Connect with us

Utah

Utah Jazz Season Preview: What is Jordan Clarkson’s value with the Jazz?

Published

on

Utah Jazz Season Preview: What is Jordan Clarkson’s value with the Jazz?


Veterans and rebuilding basketball teams—it’s not always the most natural fit. For the Utah Jazz, a team knee-deep into an all-out tank job, discovering the proper role for each player on the depth chart is essential for both player development and creating a strong team culture to build from when the team has (in theory) developed into a championship contender.

The Jazz have struggled to find the proper balance for their roster since blowing up their all-star core of Mitchell and Gobert, with ruins of that era littering the locker room with no real direction. Now, with Utah’s ship veering into the vicious waves of the NBA lottery chase, signing talented veterans can feel like stuffing a square peg into a round hole—even a toddler knows that’s a bad idea.

I present the Jordan Clarkson dilemma. Clarkson is a flamethrower scorer, capable of offensive fireworks at a moment’s notice. With the contending Jazz, he was the perfect sparkplug scorer off the bench for offensive lulls. Now, as the roster is populated with young and developing talent, Clarkson’s value has become somewhat uncertain.

Now 31 years old, Clarkson is a former 6th Man of the Year who averaged 17 points per night during the 2023-24 season. He’s expanded his game with the Jazz—especially in regards to playmaking and rebounding. Don’t you remember when he earned the first triple-double the Jazz have seen in over a decade?

Advertisement

But if he’s such a valuable asset, why hasn’t he been picked up by a serious championship contender ready to go all-in for a title run?

Good question, and one that’s sort of tricky to really stake down as we don’t have a solid answer. My thoughts boil down to a trio of roadblocks (some less easily ignored than others).

Finding Clarkson’s trade value is like a classic game of Pitfall. Obtaining the prize goes deeper than simply going through the motions. Swinging from vines, vaulting bottomless pits, and clearing crocodile-infested ponds, making a Jordan Clarkson Trade is no walk in the park. We have to explore beyond why teams would want to add the scoring machine, and instead shift toward the pitfalls of spending valuable assets on a player with his skill set.

So let’s journey deeper into the jungle of roster manipulation and better understand what may stand in the way for teams hoping to bolster their team into a championship-ready squad.

Advertisement

Obstacle 1: Defensive Disability

Jordan Clarkson battles with Derrick White of the Boston Celtics.
Photo by Alex Goodlett/Getty Images
Advertisement

It’s no secret that Clarkson brings very little on the defensive end of the floor.

Not that he doesn’t bring effort and hustle to that half of the game—he takes great pride in his performance when taking the court, but one physical aspect of his resume leaves Clarkson at a disadvantage.

To be blunt: he’s small. And unlike Ash from Fantastic Mr. Fox, he doesn’t utilize that attribute much to his advantage. When protecting the basket, Jordan is frequently outmuscled and overpowered by larger opponents. Too small to be a shooting guard, but without the natural point guard repertoire, Clarkson is in positional limbo, and that’s a serious negative for teams that may want to add the Filipino to their active list.

How can a playoff team keep Clarkson on the floor while understanding full well that he’s likely to become the target of the strategy known as the Grayson Allen treatment? If he’s on the floor, attack him on defense!

Advertisement

Defense wins championships. It may be a cliche, but you can’t deny that defense is a vital aspect of championship contention. Any team looking to transplant the flamethrower into their delicate ecosystem may get burned come playoff time, and Clarkson is likely too deep into his career to change who he is.

Obstacle 2: Mo’ Money, Mo’ Problems

Minnesota Timberwolves v Utah Jazz

Advertisement

Jordan Clarkson, Rudy Gobert, and Mike Conley were all expensive players for the contending Jazz. Now, does Clarkson cost too much to trade?
Photo by Alex Goodlett/Getty Images

In this money-driven age of player empowerment, installing the Jordan Clarkson firmware onto your bench will be an expensive undertaking. After signing a contract extension with Utah last summer, he inked a contract for $55 million from that date until the 2026-27 season.

The good news? For the next two years, Clarkson’s salary will dip to $15 million per year for the next two seasons, a significant discount when taking his $25 million 2023-24 season into account.

A team pushing their chips to the center of the table should be more than willing to add $15 million to their payroll, but is Clarkson available enough to make this premium worth the pain?

Advertisement

Last season, Clarkson was a bit of a hobbled cheerleader—often injured, rarely playing, and only earning time off the bench when he was available. Jordan appeared in 55 games with the Jazz last season, which was his lowest mark since his 2017-18 season in Cleveland.

If he were on a championship contender—think New York or Boston—it’s not hard to imagine Clarkson bragging about his Mark Breen-flavored highlight reel in the same way Nick Kroll celebrated his new hairstyle: “I GOT BANGS!” His scoring ability is phenomenal at his size, and he would bring real value to any team that adds him.

But what you see is what you get, and for some teams, it may not be enough to justify flirting with the aprons of the salary cap.

Obstacle 3: Never Ever Ever Trade With Danny Ainge

Advertisement
Los Angeles Clippers v Utah Jazz

Danny Ainge is notorious among NBA GMs. Behold the face of terror!
Photo by Chris Gardner/Getty Images

In the ancient lore of the National Basketball Association, a prophecy describes a man capable of creating a masterpiece and destroying a nation in one effortless motion. Capable of trading a washed-up Kevin Garnett and Paul Pierce for the Nets’ entire future and trading down from the number one pick just to select the best draft prospect a few spots later.

Advertisement

This man, nay, this myth, is Danny Ainge, and you don’t trade with him.

After building the Boston Celtics’ championship core, the former BYU basketball star turned NBA champion left his comfy position in Boston’s front office in favor of leading a rebuild in Utah. Tearing down the foundation and replacing cherished family heirlooms with draft capital and a new generation of residents, Ainge has taken control of the Jazz and has a stranglehold on any who feel bold enough to engage in trade negotiations.

Ainge ripped 5 first-round picks from the Timberwolves for Rudy Gobert, 3 for Donovan Mitchell, and a plethora (yes, I said a plethora) of young talented players who have become beloved figures across the Salt Lake Valley.

Though his offerings are enticing, trading with Danny Ainge has proven to only lead to pain and heartache down the road, as the players and draft picks that were once your own become players you would do anything to get your hands on.

Never trade with Danny Ainge. Not even for something as innocent as Jordan Clarkson.

Advertisement

Does Clarkson bring value to the Jazz? As a veteran presence in the locker room, young players look up to him and follow his example as they weave their way through the dizzying tapestry of their NBA careers. That’s the whole reason why the Jazz signed aging point guard Patty Mills this offseason—Utah’s roster is full of young players who will need to develop into serious NBA-level contributors if this rebuild will ever be successful.

By all indications, Clarkson loves living in Utah and loves his role with the Jazz—we aren’t likely to see Jordan demand a trade any time soon. How long will it be until Clarkson’s trade value falls, though? As he grows older, league-wide interest will decrease.

He isn’t a one-man wrecking crew capable of carrying the Jazz on his back, so his presence is far from a detriment to Utah’s rebuild. I just can’t help but wonder what his purpose with this Jazz team will be moving forward, and if both parties may be better off if they were to part ways.

For the 2024-25 season, I say keep the phone lines open and listen to every offer that may come your way, but don’t settle for a trade that’s “good enough” (that’s never been the Ainge way, so why start now?). This may be one of the last opportunities to get value in return for Clarkson, but maybe the Jazz are comfortable where they stand.



Source link

Advertisement

Utah

Utah’s bottom-up approach to clean energy

Published

on

Utah’s bottom-up approach to clean energy


Like many utilities in the Trump era, Rocky Mountain Power is pulling back on its renewable energy plans. But more than a dozen Utah communities are taking matters into their own hands.

About 300,000 homes and businesses will soon be part of a novel, bottom-up program to bring new clean power to the state’s fossil-fuel-heavy grid. The Utah Renewable Communities initiative allows city and county governments to offset their electricity use with 100 percent renewable power, backed by a $4 monthly bill surcharge.

“There’s no other program available to our residents that is this affordable or this impactful to Midvale’s environmental and economic future,” said Dustin Gettel, mayor of the Salt Lake City suburb of Midvale.

Advertisement

Midvale is set to vote Tuesday on whether to join 15 other communities that have signed up ahead of an enrollment deadline next week. Three other eligible communities have opted out, although one may reconsider.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

15-acre wildfire threatens structures north of Birdseye in Utah County

Published

on

15-acre wildfire threatens structures north of Birdseye in Utah County


A wildfire burning north of Birdseye in Utah County is threatening structures, according to Utah Fire Info.

The fire was estimated at 15 acres Thursday afternoon. The Anderson Point Fire has since grown to 40 acres, according to Utah Fire Info.

A helicopter and multiple fire engine crews responded.

Information about the cause of the fire was not immediately available.

Advertisement
Comment with Bubbles

BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT

____



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

The world’s largest data center was supposed to run on 100% natural gas. Utah’s Republican governor says ‘never.’

Published

on

The world’s largest data center was supposed to run on 100% natural gas. Utah’s Republican governor says ‘never.’


This coverage is made possible through a partnership between Grist and The Salt Lake Tribune, a nonprofit newsroom in Utah.

A sprawling, 40,000-acre data center planned for northern Utah has stirred up controversy across the state over the past month, partly because of the pollution it’s expected to contribute to a region that already struggles with smog.

Officials with the quasi-governmental Military Installation Development Authority, or MIDA, which approved the project and created tax incentives to spur its development, have become de facto cheerleaders for the data center campus, called the Stratos Project. They say Kevin O’Leary, the Canadian TV personality and the main backer of Stratos, specifically selected a remote valley north of the Great Salt Lake because a gas pipeline runs through it.

The plant that will generate electricity for the data complex would be powered “100 percent off the Ruby Pipeline,” a MIDA official said in April. 

But after weeks of protests, reams of comments against the project, and disgruntled Utahns digging into state leaders’ finances and family businesses, the state’s Republican governor has now asserted the project will “never” be solely powered by natural gas.

Advertisement

“That’s never going to happen,” Governor Spencer Cox told The Salt Lake Tribune last week. “The very first phase will be natural gas, but the other phases should not be. They should be nuclear, and they should be geothermal, and solar and other technology.”

The proposed Stratos Project is light on details so far. O’Leary has said that at full build, it will be one of the biggest data centers in the world, as large as Washington, D.C. Scientists, environmental advocates and some residents have raised alarms about the impact that the project — and the possibility of a massive natural gas plant to power it — could have on air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and water supplies near the shrinking Great Salt Lake.

According to some estimates, a 9-gigawatt power plant entirely powered by natural gas could raise Utah’s carbon emissions by 64 percent. Although it’s still unclear how much water the facility would need, the project’s developers have said they’re working to secure 13,000 acre-feet in Hansel Valley and the surrounding area, which is mostly agricultural. That’s enough water to meet the needs of more than 20,000 households in Utah.

The north end of the Great Salt Lake and Hansel Valley, the planned site for the Stratos Project.
Trent Nelson / The Salt Lake Tribune

Opposition to the proposal has been intense. A water right filed to support the data center and power plant received nearly 4,000 letters of protest this month. Opponents held a rally at Utah’s Capitol last week and delivered a letter to Cox with more than 6,000 signatures urging him to take “binding action” to preserve the Great Salt Lake instead of issuing platitudes over social media.

During a news conference on Wednesday announcing a geothermal partnership with the neighboring states of Arizona, Colorado, and New Mexico, Cox acknowledged problems with the rollout of the Stratos Project in Box Elder County, saying future decisions like it should involve his office and elected representatives.

Advertisement

“There’s no question, the process was not good,” Cox told reporters. “It’s something I’ve worried about for a long time with that entity that made that decision.” 

Cox appeared to be referring to MIDA, a development authority ostensibly meant to fund projects to support the military. Its biggest developments in recent years, however, include a hotel at the Deer Valley luxury ski resort and a swanky ski village. MIDA officials and other Stratos supporters have called the project a matter of national security.

“That was not a decision that was made by me or the Legislature,” Cox said. “In the future, those are decisions that should be made by us, so that we can do these types of things ahead of time to make sure people understand what’s actually happening out there. That did not happen, and it should happen.”

When he made his comments, Cox was hosting the final workshop in his “Energy Superabundance” initiative as chair of the Western Governors Association, part of a broader push that complements his “Operation Gigawatt” goal to more than double Utah’s energy production over the next decade.

Electricity use across the country has held relatively steady for decades, but a surge in demand for artificial intelligence computing and data centers is putting a strain on the electric grid. That’s left Western states scrambling to build new energy supplies.

Advertisement

At the same time, public skepticism toward large data center developments appears to be growing, particularly over concerns involving water use, noise, energy costs, and pollution.

“It feels like the future is here,” Cox said during his opening remarks at the workshop. “It’s coming quicker than people asked for, and there are so many amazing things that can come from that future, and some pretty awful ones as well.”

Read Next
A protestor holds a sign at a meeting
Utah’s fragile desert could feel like the Sahara if America’s biggest data center gets built

Cox has also pushed for faster permitting timelines for large energy and infrastructure projects, arguing that environmental review processes often take too long. “This whole idea of being rushed — I’m so tired of our country taking years to get stuff done,” he said in April. “It’s the dumbest thing ever. We think that taking time makes things better or safer. It absolutely does not.”

Advertisement

Last week, Cox struck a more measured tone as criticism of the project continued to mount. “One of the things people are worried about, and rightfully so, is air quality,” he said in a brief interview as he left the workshop. “That’s a yearlong [permitting] process. … We’re not speeding those up. Those are really important, and we want to make sure that things are done the right way.”

Earlier this month, O’Leary, who was featured on the reality show “Shark Tank,” also seemed to suggest that renewables could help power the Stratos Project. He described other technological advances — such as turbines cooled with air rather than water — before turning to the natural gas power causing a stir.

“We can also put a percentage of the power generation through solar, wind, and batteries, because the battery technology is 10x more efficient than it was just five years ago,” O’Leary posted on X on May 5. “So that’s very helpful, because it makes the cost of energy lower.”

But he stopped short of fully endorsing renewables for his project.

Logan Mitchell, a climate scientist and analyst with Utah Clean Energy, calculated that a 9-gigawatt natural gas power plant will produce around 35 million metric tons of carbon emissions each year. By comparison, the entire state of Utah generates 55 million metric tons annually, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. So the Stratos Project could raise Utah’s emissions by about 64 percent.

Advertisement

“That’s massive,” Mitchell said. But it could be even more, because his estimate didn’t account for “any additional methane leakage” from piping and using the natural gas, he said.






Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending