Connect with us

Washington

Car buyers love EVs but hate the prices. That’s bad for green-energy hopes.

Published

on

Car buyers love EVs but hate the prices. That’s bad for green-energy hopes.


Remark

At Washington’s annual auto present this previous week, Shawn Strayhorne and his father made a beeline for Ford’s F-150 Lightning.

Peering into the electrical pickup’s entrance trunk — a cavernous cupboard space that doubles as a cooler, situated the place the gas-guzzling engine was — they declared themselves impressed. However Strayhorne stated he wasn’t able to be “an early adopter” of a car that ranges from $56,000 to $100,000.

Advertisement

“Sooner or later, this may go down in worth. Proper now it’s a little bit too tough and costly to purchase,” he stated. Sporting an Air Drive veteran cap, his father, Ronald Strayhorne Sr., stated it was finest to attend till the truck has an extended observe report. “Let others do the tryout,” he stated.

Their wait-and-see method, shared by many on the present, may undermine a centerpiece of the Biden administration’s green-energy agenda: a push to have plug-in automobiles make up half of latest car gross sales by 2030. Electrical automotive gross sales rose sharply final 12 months to assert 5.4 p.c of the U.S. market, with many fashions attracting lengthy ready lists of consumers. However client worries about excessive costs, sparse charging infrastructure and the dangers of road-testing new expertise are nonetheless obstacles to mainstream acceptance, analysts and automotive consumers say.

New federal tax credit as much as $7,500 for electrical automobiles in-built North America may assist juice demand. However the administration continues to be figuring out the nice print on which automobiles qualify, leaving many shoppers and auto sellers confused. And the incentives come after an eye-popping leap in auto costs over the previous two years that has pushed many consumers out of any car market, electrical or gas-fired.

The typical new automotive offered for $49,507 within the U.S. on the finish of final 12 months, however the common absolutely electrical automotive value 24% extra — $61,448, in accordance with information supplier Kelley Blue E-book.

“These excessive car costs have gotten out of attain for many shoppers,” Charles Chesbrough, senior economist at Cox Automotive, informed a convention in Detroit this month, referring to all automobiles, together with electrical.

Advertisement

As extra EV fashions hit the market, there are indicators that competitors is softening costs — a pattern some analysts suppose may speed up within the coming months. EV big Tesla has slashed costs on a number of events in current weeks as rivals reduce into its market share in america and abroad. “Tesla worth cuts usher within the nice EV deflation,” a Morgan Stanley analysis be aware declared this week.

Making electrical automobiles a better attain for the plenty stays a significant pillar of U.S. inexperienced power coverage. The Biden administration and supporters in Congress are directing tens of billions of {dollars} to the challenge over the following decade, calling it key to boosting American manufacturing and slicing greenhouse fuel emissions in half by 2030.

“Realistically, there are some issues that concern me about attending to the [EV] volumes and market share we’re aiming for,” stated Brett Smith, an analyst on the Heart for Automotive Analysis in Ann Arbor, Mich.

For its half, the Biden administration is armed with counterpoints to fight upfront EV sticker shock. Michael Berube, deputy assistant secretary for sustainable transportation on the Power Division, stated in an interview that tax credit will decrease the preliminary prices for a lot of Individuals, whereas new battery expertise will drive down EV prices over time. He additionally talked up the long-term financial savings of going electrical.

“You get the financial savings after all on the upkeep — 40 p.c decrease upkeep and restore value. And the fee to gasoline a automotive is tremendously decrease,” he stated. “In the event you have been to refill a typical automotive at this time it’s $49 for a fuel automotive, $14 in case you are charging at dwelling and round $27 is you’re fast-charging exterior … to go the identical distance.”

Advertisement

Huge automakers stay optimistic and are investing tens of billions of {dollars} to launch dozens of EVs within the coming months.

Battle to dethrone Tesla heats up simply as Musk is distracted by Twitter

On the Detroit automotive convention this month, Dan Nicholson, a Common Motors vp, rattled off all the electrical fashions the corporate plans to launch within the coming months, together with a Silverado pickup, a Cadillac Celestiq and an Equinox SUV. GM says the Equinox will begin at $30,000. Extra alternative of low-priced fashions, together with the roughly $27,000 Chevy Bolt EV, will assist lure shoppers, he stated.

“We expect while you give clients a alternative, [demand] goes to be greater than many individuals suppose,” Nicholson stated.

Rod Lache, managing director of Wolfe Analysis, additionally expressed hope that competitors and incentives within the not too long ago handed Inflation Discount Act will decrease EV prices. Along with the tax credit score for consumers, the regulation offers beneficiant tax breaks to U.S. producers of car batteries. If a few of these financial savings are handed on to shoppers, costs on some fashions may fall considerably, he informed the convention.

Advertisement

Nevertheless, other than worth, one other large drawback could possibly be looming, Lache stated. Lack of charging infrastructure — and frequent studies of damaged chargers — proceed to plague electrical automotive homeowners. “You may doubtlessly injury the business for a while if that’s not addressed quickly,” he added.

The White Home goals to handle that drawback with the bipartisan infrastructure regulation signed by President Biden in 2021, which gives $7.5 billion to subsidize building of EV charging stations. The federal authorities has begun distributing that funding to states, which can considerably enhance drivers’ expertise, Berube stated. “The community that’s on the market at this time hasn’t seen the good thing about these funds but,” he stated.

Vary and availability of charging stations have been among the many high issues that auto-show attendees cited. Elka McIntyre of Rockville, Md., stated her husband wished to purchase a totally electrical Kia EV6, however she nixed the thought as a result of their condominium constructing lacks charging. The couple simply ordered a Kia Sportage hybrid as an alternative.

“I feel there’s a variety of work to do to make it extra accessible — not only for charging however simply price-wise,” she stated of EVs. “For the common individual within the U.S. it’s simply not reasonably priced.”

Testing a blue Chevy Bolt EV, retired D.C. resident Ed Smith stated he needs to go electrical however is most involved about value. “I feel EVs are overpriced proper now. I just like the expertise however the worth is frankly extra vital to me,” he stated.

Advertisement

The Bolt, like different EVs assembled in North America and priced below sure thresholds, qualifies for the $7,500 tax credit score, a perk that Smith stated would make the automotive reasonably priced to him. However he expressed uncertainty about how lengthy the automotive will qualify for the complete credit score, provided that the Biden administration continues to be finalizing guidelines about how a lot of a car’s battery should originate in america or sure pleasant nations. The Treasury Division has stated it’s going to suggest the brand new guidelines in March.

“The incentives are going to be altering, most likely within the subsequent few months,” Smith stated. “One thing like this you’d have to purchase fairly rapidly, by March. And I’m not prepared to purchase by March.” Auto business executives say many sellers are additionally confused on that time, making it onerous for them to advertise the tax credit to potential consumers.

GM believes it’s “well-positioned” to proceed qualifying for tax credit as a result of it’s “actively pursuing alternatives to localize as a lot of the availability chain as potential,” spokesman Matthew Ybarra stated.

Smith added that he doesn’t have a storage the place he can set up a charger, and isn’t wild in regards to the thought of stringing a charging twine from his home to the road, as a few of his neighbors have completed.

Tenia Grey, a 24-year-old from Baltimore perusing EVs along with her grandfather, stated she wasn’t anxious about discovering charging regardless that her condominium advanced lacks it. “I’m trying to change the carbon footprint as a result of I’m simply attempting to save lots of the atmosphere,” she stated.

Advertisement

However most different attendees who spoke with The Washington Submit expressed issues about charging and battery vary, whilst they checked out electrical fashions and stated they wished to purchase one sooner or later.

Ricki Thomas stated he doesn’t need to should cease for 30 or 40 minutes to cost in the course of the highway journeys to Florida he takes just a few occasions a 12 months. “We’re involved in these however we simply need to see the battery expertise advance a little bit bit,” he stated after wanting on the Hyundai Ioniq 6. “For a commute automotive that is good,” he added.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Washington

Jayden Daniels Will Keep Commanders Competitive vs. Lions

Published

on

Jayden Daniels Will Keep Commanders Competitive vs. Lions


The Washington Commanders have made many changes to go from a four-win team to three wins away from winning the Super Bowl, but none have been more impactful than drafting quarterback Jayden Daniels with the No. 2 overall pick.

Daniels may be a rookie, but he plays like an established veteran. That’s why Bleacher Report writer Maurice Moton believes that the Commanders will be competitive this weekend against the 15-2 Detroit Lions in the Divisional Round.

“The Commanders slowed down the Buccaneers’ third-ranked offense in a road victory last week, and Daniels helped position them to kick the game-winning field,” Moton writes.

“Head coach Dan Quinn and coordinator Joe Whitt have molded the team’s defense into a respectable unit throughout the season. In clutch moments, Daniels is far beyond his years.

Advertisement

“Washington won’t shut down the Lions offense, but along with Daniels, it can do enough to keep the score margin in the single digits.”

The Commanders are still underdogs since the Lions have arguably been the best team in the NFL this season, but Daniels won’t allow Washington to fold. He hasn’t done so yet, so there’s no reason why it would happen now.

Kickoff between the Commanders and Lions is scheduled for tomorrow at 8 p.m. ET.

Stick with CommanderGameday and the Locked On Commanders podcast for more FREE coverage of the Washington Commanders throughout the 2024 season.

• Commanders Preparing for Lions OC Ben Johnson Who Will ‘Test Your Discipline’

Advertisement

• Dan Quinn Details Commanders Rookie’s Performance in Playoff Game, He Was Impressed

• What Lions’ Amon-Ra St. Brown Said About Commanders WR, It’s Come Full Circle

• Analyst Predicts Commanders Upset vs. Lions



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington

George Washington stays unbeaten with 68-41 victory at Capital – WV MetroNews

Published

on

George Washington stays unbeaten with 68-41 victory at Capital – WV MetroNews


CHARLESTON, W.Va. — A Capital team short on experience and playing for the first time since New Year’s Eve faced quite a challenge Thursday night as it welcomed one of the state’s most polished teams in nearby rival George Washington.

The Patriots showed no sign of letting a nearby rival hang around and continued their stellar start to the season by never trailing in a resounding 68-41 victory.

“Shooting takes pressure off how we have to defend, but our defense has been the key to everything we’ve done to this point,” veteran GW head coach Rick Greene said.

The result prolongs GW’s unbeaten start to the season through at least its first eight games.

Advertisement

This one was never in doubt as the Patriots’ combination of efficient offense and lockdown defense left the Cougars playing catch-up throughout.

GW’s Chuck Kelley accounted for the game’s first two field goals and scored his team’s first six points, before Gale Lamb got in on the action and went on a personal 7-0 run that upped the Patriot lead to 14-4.

David Robinson, who led Capital with 17 points, scored five in the opening frame to keep his team within striking distance as it faced a 14-7 deficit entering the second.

After Capital’s Grant Barclay provided a bucket to start the second quarter, it was all GW the remainder of the opening half.

Lamb hit a pair of three-pointers around a Kelley transition layup, forcing the Cougars to call timeout 5:05 before halftime as they trailed 22-9.

Advertisement

At that point, Lamb was 5 for 5 with 14 points.

“He didn’t take a shot he couldn’t hit,” Greene said. “He is a really good shooter and he’s shooting with a lot of confidence. The kids want him to shoot the ball, so if you’re a shooter and you know your teammates want you to shoot it, it gives you that little bit of freedom and relaxation.”

Out of the break in the action, GW’s Noah Lewis scored inside twice, with teammate Sai’Vyon Brown knocking down a three in between. It was 29-9 at that point, and Kelley accounted for the final points of the half on a follow-up basket to send the visitors to the locker room with a commanding 33-11 advantage.

While Lamb and Kelley were both 5 for 5 with 24 combined points through two quarters, the Cougars were shooting 5 for 16 and being out-rebounded, 15-5.

“The guys coming off the bench are trying to match the defensive intensity of the first five, and that’s making us really good,” Greene said.

Advertisement

Kelley picked up where he left off to start the second half, scoring five points over the first 1:03.

Capital (2-4) upped the pace itself and Trevaun Tyson was the main beneficiary, scoring all nine of his points in the third quarter.

The Cougars doubled the first-half field goal total in the third period alone, making 10-of-15 shots to keep pace with the Patriots for that 8-minute stretch.

“It was a nice conversation at halftime,” Capital head coach Cookie Miller said. “We got them going a little bit and we have to come out like that at the beginning. It was a rough 18 days, but that’s not excuse. We had great practices for us to give that showing, but at the end of the day, hats off to them for knowing their plays and getting into things. They’ve been together for a long time.”

Unfortunately for Miller’s team, Lamb maintained his efficient play and scored nine points in the frame to spark GW’s 22-point quarter.

Advertisement

That allowed the Patriots to lead 55-32 entering the fourth, and they cruised from there.

GW made 25-of-44 shots to shoot better than 56 percent. Lamb led all players with 24 points and made 7-of-8 shots. Kelley was also 7 for 8 and scored 15.

Noah Lewis chipped in with seven points and a game-high 10 rebounds, while Jeff Harris added five points and eight boards. That duo was instrumental in allowing GW to finish with a convincing 36-16 rebounding edge.

Tyson had half of his team’s boards. 

The Cougars made 18-of-45 shots, but only one three-pointer to the Patriots’ five.

Advertisement

“Those guys have been together for a long time. Kudos to them,” Miller said. “Greene has them moving and doing what they’re supposed to doing. We’re trying to get on their level and soon we will be on their level.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Lawmakers again trying to lower legal alcohol limit for drivers in Washington • Washington State Standard

Published

on

Lawmakers again trying to lower legal alcohol limit for drivers in Washington • Washington State Standard


A measure to lower the legal limit for drunk driving in Washington cleared its first legislative hurdle Thursday.

If passed, Washington would join Utah as the only state with a 0.05% blood alcohol concentration limit. Other states have considered similar legislation, but haven’t passed it.

Utah made the move in 2018. The state was also the first to lower the limit from 0.1% to 0.08% in the 1980s.

After the switch from 0.08% to 0.05%, Utah saw a 20% drop in fatal crashes, but that figure crept back up during the COVID-19 pandemic, in line with national trends.

Advertisement

The bill in Washington is sponsored by Sen. John Lovick, D-Mill Creek. Lovick was a longtime Washington State Patrol trooper before serving as Snohomish County sheriff. 

“I see driving behavior beyond anything I could have imagined when I started as a state trooper,” Lovick told the Senate Law & Justice Committee this week. “Drivers are speeding, following too close, passing on the shoulders, running red lights, driving aggressively. Drunk drivers have made our communities unsafe.”

Opponents argue the legislation, Senate Bill 5067, would elevate the liability risk for bars and other establishments that sell alcohol.

Traffic deaths have risen rapidly in recent years, from 538 in 2019 to 809 in 2023, according to the Washington Traffic Safety Commission. The 2023 figure was the most deaths on Washington roads since 1990.

Of those 809 deaths, impaired drivers were involved in about half.

Advertisement

Compared to those driving sober, drivers with a blood alcohol concentration over 0.05% are twice as likely to crash, said Mark McKechnie, the director of external relations for the traffic safety commission. When that rises to 0.07%, the risk triples.

Early estimates for the first half of 2024 showed a marked decline in deaths on Washington roads, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

The lower legal limit would take effect July 1, 2026. 

As part of the legislation, the Washington Traffic Safety Commission would run a campaign to inform the public of the new legal limit. The Washington State Institute for Public Policy would have to evaluate the impacts of the new law in a report submitted to the Legislature.

By way of background

Lovick and others have tried repeatedly in recent years to lower the legal limit. The measure has never reached the Senate floor.

Advertisement

Last year, one of the proposal’s chief backers, Sen. Marko Liias, D-Edmonds, expressed frustration after the Senate passed over his drunk driving bill and instead took up legislation to solidify “The Evergreen State” as Washington’s official nickname.

Experts have said consuming a beer or a glass of wine with dinner wouldn’t land drivers above the lowered legal limit.

Two hours after his first drink, a 180-pound man would reach 0.05% after drinking three beers or three glasses of wine. The same is true after two hours for a 140-pound woman, after two beers or glasses of wine.

Worldwide, more than 100 countries have legal limits of 0.05% or lower. 

The concerns

As in years past, hospitality industry groups oppose the legislation. They have argued the proposal could hurt bars and other establishments that rely on alcohol sales to stay afloat.

Advertisement

Julia Gorton, a lobbyist for the Washington Hospitality Association, noted it’s already illegal to drive with a 0.05% blood alcohol concentration if officers see clear signs of impairment.

This legislation “will impact those who decide to stop drinking before they are impaired,” she said. “These are individuals choosing to behave responsibly, who will now be subject to the strongest and strictest DUI penalties in the country.”

The Washington Wine Institute’s Executive Director Josh McDonald said it would be hard for servers to identify impairment at the lower legal limit so they could cut off service.

Jason Lantz, of the Washington Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, noted Colorado and New York also have 0.05% limits, but violations at that level come with lower penalties.

He recommended a similar two-tier system, with the 0.05% limit considered “driving after consumption” instead of driving under the influence.

Advertisement

Amy Freedheim, the chair of the Felony Traffic Unit in the King County prosecutor’s office, tried to assuage concerns. She argued the lower limit wouldn’t lead to more arrests or lawsuits against bars held liable for crashes caused by impaired drivers.

On Thursday, Sen. Phil Fortunato, R-Auburn, offered an amendment to Lovick’s bill, lowering a blood alcohol concentration limit already in state law that brings stiffer penalties. The amendment would have dropped the limit from 0.15% to 0.12%. 

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

Advertisement

Penalties for first-time offenders at the higher threshold include a minimum $500 fine and at least two days in jail, 30 days of electronic home monitoring or a 120-day 24/7 sobriety program.

Below the 0.15% level, drunk driving penalties drop to a minimum fine of $350 and at least one day in jail, 15 days of electronic home monitoring or a 90-day sobriety program.

“Right now you go from .08 to .15. There’s nothing in the middle,” Fortunato said.

Advertisement

Sen. Manka Dhingra, D-Redmond, said she didn’t disagree with Fortunato’s change, but recognized the political reality for the proposal.

“I think it has been very challenging to get this bill out of the Senate with even the decrease to .05,” she said. “Let’s try to focus on getting the limit to .05, and then let’s continue working toward making sure that we are addressing the penalties.”

The committee approved Lovick’s proposal without Fortunato’s amendment. 

The House version of the bill is set for a committee hearing Tuesday.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending