Connect with us

Colorado

Colorado is caught in the crosshairs of mountain lion lovers and wolf haters (Editorial)

Published

on

Colorado is caught in the crosshairs of mountain lion lovers and wolf haters (Editorial)


Colorado Parks and Wildlife employees are in the crosshairs, caught between mountain lion lovers on the left and anti-wolf advocates on the right. The news this week that CPW employees are facing a variety of threats from radical elements in both groups of Coloradans strikes us as ironic sad — and frightening.

But in the face of unnecessary radicalism, we urge policymakers not to entrench themselves in their positions but to take a moderate approach that accepts the reality that, on both sides of the issue, there is ground to give.

CPW acting director Laura Clellan told The Colorado Sun that her staff has received anonymous threats over two mountain lions who were euthanized following a fatal attack on a runner. And after the release of 15 gray wolves into Colorado, CPW staff were followed during operations and threatened with violence.

We expect healthy and robust debate about Colorado’s wildlife management practices, but both sides of these issues have gone crazy. This outlandish and harassing behavior must stop.

Advertisement

Hunting is a vital part of our wildlife management, our economy and our Western culture as is Colorado Parks and Wildlife’s ability to euthanize animals who pose a threat to humans. The Denver Post editorial board opposed a ban on mountain lion hunting in 2024’s Proposition 127. But we also supported the reintroduction of wolves in Colorado in 2020’s Proposition 114. The wolves are native to Colorado and could help our ecosystems find the right balance between predator and prey.

From this middle-ground position, we can call for both sides to simmer down.

Because from our vantage of impartiality, we can see plainly that mountain lion hunting needs much more regulation to protect the apex predator from being overly culled. The ban simply went too far.

And we can see plainly that the reintroduction of wolves has not gone well for the wolves or for the ranchers whose livelihoods have been impacted by wolf depredation.

Neither of those realizations requires a revolution. A strongly worded letter to state officials or reintroduction of ballot measures to change state law could suffice in both instances of policy failure.

Advertisement

Accusations that CPW staff is acting inappropriately or that they are out to get Coloradans who have different ideas for how our wildlife should be managed are both inappropriate and inaccurate. There is no conspiracy to protect mountain lion hunters or the guides who make money pursuing the big cats for clients. There is no conspiracy to chase Colorado ranchers off of public lands with marauding bands of gray wolves.

What we do know is that a Colorado woman was recently killed by a mountain lion while on a heavily used trail near an established neighborhood in Estes Park. The tragic death followed months of reports of mountain lions that appeared to no longer fear humans. Euthanizing those animals was the right decision.

Hunting lions can contribute to the animals retaining a natural fear of humans and dogs. Not banning hunting was the right call. However, the tragic death also shouldn’t lead to vehement anti-lion sentiment like we are seeing with gray wolves.

Apex predators are a critical part of our ecosystem, and while they always pose a risk to humans, managing them, not eradicating them, is the right path.



Source link

Advertisement

Colorado

Keeler: Colorado’s best prep distance runner? Niwot’s Addison Ritzenhein makes case with 4A record

Published

on

Keeler: Colorado’s best prep distance runner? Niwot’s Addison Ritzenhein makes case with 4A record


LAKEWOOD — Her gold was in the bag.

They all were, technically. The night before she rewrote Colorado’s record book, Addison Ritzenhein, the Niwot senior who’s run like almost no teen distance runner ever has, went into her closet and pulled out a dozen state medals. As she laid them out side-by-side, all the miles started talking back.

Addy and her dad had found themselves waxing about the moments and the memories during a Friday night drive. It was the eve of her final CHSAA state track meet. The last ride.

“I want you to bring them (Saturday) morning,” Dathan Ritzenhein, head coach at On Athletics Club in Boulder, told his daughter when he saw the medals. He suggested putting all of them in a big bag and bringing it to Jeffco Stadium on Saturday.

Advertisement

“And then we’ll take them out at the end (of the meet). And we’re going to line them all up. I want to take a picture of you with all of them.”

Dad had a hunch.

Company was coming.

At a record pace, too.

“I wanted to have a perfect ending to my entire high school career,” Addy said after setting a state mark in the 4A girls 1600 meters in her final CHSAA event. “And I just had to remind myself that I’d done everything I could up to this moment.”

Advertisement

Move over, Wendy Koenig. Make some room, Melody Fairchild. The Kaltenbachs? Scooch over. Emma Coburn, Katie Rainsberger and Elise Cranny? You, too. If Ritzenhein isn’t the greatest girls prep distance runner in Colorado history, her closing kick made one heck of a case.



Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

Colorado RattleCam crawling with venomous snakes you must see yourself

Published

on

Colorado RattleCam crawling with venomous snakes you must see yourself


play

  • Viewers can observe the venomous snakes as they emerge from hibernation, bask and give birth.
  • The camera provides close-up views of the snakes’ features, such as their pupils and forked tongues.

Guarantee you won’t stick your hand in a rock crevice without first looking while hiking after you watch the Colorado RattleCam livestream of a rattlesnake mega den.

Yikes! Viewing the livestream is like watching a scary movie, equally entertaining and terrifying.

Advertisement

The mega den on undisclosed private property in Larimer County is crawling with the venomous snakes now that sunny weather has returned.

Project RattleCam is a collaboration between Cal Poly, Central Coast Snake Services and Dickinson College that allows viewers to observe rattlesnakes a lot closer than you would ever want to get in an effort to educate the public about these reptiles with a reputation.

A high-definition camera continually scans and zooms in and out on the rocky outcropping, where rattlesnakes slither among the rocks, bask in the sun and will give birth to live babies at this rookery, or communal birthing site, in late August and early September.

Watching the May 12 livestream, which includes a live chat, was fascinating.

The camera zoomed to show the patterns on the snakes that slowly slithered among the lichen-splotched rocks, a rattlesnake resting its head on a rock while soaking in the sun and rattlesnakes hiding in the brush.

Advertisement

The highlight was the camera capturing a rattlesnake muscling along a rock shelf. It zoomed so close you could see the vertical, slit-like pupils; pit organs on the snake’s face used to detect heat from prey; and the black forked tongue probing the air to locate prey and check out its environment.

Unless you want to get some work done, the best way to view the livestream is checking in every so often to scan the stream and see when the camera detects a rattlesnake. Otherwise, the livestream can take you down a rabbit hole, or in this case a rattlesnake den.

Here’s a timeline for your rattlesnake viewing pleasure

  • April-May: Rattlesnakes emerge from hibernation.
  • Early June: Most of the snakes travel downhill from the den to nearby meadows and shrublands where they spend the summer searching for food.
  • Late August-early September: Pregnant rattlesnakes return to the den to give birth.
  • Late September-October: The rest of the rattlesnakes return to the den.

Miles Blumhardt covers news and the outdoors for the Coloradoan.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Colorado

Colorado county and city team up to address local food accessibility

Published

on

Colorado county and city team up to address local food accessibility


To improve food access and build a healthier community, Boulder County, Colo. Public Health’s Healthy Eating, Active Living (HEAL) team collaborated with the city of Boulder on its comprehensive plan. The HEAL team analyzed best practices in nutritious food access and sustainable agriculture in comparable communities across the nation to help inform its recommendations for city planning, according to Amelia Hulbert, Boulder County Public Health’s Healthy Eating, Active Living (HEAL) lead.

“A comprehensive plan is visionary, it’s long range,” Hulbert said. “It should not just be a document that fits on the shelf and doesn’t get used, so when you have the opportunity to either create something new or update it, how do you make sure it [outlines] goals and policies that are going to support the work that you know needs to happen?

Learn more

Boulder County’s “Improving Food Access and Health for Boulder Residents Through Municipal Comprehensive Planning” initiative was the 2025 NACo Achievement Award “Best in Category” winner in Planning. 

“We wanted a place to specifically call out public health priorities, so when it came time to talk about allocating funding or anything like that, we can point to it and say, ‘As a county, we said that food access is important. We said that air quality monitoring is important.’”

When starting the process of creating the city’s comprehensive plan, City of Boulder staff reached out to the state health department looking for subject matter expertise on food access, which is how the HEAL team got involved, Hulbert said. 

Advertisement

“I think there’s this through line of ‘planners are planners, and they’re usually not subject matter experts,’” Hulbert said. “And so, when they seek out subject matter expertise, how can we make sure those connections can easily be made to people in their own community who are going to not only know the content, but know the issues? I think it’s a cool process, and others could totally do the same thing.”

The HEAL team analyzed comprehensive plans from a dozen municipalities like Boulder, including Ann Arbor, Mich.; Asheville, N.C.; Burlington, Vt. and Provo, Utah. Factors considered when choosing the municipalities included population size, economic and demographic makeup and communities with a mix of urban, suburban and unincorporated rural land, according to Hulbert. 

Olivia Ott, a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Public Health Associate working with the HEAL team, identified 34 model policies from the plans and categorized them into five themes to compare against the City of Boulder’s existing plan: healthy food access, sustainability, built environment, equity/culture and local agriculture. 

“We’re usually looking to a couple key cities across the nation that we would consider cutting edge and innovative,” Hulbert said. “So, we just applied that methodology to something very specific, of digging into, ‘How are their plans structured? What are they saying?’ And then thinking about, ‘Does it make sense for our community?’ And then [assessing] ‘What are other things that are really specific to our community?’”

Factoring in the identified best practices, Ott scored the city’s plan into three categories: “Present” in Boulder’s current plan, “Somewhat Present” and “Absent.” 

Advertisement

“That kind of grading system actually worked really well, and it really resonated with the planning team,” Hulbert said. “You could tell that they were like, ‘Oh my gosh, we’re doing really well here.’ And then, it was really specific, of ‘Hey, other people are talking about this one thing, and you all aren’t.’ I think it was just put in a way that they could really absorb.”

The HEAL team’s research and recommendations were presented to the Boulder and Broomfield County’s Food Security Network (BBFSN), a community group made up of people with lived experience of food insecurity and organizations that serve food insecure individuals, that were providing input on the city’s comprehensive plan. The HEAL team’s findings helped inform the BBFSN’s recommendations to the planning department. 

While the HEAL team had the expertise and staffing to do the research, it was “critically important” to then integrate community engagement with the BBFSN into the work, Hulbert noted. Final recommendations for the city plan from the BBFSN address food access through six different categories: transportation, land use, housing, climate, economic development and food systems. 

“We did what was within our wheelhouse, and then we knew that there was another group who has a totally different wheelhouse, so it was how could we then pass off what we’ve done and have them take it a step further?” Hulbert said. “Because I think what they brought is more of that lived experience community storytelling. Olivia can say, ‘It’s important to emphasize culturally relevant foods.’ And then there’s likely a community member that can actually give real voice to that and why that matters.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending