The State Bar of California intends to hunt the disbarment of former president Donald Trump’s election legal professional John Eastman for his function in making an attempt to overturn the outcomes of the 2020 election.
Washington
Calif. seeks to disbar Trump adviser John Eastman over Jan. 6 charges
Per the assertion, Eastman is accused of creating false and deceptive statements relating to alleged election fraud — together with claims he made at a rally on the Ellipse outdoors the White Home that preceded the lethal riot on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Within the clarification of the fees, the California bar instantly connects Eastman’s speech to the riot, saying he “contributed to scary a crowd to assault and breach the Capitol to intimidate then-Vice President [Mike] Pence and forestall the electoral rely from continuing.”
Stephen Gillers, a professor on the New York College College of Regulation who focuses on authorized ethics, known as the set of accusations levied at Eastman “scathing.”
“[It] fees Eastman with knowingly or via gross negligence failing to assist the U.S. and California constitutions, which he took an oath to do,” Gillers mentioned. “The allegation that Eastman is responsible of ‘ethical turpitude’ is an assault on his very character, in different phrases that he’s a nasty man, not merely a nasty lawyer.”
The state bar’s announcement got here after an investigation that lasted almost a yr. Cardona’s workplace concluded that Eastman violated Part 6106 of the Enterprise and Professions Code “by making false and deceptive statements that represent acts of ‘ethical turpitude, dishonesty, and corruption.’”
“There may be nothing extra sacrosanct to our American democracy than free and honest elections and the peaceable switch of energy,” Cardona mentioned in an announcement. “For California attorneys, adherence to the U.S. and California Constitutions is their highest authorized obligation.”
Eastman, Cardona added, “violated this obligation in furtherance of an try and usurp the desire of the American folks and overturn election outcomes for the best workplace within the land — an egregious and unprecedented assault on our democracy — for which he have to be held accountable.”
Eastman’s lawyer Randall A. Miller mentioned Trump’s election adviser disputes “each facet” of the California bar’s actions.
“Any lawyer engaged to supply his or her authorized evaluation in a dynamic, consequential, and sometimes emotional enviornment ought to be deeply troubled by the notion {that a} licensing authority (bar) can take their license if they don’t just like the lawyer’s recommendation, or discover the advocacy distasteful,” Miller mentioned.
Eastman has been dubbed the “architect” of Trump’s plot to steal the 2020 election. He wrote an notorious memo that laid out a number of methods Pence might facilitate not certifying Joe Biden’s victory. The previous legislation professor at Chapman College’s College of Regulation, who’s an lively member of the Federalist Society, argued that Pence might reject electors from states gained by Biden.
Eastman refused to show over 1000’s of emails to the Home particular committee investigating the riot. The panel requested the paperwork as a result of they have been associated to Eastman’s function in making an attempt to influence Pence to reject these electors. Eastman cited attorney-client privilege as a defend towards turning over the paperwork as a result of he has mentioned he was representing Trump on the time.
The committee argued that Eastman’s declare of privilege was probably voided by the “crime/fraud exception” to the confidentiality often accorded attorneys and their purchasers, which holds that communications needn’t be saved confidential if an legal professional is discovered to be helping their consumer within the fee of against the law.
Finally, the committee advisable that the Justice Division examine and prosecute Eastman on two counts. The panel concluded that Eastman knew “upfront of the 2020 election that Vice President Pence couldn’t refuse to rely electoral votes on January sixth.”
The State Bar of California got here to the identical conclusion, saying that Eastman’s methods “have been unsupported by legislation” and “based mostly on false and deceptive assertions of reality and designed for the aim of maintaining Trump in workplace.”
In its disciplinary discover, the State Bar concludes that Eastman “knew, or ought to have identified, that the factual premise for his proposals — that huge fraud was at play — was false, and that Trump had misplaced his bid for re-election.” Cardona’s workplace additionally alleges that Eastman selected to disregard these information when he spoke on the Jan. 6 rally.
Within the 35-page discover, the California bar’s supervising legal professional Duncan Carling wrote that, from on or about Dec. 9, 2020, till no less than Jan. 6, 2021, Eastman “continued to work with Trump and others to advertise the concept that the end result of the election was in query and had been stolen from Trump as the results of fraud, disregard of state election legislation, and misconduct by election officers.”
If the State Bar Courtroom decides that Eastman’s actions warrant a disbarment or suspension, the advice can be forwarded to the California Supreme Courtroom, which can decide Eastman’s destiny.
The transfer to file disciplinary fees towards Eastman was applauded by the States United Democracy Heart, a Washington-based group selling honest and safe elections that in an announcement described Eastman because the “mastermind” of the plot to overturn the 2020 election.
“He abused the authorized system and violated the oath he swore as an legal professional, in an try to dam the desire of the folks and forestall the peaceable switch of energy,” mentioned Christine P. Solar, the group’s senior vice chairman of authorized.
Washington
Jayden Daniels Will Keep Commanders Competitive vs. Lions
The Washington Commanders have made many changes to go from a four-win team to three wins away from winning the Super Bowl, but none have been more impactful than drafting quarterback Jayden Daniels with the No. 2 overall pick.
Daniels may be a rookie, but he plays like an established veteran. That’s why Bleacher Report writer Maurice Moton believes that the Commanders will be competitive this weekend against the 15-2 Detroit Lions in the Divisional Round.
“The Commanders slowed down the Buccaneers’ third-ranked offense in a road victory last week, and Daniels helped position them to kick the game-winning field,” Moton writes.
“Head coach Dan Quinn and coordinator Joe Whitt have molded the team’s defense into a respectable unit throughout the season. In clutch moments, Daniels is far beyond his years.
“Washington won’t shut down the Lions offense, but along with Daniels, it can do enough to keep the score margin in the single digits.”
The Commanders are still underdogs since the Lions have arguably been the best team in the NFL this season, but Daniels won’t allow Washington to fold. He hasn’t done so yet, so there’s no reason why it would happen now.
Kickoff between the Commanders and Lions is scheduled for tomorrow at 8 p.m. ET.
Stick with CommanderGameday and the Locked On Commanders podcast for more FREE coverage of the Washington Commanders throughout the 2024 season.
• Commanders Preparing for Lions OC Ben Johnson Who Will ‘Test Your Discipline’
• Dan Quinn Details Commanders Rookie’s Performance in Playoff Game, He Was Impressed
• What Lions’ Amon-Ra St. Brown Said About Commanders WR, It’s Come Full Circle
• Analyst Predicts Commanders Upset vs. Lions
Washington
George Washington stays unbeaten with 68-41 victory at Capital – WV MetroNews
CHARLESTON, W.Va. — A Capital team short on experience and playing for the first time since New Year’s Eve faced quite a challenge Thursday night as it welcomed one of the state’s most polished teams in nearby rival George Washington.
The Patriots showed no sign of letting a nearby rival hang around and continued their stellar start to the season by never trailing in a resounding 68-41 victory.
“Shooting takes pressure off how we have to defend, but our defense has been the key to everything we’ve done to this point,” veteran GW head coach Rick Greene said.
The result prolongs GW’s unbeaten start to the season through at least its first eight games.
This one was never in doubt as the Patriots’ combination of efficient offense and lockdown defense left the Cougars playing catch-up throughout.
GW’s Chuck Kelley accounted for the game’s first two field goals and scored his team’s first six points, before Gale Lamb got in on the action and went on a personal 7-0 run that upped the Patriot lead to 14-4.
David Robinson, who led Capital with 17 points, scored five in the opening frame to keep his team within striking distance as it faced a 14-7 deficit entering the second.
After Capital’s Grant Barclay provided a bucket to start the second quarter, it was all GW the remainder of the opening half.
Lamb hit a pair of three-pointers around a Kelley transition layup, forcing the Cougars to call timeout 5:05 before halftime as they trailed 22-9.
At that point, Lamb was 5 for 5 with 14 points.
“He didn’t take a shot he couldn’t hit,” Greene said. “He is a really good shooter and he’s shooting with a lot of confidence. The kids want him to shoot the ball, so if you’re a shooter and you know your teammates want you to shoot it, it gives you that little bit of freedom and relaxation.”
Out of the break in the action, GW’s Noah Lewis scored inside twice, with teammate Sai’Vyon Brown knocking down a three in between. It was 29-9 at that point, and Kelley accounted for the final points of the half on a follow-up basket to send the visitors to the locker room with a commanding 33-11 advantage.
While Lamb and Kelley were both 5 for 5 with 24 combined points through two quarters, the Cougars were shooting 5 for 16 and being out-rebounded, 15-5.
“The guys coming off the bench are trying to match the defensive intensity of the first five, and that’s making us really good,” Greene said.
Kelley picked up where he left off to start the second half, scoring five points over the first 1:03.
Capital (2-4) upped the pace itself and Trevaun Tyson was the main beneficiary, scoring all nine of his points in the third quarter.
The Cougars doubled the first-half field goal total in the third period alone, making 10-of-15 shots to keep pace with the Patriots for that 8-minute stretch.
“It was a nice conversation at halftime,” Capital head coach Cookie Miller said. “We got them going a little bit and we have to come out like that at the beginning. It was a rough 18 days, but that’s not excuse. We had great practices for us to give that showing, but at the end of the day, hats off to them for knowing their plays and getting into things. They’ve been together for a long time.”
Unfortunately for Miller’s team, Lamb maintained his efficient play and scored nine points in the frame to spark GW’s 22-point quarter.
That allowed the Patriots to lead 55-32 entering the fourth, and they cruised from there.
GW made 25-of-44 shots to shoot better than 56 percent. Lamb led all players with 24 points and made 7-of-8 shots. Kelley was also 7 for 8 and scored 15.
Noah Lewis chipped in with seven points and a game-high 10 rebounds, while Jeff Harris added five points and eight boards. That duo was instrumental in allowing GW to finish with a convincing 36-16 rebounding edge.
Tyson had half of his team’s boards.
The Cougars made 18-of-45 shots, but only one three-pointer to the Patriots’ five.
“Those guys have been together for a long time. Kudos to them,” Miller said. “Greene has them moving and doing what they’re supposed to doing. We’re trying to get on their level and soon we will be on their level.”
Washington
Lawmakers again trying to lower legal alcohol limit for drivers in Washington • Washington State Standard
A measure to lower the legal limit for drunk driving in Washington cleared its first legislative hurdle Thursday.
If passed, Washington would join Utah as the only state with a 0.05% blood alcohol concentration limit. Other states have considered similar legislation, but haven’t passed it.
Utah made the move in 2018. The state was also the first to lower the limit from 0.1% to 0.08% in the 1980s.
After the switch from 0.08% to 0.05%, Utah saw a 20% drop in fatal crashes, but that figure crept back up during the COVID-19 pandemic, in line with national trends.
The bill in Washington is sponsored by Sen. John Lovick, D-Mill Creek. Lovick was a longtime Washington State Patrol trooper before serving as Snohomish County sheriff.
“I see driving behavior beyond anything I could have imagined when I started as a state trooper,” Lovick told the Senate Law & Justice Committee this week. “Drivers are speeding, following too close, passing on the shoulders, running red lights, driving aggressively. Drunk drivers have made our communities unsafe.”
Opponents argue the legislation, Senate Bill 5067, would elevate the liability risk for bars and other establishments that sell alcohol.
Traffic deaths have risen rapidly in recent years, from 538 in 2019 to 809 in 2023, according to the Washington Traffic Safety Commission. The 2023 figure was the most deaths on Washington roads since 1990.
Of those 809 deaths, impaired drivers were involved in about half.
Compared to those driving sober, drivers with a blood alcohol concentration over 0.05% are twice as likely to crash, said Mark McKechnie, the director of external relations for the traffic safety commission. When that rises to 0.07%, the risk triples.
Early estimates for the first half of 2024 showed a marked decline in deaths on Washington roads, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
The lower legal limit would take effect July 1, 2026.
As part of the legislation, the Washington Traffic Safety Commission would run a campaign to inform the public of the new legal limit. The Washington State Institute for Public Policy would have to evaluate the impacts of the new law in a report submitted to the Legislature.
By way of background
Lovick and others have tried repeatedly in recent years to lower the legal limit. The measure has never reached the Senate floor.
Last year, one of the proposal’s chief backers, Sen. Marko Liias, D-Edmonds, expressed frustration after the Senate passed over his drunk driving bill and instead took up legislation to solidify “The Evergreen State” as Washington’s official nickname.
Experts have said consuming a beer or a glass of wine with dinner wouldn’t land drivers above the lowered legal limit.
Two hours after his first drink, a 180-pound man would reach 0.05% after drinking three beers or three glasses of wine. The same is true after two hours for a 140-pound woman, after two beers or glasses of wine.
Worldwide, more than 100 countries have legal limits of 0.05% or lower.
The concerns
As in years past, hospitality industry groups oppose the legislation. They have argued the proposal could hurt bars and other establishments that rely on alcohol sales to stay afloat.
Julia Gorton, a lobbyist for the Washington Hospitality Association, noted it’s already illegal to drive with a 0.05% blood alcohol concentration if officers see clear signs of impairment.
This legislation “will impact those who decide to stop drinking before they are impaired,” she said. “These are individuals choosing to behave responsibly, who will now be subject to the strongest and strictest DUI penalties in the country.”
The Washington Wine Institute’s Executive Director Josh McDonald said it would be hard for servers to identify impairment at the lower legal limit so they could cut off service.
Jason Lantz, of the Washington Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, noted Colorado and New York also have 0.05% limits, but violations at that level come with lower penalties.
He recommended a similar two-tier system, with the 0.05% limit considered “driving after consumption” instead of driving under the influence.
Amy Freedheim, the chair of the Felony Traffic Unit in the King County prosecutor’s office, tried to assuage concerns. She argued the lower limit wouldn’t lead to more arrests or lawsuits against bars held liable for crashes caused by impaired drivers.
On Thursday, Sen. Phil Fortunato, R-Auburn, offered an amendment to Lovick’s bill, lowering a blood alcohol concentration limit already in state law that brings stiffer penalties. The amendment would have dropped the limit from 0.15% to 0.12%.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.
Penalties for first-time offenders at the higher threshold include a minimum $500 fine and at least two days in jail, 30 days of electronic home monitoring or a 120-day 24/7 sobriety program.
Below the 0.15% level, drunk driving penalties drop to a minimum fine of $350 and at least one day in jail, 15 days of electronic home monitoring or a 90-day sobriety program.
“Right now you go from .08 to .15. There’s nothing in the middle,” Fortunato said.
Sen. Manka Dhingra, D-Redmond, said she didn’t disagree with Fortunato’s change, but recognized the political reality for the proposal.
“I think it has been very challenging to get this bill out of the Senate with even the decrease to .05,” she said. “Let’s try to focus on getting the limit to .05, and then let’s continue working toward making sure that we are addressing the penalties.”
The committee approved Lovick’s proposal without Fortunato’s amendment.
The House version of the bill is set for a committee hearing Tuesday.
-
Technology1 week ago
Meta is highlighting a splintering global approach to online speech
-
Science6 days ago
Metro will offer free rides in L.A. through Sunday due to fires
-
Technology1 week ago
Las Vegas police release ChatGPT logs from the suspect in the Cybertruck explosion
-
News1 week ago
Photos: Pacific Palisades Wildfire Engulfs Homes in an L.A. Neighborhood
-
Education1 week ago
Four Fraternity Members Charged After a Pledge Is Set on Fire
-
Business1 week ago
Meta Drops Rules Protecting LGBTQ Community as Part of Content Moderation Overhaul
-
Politics1 week ago
Trump trolls Canada again, shares map with country as part of US: 'Oh Canada!'
-
Technology6 days ago
Amazon Prime will shut down its clothing try-on program