Connect with us

Washington

Ask Help Desk: Smart speakers can get dumber after learning your voice

Published

on

Ask Help Desk: Smart speakers can get dumber after learning your voice


Placeholder whereas article actions load

One of the crucial annoying traps of digital life may be software program upgrades which can be secretly downgrades. I wish to share a cautionary story a few downgrade from Google that would find yourself costing you cash. After a lot forwards and backwards with me, Google described it as a “bug,” but it surely exposes an ongoing danger to our digital future.

Reader Matt Hirsch from outdoors of Boston obtained in contact with Assist Desk a few unusual phenomenon on his Google good audio system. He and his spouse each used them to stream music from YouTube Music, a Google different to Spotify. However quickly the music stopped working for his spouse. She would hear advertisements earlier than it might play a track she requested for.

One factor had modified. Hirsch and his spouse not too long ago activated the Google Voice Match service. This non-compulsory replace trains Google Assistant, powered by synthetic intelligence, to acknowledge completely different voices and current them with customized responses. Voice Match may be helpful if, for example, you wish to entry particular person calendars or buying lists.

However the Hirsch household definitely had not anticipated Voice Match would preserve their family from sharing a music account. Requested Hirsch, “Is that this one thing that’s intentional to get us to purchase the household plan or an unintended oversight?”

Advertisement

Once I informed Google about his expertise, the corporate initially denied it might occur. So I attempted to duplicate his state of affairs utilizing a Google Nest Hub speaker, which comprises a small display screen, with the assistance of the voices of some household and mates.

Certain sufficient, the good speaker wouldn’t let one other Voice Match person in my home play from my very own premium YouTube Music subscription. The opposite person obtained booted to the “free” model of YouTube Music with advertisements. Our selections had been to have everybody be part of a dearer household plan or flip off Voice Match.

The expertise jogged my memory of the digital rights locks on music information you used to purchase on the iTunes Retailer again within the day. Now the locks are on the trendy world of streaming, and the one secret’s your individual voice.

I shared the outcomes of my experiment with Google, and it denied this might occur a second time. Solely after I despatched it a video of the expertise did Google change its tune. “This situation is being attributable to a bug impacting good shows. We’re engaged on a repair as quickly as potential,” mentioned Google spokesman Robert Ferrara.

The reasons of how Voice Match and music providers work inside a family are about as difficult as logic puzzles. The basis of the issue is that Google merchandise are constructed for people, whose knowledge may be collected and marketed to, not properties stuffed with individuals who rightly anticipate they will all share in experiences like listening to music.

Advertisement

The Google coverage is that if the proprietor of good audio system has a music subscription, different members of the family may also entry it. When the good audio system don’t acknowledge the voice of a person, it defaults the music service to the proprietor.

How the expertise monopoly made good audio system dumber

However one thing clearly went haywire when the first person of the speaker subscribes to YouTube Music and a second person activates Voice Match. Issues make extra sense with Amazon Alexa and Apple Siri, which even have voice capabilities. I checked in with each firms, and neither cuts off different members of a family with voice matches from utilizing a shared streaming music account.

The Google spokesman didn’t reply after I requested him to answer to the query from Hirsch about whether or not utilizing voice identification as a lock was intentional. It could have simply been an oversight from Google. However I additionally wouldn’t put it previous a enterprise growth individual within the firm from pondering they might nickel and dime us to drive incremental income from YouTube Music.

We must always push again in opposition to the concept that firms can use software program updates to encroach on or change the performance of units we paid for. However now we have seen it again and again with merchandise reminiscent of printers that get updates to restrict the place you’ll be able to supply ink. We now have over a decade of reminders that when one thing connects to the Web, you aren’t actually in command of it.

Advertisement

My favourite instance is much more ludicrous. In 2019, Nike launched sneakers linked to the Web that used an app to lace themselves. The corporate pushed out a software program replace that inadvertently broke some the motorized mechanism on the sneakers, so they might now not even lace up. The software program replace turned sneakers into bricks.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Washington

Confirmed: Cardinal McElroy to be appointed Washington archbishop

Published

on

Confirmed: Cardinal McElroy to be appointed Washington archbishop


Cardinal Robert McElroy of San Diego will be announced as the new archbishop of Washington, D.C., The Pillar has confirmed.

Cardinal Robert Walter McElroy

After reporting January 4 that multiple U.S. bishops had said that the appointment was imminent, The Pillar has separately confirmed that Pope Francis has selected McElroy to succeed Cardinal Wilton Gregory in the capital see.

The announcement is expected Monday, according to sources close to the process.

McElroy’s appointment follows a lengthy and contentious process to find a successor for the Washington archdiocese, which involved a protracted standoff between some American cardinals and the apostolic nunciature.

Advertisement

The Pillar has previously reported that following a meeting in October in which McElroy joined Cardinals Blase Cupich of Chicago and Joseph Tobin of Newark to meet with Pope Francis during the synod on synodality in October, Francis was said to have decided against appointing McElroy.

Instead, Francis tasked former Washington archbishop Cardinal Donald Wuerl to identify a suitable candidate.

Wuerl, sources close to the process have confirmed to The Pillar, suggested Bishop Sean McKnight of Jefferson City, with Cardinal Gregory also signing off on the recommendation. However, in the weeks following the presidential election result, which saw Donald Trump reelected to the White House, Francis agreed to revisit McElroy’s candidacy.

As Bishop of San Diego and as a cardinal, McElroy has been outspoken on various subjects touching the political area, most especially immigration.

Subscribe now

Advertisement

In addition to the political sensitivities of the role, McElroy will also assume leadership of more than half a million Catholics in the DC area and southern Maryland, becoming their third archbishop since 2018.

McElroy turns 71 in February and succeeds Cardinal Gregory, 77, who was appointed to succeed Cardinal Donald Wuerl in 2019, whose resignation was accepted by Pope Francis following the scandal surrounding Wuerl’s own predecessor, Theodore McCarrick, the previous year.

Despite promises of transparency by Gregory at the time of his appointment, the archdiocese has so far declined to answer repeated questions about McCarrick’s tenure, especially money raised and spent via his personal “archbishop’s fund” during his time in Washington.

McElroy has himself faced questions about McCarrick in the past, with some expressing concerns about how he responded to a 2016 warning about the now-laicized former cardinal.

In addition to lingering questions about McCarrick, McElroy will also have to reckon with a process of financial restructuring in the Washington archdiocese.

Advertisement

In December last year, several local priests told The Pillar that chancery officials had painted a bleak picture of archdiocesan finances, announcing sweeping reforms of its parish assessment system to bridge a multi-million dollar deficit.

As Bishop of San Diego, McElroy has at times raised eyebrows on the national stage, calling for the synod on synodality to debate issues like the sacramental ordination of women, despite Pope Francis repeatedly saying such issues were not up for discussion.

The cardinal has previously made calls for “comprehensive inclusion” in Eucharistic reception.

Following the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith’s 2023 instruction Fiducia supplicans on the blessing of persons on same-sex relationships, which Rome agreed to allow the bishops of Africa to not implement in their own dioceses, McElroy hailed the “diverging pastoral paths” taken by the Church in different countries as a model of healthy decentralization, rather than a sign of contradiction within the Church.

Last year, McElroy issued a controversial homeschooling policy in the San Diego diocese, barring local Catholic home schooling groups from using parish facilities.

Advertisement
Cardinal Robert McElroy presides at a liturgy during the Los Angeles Religious Education Congress. Credit: RECongress/YouTube.

Cardinal McElroy was ordained a priest for the Archdiocese of San Francisco in 1980, serving as secretary to Archbishop John Quinn. After several years in parish ministry, Quinn named him vicar general of the archdiocese in 1995.

McElroy was named auxiliary bishop of the Archdiocese of San Francisco in 2010, and made Bishop of San Diego in 2015. Pope Francis created him a cardinal in 2022.

Subscribe now



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington

Buccaneers Claim 3 Seed in NFC Playoff Field, Face Commanders in Wild Card Round

Published

on

Buccaneers Claim 3 Seed in NFC Playoff Field, Face Commanders in Wild Card Round


The Tampa Bay Buccaneers not only captured a fourth straight NFC South title on Sunday, but they also improved their overall position in the playoff standings and kept alive the possibility of two home games in the postseason.

While the Buccaneers secured their own playoff spot with a Week 18 win over the New Orleans Saints, the Los Angeles Rams had already clinched the NFC West title the Week before. That put the Rams into the third overall seed in the NFC playoff field coming into the final weekend, but a loss to the Seattle Seahawks on Sunday allowed Tampa Bay to leap them for that spot. Both the Buccaneers and Rams finished with 10-7 records but Tampa Bay won the tiebreaker for positioning based on a better record against conference opponents (8-4 to 6-6).

As the #3 seed, the Buccaneers will host a playoff game in the Wild Card round against the team that claimed the #6 seed. That proved to be Washington after the Commanders beat the Cowboys on Sunday to improve to 11-6. The NFL will announce the date and time of the game later on Sunday evening.

The Buccaneers will be taking part in the playoffs for a fifth straight season, the longest such run in franchise history, but this is the first time in that span that they will start out as the #3 seed. They earned the top Wild Card spot in 2020 and, coincidentally, started their playoffs at Washington after the Commanders won the NFC East with a 7-9 record. The Bucs won the NFC South each year from 2021 to 2023 and in those seasons was seeded second, fourth and fourth.

Advertisement

Tampa Bay could still be at home for two playoff games. If they win next weekend and the second-seeded Philadelphia Eagles lose to Green Bay, the Buccaneers would go into the Divisional Round as the second-highest remaining seed behind the winner of the Detroit-Minnesota game on Sunday night. That team would enjoy a bye in the first round and then play at home against the lowest of the remaining seeds. The Buccaneers would get the next seeded team up from the bottom, which would be either Minnesota/Detroit or Los Angeles.



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Washington Post cartoonist quits over rejected Trump sketch

Published

on

Washington Post cartoonist quits over rejected Trump sketch


What’s New

Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist Ann Telnaes resigned from The Washington Post after the editorial team rejected one of her cartoons criticizing The Post‘s billionaire owner Jeff Bezos.

Writing on her Substack blog on Friday, Telnaes said it was the first time her work was censored due to its point of view, prompting her decision to leave

Newsweek has contacted The Washington Post via email for comment.

The Washington Post building in Washington D.C., February 21, 2019. Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist Ann Telnaes resigned from The Post after the editorial team rejected one of her cartoons criticizing The Post’s billionaire owner Jeff Bezos.

Pablo Martinez Monsivais/ASSOCIATED PRESS

Why It Matters

Telnaes’ resignation highlights concerns over press freedom and the influence of billionaire owners on editorial decisions in major news outlets, including at the LA Times and The Washington Post.

Advertisement

Critics argue that billionaire owners could censor critical commentary, undermining journalism’s role in holding power accountable.

What To Know

The cartoon in question depicted Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, LA Times owner Patrick Soon-Shiong, and The Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos, all billionaires, and Micky Mouse, representing Disney, kneeling before a statue of Donald Trump, offering sacks of cash.

Telnaes posted a rough of the cartoon in the blog post:

Why I'm Quitting the Washington Post - Cartoon Illustration by Ann Telnaes

Telnaes described the decision to reject the cartoon as a “game changer” for her relationship with the paper.

But Post Opinions editor David Shipley, in a statement to Politico, said the cartoon was rejected to avoid repetition, because a column and a satirical piece on the same subject had already been published.

In her blog post, Telnaes outlined her career as an advocate for press freedom in various roles, having served on advisory boards for organizations supporting editorial cartoonists.

Advertisement

She emphasized the importance of holding power accountable and warned against efforts to “curry favor with an autocrat-in-waiting.”

What People Are Saying

Elizabeth Warren, Senator, on X: “@AnnTelnaes resigned after The Washington Post editorial page killed her cartoon. It’s worth a share. Big Tech executives are bending the knee to Donald Trump and it’s no surprise why: Billionaires like Jeff Bezos like paying a lower tax rate than a public school teacher.”

David Shipley, Washington Post Opinions Editor, in a statement to Politico: “My decision was guided by the fact that we had just published a column on the same topic as the cartoon and had already scheduled another column — this one a satire — for publication. The only bias was against repetition.”

Ann Telnaes, Cartoonist, on Substack: “For the first time, my editor prevented me from doing that critical job. So I have decided to leave the Post.”

What Happens Next

With Donald Trump set to assume the presidency, The Post faces increased scrutiny over its ability to maintain editorial independence under Bezos’s ownership. Telnaes’ departure raises questions about how the paper will approach coverage of Trump’s administration, particularly regarding its willingness to challenge powerful figures.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending