This article was first published in the Ute Insiders newsletter. Sign up to receive the newsletter in your inbox each Wednesday night.

Fall camp begins next Monday, and it will mark the final step toward kickoff after a lengthy offseason.

For the University of Utah, this season is as heavily anticipated as any, as the Utes, led by quarterback Cam Rising, were picked to win the Big 12 Conference in the preseason media poll.

The expansion of the College Football Playoff — and the automatic bid, and bye, given to the Big 12 champion — has Utah excited heading into 2024.

“Our players were excited about the opportunity. We control our own destiny. If we’re able to win the championship of the Big 12, we are going to the playoffs. We don’t have to hope somebody votes us in,” Utah coach Kyle Whittingham said.

Here are five storylines to watch for as the Utes open up fall camp on Monday ahead of their first season in the Big 12.

The backup quarterback battle

The race for QB2 was the No. 1 storyline throughout spring camp, and it’ll dominate the headlines in the fall.

Sophomore Brandon Rose and true freshman Isaac Wilson will come into fall camp pretty much even after neither separated themselves enough to be given the edge coming out of spring ball.

Utah added Sam Huard after spring practices concluded, adding a third name into the mix. Huard is the only one of the three with college game experience, having played limited snaps in three games at Washington — save for an Apple Cup start where he threw for 190 yards, a touchdown and four interceptions as the Huskies lost 40-13 to the Cougars to cap off a 4-8 season.

With the emergence of Michael Penix Jr., Huard transferred to FCS Cal Poly, where he threw for 2,205 yards on a 60.9% completion rate and tossed 18 touchdowns and 10 interceptions.

Huard is a valuable addition who could end up winning the backup job with his previous experience.

“I can say for certain that Isaac Wilson and Brandon Rose had very good springs, and they’re coming into fall camp essentially neck and neck and now you add Sam to that mix,” Whittingham said. “We’ve got to find out what he can do. So the only thing we know for certain at quarterback is Cam is our guy, but the pecking order beyond that is to be determined.”

Which running back will emerge, or will it be by committee?

Asked which position group he had the most questions about as the Utes prepared for fall camp, Whittingham singled out the running back group.

“Who’s going to emerge as the bell cow running back, if anyone does? Maybe it’ll be by committee, which if that’s the case, that’s not a problem as long as we’re getting the production we need,” Whittingham said.

Running backs coach Quinton Ganther echoed those statements during spring ball, saying that the Utes “don’t have an every-down guy, so to speak, but we have a lot of guys that do a lot of things well.”

Utah has talent in the room, starting with senior Micah Bernard, who is back after missing the majority of last year due to injury.

In 2022, Bernard rushed for 533 yards and four touchdowns while adding 314 receiving yards and a score through the air. He’s Utah’s most versatile back, and its best pass-catching option at the position.

Will he handle the vast majority of the carries, or will it be by committee this season for the Utes?

Jaylon Glover — the No. 2 back behind Ja’Quinden Jackson last season — had a strong finish to the 2023 season, capped by his first 100-plus-yard game in the regular-season finale. If he continues on that trajectory, he’ll be a viable option for the Utes this season.

The wild cards here are Mike Mitchell and Dijon Stanley, who have seen very limited — or in Mitchell’s case, zero — time at running back.

At 6-foot, 211 pounds, Mitchell is the bruising archetype this room is in need of, and the ideal back in situations where Utah needs to pick up a few yards. Is he ready for an increased role, and could he develop into that lead running back for the Utes this year?

Stanley — who has great speed — has shown flashes in spring practices but needs to gain more weight and improve on his pass protection, according to Ganther. Will he make those strides and work his way into the rotation?

Who will be the other starting safety?

Utah replaces two starters — Cole Bishop and Sione Vaki, who were drafted to the NFL this April — at safety, which is the position group that will see the most change from last season.

Nothing is official until the first depth chart is released, but after spring camp, it seems all but certain that Tao Johnson has locked down the starting free safety role.

Johnson was the starting nickel during last season, but played a number of snaps at safety. Whittingham said last season that free safety was Johnson’s natural position, and now that there’s an opening, he’s making the move.

Defensive coordinator Morgan Scalley said that Johnson may be the first true over-the-top free safety the Utes have had since Julian Blackmon.

“Speed. He’s got really good speed over the top. He’s got great ball skills. … Cole and Sione were very good, very good safeties, could play on the back end, but Tao just with his ability to cover ground is really pleasant to see back there,” Scalley said.

The battle between Nate Ritchie, Johnathan Hall and Alaka’i Gilman will continue throughout fall camp to fill the strong safety position, with Ritchie the favorite right now.

After returning from his church mission last season, Ritchie played 154 snaps at safety over 11 games, making three starts with 22 tackles and a sack.

“Nate Ritchie had a terrific spring. He was more of the Nate Ritchie when he started as a freshman. Has shaken all the rust off and he was moving around really well,” Whittingham said.

“(Johnathan) Hall had a terrific spring as well, our safety out of Texas, Alaka’i Gilman, the Stanford transfer, showed up well in spring also. … We got four or five candidates to fill those two spots, and it’s probably headlined right now by Nate Richie.”

Will the offensive line take a step forward?

It’s impossible to divorce Utah’s offensive line play last year from the down year at quarterback the Utes had in Rising’s absence. When you don’t have good quarterback play, it affects the offensive line — especially in the run game.

Last year, Utah rushed for 2,373 yards, and while that ranked No. 33 in the nation, it was the Utes’ worst rushing output in a full season since 2017. Knowing that Utah wasn’t going to gash them through the year, teams stacked the box, which made things difficult for the line. Ja’Quinden Jackson also wasn’t 100% the entire year, further complicating matters.

Those caveats aside, it wasn’t a banner year for the offensive line.

The Utes ranked No. 129 in the FBS in pass blocking and No. 46 in run blocking, according to Pro Football Focus, and while my eye test didn’t peg them as the fifth-worst pass-blocking team in the nation, the Utes know their offensive line performance needs to be better this season.

The presence of Rising — and better quarterback play — under center again is a positive for the offensive line.

“After practice, I went to (OC Andy Ludwig’s) office and just made the comment that it just felt different with Cam (Rising) back there,” offensive line coach Jim Harding said this spring. “And if I feel that way, I’m assuming the players do as well.”

The Utes have to replace three starters — center Kolinu’u Faaiu, who transferred to Texas A&M, left guard Keaton Bills, who is now with the Buffalo Bills, and right tackle Sataoa Laumea, who was drafted by the Seattle Seahawks.

Sophomore Spencer Fano, who started at left tackle as a freshman but is expected to flip to right tackle this year, and starting right guard Michael Mokofisi are back.

Center should be a battle between Jaren Kump and Johnny Maea, both of whom have starting experience at Utah, while Tanoa Togiai (another Ute with some starting experience) is penciled in at left guard and Caleb Lomu is penciled in at left tackle.

“We’re very confident in those guys,” Whittingham said.

Utah’s modified fall camp

Utah’s injury woes last season were well covered, as a laundry list of players missed significant time in the Utes’ 8-4 campaign.

Players that missed significant time included Rising, tight end Brant Kuithe, tight end Thomas Yassmin, running back Chris Curry, wide receiver Mycah Pittman, linebacker Lander Barton, and defensive end Logan Fano. Defensive end Jonah Elliss missed the last two games, and several other players missed at least a couple of games.

This year, the Utes are moving to an NFL-style model for fall camp, taking some days off during the start of “Camp Kyle.”

Though injuries are sadly a constant in football, the goal is to do everything possible to get to the opener on August 29 fully healthy.

“Instead of just hitting the ground running, we’re going to go two days, take a day off, go three days, take a day off, go four days, take a day off. So there’s a ramping effect there,” Whittingham said.

Whittingham is also implementing modifications in lifting to prevent soft-tissue injuries and is looking at the warmup and stretch routines the Utes are doing.

“We’ve looked at every possible angle we have, and we’ll implement some of those this fall,” Whittingham said.

From the archives

Extra points

• How will Utah basketball fare in the Big 12 this season? (Deseret News)
• Will Utah make the College Football Playoff? Bowl projections for the new Big 12 (Deseret News)

LOGAN, Utah — A few weeks after Big Lots announced it would close certain “underperforming” stores, the list of those located in Utah have been released.

The company currently operates seven locations in Utah, but the stores in Layton and Logan will soon close their doors.

• LAYTON – 1030 North Main Street
• LOGAN – 1617 North Main Street

When the two Utah locations close, the South Ogden store will be the only one in the state outside of the Salt Lake-area.
When Big Lots first announced the proposed closures in early July, officials said only 35-40 locations would be shuttered. However, when the list of closings was released, the number of stores was more than double the original number.

Big Lots operations 1,392 stores, but said falling sales was the reason for the move, with net sales decreasing $114.5 million, or 10.2%, in the first quarter of 2024 compared to the first quarter of 2023.

The exact date when the stores will be closed has not been announced.

Picture this: A young Utah family, excited to buy a first home, finds a dream house slipping further out of reach with each passing month. Sound familiar? It should.

In the Beehive State, the affordability crisis isn’t just making headlines — it’s reshaping lives. Redfin data shows that, since May 2019, median home prices have increased by a startling $206,700 — a 61.53% increase that’s left many Utahns reeling.

And what about renters? From 2013 to 2020, rent in the Salt Lake City area increased by 6% annually, spiked by 19% in 2021, rose moderately in 2022, and remained elevated in 2023, resulting in a substantial overall increase over the decade. But what if we’re only seeing part of the picture?

Andrew Gruber, Executive Director of the Wasatch Front Regional Council, thinks we’re overlooking a crucial piece of the affordability puzzle. In a candid conversation with The Salt Lake Tribune’s Innovation Lab, Gruber challenges us to rethink our approach to this pressing issue.

“We need to stop looking at housing costs in isolation,” Gruber asserts. “For most Utahns, the real story of affordability is written in the combined ink of housing and transportation expenses.”

Intrigued? So were we. Let’s dive into Gruber’s fresh perspective on Utah’s affordability challenges.

Michael Parker (MP): Andrew, you’ve suggested we should look at both housing and transportation costs together when considering affordability. Can you explain why this combined approach is so important, especially for middle-class families?

Andrew Gruber (AG): Housing and transportation expenses are fundamentally linked in a household’s budget and lifestyle choices. By looking at them in tandem, we get a much clearer picture of the true cost of living in a particular area. This holistic view isn’t just about numbers on a spreadsheet — it’s about developing strategies that can genuinely improve affordability and quality of life for our communities.

MP: It’s true that most families instinctively juggle these expenses in their household budgets. But you’re suggesting a broader perspective. How could elevating this approach to a community-wide strategy create meaningful change for Utah families?

AG: Where we live can reduce how much we spend on transportation. Take a typical family earning $70,000 a year. Traditional guidelines suggest they shouldn’t spend more than $21,000 annually on housing (30%). Say that family finds a home in a suburb where their mortgage plus utilities are $18,000 per year. But what about transportation?

If their home is far from work, shopping or schools, with limited public transportation, they might need multiple cars, increasing costs significantly.

Now, consider if they choose a home in a mixed-use community, close to jobs, schools, shopping and public transit. That family might drive less, have shorter trips and maybe need just one car. They could save thousands annually on car payments, insurance and gas. They’d also save time by avoiding traffic.

This makes a huge difference in overall household costs. The two locations might not even be far apart — the mixed-use area could be the center of the same suburb.

MP: Can you give us an example of a successful local model?

AG: Definitely. Look at Daybreak as a mixed-use community within the city of South Jordan. This community is designed to be walkable with schools, parks, places to work and shops all within a short distance. Residents can bike or walk to most places and the UTA’s Trax line has two stations in Daybreak. Another will be opening soon. Another example would be Station Park [in Farmington] focusing on jobs and transit. This all significantly reduces the need for driving. This model not only cuts down on transportation costs — with both money and time savings — but also enhances quality of life by promoting a healthier, more active lifestyle.

MP: Would this approach to how we design our communities impact local taxes and city budgets?

AG: Yes, usually positively. In mixed-use communities like Daybreak, with diverse housing and transportation options, infrastructure costs are often lower per home. Smaller lots, townhomes and increased use of public transit or walking also reduce the land and resources needed. This can lead to more investment in parks and amenities, improving quality of life while keeping tax rates reasonable.

MP: Would this approach help a family get around for things like soccer practices?

AG: Yes. The basic concept is to give people easier access to the things that are most important to them. Imagine living in a neighborhood where job opportunities, schools, parks and grocery stores are within a short drive, or even within walking or biking distance. This means less time spent driving to soccer practices or running errands, saving both time and money.

MP: Are you suggesting every community should follow the same design?

AG: Definitely not. By offering both single-family housing neighborhoods and mixed-used communities a city offers more options to residents based on their wants and needs. So each community has to consider what works best for its residents. Some smaller suburban or rural communities can have a nice main street or town center that connects to residential areas with safe roads and sidewalks for biking and walking. Other areas can have a mixed-use city center where some of its residents can live, work and shop. And our larger cities can have “downtown” areas with lots of activity and development, like Ogden, Provo and our capital city of Salt Lake.

MP: How would you sum up what you’ve described?

AG: If we want Utah residents and families to be able to afford to live here, and to thrive, we should be thinking not just about housing costs, but overall household affordability. By considering the costs of housing and transportation together and considering that relationship as we develop our communities, we can give Utahns a better shot at making it. And not only can this help with household costs, it can enhance quality of life at the same time.

MP: Thank you for offering this fresh perspective on affordable living, one that extends beyond just rent or mortgages. It’s a broader, more holistic approach to thinking about our cities and finances. With innovative ideas like these, the future of Utah could become more affordable and enjoyable than we ever imagined. For instance, including transit passes with rent for apartments near TRAX stations or with home purchases within half a mile of fixed transit lines would be a transformative change for many families.

Andrew Gruber is the executive director of the Wasatch Front Regional Council, which along with its partners develops the Wasatch Choice Vision to create strategies for better transportation, diverse housing options, and walkable city centers. Learn more at www.wasatchchoice.org.

Michael Parker is the director of community solutions for The Salt Lake Tribune’s Innovation Lab and principal and founder of Do Good.

The Innovation Lab invites Utahns to share ideas on supporting the middle class. Email voices@sltrib.com to contribute.