Two months after Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine, Individuals are stalwart of their assist of the embattled nation, with a big, bipartisan majority supporting elevated sanctions towards Russia and most additionally backing army and humanitarian assist for Ukrainians, in response to a Washington Submit-ABC Information ballot.
Washington
Big majority of Americans back sanctions on Russia, aid to Ukraine, poll finds
On the identical time, 72 % oppose the USA taking direct army motion towards Russian forces, whereas 21 % assist the thought. Even amongst those that say the nation is doing too little to assist Ukraine, 57 % oppose direct army motion, one thing President Biden has stated is off the desk, repeatedly warning that such a transfer may result in “World Struggle III.”
The findings recommend that Biden’s insurance policies largely mirror Individuals’ preferences in terms of the Russian invasion. Biden has steadily ramped up army and humanitarian help to Kyiv — he requested Congress on Thursday for one more $33 billion in such funding — whereas often tightening sanctions on Moscow. However he has additionally been fast to emphasize that he won’t ship Individuals to Ukraine or take different actions, comparable to implementing a no-fly zone, that would result in a direct army conflict with Russia.
Regardless of the broad assist for sanctions, they’ve created a political drawback for Biden and different Democrats by serving to drive up gasoline costs, and that dynamic is mirrored within the ballot.
About 2 in 3 Individuals, or 66 %, say they’re involved about sanctions contributing to larger meals and vitality prices at residence. The anxiousness is bipartisan, with 68 % of Democrats and 70 % of Republicans saying they’re involved. Fuel costs have averaged greater than $4 a gallon because the begin of March.
However even amongst these involved that sanctions are spurring inflation, 64 % assist rising them, as do 67 % of Individuals general.
Biden has tried to organize the nation for the monetary ache stemming from the disaster in Ukraine, blaming it on Russian President Vladimir Putin and citing “Putin’s value hike” each time he speaks of upper costs on the pump.
“The price of this battle is just not low-cost, however caving to aggression goes to be extra pricey if we permit it to occur,” Biden stated final week in urging extra assist to Ukraine. “We both again the Ukrainian folks as they defend their nation, or we stand by because the Russians proceed their atrocities and aggression in Ukraine.”
Individuals are extensively anxious concerning the battle escalating, with 81 % saying they concern that the struggle will increase into different European international locations, 80 % involved about U.S. forces getting concerned within the combating and 80 % involved about Russia utilizing nuclear weapons. Fifty % say they’re “very involved” about nuclear weapons.
These issues over the disaster escalating are additionally bipartisan. Greater than 8 in 10 Democrats and Republicans are involved concerning the struggle increasing past Ukraine and the USA turning into concerned within the combating. Giant majorities of each teams are additionally involved about Russia utilizing nuclear weapons, although Democrats are considerably extra anxious about this (86 %) than Republicans (72 %).
Approval for Biden’s dealing with of the struggle within the Ukraine — in addition to his dealing with of the pandemic — has helped buoy his general job approval rankings, which elevated 5 factors from 37 % in February to 42 % within the new ballot. Nonetheless, Biden stays solidly in detrimental territory, with 52 % disapproving of his job efficiency amid persistent issues concerning the economic system.
Particularly, 42 % of Individuals approve of Biden’s dealing with of the state of affairs between Russia and Ukraine, up from 33 % when Russia launched its invasion simply over two months in the past. Now, 47 % of Individuals disapprove of his dealing with of the disaster, the identical % that disapproved in February, whereas fewer folks say they don’t have any opinion.
The approval for Biden’s dealing with of the struggle is essentially partisan, with 73 % of Democrats and 41 % of independents approving. Solely 14 % of Republicans permitted of Biden’s dealing with of the struggle, with 76 % disapproving.
Notably, Biden’s assist of his dealing with of Ukraine and Russia has improved markedly with independents since February, when 30 % permitted.
Whereas the newest Submit-ABC ballot didn’t measure Individuals’ causes for supporting Ukraine, polls within the weeks after Russia’s invasion discovered a pointy improve in assist for sanctions, in addition to in detrimental views towards Russia. A Pew Analysis Middle survey, as an example, discovered 70 % stated Russia is an enemy moderately than a competitor or accomplice, up from 41 % who stated the identical in January.
Biden has repeatedly sought to make the case for U.S. involvement within the distant struggle, suggesting that he acknowledges that assist may wane if it drags on too lengthy.
“All through our historical past, we’ve discovered that when dictators don’t pay the value for his or her aggression, they trigger extra chaos and have interaction in additional aggression,” Biden stated final week. “They maintain shifting, and the prices, the threats to America and the world, maintain rising. We are able to’t let this occur.”
Views on Ukraine stay remarkably steady throughout celebration strains, together with amongst Individuals who voted for opposing candidates within the 2020 presidential election, making Ukraine an space of uncommon bipartisan settlement. Comparatively few Republicans have been forcefully crucial of Biden on the difficulty, particularly in contrast with their common assaults on him over inflation, crime, immigration and different topics.
Of those that voted for Biden, 64 % assist extra army assist for Ukraine, as do 52 % of those that voted for President Donald Trump. And 83 % of Individuals who voted for Biden assist extra humanitarian assist for Ukraine, as do 67 % of Individuals who voted for Trump.
On Thursday, Biden referred to as for a dramatic improve in assist to Ukraine, urging Congress to go a brand new $33 billion spending bundle that features army and humanitarian assist.
The request for extra assist got here at a time when the USA has decided, as Protection Secretary Lloyd Austin put it, that Ukraine “can win — they’ll win if they’ve the correct tools, the correct assist.” And it additionally comes because the combating shifts to the jap a part of the nation for what is predicted to be an extended slog.
The Submit-ABC ballot finds that age is a a lot larger supply of division about U.S. involvement in Ukraine, with youthful Individuals much less supportive of further actions.
Whereas 69 % of these aged 65 and older assist rising army assist, that drops to 54 % amongst these aged 40 to 64 and 47 % amongst adults youthful than 40. Assist for rising army assist is especially low amongst youthful adults who establish or lean Republican: 38 % assist boosting army assist to Ukraine, whereas 52 % are opposed.
The Submit-ABC ballot was performed April 24 to April 28 amongst a random nationwide pattern of 1,004 adults, reached on cellphones and landlines. The margin of error is plus or minus 3.5 share factors for general outcomes and is bigger for subgroups.
Washington
Confirmed: Cardinal McElroy to be appointed Washington archbishop
Cardinal Robert McElroy of San Diego will be announced as the new archbishop of Washington, D.C., The Pillar has confirmed.
After reporting January 4 that multiple U.S. bishops had said that the appointment was imminent, The Pillar has separately confirmed that Pope Francis has selected McElroy to succeed Cardinal Wilton Gregory in the capital see.
The announcement is expected Monday, according to sources close to the process.
McElroy’s appointment follows a lengthy and contentious process to find a successor for the Washington archdiocese, which involved a protracted standoff between some American cardinals and the apostolic nunciature.
The Pillar has previously reported that following a meeting in October in which McElroy joined Cardinals Blase Cupich of Chicago and Joseph Tobin of Newark to meet with Pope Francis during the synod on synodality in October, Francis was said to have decided against appointing McElroy.
Instead, Francis tasked former Washington archbishop Cardinal Donald Wuerl to identify a suitable candidate.
Wuerl, sources close to the process have confirmed to The Pillar, suggested Bishop Sean McKnight of Jefferson City, with Cardinal Gregory also signing off on the recommendation. However, in the weeks following the presidential election result, which saw Donald Trump reelected to the White House, Francis agreed to revisit McElroy’s candidacy.
As Bishop of San Diego and as a cardinal, McElroy has been outspoken on various subjects touching the political area, most especially immigration.
In addition to the political sensitivities of the role, McElroy will also assume leadership of more than half a million Catholics in the DC area and southern Maryland, becoming their third archbishop since 2018.
McElroy turns 71 in February and succeeds Cardinal Gregory, 77, who was appointed to succeed Cardinal Donald Wuerl in 2019, whose resignation was accepted by Pope Francis following the scandal surrounding Wuerl’s own predecessor, Theodore McCarrick, the previous year.
Despite promises of transparency by Gregory at the time of his appointment, the archdiocese has so far declined to answer repeated questions about McCarrick’s tenure, especially money raised and spent via his personal “archbishop’s fund” during his time in Washington.
McElroy has himself faced questions about McCarrick in the past, with some expressing concerns about how he responded to a 2016 warning about the now-laicized former cardinal.
In addition to lingering questions about McCarrick, McElroy will also have to reckon with a process of financial restructuring in the Washington archdiocese.
In December last year, several local priests told The Pillar that chancery officials had painted a bleak picture of archdiocesan finances, announcing sweeping reforms of its parish assessment system to bridge a multi-million dollar deficit.
As Bishop of San Diego, McElroy has at times raised eyebrows on the national stage, calling for the synod on synodality to debate issues like the sacramental ordination of women, despite Pope Francis repeatedly saying such issues were not up for discussion.
The cardinal has previously made calls for “comprehensive inclusion” in Eucharistic reception.
Following the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith’s 2023 instruction Fiducia supplicans on the blessing of persons on same-sex relationships, which Rome agreed to allow the bishops of Africa to not implement in their own dioceses, McElroy hailed the “diverging pastoral paths” taken by the Church in different countries as a model of healthy decentralization, rather than a sign of contradiction within the Church.
Last year, McElroy issued a controversial homeschooling policy in the San Diego diocese, barring local Catholic home schooling groups from using parish facilities.
Cardinal McElroy was ordained a priest for the Archdiocese of San Francisco in 1980, serving as secretary to Archbishop John Quinn. After several years in parish ministry, Quinn named him vicar general of the archdiocese in 1995.
McElroy was named auxiliary bishop of the Archdiocese of San Francisco in 2010, and made Bishop of San Diego in 2015. Pope Francis created him a cardinal in 2022.
Washington
Buccaneers Claim 3 Seed in NFC Playoff Field, Face Commanders in Wild Card Round
The Tampa Bay Buccaneers not only captured a fourth straight NFC South title on Sunday, but they also improved their overall position in the playoff standings and kept alive the possibility of two home games in the postseason.
While the Buccaneers secured their own playoff spot with a Week 18 win over the New Orleans Saints, the Los Angeles Rams had already clinched the NFC West title the Week before. That put the Rams into the third overall seed in the NFC playoff field coming into the final weekend, but a loss to the Seattle Seahawks on Sunday allowed Tampa Bay to leap them for that spot. Both the Buccaneers and Rams finished with 10-7 records but Tampa Bay won the tiebreaker for positioning based on a better record against conference opponents (8-4 to 6-6).
As the #3 seed, the Buccaneers will host a playoff game in the Wild Card round against the team that claimed the #6 seed. That proved to be Washington after the Commanders beat the Cowboys on Sunday to improve to 11-6. The NFL will announce the date and time of the game later on Sunday evening.
The Buccaneers will be taking part in the playoffs for a fifth straight season, the longest such run in franchise history, but this is the first time in that span that they will start out as the #3 seed. They earned the top Wild Card spot in 2020 and, coincidentally, started their playoffs at Washington after the Commanders won the NFC East with a 7-9 record. The Bucs won the NFC South each year from 2021 to 2023 and in those seasons was seeded second, fourth and fourth.
Tampa Bay could still be at home for two playoff games. If they win next weekend and the second-seeded Philadelphia Eagles lose to Green Bay, the Buccaneers would go into the Divisional Round as the second-highest remaining seed behind the winner of the Detroit-Minnesota game on Sunday night. That team would enjoy a bye in the first round and then play at home against the lowest of the remaining seeds. The Buccaneers would get the next seeded team up from the bottom, which would be either Minnesota/Detroit or Los Angeles.
Washington
Washington Post cartoonist quits over rejected Trump sketch
What’s New
Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist Ann Telnaes resigned from The Washington Post after the editorial team rejected one of her cartoons criticizing The Post‘s billionaire owner Jeff Bezos.
Writing on her Substack blog on Friday, Telnaes said it was the first time her work was censored due to its point of view, prompting her decision to leave
Newsweek has contacted The Washington Post via email for comment.
Why It Matters
Telnaes’ resignation highlights concerns over press freedom and the influence of billionaire owners on editorial decisions in major news outlets, including at the LA Times and The Washington Post.
Critics argue that billionaire owners could censor critical commentary, undermining journalism’s role in holding power accountable.
What To Know
The cartoon in question depicted Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, LA Times owner Patrick Soon-Shiong, and The Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos, all billionaires, and Micky Mouse, representing Disney, kneeling before a statue of Donald Trump, offering sacks of cash.
Telnaes posted a rough of the cartoon in the blog post:
Telnaes described the decision to reject the cartoon as a “game changer” for her relationship with the paper.
But Post Opinions editor David Shipley, in a statement to Politico, said the cartoon was rejected to avoid repetition, because a column and a satirical piece on the same subject had already been published.
In her blog post, Telnaes outlined her career as an advocate for press freedom in various roles, having served on advisory boards for organizations supporting editorial cartoonists.
She emphasized the importance of holding power accountable and warned against efforts to “curry favor with an autocrat-in-waiting.”
What People Are Saying
Elizabeth Warren, Senator, on X: “@AnnTelnaes resigned after The Washington Post editorial page killed her cartoon. It’s worth a share. Big Tech executives are bending the knee to Donald Trump and it’s no surprise why: Billionaires like Jeff Bezos like paying a lower tax rate than a public school teacher.”
David Shipley, Washington Post Opinions Editor, in a statement to Politico: “My decision was guided by the fact that we had just published a column on the same topic as the cartoon and had already scheduled another column — this one a satire — for publication. The only bias was against repetition.”
Ann Telnaes, Cartoonist, on Substack: “For the first time, my editor prevented me from doing that critical job. So I have decided to leave the Post.”
What Happens Next
With Donald Trump set to assume the presidency, The Post faces increased scrutiny over its ability to maintain editorial independence under Bezos’s ownership. Telnaes’ departure raises questions about how the paper will approach coverage of Trump’s administration, particularly regarding its willingness to challenge powerful figures.
-
Health1 week ago
New Year life lessons from country star: 'Never forget where you came from'
-
Technology1 week ago
Meta’s ‘software update issue’ has been breaking Quest headsets for weeks
-
Business5 days ago
These are the top 7 issues facing the struggling restaurant industry in 2025
-
Culture5 days ago
The 25 worst losses in college football history, including Baylor’s 2024 entry at Colorado
-
Sports5 days ago
The top out-of-contract players available as free transfers: Kimmich, De Bruyne, Van Dijk…
-
Politics4 days ago
New Orleans attacker had 'remote detonator' for explosives in French Quarter, Biden says
-
Politics3 days ago
Carter's judicial picks reshaped the federal bench across the country
-
Politics2 days ago
Who Are the Recipients of the Presidential Medal of Freedom?