Connect with us

Utah

Utah Jazz Season Preview: What is Jordan Clarkson’s value with the Jazz?

Published

on

Utah Jazz Season Preview: What is Jordan Clarkson’s value with the Jazz?


Veterans and rebuilding basketball teams—it’s not always the most natural fit. For the Utah Jazz, a team knee-deep into an all-out tank job, discovering the proper role for each player on the depth chart is essential for both player development and creating a strong team culture to build from when the team has (in theory) developed into a championship contender.

The Jazz have struggled to find the proper balance for their roster since blowing up their all-star core of Mitchell and Gobert, with ruins of that era littering the locker room with no real direction. Now, with Utah’s ship veering into the vicious waves of the NBA lottery chase, signing talented veterans can feel like stuffing a square peg into a round hole—even a toddler knows that’s a bad idea.

I present the Jordan Clarkson dilemma. Clarkson is a flamethrower scorer, capable of offensive fireworks at a moment’s notice. With the contending Jazz, he was the perfect sparkplug scorer off the bench for offensive lulls. Now, as the roster is populated with young and developing talent, Clarkson’s value has become somewhat uncertain.

Now 31 years old, Clarkson is a former 6th Man of the Year who averaged 17 points per night during the 2023-24 season. He’s expanded his game with the Jazz—especially in regards to playmaking and rebounding. Don’t you remember when he earned the first triple-double the Jazz have seen in over a decade?

Advertisement

But if he’s such a valuable asset, why hasn’t he been picked up by a serious championship contender ready to go all-in for a title run?

Good question, and one that’s sort of tricky to really stake down as we don’t have a solid answer. My thoughts boil down to a trio of roadblocks (some less easily ignored than others).

Finding Clarkson’s trade value is like a classic game of Pitfall. Obtaining the prize goes deeper than simply going through the motions. Swinging from vines, vaulting bottomless pits, and clearing crocodile-infested ponds, making a Jordan Clarkson Trade is no walk in the park. We have to explore beyond why teams would want to add the scoring machine, and instead shift toward the pitfalls of spending valuable assets on a player with his skill set.

So let’s journey deeper into the jungle of roster manipulation and better understand what may stand in the way for teams hoping to bolster their team into a championship-ready squad.

Advertisement

Obstacle 1: Defensive Disability

Jordan Clarkson battles with Derrick White of the Boston Celtics.
Photo by Alex Goodlett/Getty Images
Advertisement

It’s no secret that Clarkson brings very little on the defensive end of the floor.

Not that he doesn’t bring effort and hustle to that half of the game—he takes great pride in his performance when taking the court, but one physical aspect of his resume leaves Clarkson at a disadvantage.

To be blunt: he’s small. And unlike Ash from Fantastic Mr. Fox, he doesn’t utilize that attribute much to his advantage. When protecting the basket, Jordan is frequently outmuscled and overpowered by larger opponents. Too small to be a shooting guard, but without the natural point guard repertoire, Clarkson is in positional limbo, and that’s a serious negative for teams that may want to add the Filipino to their active list.

How can a playoff team keep Clarkson on the floor while understanding full well that he’s likely to become the target of the strategy known as the Grayson Allen treatment? If he’s on the floor, attack him on defense!

Advertisement

Defense wins championships. It may be a cliche, but you can’t deny that defense is a vital aspect of championship contention. Any team looking to transplant the flamethrower into their delicate ecosystem may get burned come playoff time, and Clarkson is likely too deep into his career to change who he is.

Obstacle 2: Mo’ Money, Mo’ Problems

Minnesota Timberwolves v Utah Jazz

Advertisement

Jordan Clarkson, Rudy Gobert, and Mike Conley were all expensive players for the contending Jazz. Now, does Clarkson cost too much to trade?
Photo by Alex Goodlett/Getty Images

In this money-driven age of player empowerment, installing the Jordan Clarkson firmware onto your bench will be an expensive undertaking. After signing a contract extension with Utah last summer, he inked a contract for $55 million from that date until the 2026-27 season.

The good news? For the next two years, Clarkson’s salary will dip to $15 million per year for the next two seasons, a significant discount when taking his $25 million 2023-24 season into account.

A team pushing their chips to the center of the table should be more than willing to add $15 million to their payroll, but is Clarkson available enough to make this premium worth the pain?

Advertisement

Last season, Clarkson was a bit of a hobbled cheerleader—often injured, rarely playing, and only earning time off the bench when he was available. Jordan appeared in 55 games with the Jazz last season, which was his lowest mark since his 2017-18 season in Cleveland.

If he were on a championship contender—think New York or Boston—it’s not hard to imagine Clarkson bragging about his Mark Breen-flavored highlight reel in the same way Nick Kroll celebrated his new hairstyle: “I GOT BANGS!” His scoring ability is phenomenal at his size, and he would bring real value to any team that adds him.

But what you see is what you get, and for some teams, it may not be enough to justify flirting with the aprons of the salary cap.

Obstacle 3: Never Ever Ever Trade With Danny Ainge

Advertisement
Los Angeles Clippers v Utah Jazz

Danny Ainge is notorious among NBA GMs. Behold the face of terror!
Photo by Chris Gardner/Getty Images

In the ancient lore of the National Basketball Association, a prophecy describes a man capable of creating a masterpiece and destroying a nation in one effortless motion. Capable of trading a washed-up Kevin Garnett and Paul Pierce for the Nets’ entire future and trading down from the number one pick just to select the best draft prospect a few spots later.

Advertisement

This man, nay, this myth, is Danny Ainge, and you don’t trade with him.

After building the Boston Celtics’ championship core, the former BYU basketball star turned NBA champion left his comfy position in Boston’s front office in favor of leading a rebuild in Utah. Tearing down the foundation and replacing cherished family heirlooms with draft capital and a new generation of residents, Ainge has taken control of the Jazz and has a stranglehold on any who feel bold enough to engage in trade negotiations.

Ainge ripped 5 first-round picks from the Timberwolves for Rudy Gobert, 3 for Donovan Mitchell, and a plethora (yes, I said a plethora) of young talented players who have become beloved figures across the Salt Lake Valley.

Though his offerings are enticing, trading with Danny Ainge has proven to only lead to pain and heartache down the road, as the players and draft picks that were once your own become players you would do anything to get your hands on.

Never trade with Danny Ainge. Not even for something as innocent as Jordan Clarkson.

Advertisement

Does Clarkson bring value to the Jazz? As a veteran presence in the locker room, young players look up to him and follow his example as they weave their way through the dizzying tapestry of their NBA careers. That’s the whole reason why the Jazz signed aging point guard Patty Mills this offseason—Utah’s roster is full of young players who will need to develop into serious NBA-level contributors if this rebuild will ever be successful.

By all indications, Clarkson loves living in Utah and loves his role with the Jazz—we aren’t likely to see Jordan demand a trade any time soon. How long will it be until Clarkson’s trade value falls, though? As he grows older, league-wide interest will decrease.

He isn’t a one-man wrecking crew capable of carrying the Jazz on his back, so his presence is far from a detriment to Utah’s rebuild. I just can’t help but wonder what his purpose with this Jazz team will be moving forward, and if both parties may be better off if they were to part ways.

For the 2024-25 season, I say keep the phone lines open and listen to every offer that may come your way, but don’t settle for a trade that’s “good enough” (that’s never been the Ainge way, so why start now?). This may be one of the last opportunities to get value in return for Clarkson, but maybe the Jazz are comfortable where they stand.



Source link

Advertisement

Utah

Utah hit with largest measles outbreak in over 30 years

Published

on

Utah hit with largest measles outbreak in over 30 years


Utah has been hit with the largest measles outbreak in more than 30 years.

The Utah State Epidemiologist stated that it’s the most contagious disease scientists know of.

As of this month, the Utah Department of Health and Human Services reported 115 confirmed cases.

MORE | Measles

“It’s a little surprising to see an uptick in measles, but it’s not surprising to hear that Utah County is one of the places where we have seen more of those cases,” said Elsie, a Utah County resident with several children in local schools. “I think because there’s kind of been a movement towards anti-vaccination.”

Advertisement

Samantha Marberger, who also lives in Utah County and has a young child, said measles wasn’t something she thought was here.

“I’ve heard of big outbreaks like that in Texas and a few other places, but it wasn’t something that I thought was as local,” she said.

Utah State Epidemiologist Leisha Nolen called the outbreak “extreme” and “really concerning.”

“Why does the health department believe this is happening now? Is this like a delayed reaction of previous low vaccination rates?” 2News asked her.

“Yeah, I think unfortunately our vaccine rates have gone down over time, and we do now have a number of people who are vulnerable to this infection, and they haven’t been protected,” Nolen said. “There also has been cases in neighboring states, and so it was easy to introduce here in Utah.”

Advertisement

The DHHS stated that roughly 90% of the population is vaccinated, but those rates vary from area to area and aren’t enough to reach herd immunity for measles.

“Measles is highly contagious. It’s the most contagious infection we know of,” Nolen said. “The data historically says that if you have 20 people in a room and somebody with measles comes in, 18 of those people are going to get measles.”

She said that since the outbreak started, the health department has given 30% more vaccines than they did last year at this time. She said most infections can be traced back to southwestern Utah and appear to be from in-state travel.

“It’s likely in Utah, many hundreds of Utahns who are vaccinated have been exposed to this virus, and they did not know it, and their bodies fought it off as it should,” Nolen said.

The second largest outbreak in Utah is in Utah County, with 10 confirmed cases.

Advertisement

The state is asking people to cooperate with the health department’s contact tracers if they call.

If you suspect measles in yourself or a loved one, they urge you not to go to a clinic waiting room but call ahead for the next steps to stop the spread.

_____



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

Widow of slain Utah County sergeant testifies in favor of accomplice’s parole

Published

on

Widow of slain Utah County sergeant testifies in favor of accomplice’s parole


EAGLE MOUNTAIN, Utah — Nannette Wride-Zeeman says her late husband, Utah County Sheriff’s Sergeant Cory Wride, is still very much a part of her life nearly 12 years after he was ambushed and killed in Eagle Mountain.

On Tuesday, Wride-Zeeman did something that might surprise many people: She testified in favor of parole for Meagan Grunwald, the young woman who was an accomplice in her husband’s murder.

Wride’s killer lost his life in a shootout with police the same day as the ambush. But Grunwald, who was with the shooter, has been serving time for her role in the crime.

Before the parole hearing, Wride-Zeeman met Grunwald face to face on Monday for the first time since the tragedy.

Advertisement

“She was in the other room, hyperventilating and sobbing. And she was so afraid to come and meet me. And I can’t even tell you. The days and probably weeks of sleepless nights I had, being afraid to meet her, and what do I say, and how do I, how do I do this, and am I making a mistake, and like all these things that it felt in my heart, just this calm feeling like it was the right thing to do,” Wride-Zeeman said.

“She was so afraid that I was going to be angry with her, and those angry days have long passed,” she said.

When Grunwald entered the room, the emotion was overwhelming for both women.

“And she came walking in, she had her hands over her face, and she was still sobbing and she was shaking. And I just saw this little girl that was just terrified,” Wride-Zeeman said.

“And she’s sitting across from me, and she, her hands or her face are in her hands, and she’s just sobbing, and she keeps repeating, I’m so afraid, I’m so afraid. I’m so sorry, I’m so sorry, I’m so afraid, just back and forth. And when she got done, I said, Megan, you don’t have anything to be afraid of. I said, Look at me, and she looks up at me, and I see her blue eyes and all the tears,” she said.

Advertisement

What happened next was a moment of healing that lasted three hours.

“So I walked over to her, and I went like this to her, and she stood up, and we embraced for the first time, and she just sobbed and sobbed. And I just held her and I said, do not be afraid of me. We’re here to heal. And it opened up 3 hours of healing,” Wride-Zeeman said.

The widow says she has completely forgiven Grunwald and wants to be part of her life when she’s released.

“I said, you can’t live with me, but I want to be a part of your life when you get out, and I want us to stay in touch. I am your biggest cheerleader, and I want to see you find your happy like I did, because I never thought I’d be happy, and here I am happier than I’ve ever been in my life, and I want her to find that. And we talked about what her dreams are, what her passions are, how she wants to give back to the community, to people, across the board, including veterans and first responders,” Wride-Zeeman said.

Wride-Zeeman says 100 percent she has forgiven Grunwald and wants nothing but the brightest of futures for her.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Utah Supreme Court considers defamation lawsuit over ‘Sound of Freedom’ movie

Published

on

Utah Supreme Court considers defamation lawsuit over ‘Sound of Freedom’ movie


SALT LAKE CITY — The state’s top court is considering whether to allow a defamation lawsuit to move forward over the movie “Sound of Freedom” and its portrayal of a villain in the movie.

On Wednesday, the Utah Supreme Court heard an appeal by Angel Studios, the filmmakers who created “Sound of Freedom” and Operation Underground Railroad founder Tim Ballard. They are being sued by Kely Suarez, who alleges the central villain character in the movie has defamed her and ruined her reputation.

Cherise Bacalski, Suarez’s attorney, said the character of “Katy Giselle” in the film is “a kingpin sex trafficker.”

“And she never was,” Bacalksi said of her client.

Advertisement

Before the Utah Supreme Court, Bacalski argued Suarez was a college student who was caught up in a raid that Ballard was involved with in Colombia.

A lower court allowed Suarez’s lawsuit to move toward trial. The studio and Ballard have appealed, arguing they are protected under a Utah law designed to safeguard speech and that the film is a docudrama that is “based on a true story.” The justices grilled lawyers for all sides about the level of involvement each party had and whether promotion of the film crossed any lines.

“Here it’s alleged the movie itself was defamatory and Angel Studios is the one who is putting out the movie,” Justice Paige Petersen said during Wednesday’s hearing.

Robert Gutierrez, an attorney for Angel Studios, insisted to the court that while the film may be based on Ballard’s experiences, there were disclaimers in the film.

“The Katy Giselle character was, in fact, a composite character in order to make it a subject matter the viewing public could actually watch,” he argued. “And fulfill the writer’s mission about the ugly truth of child trafficking.”

Advertisement

The justices questioned where the line is in a “docudrama” or when things are “based on a true story.”

“So under your definition is this a movie of and concerning Mr. Ballard? Or is that they happen to use the same name?” asked Justice John Nielsen.

Gutierrez replied it was a story “inspired by Tim Ballard.” Later in arguments, he noted that Suarez had actually been convicted of criminal charges in Colombia. That was something Bacalski said was not properly before the court and she argued against the veracity of it.

“We also believe the conviction is unreliable, coming from Colombia and really under suspicious circumstances,” she told FOX 13 News outside of court. “That conviction would not likely stand because of the constitutional protections we enjoy in the United States of America.”

Ballard’s attorney, Mark Eisenhut, argued that his client was not involved in the movie-making itself. Ballard was consulted as the film was being created.

Advertisement

“I do not believe there’s any evidence of him producing, writing, directing, anything of that nature,” Eisenhut argued.

The justices took the case under advisement with no timeline for a ruling. The movie, which starred Jim Caviezel as Ballard, went on to become a box office success in 2023.

“She’s very hopeful our justice system will do her justice,” Bacalski said of Suarez outside court.

Ballard faced a number of lawsuits and accusations of misconduct that led to ties being cut with Operation Underground Railroad, the anti-human trafficking organization he founded. He has denied wrongdoing and filed his own defamation lawsuit against some of his accusers.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending