Veterans and rebuilding basketball teams—it’s not always the most natural fit. For the Utah Jazz, a team knee-deep into an all-out tank job, discovering the proper role for each player on the depth chart is essential for both player development and creating a strong team culture to build from when the team has (in theory) developed into a championship contender.
The Jazz have struggled to find the proper balance for their roster since blowing up their all-star core of Mitchell and Gobert, with ruins of that era littering the locker room with no real direction. Now, with Utah’s ship veering into the vicious waves of the NBA lottery chase, signing talented veterans can feel like stuffing a square peg into a round hole—even a toddler knows that’s a bad idea.
I present the Jordan Clarkson dilemma. Clarkson is a flamethrower scorer, capable of offensive fireworks at a moment’s notice. With the contending Jazz, he was the perfect sparkplug scorer off the bench for offensive lulls. Now, as the roster is populated with young and developing talent, Clarkson’s value has become somewhat uncertain.
Now 31 years old, Clarkson is a former 6th Man of the Year who averaged 17 points per night during the 2023-24 season. He’s expanded his game with the Jazz—especially in regards to playmaking and rebounding. Don’t you remember when he earned the first triple-double the Jazz have seen in over a decade?
Advertisement
But if he’s such a valuable asset, why hasn’t he been picked up by a serious championship contender ready to go all-in for a title run?
Good question, and one that’s sort of tricky to really stake down as we don’t have a solid answer. My thoughts boil down to a trio of roadblocks (some less easily ignored than others).
Finding Clarkson’s trade value is like a classic game of Pitfall. Obtaining the prize goes deeper than simply going through the motions. Swinging from vines, vaulting bottomless pits, and clearing crocodile-infested ponds, making a Jordan Clarkson Trade is no walk in the park. We have to explore beyond why teams would want to add the scoring machine, and instead shift toward the pitfalls of spending valuable assets on a player with his skill set.
So let’s journey deeper into the jungle of roster manipulation and better understand what may stand in the way for teams hoping to bolster their team into a championship-ready squad.
Advertisement
Obstacle 1: Defensive Disability
It’s no secret that Clarkson brings very little on the defensive end of the floor.
Not that he doesn’t bring effort and hustle to that half of the game—he takes great pride in his performance when taking the court, but one physical aspect of his resume leaves Clarkson at a disadvantage.
To be blunt: he’s small. And unlike Ash from Fantastic Mr. Fox, he doesn’t utilize that attribute much to his advantage. When protecting the basket, Jordan is frequently outmuscled and overpowered by larger opponents. Too small to be a shooting guard, but without the natural point guard repertoire, Clarkson is in positional limbo, and that’s a serious negative for teams that may want to add the Filipino to their active list.
How can a playoff team keep Clarkson on the floor while understanding full well that he’s likely to become the target of the strategy known as the Grayson Allen treatment? If he’s on the floor, attack him on defense!
Advertisement
Defense wins championships. It may be a cliche, but you can’t deny that defense is a vital aspect of championship contention. Any team looking to transplant the flamethrower into their delicate ecosystem may get burned come playoff time, and Clarkson is likely too deep into his career to change who he is.
Obstacle 2: Mo’ Money, Mo’ Problems
In this money-driven age of player empowerment, installing the Jordan Clarkson firmware onto your bench will be an expensive undertaking. After signing a contract extension with Utah last summer, he inked a contract for $55 million from that date until the 2026-27 season.
The good news? For the next two years, Clarkson’s salary will dip to $15 million per year for the next two seasons, a significant discount when taking his $25 million 2023-24 season into account.
A team pushing their chips to the center of the table should be more than willing to add $15 million to their payroll, but is Clarkson available enough to make this premium worth the pain?
Advertisement
Last season, Clarkson was a bit of a hobbled cheerleader—often injured, rarely playing, and only earning time off the bench when he was available. Jordan appeared in 55 games with the Jazz last season, which was his lowest mark since his 2017-18 season in Cleveland.
If he were on a championship contender—think New York or Boston—it’s not hard to imagine Clarkson bragging about his Mark Breen-flavored highlight reel in the same way Nick Kroll celebrated his new hairstyle: “I GOT BANGS!” His scoring ability is phenomenal at his size, and he would bring real value to any team that adds him.
But what you see is what you get, and for some teams, it may not be enough to justify flirting with the aprons of the salary cap.
Obstacle 3: Never Ever Ever Trade With Danny Ainge
In the ancient lore of the National Basketball Association, a prophecy describes a man capable of creating a masterpiece and destroying a nation in one effortless motion. Capable of trading a washed-up Kevin Garnett and Paul Pierce for the Nets’ entire future and trading down from the number one pick just to select the best draft prospect a few spots later.
Advertisement
This man, nay, this myth, is Danny Ainge, and you don’t trade with him.
After building the Boston Celtics’ championship core, the former BYU basketball star turned NBA champion left his comfy position in Boston’s front office in favor of leading a rebuild in Utah. Tearing down the foundation and replacing cherished family heirlooms with draft capital and a new generation of residents, Ainge has taken control of the Jazz and has a stranglehold on any who feel bold enough to engage in trade negotiations.
Ainge ripped 5 first-round picks from the Timberwolves for Rudy Gobert, 3 for Donovan Mitchell, and a plethora (yes, I said a plethora) of young talented players who have become beloved figures across the Salt Lake Valley.
Though his offerings are enticing, trading with Danny Ainge has proven to only lead to pain and heartache down the road, as the players and draft picks that were once your own become players you would do anything to get your hands on.
Never trade with Danny Ainge. Not even for something as innocent as Jordan Clarkson.
Advertisement
Does Clarkson bring value to the Jazz? As a veteran presence in the locker room, young players look up to him and follow his example as they weave their way through the dizzying tapestry of their NBA careers. That’s the whole reason why the Jazz signed aging point guard Patty Mills this offseason—Utah’s roster is full of young players who will need to develop into serious NBA-level contributors if this rebuild will ever be successful.
By all indications, Clarkson loves living in Utah and loves his role with the Jazz—we aren’t likely to see Jordan demand a trade any time soon. How long will it be until Clarkson’s trade value falls, though? As he grows older, league-wide interest will decrease.
He isn’t a one-man wrecking crew capable of carrying the Jazz on his back, so his presence is far from a detriment to Utah’s rebuild. I just can’t help but wonder what his purpose with this Jazz team will be moving forward, and if both parties may be better off if they were to part ways.
For the 2024-25 season, I say keep the phone lines open and listen to every offer that may come your way, but don’t settle for a trade that’s “good enough” (that’s never been the Ainge way, so why start now?). This may be one of the last opportunities to get value in return for Clarkson, but maybe the Jazz are comfortable where they stand.
Should Utah’s “school choice” program be allowed to stay put — or is it unconstitutional?
That’s the question that a judge is now weighing after spending several hours listening to oral arguments Thursday.
In the hearing, 3rd District Court Judge Laura Scott grilled attorneys for both the state and for Utah’s largest teacher union, the Utah Education Association, on the complex constitutional questions she must now unravel before issuing a ruling in the case — which she said she expects to hand down sometime in mid-to-late January.
Earlier this year, the Utah Education Association filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the Utah Fits All “scholarship program,” which the 2023 Utah Legislature created as an effort to offer “school choice” options by setting up a fund from which eligible K-12 students can receive up to $8,000 for education expenses including private school tuition and fees, homeschooling, tutoring services, testing fees, materials and other expenses.
Advertisement
Utah’s largest teacher union files lawsuit against Utah Fits All school choice voucher program
In 2023, lawmakers appropriated about $42.5 million in ongoing income tax revenue to the program. Then this year they nearly doubled that ongoing funding by adding an additional $40 million. In total, the program uses about $82.5 million in taxpayer funding a year.
That is, if the courts allow it to continue to exist.
In its lawsuit, the Utah Education Association alleges it’s an unconstitutional “voucher” program that diverts money from Utah’s public school system — using income tax dollars that they contend are earmarked under the Utah Constitution for the public education system and should not be funneled to private schools or homeschooling in the form of the Utah Fits All scholarship program.
The Utah Constitution has historically required the state’s income tax revenue be used only for public education, though that constitutional earmark has been loosened twice — once in 1996 to allow income tax revenue to be spent on public higher education, and once in 2020 with voter-approved Amendment G, which opened income tax revenue to be used to “support children and to support individuals with a disability.”
Advertisement
This year the Utah Legislature tried to remove that education earmark completely by putting Amendment A on the Nov. 5 ballot — but that effort failed after a judge voided the question because lawmakers failed to properly publish the proposed constitutional amendment in newspapers across the state.
Attorneys representing state officials, the Alliance for Choice in Education (a group that the Utah State Board of Education chose to administer the program), and parents of students benefiting from the program urged the judge to dismiss the lawsuit.
They argued the Utah Legislature acted within its constitutional constraints when it created the program. They contended that when Amendment G added to the Utah Constitution the word “children” as an allowable use for income tax dollars, that created a “broad” yet “not ambiguous” category that allowed Utah lawmakers to use the revenue for the Utah Fits All scholarship fund.
Attorneys for the Utah Education Association, however, argued that when legislators put Amendment G on the ballot and pitched it to voters, their stated intentions did not include using the funding for private school vouchers. Rather, they argued it was characterized as an effort to narrowly open the revenue up to “social services” for children and people with disabilities.
The judge repeatedly questioned state attorneys about their position, asking for clarity on the state’s interpretation of the Utah Constitution and whether it would allow Utah lawmakers the power to create a “shadow” or “parallel” education system that could funnel public dollars to private schools, which can select students based on religion, political beliefs, family makeup or other criteria. In contrast, Utah’s public school system must be free and open to all.
Arif Panju, an attorney representing parents who intervened in the case to argue in favor of protecting the Utah Fits All program, argued parents have a “fundamental right” to exercise their “school choice” options.
Advertisement
“The mere fact that they can use a private scholarship … does not transform those options into a shadow system,” Panju argued.
But to Scott, that still didn’t answer her question.
“I’m getting a little frustrated,” Scott said, adding that she wasn’t trying to debate school choice but rather she was trying to conduct a constitutional analysis.
Ultimately, state attorneys conceded their position could open the door to a “parallel” or “shadow” system — however, they argued that’s not what is being debated in this case. They argued the Utah Fits All program was funded only after the Utah Legislature appropriately funded its education system, as required by the Utah Constitution (which does not set a specific threshold).
When the hearing’s time ran out at about 4:30 p.m., Scott said she would take the issue under advisement, and she would not be ruling from the bench.
Advertisement
“I’m hopeful for mid-to-late January,” she said, “but I’m not making any promises I won’t take the entirety of the 60 days” that she has to make a decision.
SALT LAKE CITY — There’s frustration in the search to find the body of a missing member of the Utah National Guard, presumed murdered by his wife.
Matthew Johnson has been missing for nearly three months, and one of his fellow Green Berets said more should be done to find him.
“I think more can be done,” said John Hash, Utah Army National Guard 19th Special Forces Group.
Hash served with Johnson for 12 years in the Utah Guard’s 19th Special Forces Group and became friends outside of work. He was stunned to learn Johnson’s wife, Jennifer Gledhill, was arrested and charged for his murder.
Advertisement
Cottonwood Heights police officers escort Jennifer Gledhill into a police car on Wednesday, Oct. 2, 2024. Police say she shot and killed her husband as he slept. (Ed Collins, KSL TV)
“Having had Jen in our home before, you know, breaking bread with them, it turned out she’s responsible for his death; it was shocking, frankly,” Hash said.
That pain made it worse that Johnson’s body is still out there somewhere. Hash would like Utah Gov. Spencer Cox to get the National Guard out looking.
“I’d like to see the Governor commit openly to finding Matt, to bringing him home and giving him a proper burial,” he said.
A photo of Matthew Johnson and John Hash. (Courtesy John Hash)
Advertisement
While the governor can call them out, the National Guard said that’s not what they do.
“This is a local law enforcement issue and not a National Guard or a state level issue. Human recovery is not a mission that’s specifically a National Guard mission or something that we specifically train for,” said Lt. Col. Chris Kroeber, Public Affairs Officer for the Utah Army National Guard.
It’s not necessarily an answer Hash wants to hear.
“You don’t give up, you leave no one behind, you bring him home, and he’s home, we just can’t find him, let’s find him,” Hash said.
Cottonwood Heights police, the agency in charge of the search for Johnson, said they didn’t have an update and are doing all they can to find him.
Advertisement
KSL TV contacted the Governor’s Office Thursday night but didn’t immediately hear back.
Utah’s liquor commission approved licenses for three bars and and seven restaurants Thursday, including the long-awaited second location of Kiitos Brewing.
The commission for the Utah Department of Alcoholic Beverage Services’ (DABS) also learned that a program to allow customers to “round up” purchases to the nearest dollar — and donate the difference to help unsheltered Utahns — has been successful in its first weeks.
During the board’s monthly meeting Thursday, Todd Darrington, DABS’ director of finance, said $87,989 had been raised so far for the Pamela Atkinson Homeless Account, to support its homelessness services.
Commissioner Jacquelyn Orton said she found that number to be “extraordinary.”
Advertisement
Through Feb. 28, shoppers at Utah’s state-run liquor stores will also find donation boxes, each supporting a different local charity. With the donation of coats, canned goods, pet food and more, customers can help organizations (see a full list at ABS.utah.gov) that support people and animals across the state.
DABS director Tiffany Clason spoke about the importance of having a plan for a safe ride home when people go out to drink. That’s why DABS has partnered with WCF Insurance and the Utah Department of Public Safety, she said, to have WCF offer $10 rideshare vouchers for bar patrons needing a ride home. People can get the vouchers by scanning a QR code at the door of the bar they’re visiting.
The bars that received their licenses Thursday are:
• SnowmoBAR, 877 S. 200 West, Salt Lake City (conditional, projected opening Jan. 1, 2025). This bar will be a rebrand of Snowmobile Pizza, which has been closed since August for a remodel.
• Eleven Nightclub, downtown Salt Lake City (conditional, projected opening Jan. 10, 2025).
Advertisement
• Kiitos Brewing, 1533 S. 1100 East, Salt Lake City (conditional, projected opening Jan. 28, 2025). Business manager Jamie Kearns said February is looking more likely for the opening of this second Kiitos location, in Sugar House.
The restaurants that received their licenses are:
• Don Miguel’s, 453 S. Main St., Cedar City.
• The Hub, 1165 S. Main St., Heber City.
• Cody’s Gastro Garage, 2100 S. Main St., Nephi (conditional).
Advertisement
• Back Spin Bistro, St. George (conditional, projected opening Jan. 1, 2025).
• Cosmica, Salt Lake City (conditional, projected opening Jan. 15, 2025).
• Lucky Slice Pizza, 37 W. Center Street, Logan (conditional, projected opening Feb. 1, 2025; this is a new location).
• Hash Kitchen, Salt Lake City (conditional, projected opening Feb. 14, 2025).