Connect with us

Utah

Sundance Film Festival will explore options beyond 2026 — and a move out of Utah is on the table

Published

on

Sundance Film Festival will explore options beyond 2026 — and a move out of Utah is on the table


The organizers of the Sundance Film Festival, which has called Park City home for more than 40 years, are taking a hard look at the independent film event’s future — including whether it will stay in Utah or move elsewhere.

The Sundance Institute, the nonprofit that has presented the Sundance Film Festival since 1985, announced Wednesday it is starting a process to “explore viable locations in the United States to host” the festival, beginning in 2027.

Eugene Hernandez, director of the festival and head of the institute’s public programming, said the move was prompted by the fact that the festival’s contract with Park City is up for renewal. The institute is obligated to inform Park City by October whether it will start negotiating a new contract.

“This hasn’t happened in over a decade,” Hernandez said, “so in really trying to think about how to be the most responsible to our festival, … we created this [Request for Information] and [Request for Proposals] process that can help us really develop the right process to evaluate and consider about how we build the future of the festival.”

Advertisement

(Francisco Kjolseth | The Salt Lake Tribune) Troy Higgins makes a delivery along Main Street in Park City on opening-day of the Sundance Film Festival on Thursday, Jan. 18, 2024.

In a statement Wednesday, Park City Mayor Nann Worel said the city “will work collaboratively with all our state and local partners on next steps.”

Worel said, “we appreciate our partnership with Sundance, and we want the festival to remain here for another 40 years. We will not be alone in the effort to ensure that Utah remains host to diverse new voices from around the globe.”

Virginia Pearce, director of the Utah Film Commission, said Wednesday in a statement that “we see this as an opportunity to reimagine what the future of the festival looks like in Utah. With over 40 years of demonstrated success as the home of the Sundance Film Festival, we are well-positioned to continue this partnership.”

The process, according to a release from the institute, begins Wednesday with a Request For Information (RFI) phase, which will run for two weeks and close on May 1. Interested parties can submit proposals to proposal@sundance.org.

Advertisement

The festival, the release said, “will employ the RFI process to identify new opportunities to elevate artists while providing a space that reflects the festival’s values of inclusion, racial equity, accessibility and belonging at every level for artists, audiences, staff and volunteers.”

On May 7, a Request for Proposals (RFP) phase will open. In this phase of the process, “specific details will be assessed,” the release said. The RFP process will close on June 21.

A final decision on the festival’s location for 2027 and beyond will be announced in the fourth quarter of this year or the first quarter of 2025.

Hernandez didn’t share specifics about the criteria the institute is looking for from cities or proposals, except that it is all “about continuing the vital work of the Sundance festival.”

(Trent Nelson | The Salt Lake Tribune) Eugene Hernandez, new director of the Sundance Film Festival, in Salt Lake City on Wednesday, Jan. 10, 2024.

Advertisement

He added, “we really want and hope Utah will go along on this journey with us, and we feel like we’re really well-suited to have this conversation with our friends in Utah, because of the long history and legacy of this festival that we share together.”

Hernandez noted that the 2025 and 2026 festivals will be held in Park City — and that he’s already started watching early films for next year’s festival, which the institute announced in March will happen in Park City and Salt Lake City from Jan. 23 to Feb. 2, 2025.

“We are committed to our audience, because the audience has been committed to Sundance for all of these decades,” he said. “This is a festival for people who live there in Utah, and also for people who travel. … So for 2027 and beyond that, we’re going do what’s best for artists and [the] audience. But there’s no need to panic.”

The institute’s release noted the decades that Sundance has been in Utah. “Sundance Institute’s connection to Utah is profound, reflecting decades of shared cultural achievements that have shaped the festival into what it is today,” the release said.

The festival’s connection to Utah predates the institute’s existence. The first Utah/US Film Festival was held September 1978 in Salt Lake City, and moved to Park City in January 1981 — a few months before actor-director-activist Robert Redford founded the Sundance Institute as a laboratory for independent filmmakers. In 1985, the institute took over operations of what was then called the United States Film Festival; the name was changed to Sundance in 1991.

Advertisement

When Sundance came to Park City, Mayor Worel said in her statement, “it was buoyed by a tight-knit and passionate group of individuals who worked together to provide a voice for independent storytellers that became impactful beyond anyone’s imagination.”

At the same time, Worel said, Park City was “just starting to realize what this place could become. As Sundance grew, so did we — into a world-class mountain town that welcomes the world year-round.”

(Francisco Kjolseth | Salt Lake Tribune file photo) Robert Redford, seated alongside festival director John Cooper, answers questions from the media at the Egyptian Theatre as the Sundance Film Festival gets underway in Park City on Thursday, Jan. 21, 2010.

Over the years, festival visitors from time to time have complained about trudging through the snow during Sundance — but Redford has long argued that the difficulty of navigating the festival was the point.

“The snow and the inconvenience — I love it,” Redford told The Tribune in 1996. “This is sort of what the idea was: Make it in the winter, move into Park City, make it a little rougher atmosphere to suit the image of what independent film is.”

Advertisement

Redford, 87, retired from acting in 2018 (his last on-screen role was in 2019′s “Avengers: Endgame”), and as founder is on the institute’s board of trustees. His daughter, Amy, also a filmmaker, is also a board member — and will be on the task force looking through the RFI and RFP submissions.

Wednesday’s announcement comes at a turbulent time for the festival and the institute — weeks after the sudden departure of the institute’s CEO, Joana Vicente, who had held the job for just 2½ years. Amanda Kelso, a member of the institute’s board, has been named acting CEO.

(Francisco Kjolseth | The Salt Lake Tribune) Joana Vicente, CEO of Sundance Institute, leads a conversation during the Sundance Scoop opening-day press conference at the Filmmaker Lodge in Park City on Thursday, Jan. 18, 2024. Vicente left the CEO job in March 2024.

This year’s festival, Hernandez’s first as director, saw an increase in single-ticket prices. Two of the festival’s largest Park City venues, the Eccles Theatre and the Prospector Square Theatre, housed movie screenings only during the festival’s first half. Two other venues, the MARC and the Temple Theatre, have not been used since 2020, before the COVID-19 pandemic forced Sundance to go completely online in 2021 and 2022.

IndieWire, the online trade publication Hernandez co-founded, reported in March that Metropolitan Theaters Corporation, which operates two of Sundance’s Park City venues — the Redstone 8 and Holiday Village Cinemas 4 multiplexes — filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy in February. Park City radio station KPCW later reported that the Holiday Village has closed its doors.

Advertisement

On the upside, according to the trade paper Variety, the festival’s inaugural gala fundraiser — which toasted actor Kristen Stewart and directors Christopher Nolan and Celine Song — raked in $1.5 million for the nonprofit. And, The New York Times reported, distribution deals for festival films were robust after a slow start.

According to its most recent 990 forms — the tax forms nonprofits file with the Internal Revenue Service — in 2021, Sundance Institute took in $24 million more in revenue than in 2020, and ended the year with $78.1 million in net assets and a net revenue of $13 million.

The festival continued to attract independent filmmakers and fans from around the world. The 2024 festival drew 17,345 submissions from 153 countries — the most in its history.

On a podcast in January, reported by KPCW, Vicente spoke about the challenges the festival faced being held in Park City, including accessibility and cost. She also expressed excitement about what the festival is doing in its Salt Lake City venues, “really getting to a more diverse, younger audience.”

Hernandez, who has been attending the festival for 30 years, said the event has continued to “evolve right in front of everyone’s eyes.”

Advertisement

What brings success to the festival, Hernandez said, is “so inherent in what you can see at the Sundance Film Festival over these 40-plus years. … It’s that openness of the audience. It’s that careful curation.”

This is a developing story.

Tribune culture & business editor Sean P. Means and business reporter Shannon Sollitt contributed to this report.



Source link

Advertisement

Utah

Man accused of killing Charlie Kirk files motion to disqualify Utah County Attorney’s Office from prosecuting case

Published

on

Man accused of killing Charlie Kirk files motion to disqualify Utah County Attorney’s Office from prosecuting case


The bottom line? An atmospheric river will pump moisture into northern Utah through the weekend, but with how warm it is, snow levels will remain high. Even the Wasatch Back will see more rain than snow, and what little snow they get will barely stick, if at all. Mountains won’t do too bad.



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Utah QB Devon Dampier confirms he will play in Las Vegas Bowl vs. Nebraska

Published

on

Utah QB Devon Dampier confirms he will play in Las Vegas Bowl vs. Nebraska


The weeks following the college football regular season provide players plenty of time to weigh their NFL draft options against their desire to compete in a bowl game.

In Utah’s case, offensive tackles Spencer Fano and Caleb Lomu, as well as defensive end Logan Fano, decided it was in their best interests to forego the Utes’ Las Vegas Bowl matchup against Nebraska and declare for the 2026 NFL Draft instead.

Utah quarterback Devon Dampier, meanwhile, was looking forward to one last ride with his 2025 teammates before calling it a season.

Advertisement

“I chose to finish out this season with my team,” Dampier said during a media availability session Thursday. “I’m gonna play in the game. But some people, it’s a lot higher stakes; got a couple first rounders and things like that.”

Advertisement

‘We know those guys love us. They let it be known every day since they’ve been here, so we still support those guys and they support us.”

Utah head coach Kyle Whittingham presumed Thursday that the Fano brothers and Lomu would be the only bowl game opt-outs on Utah’s side, along with a few walk-ons. Some Utes who announced their transfer portal intentions continued to practice with the team as well.

Dampier confirmed his availability for the Las Vegas Bowl after a historic regular season under center, becoming the first Utes signal-caller to throw for over 2,000 yards and rush for over 600 yards in a single season since Alex Smith accomplished the feat in 2004. Dampier had 2,180 passing yards, a career-high 22 passing touchdowns and only five interceptions after throwing 12 picks last season. He also had 687 rushing yards and seven touchdowns going into Utah’s postseason game.

While his intentions for Dec. 31 were made clear, Dampier’s status for next season remained somewhat cloudy. He did hint at making an announcement alongside fellow quarterback Byrd Ficklin, though it was postponed after Ficklin’s return to the Utes was leaked Dec. 11.

Advertisement

“Y’all going to see,” Dampier said when asked if he was coming back for the 2026 campaign. “It’s great. I’m very happy to be here.”

Advertisement

“[Ficklin and I] were trying to do something special, but his [return] got a little leaked out before we could get to it. But it’s coming.”

Dampier said during a radio show appearance earlier in December that he was “big on staying” and had “no intentions to leave” the Utes. He also said over the airwaves that he anticipates being named a captain for the 2026 squad, and that he does play a role in recruiting.

Dampier discussed Kyle Whittingham’s impending departure from the program and the future outlook with Morgan Scalley set to take over during his media availability session.

On Kyle Whittingham’s decision to step down as head coach

Advertisement

“That’s a legend. I got a lot of respect for him. I think he’s transformed this program. He’s made it perfect for [Morgan] Scalley to step in. I’m still excited to still be at Ute.”

On Morgan Scalley taking over as head coach

“I’m very confident in Scalley. When I came here on my visit, that was someone I talked to. He let me know the rundown for when his time comes. He had his full belief in me and in my talent, so I’m perfectly fine where I’m at.”

Advertisement

On sending Whittingham off with a win

“It means a lot to me. I could try to speak for everybody on the team, but for me, especially, that’s a coach that believed in me to come in here after being at New Mexico, and just had a full trust in me, in the offense, to do what we do. And that’s just huge respect from him, and just what he’s done for this program. This is one only programs in college football where you know what Utes do, you know how they play and you know the mentality. So for him to leave that up, I got to finish well for him.”

Advertisement

On whether the program is in better hands than it would be if an outsider was hired

“Most definitely. I think just what’s already set here, what’s known here; Scalley has been under Whitt. I think Whitt’s done a great job of allowing him to demonstrate what a good head coach looks like and I know Scalley is gonna step into it and do what he does.”

MORE UTAH NEWS & ANALYSIS

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Where did the Red Wings go wrong in loss to Utah? 5 thoughts

Published

on

Where did the Red Wings go wrong in loss to Utah? 5 thoughts


DETROIT — Just as the Detroit Red Wings looked like they were getting into a groove, they hit a stumbling block Wednesday in a 4-1 loss to the Utah Mammoth.

It’s only one game for a team that still sits atop the Atlantic Division, and none of the Red Wings players or coaches were going to panic in the aftermath. But a night after head coach Todd McLellan cautioned, “You can’t give it back,” after a strong run of recent play, a three-goal loss on home ice wasn’t the follow-up anyone was looking for.

Here’s what went wrong and some other thoughts from Wednesday night.

1. There was no doubt what McLellan thought the biggest issue was against the Mammoth.

Advertisement

“For me, the difference was obvious,” he said. “It was play around our net.”

And that was a theme on all four goals Detroit allowed. On the first, Simon Edvinsson drifted just off of Clayton Keller in the slot, giving him enough room to put home a big rebound off Cam Talbot. On the second, Ben Chiarot didn’t tie up Jack McBain on the back post. The third was a bit different, as no one really lost their man, but when Moritz Seider went to clear a trickling puck headed for a goal line, he ended up bouncing it off Talbot’s pad and right to Dylan Guenther for an easy goal. And on the fourth, Nate Danielson was a step or two off his check in the slot for a one-timer.

“It’s like sitting at your desk at school,” McLellan said. “You’re sitting there, but big deal. Are you doing any work? We’re in position. Do the work. Do the job. Get it done.”

McLellan also noted that Edvinsson and Danielson threw their heads back after the first and fourth goals, indicating they knew immediately what had gone wrong.

2. Though those goals against were ultimately the difference in the final score, Detroit also created far too little danger of its own against the Mammoth, especially at five-on-five.

Advertisement

Detroit’s top players, in particular, had uncharacteristic nights, with their first line (Larkin, Lucas Raymond and Emmitt Finnie) and the top defense pair (Seider and Edvinsson) all ending the night at minus-2, and with five-on-five expected goals shares below 25 percent, according to Natural Stat Trick.

Finnie got the Red Wings’ lone goal on a third-period power-play blast that briefly gave Detroit life, but there just weren’t enough serious chances in the second or third periods to really threaten Utah.

Although Detroit’s power play eventually scored in the third, a pair of second-period opportunities on the man advantage went by uneventfully when the score was still 1-0. The Red Wings didn’t record a shot on goal in the first of those two chances, and the top unit managed just one shot on goal in the second as well.

“We had looks, we had zone time, we just didn’t get it done,” Larkin said. “Didn’t get pucks through. Credit to them, they had a tight diamond, and I’m sure Todd will tell you both on their penalty kill and five-on-five, they probably won the net play tonight, and that was probably the story of the game.”

Certainly, the lack of any five-on-five offense is a more damning proposition than a 1-for-4 night on the power play. But situationally, in a one-goal game, those were big missed chances to swing momentum. Utah scored just 22 seconds after killing off the second penalty to make it 2-0, and that ultimately proved to be the game-winning goal.

Advertisement

Still, with just one even-strength goal in the last two games, the Red Wings are going to need more there, and that includes their top players, who have really carried them offensively to this point.

3. Wednesday’s loss dropped the Red Wings to 1-5 in the second half of back-to-backs this season.

It’s a small sample, but that stands out, even with the inherent challenge of playing on consecutive nights. It didn’t seem to slow Utah too much Wednesday, for example.

Larkin acknowledged the Red Wings will have to be better in those situations, particularly with more on the horizon. Detroit will play three more sets of back-to-backs in the next two weeks, with a home-and-home against the Washington Capitals this weekend, tilts against the Carolina Hurricanes and Toronto Maple Leafs the following weekend, and then the Winnipeg Jets and Pittsburgh Penguins at New Year’s.

I asked McLellan if there was anything he could put his finger on with the back-to-backs, and he pointed out that Detroit hadn’t scored first in any of those losses. That is true, and it’s probably a symptom and a cause.

Advertisement

Not scoring early has been a theme all season, though. Detroit has just 19 first-period goals in 35 games, which ranks 30th in the league, while giving up 28. The goals against number isn’t so bad — it’s still roughly league average — but it still translates to coming out of the first in a hole too often.

Cam Talbot hasn’t quite hit the same highs as earlier this season in recent games. (Rick Osentoski / Imagn Images)

4. Just as John Gibson seems to have found a bit of a rhythm for the Red Wings, Cam Talbot — who was Detroit’s rock in net early this season — has slipped into a bit of a funk. Not many of Wednesday’s goals were on him, but the rebound he gave up on the first goal (stemming from a low-percentage shot from along the boards) and then the trickling puck that led the third are atypical of where he was to start the season.

McLellan said he thinks the Red Wings have played better in front of Gibson of late, a reversal from early in the season, but that he’d “have a conversation (with Talbot) real quick, just let him know that we believe in him, because we do.”

5. After Tuesday night’s game, I noted Detroit had a tougher portion of the schedule coming up, with the back-to-back games against Washington and hosting a good Dallas Stars team to lead into Christmas.

Advertisement

Co-worker Dom Luszczyszyn pointed out to me that it’s actually more dramatic in the big picture. His model projects the Red Wings with the league’s toughest remaining schedule coming into Wednesday, and Detroit’s remaining opponents also have the second-highest collective win percentage.

That’s just one more reason that banking every point possible matters right now, especially from Eastern Conference foes they’ll be competing with for a playoff spot.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending