Connect with us

Utah

Gordon Monson: Where have you gone, Cam Rising? Your Utes badly need you — the real you — back.

Published

on

Gordon Monson: Where have you gone, Cam Rising? Your Utes badly need you — the real you — back.


Cam Rising, man, where are you? The real you? The you riding up on the high horse with the talent and the swagger and the winning way? The you who will spin a ball straight down the throat of a formidable opponent and laugh at their pain?

Cam? … Cameron? … Mr. Rising? … Bad Moon?

Helloooooooooooo? You out there? Somewhere, anywhere?

No, no, no that you. Not the No. 7 under center for the Utes on Friday night against Arizona State, not the imposter who completed just 16 of 37 passes for 209 yards, with zero touchdowns and three interceptions, including the pick at the end that finished any slight chance for Utah to catch the Sun Devils, the throwing error that capped many throwing errors. The mistake that kept the count in arrears at 27-19 to end the game. Not the quarterback who too often looked uncertain and overmatched, who blooped the ball here, shanked the ball there, misfired the ball everywhere. No. Not him.

Advertisement

Will the real Cam Rising please stand up? Will the real Cam Rising please show up?

Cam? All stations, calling for Cam.

Whose this? Nuh-uh, not you, Cam Skattebo. You’re a sweet little story, granted, a bowling ball of a running back for ASU via Sacramento State who nobody initially wanted, and, now, you’re knocking down Ute linebackers, making them explode like pins at the end of an alley. While we’re looking for Cam Rising, we, instead, got you. A lot of you; 158 yards and two long touchdowns worth.

Well, yeah, so it was that the long-awaited return of Utah’s QB1 actually happened at Arizona State. Everybody wanted him to rush back. But when he took the field, it seemed a mirage in the desert, a dark one, not the real thing. Upon Rising’s reemergence, after a month away, everything for the Utes was gonna be all right, right?

Um … can we get back to you on that? We’ll have to because the guy wearing Rising’s jersey did not look like Rising, did not play like Rising, did not drill the ball like Rising, did not command the offense like Rising, did not exude confidence like Rising, did not lift his team like Rising.

Advertisement

Was the damaged finger on his throwing hand to blame, or was it a newly acquired leg injury?

Either way, the effect was devastating for Utah’s season of promise, a second loss to a Big 12 team that pushed the Utes and their chances for a league title under the waterline.

“It’s very apparent that [Cam’s] not 100 percent,” Kyle Whittingham said, afterward. “But it’s a coaching decision to decide who gives you the best chance to win the game and that’s who you put in there.”

Just a few days earlier, Whittingham had been asked whether he would play an athlete — read: a quarterback — who had been medically cleared, but was less than 100 percent. He said: “It’s who gives you the best chance to win. Is an 80-percent Cam Rising more of an opportunity to win than a 100-percent Isaac Wilson? That’s a coach’s decision.”

The coach decided on Rising here at whatever lowered percentage he was.

Advertisement

But Whittingham added: “You could see the rust. …”

And he added further: “He’s a heck of a quarterback and he’ll bounce back.”

But will the Utes?

Straight from jump and straight on through to the end of this game, they were out of rhythm, out of whack, out of luck. They played like a melon that had been sliced in half, and then sloppily plopped back together slightly off-center. They displayed a form far from their best, odd for a team that was favored to beat the Sun Devils on the road, the line having suddenly leaned more steeply in its direction once it became known that You-Know-Who would be back in the lineup.

Utah’s door, though, looked ajar not just on attack, but also on defense, the one seeming to adversely influence the other. It helped not one bit that Rising got hit and twisted on a play in the first quarter, after he delivered a pass, and walked gingerly thereafter, like a barefoot quarterback traversing a rocky beach.

Advertisement

Emblematic of that, at least results-wise, was Utah settling for two field goals in that initial quarter, including after a fortuitous interception deep in ASU territory, a gift that typically would have handed the Utes a touchdown, but not now, not here. That rankled Whittingham because in the run-up to this game, one of the points he stressed was taking advantage of opportunities in and around the red zone. Field goals were not what he had in mind. By his reckoning, his team had been cashing in with touchdowns on only 50 percent of its trips into the red zone. That number was some 20 percent less than Whittingham’s target percentage.

The goings on here did nothing to advance it. After their field goals, Utah yielded two touchdowns to the Devils, and when the Utes gained another scoring chance, Rising short-armed a ball that was picked within the shadow of ASU’s goal posts, canceling that drive.

In the final moments of the first half, Rising had a chance to deliver a touchdown pass from the ASU 12-yard line, but a squibbed ball aimed at Dorian Singer was knocked away to force another field goal, making it 13-9.

“As long as we have our holes in the red zone, we may not win another game this season until we get it fixed,” Whittingham said. “… [G]ot out-rushed, we were awful in the red zone, lost the turnover margin and missed a bunch of tackles.”

That about covers it.

Advertisement

Rising carried on in the second half a bit better, but with similar results. He threw another interception near midfield, getting hit hard as he released the ball. No doubt, the veteran quarterback is one leathery-tough dude, but he struggled throughout, as did others. He was greatly helped by Micah Bernard, who ran hard for 129 yards and a TD, but it simply wasn’t enough.

What exactly did this game prove? It showed that an 80-percent Cam Rising wasn’t the force at the most important position on the field that the Utes needed. And it showed that Whittingham didn’t believe that a 100-percent Isaac Wilson was the necessary force, either.

A loss is almost never all the quarterback’s fault, especially when a supposedly strong Utah defense allows itself to get gashed for a 50-yard TD run and a 47-yard TD run. But when Rising plays and plays well, traditionally, that tide has raised all of Utah’s boats, on both sides of the ball.

“We’re a good football team, I firmly believe that,” Whittingham said, closing his eyes and clicking his heels together three times. “… We know our deficiencies, I guess that’s a positive, but we haven’t seemed to be able to get them rectified.”

Finding the real Cam Rising — where is he? — would go a long way to getting that done.

Advertisement

Editor’s note • This story is available to Salt Lake Tribune subscribers only. Thank you for supporting local journalism.



Source link

Utah

Man accused of killing Charlie Kirk files motion to disqualify Utah County Attorney’s Office from prosecuting case

Published

on

Man accused of killing Charlie Kirk files motion to disqualify Utah County Attorney’s Office from prosecuting case


The bottom line? An atmospheric river will pump moisture into northern Utah through the weekend, but with how warm it is, snow levels will remain high. Even the Wasatch Back will see more rain than snow, and what little snow they get will barely stick, if at all. Mountains won’t do too bad.



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Utah QB Devon Dampier confirms he will play in Las Vegas Bowl vs. Nebraska

Published

on

Utah QB Devon Dampier confirms he will play in Las Vegas Bowl vs. Nebraska


The weeks following the college football regular season provide players plenty of time to weigh their NFL draft options against their desire to compete in a bowl game.

In Utah’s case, offensive tackles Spencer Fano and Caleb Lomu, as well as defensive end Logan Fano, decided it was in their best interests to forego the Utes’ Las Vegas Bowl matchup against Nebraska and declare for the 2026 NFL Draft instead.

Utah quarterback Devon Dampier, meanwhile, was looking forward to one last ride with his 2025 teammates before calling it a season.

Advertisement

“I chose to finish out this season with my team,” Dampier said during a media availability session Thursday. “I’m gonna play in the game. But some people, it’s a lot higher stakes; got a couple first rounders and things like that.”

Advertisement

‘We know those guys love us. They let it be known every day since they’ve been here, so we still support those guys and they support us.”

Utah head coach Kyle Whittingham presumed Thursday that the Fano brothers and Lomu would be the only bowl game opt-outs on Utah’s side, along with a few walk-ons. Some Utes who announced their transfer portal intentions continued to practice with the team as well.

Dampier confirmed his availability for the Las Vegas Bowl after a historic regular season under center, becoming the first Utes signal-caller to throw for over 2,000 yards and rush for over 600 yards in a single season since Alex Smith accomplished the feat in 2004. Dampier had 2,180 passing yards, a career-high 22 passing touchdowns and only five interceptions after throwing 12 picks last season. He also had 687 rushing yards and seven touchdowns going into Utah’s postseason game.

While his intentions for Dec. 31 were made clear, Dampier’s status for next season remained somewhat cloudy. He did hint at making an announcement alongside fellow quarterback Byrd Ficklin, though it was postponed after Ficklin’s return to the Utes was leaked Dec. 11.

Advertisement

“Y’all going to see,” Dampier said when asked if he was coming back for the 2026 campaign. “It’s great. I’m very happy to be here.”

Advertisement

“[Ficklin and I] were trying to do something special, but his [return] got a little leaked out before we could get to it. But it’s coming.”

Dampier said during a radio show appearance earlier in December that he was “big on staying” and had “no intentions to leave” the Utes. He also said over the airwaves that he anticipates being named a captain for the 2026 squad, and that he does play a role in recruiting.

Dampier discussed Kyle Whittingham’s impending departure from the program and the future outlook with Morgan Scalley set to take over during his media availability session.

On Kyle Whittingham’s decision to step down as head coach

Advertisement

“That’s a legend. I got a lot of respect for him. I think he’s transformed this program. He’s made it perfect for [Morgan] Scalley to step in. I’m still excited to still be at Ute.”

On Morgan Scalley taking over as head coach

“I’m very confident in Scalley. When I came here on my visit, that was someone I talked to. He let me know the rundown for when his time comes. He had his full belief in me and in my talent, so I’m perfectly fine where I’m at.”

Advertisement

On sending Whittingham off with a win

“It means a lot to me. I could try to speak for everybody on the team, but for me, especially, that’s a coach that believed in me to come in here after being at New Mexico, and just had a full trust in me, in the offense, to do what we do. And that’s just huge respect from him, and just what he’s done for this program. This is one only programs in college football where you know what Utes do, you know how they play and you know the mentality. So for him to leave that up, I got to finish well for him.”

Advertisement

On whether the program is in better hands than it would be if an outsider was hired

“Most definitely. I think just what’s already set here, what’s known here; Scalley has been under Whitt. I think Whitt’s done a great job of allowing him to demonstrate what a good head coach looks like and I know Scalley is gonna step into it and do what he does.”

MORE UTAH NEWS & ANALYSIS

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Where did the Red Wings go wrong in loss to Utah? 5 thoughts

Published

on

Where did the Red Wings go wrong in loss to Utah? 5 thoughts


DETROIT — Just as the Detroit Red Wings looked like they were getting into a groove, they hit a stumbling block Wednesday in a 4-1 loss to the Utah Mammoth.

It’s only one game for a team that still sits atop the Atlantic Division, and none of the Red Wings players or coaches were going to panic in the aftermath. But a night after head coach Todd McLellan cautioned, “You can’t give it back,” after a strong run of recent play, a three-goal loss on home ice wasn’t the follow-up anyone was looking for.

Here’s what went wrong and some other thoughts from Wednesday night.

1. There was no doubt what McLellan thought the biggest issue was against the Mammoth.

Advertisement

“For me, the difference was obvious,” he said. “It was play around our net.”

And that was a theme on all four goals Detroit allowed. On the first, Simon Edvinsson drifted just off of Clayton Keller in the slot, giving him enough room to put home a big rebound off Cam Talbot. On the second, Ben Chiarot didn’t tie up Jack McBain on the back post. The third was a bit different, as no one really lost their man, but when Moritz Seider went to clear a trickling puck headed for a goal line, he ended up bouncing it off Talbot’s pad and right to Dylan Guenther for an easy goal. And on the fourth, Nate Danielson was a step or two off his check in the slot for a one-timer.

“It’s like sitting at your desk at school,” McLellan said. “You’re sitting there, but big deal. Are you doing any work? We’re in position. Do the work. Do the job. Get it done.”

McLellan also noted that Edvinsson and Danielson threw their heads back after the first and fourth goals, indicating they knew immediately what had gone wrong.

2. Though those goals against were ultimately the difference in the final score, Detroit also created far too little danger of its own against the Mammoth, especially at five-on-five.

Advertisement

Detroit’s top players, in particular, had uncharacteristic nights, with their first line (Larkin, Lucas Raymond and Emmitt Finnie) and the top defense pair (Seider and Edvinsson) all ending the night at minus-2, and with five-on-five expected goals shares below 25 percent, according to Natural Stat Trick.

Finnie got the Red Wings’ lone goal on a third-period power-play blast that briefly gave Detroit life, but there just weren’t enough serious chances in the second or third periods to really threaten Utah.

Although Detroit’s power play eventually scored in the third, a pair of second-period opportunities on the man advantage went by uneventfully when the score was still 1-0. The Red Wings didn’t record a shot on goal in the first of those two chances, and the top unit managed just one shot on goal in the second as well.

“We had looks, we had zone time, we just didn’t get it done,” Larkin said. “Didn’t get pucks through. Credit to them, they had a tight diamond, and I’m sure Todd will tell you both on their penalty kill and five-on-five, they probably won the net play tonight, and that was probably the story of the game.”

Certainly, the lack of any five-on-five offense is a more damning proposition than a 1-for-4 night on the power play. But situationally, in a one-goal game, those were big missed chances to swing momentum. Utah scored just 22 seconds after killing off the second penalty to make it 2-0, and that ultimately proved to be the game-winning goal.

Advertisement

Still, with just one even-strength goal in the last two games, the Red Wings are going to need more there, and that includes their top players, who have really carried them offensively to this point.

3. Wednesday’s loss dropped the Red Wings to 1-5 in the second half of back-to-backs this season.

It’s a small sample, but that stands out, even with the inherent challenge of playing on consecutive nights. It didn’t seem to slow Utah too much Wednesday, for example.

Larkin acknowledged the Red Wings will have to be better in those situations, particularly with more on the horizon. Detroit will play three more sets of back-to-backs in the next two weeks, with a home-and-home against the Washington Capitals this weekend, tilts against the Carolina Hurricanes and Toronto Maple Leafs the following weekend, and then the Winnipeg Jets and Pittsburgh Penguins at New Year’s.

I asked McLellan if there was anything he could put his finger on with the back-to-backs, and he pointed out that Detroit hadn’t scored first in any of those losses. That is true, and it’s probably a symptom and a cause.

Advertisement

Not scoring early has been a theme all season, though. Detroit has just 19 first-period goals in 35 games, which ranks 30th in the league, while giving up 28. The goals against number isn’t so bad — it’s still roughly league average — but it still translates to coming out of the first in a hole too often.

Cam Talbot hasn’t quite hit the same highs as earlier this season in recent games. (Rick Osentoski / Imagn Images)

4. Just as John Gibson seems to have found a bit of a rhythm for the Red Wings, Cam Talbot — who was Detroit’s rock in net early this season — has slipped into a bit of a funk. Not many of Wednesday’s goals were on him, but the rebound he gave up on the first goal (stemming from a low-percentage shot from along the boards) and then the trickling puck that led the third are atypical of where he was to start the season.

McLellan said he thinks the Red Wings have played better in front of Gibson of late, a reversal from early in the season, but that he’d “have a conversation (with Talbot) real quick, just let him know that we believe in him, because we do.”

5. After Tuesday night’s game, I noted Detroit had a tougher portion of the schedule coming up, with the back-to-back games against Washington and hosting a good Dallas Stars team to lead into Christmas.

Advertisement

Co-worker Dom Luszczyszyn pointed out to me that it’s actually more dramatic in the big picture. His model projects the Red Wings with the league’s toughest remaining schedule coming into Wednesday, and Detroit’s remaining opponents also have the second-highest collective win percentage.

That’s just one more reason that banking every point possible matters right now, especially from Eastern Conference foes they’ll be competing with for a playoff spot.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending