Connect with us

Washington

Biden to name Jeff Zients as chief of staff, source says

Published

on

Biden to name Jeff Zients as chief of staff, source says


FILE PHOTO: White Home COVID-19 Response Coordinator Jeff Zients delivers remarks throughout a press briefing on the White Home in Washington, U.S., April 13, 2021. REUTERS/Tom Brenner/File Picture

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President Joe Biden will identify as his chief of workers Jeff Zients, a former White Home pandemic coverage coordinator, a supply aware of the matter stated on Sunday.

The Washington Publish earlier reported the choice.

Ron Klain, Biden’s present chief of workers, plans to go away his put up within the coming weeks, sources aware of the matter have instructed Reuters.

Advertisement

Zients served because the White Home COVID coordinator from the beginning of the Biden administration in early 2021 via April of final yr. He was credited with overseeing and implementing Biden’s efforts to get Individuals vaccinated, but additionally confronted criticism that the administration didn’t do sufficient early on to spice up testing capability.

Zients additionally served as an financial adviser to President Barack Obama’s administration, wherein Biden served as vice chairman.

The White Home had no instant remark.

Zients’s return to the White Home would come as Biden prepares to declare his intention to hunt a second four-year time period in 2024, a transfer anticipated after the State of the Union handle subsequent month.

The chief of workers place, thought-about some of the essential on the White Home, is the senior political appointee liable for driving the president’s coverage agenda and guaranteeing applicable workers members are employed.

Advertisement

The job can have a excessive burnout fee because the lengthy days pile up. Biden’s predecessor, Republican Donald Trump, went via 4 chiefs of workers in 4 years.

Reporting by Jason Lange in Washington and Nandita Bose in Rehoboth Seashore, Delaware; Modifying by Scott Malone and Chizu Nomiyama



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Washington

Democrats have ‘no one’ to lead opposition to Trump going into 2025: Byron York – Washington Examiner

Published

on

Democrats have ‘no one’ to lead opposition to Trump going into 2025: Byron York – Washington Examiner


The Washington Examiner’s Byron York argued the Democratic Party has a serious dilemma facing it going into 2025, specifically how it does not have anyone of the same caliber as Donald Trump to oppose the incoming president’s agenda.

Following Trump’s victory against Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 election, the Democratic Party has yet to find a new person to emerge as the new voice and face of its movement. York, the chief political correspondent for the Washington Examiner, assessed that this situation stems from how Democrats lost the White House and the Senate last month while also failing to retake the House of Representatives.  

‘UNCOMMITTED’ VOTERS BLAME HARRIS ‘CHOOSING PATH OF LIZ CHENEY’ FOR THEIR TURN TO TRUMP

“And even at this moment, of course, President Biden seems to be more out of it than he was even in the past, so they have no one to lead,” York argued on Fox News’s America Reports. “The only bright spot they’ve had in the last week or two has been that Republicans in the House have so much trouble getting their act together, and they hope — the Democrats hope that that will help them trip up the Republican Party in the coming year. But right now, there’s one leader, and that’s the president-elect, Donald Trump, and Democrats don’t have anybody to match his stature.”

Advertisement

York also agreed with the assessment of some Democrats that the most successful candidates among Democrats over the past cycle were those who ran against the party’s brand. He added that the party needs to have a proper debate over where the party went wrong in 2024, in which some could argue the party pushed its policies too far while others could argue the massive loss was due to a messaging problem.

York’s assessment comes after billionaire Bill Ackman, who endorsed Trump shortly after the president-elect’s first assassination attempt, argued the best-case scenario for the Democratic Party in the 2024 election cycle would be “a massive loss,” as this would force the party and its leadership to undergo a “reboot.”

Ahead of the Democratic National Committee’s election for its new chair, 2024 Democratic presidential candidate Marianne Williamson has launched her bid for the role, though York argued she would ultimately not win this election. Among the competitors she faces for DNC chair is Ben Wikler, the party chairman for Wisconsin, with York calling his bid “smart,” as Democrats could have won the 2024 election if they had won Wisconsin in the Electoral College. 

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

“So you’re going to have a contest for the Feb. 1 election for the DNC chair,” York stated. “You’re going to have a contest among people who actually had some background in the party and people who have actually held positions in the party.”

Advertisement

Amid the Democratic Party’s struggle to find a new face going forward, Democratic strategist Tad Devine assessed that his party has “no leadership now at the highest level.” Another person has argued that Democrats are “absolutely committed to their own ideas, even when they’re failing.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Southwest Washington officials look to state for new law enforcement training center

Published

on

Southwest Washington officials look to state for new law enforcement training center


Vancouver Police Department, West Precinct, in Vancouver, Wash., June 29, 2024.

Anna Lueck / OPB

The legislators will make an initial request of $3.5 million toward plans for the training center, which would serve new recruits and current staff. They will seek an additional $3 million during the 2026 legislative session as well as federal appropriations from Washington’s Congressional delegation, according to a letter from Vancouver Mayor Anne McEnerny-Ogle.

“We really need one place to come together and have the ability to give our officers the best training,” said Vancouver Police Department Deputy Chief Erica Nilsen, who noted Southwest Washington’s booming population. “That’s really why we need the regional academy.”

Advertisement

The academy would primarily serve as a training site for police and sheriff’s department staff from Clark, Cowlitz and Skamania counties, Nilsen said. Her department hopes to have a facility where prospective officers could train on squad car driving, firearms and scenario training, and do classroom work.

Since January, the Vancouver Police Department has used a repurposed elementary school in the city. They also rent a driving track and send recruits to the Washington State Criminal Justice Training Commission academy in Burien, about two-and-a-half hours north.

That distance creates barriers to hiring potential officers who are female or single parents, Nilsen said.

“To leave your family for four months is incredibly difficult. Sometimes that stops the conversation before they even get past that,” she said.

Lawmakers are pitching the idea of a potential location in Ridgefield on property that’s privately owned by the family of Boschma Farms, near where Clark College is currently building an advanced manufacturing campus.

Advertisement

The likelihood of landing such a request for state funds remains uncertain, given Washington’s projected $10-12 billion budget deficit. Clark County and the city of Vancouver are also navigating multimillion-dollar deficits.

“With the budget issues that we’re going to be facing, it kind of remains to be seen where we’re at. It’s going to be probably quite a stretch, but [law enforcement] is certainly my priority going into this next session,” said state Rep. Stephanie McClintock, R-Vancouver, whose district spans the north end of Clark County.

McClintock said that in addition to being a training academy, she hopes such a facility would provide a new administrative home for the Clark County Sheriff’s Office.

Officials with the Vancouver Police Department and county sheriff’s office have both recently said they are among the lowest-staffed departments in the state per capita. McClintock said a new training facility could help attract more law enforcement officers.

“We need to send a message that they are a priority,” she said. “It’s a morale issue. And it’s a good recruiting tool to show that we support our law enforcement here in Southwest Washington.”

Advertisement

In November, the city of Vancouver attempted to increase property taxes to fund 80 new police officers. The proposal was rejected by voters. Clark County is considering asking voters to pay for 30 new sheriff’s deputies, according to the mayor’s memo.

From 2020 to 2023, Clark County saw a 3.5% increase in population. While a new law enforcement facility would take years to complete, the need to train officers will increase as the population of Southwest Washington continues to grow.



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Tale of the Tape, Predictions: Louisville vs. Washington

Published

on

Tale of the Tape, Predictions: Louisville vs. Washington


LOUISVILLE, Ky. – Louisville (8-4, 5-3 ACC) is set to face Washington (6-6, 4-5 Big Ten) in the Sun Bowl on Tuesday, Dec. 31 at 2:00 p.m. EST at Sun Bowl Stadium in El Paso, Texas. Here’s how the Cardinals stack up against the Huskies:

*Mobile users can scroll left and right on the tables below*

Washington

Louisville

Advertisement

AP/USAT

NR/NR

RV/RV

CFP

NR

Advertisement

NR

SOS

12th

28th

SOR

Advertisement

46th

25th

SP+

61st

18th

Advertisement

FPI

45th

12th

Sagarin

47th

Advertisement

17th

Kelley Ford

49th

13th

CFB Insiders

Advertisement

41st

11th

Washington

Louisville

Total Offense

Advertisement

68th (383.7)

10th (455.8)

Yards Per Play

52nd (5.96)

3rd (6.88)

Advertisement

Scoring Offense

109th (22.5)

9th (36.6)

Passing Yards

39th (252.3)

Advertisement

20th (272.4)

Yards Per Completion

113th (10.97)

37th (12.82)

Rushing Yards

Advertisement

93rd (131.3)

37th (183.3)

Yards Per Rush Attempt

85th (4.07)

9th (5.60)

Advertisement

First Downs Gained

76th (248)

57th (261)

3rd Down Con. %

102nd (36.4%)

Advertisement

74th (39.7%)

4th Down Con. %

101st (45.8%)

(116th (40.0%)

Red Zone Con. %

Advertisement

85th (82.2%)

95th (80.8%)

Turnovers Lost

19th (11)

19th (11)

Advertisement

Interceptions Thrown

26th (7)

10th (6)

Fumbles Lost

15th (4)

Advertisement

30th (5)

Tackles for Loss Allowed

87th (5.83)

19th (4.17)

Sacks Allowed

Advertisement

111th (2.83)

23rd (1.25)

Avg. Time of Possession

66th (30:10)

73rd (29:57)

Advertisement

Key: National Rank out of 134 FBS Teams (Value)

Washington

Louisville

Total Defense

27th (324.8)

Advertisement

58th (360.1)

Yards Allowed Per Play

28th (5.00)

49th (5.28)

Scoring Defense

Advertisement

45th (22.8)

52nd (23.3)

Passing Yards Allowed

5th (166.8)

80th (224.7)

Advertisement

Rushing Yards Allowed

83rd (158.1)

43rd (135.4)

First Downs Allowed

69th (241)

Advertisement

40th (229)

3rd Down Defensive %

106th (43.9%)

39th (35.5%)

4th Down Defensive %

Advertisement

91st (57.1%)

112th (64.5%)

Red Zone Defensive %

53rd (81.0%)

63rd (81.8%)

Advertisement

Turnovers Gained

91st (14)

69th (16)

Interceptions Caught

93rd (8)

Advertisement

75th (9)

Fumbles Recovered

69th (6)

49th (7)

TFL Per Game

Advertisement

132nd (3.6)

39th (6.4)

Sacks Per Game

90th (1.67)

40th (2.42)

Advertisement

Key: National Rank out of 134 FBS Teams (Value)

Washington

Louisville

Net Punting

131st (34.49)

Advertisement

109th (36.74)

Avg. Kickoff Return

30th (22.42)

60th (20.53)

Avg. Kickoff Return Def.

Advertisement

92nd (21.83)

24th (17.42)

Avg. Punt Return

74th (7.27)

106th (5.13)

Advertisement

Avg. Punt Return Def.

126th (14.94)

31st (5.00)

Field Goal Attempts

18-26

Advertisement

18-25

PAT

26-26

55-55

Key: National Rank out of 134 FBS Teams (Value)

Advertisement

– FPI Prediction: Per ESPN’s Football Power Index, the Cardinals have a 74.8 percent chance to win against the Huskies. Louisville has an FPI rating of 16.4 (12th overall), whereas Washington has an FPI rating of 5.1 (45th overall).

– SP+ Prediction: Per Bill Connelly’s SP+ model, the Cardinals have a 76.89 percent chance to take down the Huskies. Louisville has an SP+ rating of 15.5 (18th overall), whereas Washington has an SP+ rating of 3.0 (61st overall).

– Kelley Ford Prediction: Per the Kelley Ford ratings, the Cardinals have a 73 percent chance to defeat the Huskies. Louisville has a KFord rating of 16.5 (14th overall), whereas Washington has a KFord rating of 5.1 (48th overall).

– College Football Insiders Prediction: Per College Football Insiders’ IPR metric, the Cardinals have a 71.99 percent chance to take down the Huskies. Louisville has an IPR rating of 65.5 (11th overall), whereas Washington has an IPR rating of 53.5 (41st overall).

– Personal Prediction: Louisville 28, Washington 24

Advertisement

(Photo via Jordan Prather – Imagn Images)

You can follow Louisville Cardinals On SI for future coverage by liking us on Facebook, Twitter/X and Instagram:

Facebook – @LouisvilleOnSI
Twitter/X – @LouisvilleOnSI
Instagram – @louisvilleonsi

You can also follow Deputy Editor Matthew McGavic at @Matt_McGavic on Twitter/X and @mattmcgavic.bsky.social on Bluesky





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending