Veterans and rebuilding basketball teams—it’s not always the most natural fit. For the Utah Jazz, a team knee-deep into an all-out tank job, discovering the proper role for each player on the depth chart is essential for both player development and creating a strong team culture to build from when the team has (in theory) developed into a championship contender.
The Jazz have struggled to find the proper balance for their roster since blowing up their all-star core of Mitchell and Gobert, with ruins of that era littering the locker room with no real direction. Now, with Utah’s ship veering into the vicious waves of the NBA lottery chase, signing talented veterans can feel like stuffing a square peg into a round hole—even a toddler knows that’s a bad idea.
I present the Jordan Clarkson dilemma. Clarkson is a flamethrower scorer, capable of offensive fireworks at a moment’s notice. With the contending Jazz, he was the perfect sparkplug scorer off the bench for offensive lulls. Now, as the roster is populated with young and developing talent, Clarkson’s value has become somewhat uncertain.
Now 31 years old, Clarkson is a former 6th Man of the Year who averaged 17 points per night during the 2023-24 season. He’s expanded his game with the Jazz—especially in regards to playmaking and rebounding. Don’t you remember when he earned the first triple-double the Jazz have seen in over a decade?
Advertisement
But if he’s such a valuable asset, why hasn’t he been picked up by a serious championship contender ready to go all-in for a title run?
Good question, and one that’s sort of tricky to really stake down as we don’t have a solid answer. My thoughts boil down to a trio of roadblocks (some less easily ignored than others).
Finding Clarkson’s trade value is like a classic game of Pitfall. Obtaining the prize goes deeper than simply going through the motions. Swinging from vines, vaulting bottomless pits, and clearing crocodile-infested ponds, making a Jordan Clarkson Trade is no walk in the park. We have to explore beyond why teams would want to add the scoring machine, and instead shift toward the pitfalls of spending valuable assets on a player with his skill set.
So let’s journey deeper into the jungle of roster manipulation and better understand what may stand in the way for teams hoping to bolster their team into a championship-ready squad.
Advertisement
Obstacle 1: Defensive Disability
Jordan Clarkson battles with Derrick White of the Boston Celtics.Photo by Alex Goodlett/Getty Images
Advertisement
It’s no secret that Clarkson brings very little on the defensive end of the floor.
Not that he doesn’t bring effort and hustle to that half of the game—he takes great pride in his performance when taking the court, but one physical aspect of his resume leaves Clarkson at a disadvantage.
To be blunt: he’s small. And unlike Ash from Fantastic Mr. Fox, he doesn’t utilize that attribute much to his advantage. When protecting the basket, Jordan is frequently outmuscled and overpowered by larger opponents. Too small to be a shooting guard, but without the natural point guard repertoire, Clarkson is in positional limbo, and that’s a serious negative for teams that may want to add the Filipino to their active list.
How can a playoff team keep Clarkson on the floor while understanding full well that he’s likely to become the target of the strategy known as the Grayson Allen treatment? If he’s on the floor, attack him on defense!
Advertisement
Defense wins championships. It may be a cliche, but you can’t deny that defense is a vital aspect of championship contention. Any team looking to transplant the flamethrower into their delicate ecosystem may get burned come playoff time, and Clarkson is likely too deep into his career to change who he is.
Obstacle 2: Mo’ Money, Mo’ Problems
Advertisement
Jordan Clarkson, Rudy Gobert, and Mike Conley were all expensive players for the contending Jazz. Now, does Clarkson cost too much to trade?Photo by Alex Goodlett/Getty Images
In this money-driven age of player empowerment, installing the Jordan Clarkson firmware onto your bench will be an expensive undertaking. After signing a contract extension with Utah last summer, he inked a contract for $55 million from that date until the 2026-27 season.
The good news? For the next two years, Clarkson’s salary will dip to $15 million per year for the next two seasons, a significant discount when taking his $25 million 2023-24 season into account.
A team pushing their chips to the center of the table should be more than willing to add $15 million to their payroll, but is Clarkson available enough to make this premium worth the pain?
Advertisement
Last season, Clarkson was a bit of a hobbled cheerleader—often injured, rarely playing, and only earning time off the bench when he was available. Jordan appeared in 55 games with the Jazz last season, which was his lowest mark since his 2017-18 season in Cleveland.
If he were on a championship contender—think New York or Boston—it’s not hard to imagine Clarkson bragging about his Mark Breen-flavored highlight reel in the same way Nick Kroll celebrated his new hairstyle: “I GOT BANGS!” His scoring ability is phenomenal at his size, and he would bring real value to any team that adds him.
But what you see is what you get, and for some teams, it may not be enough to justify flirting with the aprons of the salary cap.
Obstacle 3: Never Ever Ever Trade With Danny Ainge
Advertisement
Danny Ainge is notorious among NBA GMs. Behold the face of terror!Photo by Chris Gardner/Getty Images
In the ancient lore of the National Basketball Association, a prophecy describes a man capable of creating a masterpiece and destroying a nation in one effortless motion. Capable of trading a washed-up Kevin Garnett and Paul Pierce for the Nets’ entire future and trading down from the number one pick just to select the best draft prospect a few spots later.
Advertisement
This man, nay, this myth, is Danny Ainge, and you don’t trade with him.
After building the Boston Celtics’ championship core, the former BYU basketball star turned NBA champion left his comfy position in Boston’s front office in favor of leading a rebuild in Utah. Tearing down the foundation and replacing cherished family heirlooms with draft capital and a new generation of residents, Ainge has taken control of the Jazz and has a stranglehold on any who feel bold enough to engage in trade negotiations.
Ainge ripped 5 first-round picks from the Timberwolves for Rudy Gobert, 3 for Donovan Mitchell, and a plethora (yes, I said a plethora) of young talented players who have become beloved figures across the Salt Lake Valley.
Though his offerings are enticing, trading with Danny Ainge has proven to only lead to pain and heartache down the road, as the players and draft picks that were once your own become players you would do anything to get your hands on.
Never trade with Danny Ainge. Not even for something as innocent as Jordan Clarkson.
Advertisement
Does Clarkson bring value to the Jazz? As a veteran presence in the locker room, young players look up to him and follow his example as they weave their way through the dizzying tapestry of their NBA careers. That’s the whole reason why the Jazz signed aging point guard Patty Mills this offseason—Utah’s roster is full of young players who will need to develop into serious NBA-level contributors if this rebuild will ever be successful.
By all indications, Clarkson loves living in Utah and loves his role with the Jazz—we aren’t likely to see Jordan demand a trade any time soon. How long will it be until Clarkson’s trade value falls, though? As he grows older, league-wide interest will decrease.
He isn’t a one-man wrecking crew capable of carrying the Jazz on his back, so his presence is far from a detriment to Utah’s rebuild. I just can’t help but wonder what his purpose with this Jazz team will be moving forward, and if both parties may be better off if they were to part ways.
For the 2024-25 season, I say keep the phone lines open and listen to every offer that may come your way, but don’t settle for a trade that’s “good enough” (that’s never been the Ainge way, so why start now?). This may be one of the last opportunities to get value in return for Clarkson, but maybe the Jazz are comfortable where they stand.
The NBA Draft is less than a week away, and the Utah Jazz have a big decision to make. What’s difficult for the Jazz is that there isn’t an obvious choice between some incredible prospects at the top of the draft: AJ Dybantsa, Darryn Peterson, and Cam Boozer. Obviously, everything depends on what the Washington Wizards decide to do with their pick. But with all the smoke screens we’ve seen, it’s not clear who will be available to the Jazz.
That’s where you come in. If you were the Utah Jazz and you had the chance to choose between AJ Dybantsa, Darryn Peterson, and Cam Boozer, who would you choose?
Welcome to SB Nation Reacts, a survey of fans across the NBA. Throughout the year we ask questions of the most plugged-in Jazz fans and fans across the country. Sign up here to participate in the weekly emailed surveys.
SALT LAKE CITY — Utah is no stranger to discourse surrounding early child literacy.
While the Beehive State generally performs higher than other states in terms of proficiency measures, its leaders still recognize — especially post-COVID — that it’s a real issue that demands serious solutions.
A legislative audit released Tuesday said Utah school teachers and administrators should focus enhanced attention not only on third-graders, the traditional benchmark for early literacy, but also on first-graders, where data starts spotting early literacy challenges in young students.
Then, Utah first lady Abby Cox on Wednesday added to that discussion, speaking with Utah education and policy leaders about the need to meet the literacy crisis head-on and ways Utah has worked to do just that.
Advertisement
“We’re not in the best place that we can be, and we’re a little ahead of the national average; we always have been, but that still isn’t great. We’re in a moment where everybody’s starting to realize this … business community, educators, all of us coming together to realize there’s an issue here,” Cox said.
She mentioned the passage of SB241 during the 2026 legislative session, which committed $25.6 million to literacy coaching, increased the statewide goal to have 80% of third-graders reading at grade-level by 2030 and includes an intervention measure requiring struggling third-graders to repeat the grade — “except in cases of certain good cause exemption.”
“I know we can get 97-plus percent of our kiddos reading on grade level by third grade. We can do this,” Cox said.
She also emphasized the need to get “attention-sucking machines,” AKA cellphones, out of classrooms — something top lawmakers in the state have made strides to emphasize.
July 1 will mark the start of a new Utah law ushered in with the passage of SB69 that essentially places a bell-to-bell ban on cellphones at Utah’s K-12 public schools, unless a school or district opts for a looser policy.
Advertisement
The latest piece of legislation was built upon a similar bill passed during the 2025 session that set a default policy barring students from using their phones during class time.
Despite those restrictions, many lawmakers and educators argued they didn’t go far enough, which led to SB69.
“I don’t think we all know enough about how wonderful this is going to be,” Cox said, adding that data has shown library book checkouts have skyrocketed in schools that have instituted daylong cellphone ban policies.
“I talked to a principal who, after the first day of going bell-to-bell, walked into his high school lunch room, thinking there was a fight, because there was all this chaos and noise … and it was just (students) communicating with each other, playing cards, bringing little games,” Cox said. “It was just beautiful to see, and I think we’re going to see an incredible resurgence as we implement this statewide.”
The Key Takeaways for this article were generated with the assistance of large language models and reviewed by our editorial team. The article, itself, is solely human-written.
The nation’s soccer team practiced in front of fans this week at Real Salt Lake’s stadium in Sandy.
(Bethany Baker | The Salt Lake Tribune) Fans cheer as Bosnia-Herzegovina players practice for the World Cup during an open training session at America First Field in Sandy on Monday.
The majority of the Bosnians living in Utah did not leave for the Wasatch Front under favorable circumstances.
The Bosnian War in the mid-1990s brought more than 100,000 refugees to the United States, with thousands settling in Salt Lake City.
Thirty years later, however, a moment of celebration brought thousands of Bosnian-Americans together with the arrival of their country’s soccer team in Utah.
Blue and white jerseys flooded the plaza and stands of Real Salt Lake’s Sandy stadium on Monday to watch Bosnia-Herzegovina’s soccer team, which has made Utah its home base in between World Cup games.
Advertisement
(Bethany Baker | The Salt Lake Tribune) Bosnia-Herzegovina players practice for the World Cup during an open training session at America First Field in Sandy on Monday.
“It was like a dream,” Anel Alagic, who was born in Bosnia but raised in Salt Lake, said. “That we qualified for the World Cup was crazy, but then they told us that the home base would never be here in Salt Lake. It’s surreal.”
The festivities extended beyond the field, as well, with several vendors and volunteers serving Bosnian food and drinks, including its signature coffee from the world’s largest coffee pot, which was made in Bosnia.
The pot is traveling with the national team, heading to Los Angeles on Thursday for a match against Switzerland and then to Seattle for Bosnia’s June 24 match against Qatar.
A dream just to qualify
Bosnia has qualified for the World Cup just twice since declaring its independence in 1992, with the first time coming in Brazil in 2014. This year’s team qualified in dramatic fashion, defeating four-time World Cup champion Italy on penalty kicks.
Advertisement
The Bosnian fans are not taking their team’s presence in the World Cup for granted, with a viral video showing thousands marching in Toronto before the first game and 40,000 to 50,000 expected to be in attendance in Los Angeles on Thursday.
Two Bosnian restaurants in Salt Lake, Cafe on Main and Old Bridge Cafe, will both be closing their doors on Thursday to make the trek to California in support of their country.
And it’s not just people born in Bosnia jumping on the bandwagon, with Cafe on Main saying several Americans showed up in Bosnia jerseys to watch the opening game at the restaurant last week in a packed house.
“I’ve invited a lot of my co-workers and friends that typically don’t even watch soccer,” Alagic said of Bosnia World Cup fever catching on, thanks to events like the open training session. “I was like, ‘We’re having this event. Show out.’ I’ve seen a lot of people here, so it’s cool.”
Bringing people together
(Bethany Baker | The Salt Lake Tribune) Fans cheer as Bosnia-Herzegovina players practice for the World Cup during an open training session at America First Field in Sandy on Monday.
Advertisement
“Because of the war, our community is all over the world,” said RSL goalkeeper coach Mirza Harambasic, who is Bosnian. “It’s especially strong in the United States, and it’s strong here in Salt Lake City. So obviously everyone is so excited, so happy to be here, so happy to support.”
Harambasic was born in Bosnia and, like many others, came to the U.S. in the ‘90s. He helped coordinate Monday’s event and was confident in Salt Lake’s ability to accommodate the soccer needs of a World Cup team.
“When you talk about an environment to be successful, I don’t think there are many better places in the United States,” Harambasic said. “As far as city, lifestyle, training at elevation, and then obviously the facilities that RSL provides.”
With the first two games in Bosnia’s Group B ending in 1-1 draws, the top two spots are still very much up for the taking, giving fans just enough hope that the country can advance beyond the World Cup group stage for the first time in its history.
sltrib.com is now free to access — no subscription required. We made this decision because we believe access to trustworthy, independent news shouldn’t depend on what you can afford — especially as misinformation and AI-generated content continue to rise.
Advertisement
Free to read doesn’t mean free to produce. Our reporters show up every day to ask hard questions and hold powerful institutions to account. That work takes resources. As a nonprofit newsroom, we rely on support from people who believe it matters. Make a donation today to fund local news that serves Utah communities.
You can help us bring more local news to more communities today.