the city allowed the encampments when the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit “erroneously” ruled in two cases, saying a city may not criminalize public camping if there is no alternative space available for the campers to relocate.

While the decisions did not allow or require the city to permit encampments in a way in which it created a public nuisance, the city permitted and invited encampments in Harrison and Lower Dwight, knowing they would be a public nuisance, the plaintiffs allege.

The city also allowed encampments to remain in place despite shelter space being available.

GOV NEWSOM ORDERS HOMELESS ENCAMPMENTS TORN DOWN ACROSS CALIFORNIA: ‘NO MORE EXCUSES’

Advertisement

But in 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the Ninth Circuit’s decisions and said municipalities are permitted to remove public encampments whether sufficient alternative space is available or not.

The businesses said in the lawsuit they believe the city refuses to act, in part, because it fears litigation by advocates of those living in RVs and those who are homeless.

By filing the lawsuit, the businesses are asking the court to step in and require the city to follow the law and remove the encampments so the neighborhoods will be free of public and private nuisance conditions.

MASSIVE CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL TOWER TO OFFER HOMELESS PRIVATE ROOMS, GYM, CAFE AND MORE AMENITIES

Berkeley-Homeless-Encampment-3

The City of Berkeley, California, is being sued by several businesses for failing to remove homeless encampments. (Superior Court of the State Of California County of Alameda)

Fox News Digital has reached out to the city manager and some of the businesses who filed the lawsuit for comment.

Advertisement

The businesses are represented by Gavrilov & Brooks of Sacramento and Arizona-based Tully Bailey LLP. The latter won a case in 2023 that required the city of Phoenix to clear a homeless camp within the city limits.

Ilan Wurman, an attorney from Tully Bailey LLP who is on the Berkeley case, told Fox News Digital the Supreme Court’s decision earlier this year that held cities have the authority to remove homeless encampments, does not compel them to do so.

“It has become clear that Berkeley, even though it has shelter to offer, and its offers are routinely refused, does not plan to do anything about the encampments,” Wurman said. “Only a public nuisance lawsuit can force the city to do the right thing and clean up the city. This legal theory was deployed successfully in Phoenix, and we are optimistic it will work in Berkeley, too.”

FOX 2 in San Francisco spoke with Winston, who said she has tried to work with the city over the years to control the encampment near her business.

“It’s tough. It’s filthy. There’s trash everywhere. The street is frightening to drive down for customers. It’s not safe for our customers or our staff,” Winston said.

Advertisement

She also told the station she wants the unhoused residents to receive shelter and treatment they need but also called the city out for failing to improve conditions, forcing her to pursue legal action.

HOMELESS PERSON ALLEGEDLY ABDUCTS 4-YEAR-OLD AT CALIFORNIA RESTAURANT AMID UPTICK OF CRIME

Governor Gavin Newsom along with Caltrans clean up an encampment site near Paxton Street and Remick Avenue in Los Angeles as the state's Clean California initiative continues on Thursday, Aug. 8, 2024 in Los Angeles, CA.

Gov. Gavin Newsom along with a Caltrans cleanup crew at an encampment site near Paxton Street and Remick Avenue in Los Angeles as the state’s Clean California initiative continues Aug. 8, 2024, in Los Angeles. (Jason Armond/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)

“I was not eager to do this. This was certainly not my idea of a good time. I wish the city would just have cleaned it up anyway,” she said.

Homeless encampments are a growing problem across California.

Gov. Gavin Newsom took to the streets of California in August to clean up trash left behind by homeless encampments, threatening municipalities that if they do not clean up encampments, they will lose state funding next year.

Advertisement

“I want to see results,” Newsom said at the time. “I don’t want to read about them. I don’t want to see the data. I want to see it.”

Homelessness has skyrocketed in the Golden State under Newsom’s leadership. According to the 2024 point-in-time count, which provides a snapshot of homelessness on a given night, the number of homeless individuals in California increased to approximately 172,000. This represented an increase from the estimated 131,000 homeless individuals counted in 2018, the year Newsom took office.

OAKLAND HOMELESS WOMAN STEALS CITY COUNCIL CANDIDATE’S FUNDRAISING MONEY: ‘I WAS LEFT TO FEND FOR MYSELF’

Berkeley-Homeless-Encampment-2

The City of Berkeley, California, is being sued by several businesses for failing to remove homeless encampments. (Superior Court of the State Of California County of Alameda)

Earlier this year, Newsom’s administration blamed counties and cities after a state audit report found his own homelessness task force failed to track how billions of dollars have been spent trying to tackle the crisis in the last five years. 

At the time, a senior spokesperson for the California Interagency Council on Homelessness (CICH), which coordinates homeless programs across the state, told Fox News Digital the audit’s findings “highlight the significant progress made in recent years to address homelessness at the state level, including the completion of a statewide assessment of homelessness programs.”

Advertisement

Over the past five years, the CICH didn’t consistently track whether the money actually improved the situation, the audit concluded.

The spokesperson added local governments “are primarily responsible for implementing these programs and collecting data on outcomes that the state can use to evaluate program effectiveness.”

Since 2016, California has spent over $25 billion on homelessness. This includes state, local and federal funding allocated toward boosting the state’s “housing first” ideology through various programs, which prioritize placing people in housing first before addressing mental illness or substance abuse problems.

Fox News’ Jamie Joseph contributed to this report.

Advertisement

Read the full article from Here

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Washington

Chris Mason: Joe Biden and Keir Starmer try to second guess Putin

Published

on

Chris Mason: Joe Biden and Keir Starmer try to second guess Putin


In the hours before the prime minister was taken by motorcade to the White House, he and his team were in a secure room at the nearby British Embassy.

This is a room designed for conversations spies are not meant to hear, however sophisticated their techniques for eavesdropping and intercepting digital exchanges.

The Downing Street team were talking to British government staff in Ukraine and Russia, assembling their briefing and approach for their forthcoming conversation with President Biden.

They arrived at the White House in the late afternoon Washington time, the president showing Sir Keir Starmer around the Rose Garden before heading for the Blue Room.

Advertisement

On each side of a long rectangular table, the two delegations, the prime minister and president with seven colleagues each alongside them.

For just a few minutes, we reporters were invited in too.

Warm words from the leaders followed by loud questions and prompt ejection for the journalists.

What followed was about 90 minutes of conversation in private.

Ukraine dominated, but not to the exclusion of other issues – not least the Middle East, China and Iran.

Advertisement

Downing Street had sought in advance to portray this as an opportunity for a deeper conversation than the usual round of international summits often allow.

But why bother when President Biden is soon to be yesterday’s man, out of office, power and influence in four months time?

The urgency of the issues on the table, I am told.

Take Ukraine: an ally of both the UK and the US, still in desperate need of ongoing help as its friends weigh up how best to provide it – and at what cost.

The UK has been “forward facing” as it was put to me in making the case to others to agree to Kyiv’s request to be allowed to fire western missiles into Russia.

Advertisement

President Biden is sceptical, fearful it could drag America and Europe into direct conflict with Moscow.

That is just what Vladimir Putin has been hinting at in the last few days.

Then again his sabre rattling in the past hasn’t come to much, so perhaps it wouldn’t again?

But maybe, this time, it would.

Diplomacy and intelligence turning to the psychology of a leader at war, attempting to second guess how he might react.

Advertisement

Would he really contemplate a military attack on a Nato member state – with the frightening potential of hauling the whole western alliance into war with Russia?

And, if not that, would Ukraine’s allies stomach lower level aggression in retaliation, such as cyber attacks or damaging sub-sea communication cables?

There was little expectation this meeting would resolve the question about western missiles, not least because further conversations with others at the United Nations are expected shortly.

Afterwards, the prime minister wouldn’t be drawn on whether he had persuaded the president to change his mind.

This is a conflict without obvious end which presents too no end of thorny dilemmas based around a recurring theme: how to defeat Russia without provoking Moscow.

Advertisement

What could be the consequences of action?

And what could be the consequences of inaction?

It is the essence of the West’s challenge since the full scale invasion of Ukraine two and a half years ago.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wyoming

Why Wyoming fans are ready to welcome BYU football back to Laramie

Published

on

Why Wyoming fans are ready to welcome BYU football back to Laramie


LARAMIE, Wyo. — The most iconic bar in town may surprise you.

It hangs from the ceiling at the Buck Horn, a popular watering hole in downtown Laramie just a half mile away from the University of Wyoming campus, ripped from a football goal post with a simple, framed explanation hanging below:

Nov. 13, 1999. Wyoming 31, BYU 17.

The goal post crossbar from Wyoming’s 1999 win over BYU is displayed at the Buck Horn bar in Laramie. | Jackson Payne, Deseret News

On an unusually warm autumn evening a quarter-century ago, upon toppling the No. 15-ranked Cougars (and preventing them from earning an outright conference championship), a rowdy sea of Cowboy fans spilled onto the field at War Memorial Stadium in hysteria, tearing down a goal post and marching it down Grand Avenue through the heart of Laramie.

Advertisement

“They don’t like it when you do that now,” Wyoming student government representative Rece Robertson said of the impromptu goal post removal. “But there will be a lot of energy and hype around town if Wyoming beats BYU this weekend.”

There’s already a palpable buzz throughout Cowboy country as the Cougars come to visit for the first time since 2009. The Buck Horn’s famous crossbar is just one reminder of how hot the historic rivalry once burned, and those fiery feelings toward BYU have never been forgotten.

Wyoming fans tear down one of the goal posts after the Cowboys defeated BYU 13-10 in Laramie on Oct. 18, 2003. Wyoming fans pulled off the same stunt in another win over the Cougars in 1999. | Stuart Johnson, Deseret News

“It was always such a dark, good rivalry,” Wyoming alumna Erin Rumsey said. “The whole state felt that BYU was a team we couldn’t beat. Sometimes we did, but usually we didn’t. Winning against BYU is a huge deal.”

The Cougars and Cowboys shared four conferences — the Rocky Mountain, Skyline, WAC and Mountain West — over an 88-year span. They’ve faced off on 79 occasions, with BYU holding a 46-30-3 series advantage along with a current nine-game win streak.

With Saturday’s contest between the two teams being just the third since 2010, I set out to gauge the rivalry’s current temperature around Laramie, mingling with dozens of students, alumni and locals around town to see if any hostility toward BYU still remains.

Long story short: It does.

Advertisement

Many individuals I spoke with declined to be quoted, though their colorful vocabulary would have been impossible to print anyway. While not every conversation was R-rated, the overwhelming consensus suggested widespread contempt for the Cougars even after all these years.

“I could never forget our chants against BYU — they should never be repeated or printed,” said Lee Feather, a ′77 Wyoming grad who traveled from the northern part of the state for Saturday’s game. “I honestly don’t know why we don’t like BYU. It’s just always been that way. … Disliking BYU is just part of being a Cowboys fan, even still today.”

The Buck Horn bar, one of the prime gathering spots for Wyoming fans, is pictured here in Laramie. | Jackson Payne, Deseret News

Though Wyoming students still consider Colorado State to be their foremost foe, BYU still and will always register as a rival on campus, where hundreds of alumni are returning from all across the country to catch Saturday’s action. Given the excitement, you would hardly realize the Cowboys are 0-2 thus far on the season.

“I think it will always be a rivalry and the students will always consider it like that, just given the history of these two teams,” said Mason Riding, the sports editor for Wyoming’s campus publication the Branding Iron. “It just makes sense. There’s a lot of passion here when it comes to rivalries, and we get really excited for these games … especially just because it’s been so long since BYU has come to town, and it will probably be a really long time if they even come back again.”

I received a number of explanations for the continued angst against the Cougars. The win-loss record over the years is one thing, but BYU’s perceived arrogance in bolting from the Mountain West more than a decade ago is still a sore subject. Others claimed that LaVell Edwards-led teams played dirty or “held the refs in their pocket.”

“That 1981 game was so much fun,” Feather said of Wyoming’s 33-20 win over the No. 13-ranked Cougars. “Jim McMahon was such a turkey, I really hated him. Wins against BYU just stick with you.”

Advertisement

And then there is religion. “Christians in our community have a hard time with (BYU) for whatever reason,” Rumsey explains.

The Black 14 scandal is still a heavy chapter in school lore. Fraternity houses are currently flying flags with mild digs, and Wyoming’s Western Thunder Marching Band plans to change the lyrics to its famous “Beer Song” to poke light fun at BYU’s stone-cold sober status. “It’s out of love,” a band member insists.

One woman even took issue with BYU’s pregame alumni tailgate sponsoring a food drive to give back to underprivileged individuals in Laramie. “They think they’re so much holier than us, and it’s fake,” she ranted.

“(Wyoming fans) are not shy or afraid of talking trash,” said one male student who wished to remain anonymous. “You’re going to hear a lot of banter from the student section about that (religious) aspect, and there may be chants that are mocking the religion. … I don’t think it’s necessarily hate speech or anything like that, I just think it’s part of the rivalry that people get really into and (religion) is an aspect that plays into it.”

Wyoming’s “Breakin’ Through” statue is shown in front of War Memorial Stadium in Laramie. | Jackson Payne, Deseret News

Even with all of the animosity, wherever it may be coming from, the Cougars’ return to War Memorial Stadium feels almost perfectly timed. With the Pac-12′s addition of four Mountain West schools — including Colorado State — Wyoming’s future seems to be in flux. Both its conference and rivalry outlooks are murky, and it would be easy for the Cowboys to be counted out of the new college football landscape.

“We’re definitely a much smaller campus and don’t generally get as many superstars; we’re always kind of (nationally) treated like the bottom of the barrel, which I don’t always think is fair,” Robertson said. “It will be a good feeling for the college and the community to have somebody in town (like BYU) that we’ve played constantly over the years.”

Advertisement

To many, BYU being back in town is an appreciated distraction from Wyoming’s uncertainty ahead, along with a reminder of torn-down goal posts, beating McMahon and other warm memories from the good ol’ days.

Clinging to such memories will be needed in a place like Laramie.

“Wyoming is never in the (realignment) conversation, their name doesn’t ever really get thrown around there,” Riding added. “With BYU coming in, it’s rejuvenating for everyone, especially if Wyoming wins.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

More big-name stores opening and expanding at San Francisco's Union Square

Published

on

More big-name stores opening and expanding at San Francisco's Union Square


SAN FRANCISCO (KGO) — There are some signs of improvement in San Francisco’s Union Square, which has seen a significant loss of retailers in the past four years.

The area is now seeing an uptick in new businesses moving in. Several big-name stores have just opened and more are expected by the end of the month.

If you are looking for a Rolex watch, you can now find it on Post Street in Union Square.

The new Rolex store opened last month.

Advertisement

Despite the many “for lease” signs in the Union Square area, Kazuko Morgan, executive vice chair for commercial real estate firm Cushman and Wakefield, says there’s a lot going on there right now.

MORE: SF’s Saks Fifth Avenue shifting to ‘appointment-only’ shopping, announces layoffs, report says

“There are several other tenants that have signed leases or are in lease negotiations in Union Square,” Morgan said.

Morgan helps find tenants for exclusive retail spaces in Union Square.

“Rolex opened a few weeks ago. Patek Phillip is opening this month. St. John’s relocated from the Four Seasons to Post Street,” Morgan said.

Advertisement

Christopher Clark gallery relocated from Geary Street to Post Street. Max Mara is under construction and will open by the end of the month.

Morgan says a lot of new businesses are expanding or moving into Union Square.

MORE: SF’s Union Square: How it’s doing 1 year after new zoning regulations went into effect

“A lot of work was done over the last year in terms of getting leases done,” Morgan said.

Downtown San Francisco continues to grapple with record-high office vacancy rates. During the second quarter of this year, it was nearly 37%.

Advertisement

In Union Square though, the vacancy rate during the same period was nearly 22% according to Cushman and Wakefield.

Morgan says spaces are leased or in negotiation, even though the signs have not been taken down.

Next year, a new Nintendo store will go up at 331 Powell Street in Union Square.

MORE: SF Union Square on path to economic recovery: Here are the signs and roadblocks

As for the San Francisco Macy’s flagship store, that’s expected to stay open until the property is sold.

Advertisement

Macy’s released this statement saying:

“Macy’s Union Square remains open as the Fall and Holiday Season draws near…We are working in close partnership with the Mayor’s Office and others as we explore options for this location.”

Morgan says people often think San Francisco is a challenging market to enter, that it’s expensive or that the best locations have been taken.

But not now.

MORE: SF’s Saks Fifth Avenue shifting to ‘appointment-only’ shopping, announces layoffs, report says

Advertisement

“For the first time in my career, there’s a lot of good opportunity for brands, and landlords are most flexible we’ve ever seen,” Morgan said.

Mayor London Breed’s Office released this statement Friday saying:

“Mayor Breed looks forward to continue to build on the momentum we are seeing from businesses and corporations that are investing in Union Square and in San Francisco’s future, including Breitling, Nintendo, and Visa.”

Morgan and others hope the momentum continues for business to survive and thrive in Union Square.

Copyright © 2024 KGO-TV. All Rights Reserved.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending