Connect with us

Utah

Utah leaders presented federal officials with a ‘wish list’ of national park changes. Here’s what was on it.

Published

on

Utah leaders presented federal officials with a ‘wish list’ of national park changes. Here’s what was on it.


Utah state and county leaders pushed federal officials and park superintendents for expanded access and increased visitation at the state’s national parks in a closed-door meeting on Monday, according to those who attended.

The meeting covered a wide array of topics, including the federal government shutdown, timed entry systems at Arches and Zion National Parks, trails, roads and off-highway vehicle use, according to reports from city, county and state officials.

“It really was just a whole day of wish lists” from county and state officials, said Barbara Bruno, mayor of Springdale, a gateway community to Zion National Park.

The state’s Public Lands Policy Coordinating Office convened the meeting, which included leading federal and state officials such as Interior Department Deputy Secretary Karen Budd-Falen and Lt. Gov. Diedre Henderson, according to city and state officials. Representatives from Utah’s outdoor recreation, state parks and tourism offices were also present, as well park superintendents, county leaders and mayors of national park gateway communities.

Advertisement

Grand County Commissioner Trisha Hedin, who attended the meeting, criticized the “top down” approach and said the overarching theme of the meeting was about increasing access to the parks and getting “as many people in there as possible.”

“I thought it was really backward, and so it made people very weary and leery,” Hedin said. “I think it could have actually been a really productive meeting, but when you go in with your hackles up, it doesn’t feel good.”

The meeting sparked some concerns that this may be another move by Utah to seize control of federal public lands after three failed attempts earlier this year. The Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance called the meeting the state’s “latest effort to undermine and dismantle the nation’s public lands system” in a news release on Tuesday.

(Francisco Kjolseth | The Salt Lake Tribune) A billboard along Interstate 80 for the state’s “Stand for our Land” campaign against the Bureau of Land Management to regain control of public lands in Utah, is pictured on Tuesday, Sept. 24, 2024.

The state dismissed such claims. “This was not about the state taking over management of the national parks. We are the Public Lands Policy Coordinating Office, so we coordinate with all of our federal partners, and we do it on a regular basis,” said Redge Johnson, the office’s director.

Advertisement

While county and state leaders often meet with Interior and the National Park Service, Johnson did acknowledge it’s “unique” for the state to convene representatives from all the parks in one meeting.

“It was not a full-on land grab or anything like that,” said Bruno, “but it was clearly an opportunity to start talking about some of the things that the state would like to see happen with those parks.”

The wish list

Throughout the meeting, county and state officials presented their desires for Utah’s national parks, monuments and recreation areas. The reservation systems at Arches and Zion National Parks were a major topic of discussion.

Washington County and Kane County expressed their opposition to a timed-entry system at Zion, Bruno said. The park is currently developing its visitor use management plan, and a reservation system is a possible path forward. State and county leaders said earlier this year that they want a timed-entry system off the table, raising concerns that it could turn visitors away and hurt the local economy.

Bruno was not invited to present, despite representing the gateway community most affected by park crowds. She still shared how high visitation affects her community from the audience, though, she said.

Advertisement

“When [visitors] arrive on Labor Day weekend at 9 a.m. and they’re in a line, they’re in a line that’s on the one road in and out of our town, and our folks don’t get home, and we don’t get mail delivery at our homes, and we don’t get to the post office,” she said in an interview with The Tribune.

Bruno said she wants the planning process to continue so the park can figure out the best path forward to accommodate growing crowds. Zion was the second most visited national park in the country last year.

(Leah Hogsten | The Salt Lake Tribune) The parking lot at The Windows is full in Arches National Park, Monday, May 15, 2023. In April 2023, Arches National Park implemented a timed entry system to pace visitors’ arrival times to alleviate overcrowding and congestion among some 1.8 million visitors a year.

For Arches, Grand County Commissioner Brian Martinez presented a proposal a majority of county commissioners would like included in the park’s visitor use planning process, the Access and Capacity Enhancement Alternative, according to Hedin. The proposal includes a package of non-reservation ideas to manage crowds, such as expanded parking, new trail connections and greater use of real-time traffic and visitation data.

For the past four years, Arches has been testing a timed-entry pilot system. The system has drawn mixed reactions locally. Some county officials like Martinez are concerned it may be hurting the economy.

Advertisement

Moab Mayor Joette Langianese doesn’t want timed entry to go away, though, and expressed her support of the system during the meeting on Monday, she told The Tribune. “We’re not seeing any kind of economic impact to the city of Moab from the timed-entry,” she said.

She said the conversation around Arches felt “balanced” and she was grateful that mayors were included in the meeting. “It was really good to meet the deputy secretary and have her hear our perspective on what’s happening at Arches and Canyonlands National Park,” she said.

Deputy Secretary Budd-Falen shared that the Interior Department is currently working on a mobile application that would help park visitors find nearby attractions, such as hikes outside the parks or restaurants in nearby communities, as they’re waiting for their reservation slot or turned away because of long lines, according to Langianese.

Other ideas discussed include opening more areas to off highway vehicle use in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area and Capitol Reef National Park, as well as paving the entirety of the Burr Trail in Capitol Reef, according to a report from Hedin that was published in the Grand County Commission meeting agenda Tuesday.

(Bethany Baker | The Salt Lake Tribune) A car drives past the sign for Capitol Reef National Park near Torrey on Saturday, June 7, 2025.

Advertisement

The state would also like to see park areas that close seasonally open more, according to Hedin’s report, including Rainbow Point Road in Bryce Canyon National Park, the visitor center at Hovenweep National Monument and the North Rim of the Grand Canyon, which is in Arizona but near southwest Utah towns such as Kanab.

“The overarching theme was … more access and getting as many people in there as possible, which is discouraging,” Hedin said.

Bruno noted that environmental concerns were absent from the discussion. “It was all about how these properties are economic drivers for the state. … Nobody talked about preserving the natural resources,” she said.

That focus is “extremely concerning” and is drifting from the reasons parks were protected, Cory MacNulty, southwest regional campaign director with the National Parks Conservation Association, told The Tribune.

“They seem to be really focused on short term economic gain with a willingness to sacrifice long term park planning, park resources, as well as the visitor experience,” MacNulty said.

Advertisement

Collaboration going forward

The meeting also covered how the state, national parks and Interior Department work together going forward, particularly during a government shutdown.

The state spent $336,000 to keep visitor centers open at parks across Utah during the recent shutdown, according to Anna Loughridge, communications director for the Utah Office of Tourism.

“I’d like to say we’ll never have another shutdown, but that’s probably not likely, so if and when that happens again, we just wanted to talk about a way that we could do that more smoothly,” Johnson, PLPCO’s director, said.

Officials also discussed maintenance backlogs at parks and how the state may be able to help with those costs, Johnson said. This year, the state helped cover the costs of a new sewer line in Zion National Park to replace a failing septic system.

Cuts to the Park Service’s staff and budget were not discussed at the meeting, according to both Hedin and Langianese. The National Park Service has lost 25% of their staff since the beginning of 2025, and the Trump administration has proposed massive cuts to the agency’s budget.

Advertisement

(Erin Schaff | The New York Times) Park Rangers assist visitors at Zion National Park, Aug. 15, 2025. The mandate to keep the parks open coupled with insufficient staff has forced employees to take on multiple roles.

“They asked for more people to be allowed into the parks,” MacNulty said. “They asked for OHVs to be allowed on roads. They asked for roads to be paved and a number of other things, but they did not ask for the restoration of adequate staffing and funding for the park service.”

State, county and federal officials did not come to any final agreements on future collaboration during shutdowns or park maintenance costs during the meeting on Monday, Johnson said. Deputy Secretary Budd-Falen said she’d follow up with park superintendents on topics discussed, according to Langianese.

“There was nothing earth shattering,” Johnson said, “and no decisions were made.”



Source link

Advertisement

Utah

Utah snowpack numbers looking dismal with not much time to catch up

Published

on

Utah snowpack numbers looking dismal with not much time to catch up


The 2025-2026 winter season isn’t quite over, but it’s no secret that it’s been a rough one when it comes to snow. Right now, statewide snowpack numbers are hovering around 60% of the median.

But you don’t have to know those numbers to understand what a strange winter it’s been.

“It’s kind of good,” said Carrie Stewart, who lives in Salt Lake City. “I mean, I like it because I like a milder climate. But I realize this summer is going to be hard.”

MORE | Snowpack

“I’m not sad I’m not shoveling,” said Sally Humphreys of Salt Lake City. “But it’s definitely worrying.”

Advertisement

State water officials are also worried. The clock is ticking to bulk up those snowpack numbers.

“We’re running out of time to get the snowpack that we need,” said Jordan Clayton, supervisor of the Utah Snow Survey. “We have about 40 or so days until our typical snowpack peak.”

There is still some time to make up lost ground, but the odds aren’t great. Clayton estimates a 10% chance of reaching normal by the end of the season.

“Those are terrible odds,” he said.

In fact, the odds of having a record low snowpack are greater, sitting at 20%. It’s a grim reality that has officials looking toward the summer anxiously.

Advertisement

“I would expect to see watering restrictions outdoors for a lot of places,” said Laura Haskell, Utah’s drought coordinator.

It’s unknown what the next few weeks will bring, but if Haskell had to guess, she doesn’t see state reservoirs filling up much from where they are now.

“In the spring when that runoff hits, we do get a noticeable peak in our reservoir storage,” Haskell said. “The water just starts coming in. But this year, we don’t anticipate getting that.”

Haskell says we have enough reservoir storage to likely make it through the summer, but there are other implications to worry about.

Our autumn season was pretty wet. That led to decent soil moisture levels, which can then lead to higher vegetation growth.

Advertisement

“If we then have a snowpack that melts out really early, we’ll have a longer than normal summer, if you will, with forage growth that might dry out, and so that’s kind of a bad recipe for promoting fire hazard,” Clayton said.

Utahns have dealt with low snowpack levels in the past. Many Utahns are familiar with their lawn turning brown because of water restrictions.

“We’ll probably just let it go that nice, sandy, golden color that it gets in the summer in a dry climate,” said Dea Ann Kate, who lives in Cottonwood Heights.

As we wait to see what the next few weeks bring, people like Carrie Stewart are just reflecting on an unusual winter.

“It is worrying,” she said. “We need snow. We’ve only shoveled once this season, and that’s very unusual.”

Advertisement

Water officials are now hoping for something else unusual: climbing out of the snowpack hole that’s been created.

“But there are no times going back where the snowpack totals for the state were close to where they are right now, and we ended up actually at a normal peak,” Clayton said. “So while it’s possible, it’s very unlikely.”

_____



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

Immigration agents bolster action at Utah courthouses, prompting criticism from some

Published

on

Immigration agents bolster action at Utah courthouses, prompting criticism from some


SALT LAKE CITY — The presence of federal immigration agents tracking immigrants has increased in Salt Lake County-area courtrooms since mid-February as have complaints about how they’re carrying out their duties.

United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents may have carried out operations at the Matheson Courthouse in Salt Lake City, according to Lacey Singleton, a public defender who’s regularly at the facility.

“Now it is like they are there all the time … They just basically hang out, and they’re either sitting in the courtroom, or they’re lurking in the hallways,” she said. They wear normal street garb, she said, but for regulars in the courtroom, “they stand out.”

Immigration enforcement action at courthouses around the country has become “a cornerstone” in the efforts of the administration of President Donald Trump to detain and deport immigrants in the country illegally, according to the American Immigration Council, an immigrant advocacy group. Since an arrest of one of Lacey’s clients around Feb. 12 or 13, she and others say, the practice has become more and more common in Utah.

Advertisement

ICE didn’t respond to a KSL query seeking comment, but the practice aligns with the Trump administration’s push to crack down on illegal immigration. Agency guidance notes that the people ICE seeks may appear in courthouses to address unrelated criminal and civil matters, and that such facilities are typically secure.

“Accordingly, when ICE engages in civil immigration enforcement actions in or near courthouses, it can reduce safety risks to the public, targeted alien(s) and ICE officers and agents,” reads a May 27 memo on the matter.

Critics, though, say immigration agents’ efforts can be disruptive and could spur immigrants, otherwise trying to resolve their legal issues, to steer clear of court, jeopardizing their cases. As word spreads of the activity, it could also spur fearful immigrant witnesses and crime victims to steer clear of the legal system, Lacey worries.

Salt Lake County Sheriff Rosie Rivera brought the issue up at a Salt Lake County Council meeting on Tuesday, saying her office has received “multiple complaints” about ICE agents’ activity in Salt Lake County courthouses, where sheriff’s officials, serving as court bailiffs, provide security.

U.S. agents have ratcheted up immigration enforcement action at Utah courthouses, prompting criticism from some. The photo shows attorney Lacey Singleton, center, questioning a suspected agent recently at Matheson Courthouse in Salt Lake City. (Photo: Salt Lake City Bail Fund)

Part of the problem, she said, is that the agents typically wear plain clothes and don’t identify themselves, not even to bailiffs. Another issue relates to the actual process of taking an immigrant into custody, which Rivera says should occur outside of public view with the suspects’ lawyers present.

Advertisement

In one instance, she said, a bailiff heard a scuffle and thought someone was getting assaulted, only to find out it was ICE agents detaining somebody.

A bailiff and an ICE agent subsequently “got into a verbal altercation,” Rivera said. “We are addressing that issue, but I want you to understand, these deputies are put in a really tough situation, and in this situation, I understand how he could get to that point where he had no idea who they were, and he was trying to make sure that somebody wasn’t being assaulted at the time.”

Video from last week, posted to social media by the Salt Lake City Bail Fund, shows Lacey walking past a suspected immigration agent at the Matheson Courthouse, asking for identification but getting no reply. The Salt Lake City Bail Fund, critical of ICE activity, sends observers to the Matheson Courthouse to monitor the agency’s activity.

“That’s a problem because it’s like, who are you?” Lacey said. “For all I know, you’re some random dude who is just, like, off the street and participating in kidnapping people.”

Video supplied to KSL shows an incident outside Riverton Justice Court on Wednesday — four apparent immigration agents in plain clothes wrestling on the ground with an apparent suspect they were trying to take into custody.

Advertisement

“Don’t resist,” someone off-camera says in Spanish while filming the incident. “Son, don’t resist. Calm down. They’re going to hurt you more.”

The woman asks for his name and contact info after the agents cuff him and take him to a nearby car, while another man on the scene shouts at the officials and berates them. “You guys are disgusting,” the man says.

Anna Reganis, a public defender with the Salt Lake Legal Defender Association, like Lacey, said immigration agents detained a man at Salt Lake City Justice Court on Wednesday. She didn’t witness the actual detention, but heard the aftermath.

“All of a sudden, in my courtroom, we could hear from the lobby blood-curdling screams,” Reganis said. She went to the main lobby, finding a woman holding her infant baby “just inconsolably screaming and crying.” Turns out the woman had gone to the courthouse with her husband, and he had just been detained by immigration agents.

Read more:

Lacey maintains that the people the ICE agents seem to be pursuing aren’t the most hardened of criminals, which the Trump administration said would be the focus when the crackdown started. Reganis echoed that, noting that those with business in the Salt Lake City Justice Court face relatively minor offenses.

Advertisement

“Myself and my co-workers all had a bit of a wake-up call because we kept telling ourselves that this wasn’t going to happen at the justice court because all of our cases are class B and C misdemeanors and infractions,” she said.

The Salt Lake City Bail Fund launched training sessions late last year for volunteers to serve as courthouse observers, particularly at the Matheson Courthouse. Liz Maryon, who helps oversee the effort, foresees another round of training to get more help. “We’re currently working on expanding our capacity so that we can be there every day,” she said.

The Key Takeaways for this article were generated with the assistance of large language models and reviewed by our editorial team. The article, itself, is solely human-written.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

Iranians in Utah, Middle East eye future after U.S. military action in Iran – KSLTV.com

Published

on

Iranians in Utah, Middle East eye future after U.S. military action in Iran – KSLTV.com


SALT LAKE CITY — Iranians in Utah said Sunday they were celebrating and grateful for U.S. military action against Iran after nearly 47 years of the Islamic Republic regime.

They expressed hope for a future that might bring greater freedom to the people of that country.

“Thank you, Mr. Trump, for helping us,” said Kathy Vazirnejad as she sat inside Persian restaurant Zaferan Café. “The 21st of March is our New Year. For our New Year’s, we do exchange presents and I think President Trump gave us the best gift as any for this year in attacking this government and killing all of those people.”

Vazirnejad moved from Iran to Utah in 1984, graduated from the University of Utah, and obtained U.S. citizenship.

Advertisement

She said the regime was oppressive and “vicious.”

“They’re just a devil,” she said. “I mean, it’s a government that kills its own people.”

Though she has continued to return to Iran to visit family, she said those visits had become increasingly tense and uncertain, even though most Iranians opposed their own government.

“I have a dual citizenship, Persian passport and an American passport,” Vazirnejad explained. “It’s hard. Each time I go there to the airport, I’m showing them my Persian passport and I’m like, ‘Oh my gosh, if they see I’m very active in my social media against the government?’”

Numerous other Iranians shared similar stories of their departure from their homeland, including Ramin Arani, who once served for two years in the Iranian army at the age of 18.

Advertisement

“It was right after the Iran and Iraq war and I was part of the team that was cleaning the war zone basically in terms of unexploded shells and land mines and all that,” Arani explained. “I put my life on the line for the sake of my country, although I was not treated as a first-hand citizen.”

Arani said when he left Iran, he migrated to the U.S. and graduated from the University of Utah with an engineering degree.

“Every day, I appreciate the opportunity that was provided to me,” Arani said.

He said for decades, Iranians didn’t believe the day would come when much of the Islamic Republic’s leadership would be taken out in military strikes.

“I believe we are watching history unfolding,” Arani said. “Potentially, the course of history is about to change.”

Advertisement

What that change looks like exactly remains largely uncertain, though there has been much discussion about potential regime change or the Iranian people taking matters into their own hands.

“Regime change is, you know, a be-careful-what-you-wish-for,” said Amos Guiora, a University of Utah law professor and Middle East analyst with family in Israel. “I say, ‘regime change,’ I get the phrase, but how it comes about, time will tell.”

Guiora questioned how long the U.S. intended to stay involved and what the endgame truly is.

“There’s an expression in Hebrew, if I may—zbang ve’ga’mar’no—which means ‘it ends just like that’—that’s not how these things end and obviously there are political calculations,” Guiora said.

He said he feared for the potential loss of life if boots-on-the-ground are ultimately required.

Advertisement

“(If) any of these things turn into a war of attrition, that would be horrible,” Guiora said.

Guiora, however, said he saw the obvious benefit of different leadership in Iran.

“You know, a shah-like Iran that would not be focused on the support of terrorist organizations and committing acts of terrorism—I think that would be a win-win for the world,” Guiora said.

Arani said if regime change does happen in Iran, he would like to see a constitutional monarchy take root like those in Great Britain and elsewhere in Europe.

“Sweden, Norway, these are all systems that are democratic, or I call them semi-democratic and they still have a monarch, which is a continuation of their culture,” Arani said.

Advertisement

Arani talked of the rich and proud long history of Iran, dating back thousands of years, and he believed there is much of that to share with the world today.

“The culture of Iran that is hidden underneath the layers of history I’m talking about, it’s all about light,” Arani said. “Iranian culture, the real one I’m talking about, is all about appreciating life, not ‘death to this,’ ‘death to that.’”

Vazirnejad believed as many as “85 percent” of Iranians supported the return of the shah’s family to Iran to lead, and she predicted a future where Iran is a partner with the U.S. and Israel.

She suspected that maybe one in five Iranians who left Iran because of the regime might consider returning permanently to the country under new leadership.

“It’s going to be very good,” she said. “Hopefully, we are celebrating the New Year with (the Islamic Republic) gone and hopefully by next year, the New Year’s 21st of March, we all go back to Iran, at least to visit.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending