Movie Reviews
Birth of Kitaro: The Mystery of GeGeGe Anime Movie Review
Modern folklore-focused anime and manga owe a huge debt to the work of 1960s manga Ge Ge Ge no Kitaro‘s artist and writer Shigeru Mizuki. A second world war veteran, the traumatic amputation of his left arm, due to an air raid explosion, never held back his pre-existing artistic ambitions. An avid researcher of international folklore, he poured his encyclopedic knowledge of the supernatural not only into his wildly influential manga, but also into countless factual tomes – some of which are available in English. Mizuki made his journey to the otherworld in 2015, at the age of 93, leaving an unparalleled legacy that this movie attempts to do justice to, acting as a prequel to the most recent anime adaptation and as an entry point for newcomers.
I’ll admit it now – before watching this, I was only familiar with Kitaro, and Mizuki’s work in general. Mainly on the strength of Scotland Loves Anime’s presenter Jonathan Clements‘ urgings, in preparation for this review I sought out several volumes of the original manga and episodes of the 2018 TV anime. It appears I am now very much a Mizuki fan, though not necessarily due to this movie.
Oddly, while Ge Ge Ge no Kitaro‘s TV incarnation is aimed primarily at children (with a theme song that claims it’s more fun to be a ghost because school attendance isn’t required), Birth of Kitaro is a grim and gritty horror film targeted at an adult audience. It loosely adapts a short manga chapter from 1966, however only uses the most basic of elements from it, crafting a mostly original story, tonally removed from the progenitor TV show. There’s even an “uncut” version, released only very recently in Japan, that dials up the already bloody violence even further. Birth of Kitaro has an unusual pedigree: it’s written by Hiroyuki Yoshino of Macross Frontier and Dance in the Vampire Bund, while directed by Gō Koga, best known for Precure and Digimon.
We’re first subjected to a baffling non-sequitur of a prologue that clumsily attempts to tie into TV show continuity with an appearance from Kitaro and pals in the “modern” day before jarringly segueing into the film’s primarily historical setting – it’s not a promising start. Most of the action transpires in 1956, during Japan’s post-war Showa-era economic recovery. Protagonist Mizuki (who is apparently a stand-in for author Mizuki himself) is an ambitious middle-management businessman who works for the “Imperial Blood Bank,” a company run by the mysterious Ryuga family. When the family head dies, Mizuki is summoned by his boss to the Ryuga’s remote mountain village estate to observe the transfer of power to the deceased head’s nominated heir. As expected from this genre, events don’t exactly proceed according to plan.
It’s immediately obvious this village is a strange place – accessible only by dangerous, unmaintained mountain roads, even locals from nearby areas avoid it entirely. Mizuki’s arrival is viewed with either novelty (from a village child), interest (from the main female character), or outright hostility (from most of the rest of the cast). His status as an unwelcome outsider is constantly reinforced by various senior Ryuga family members. Once poor Mizuki realizes he’s now trapped in a Hinamizawa/Twin Peaks/Royston Vasey-esque situation, it’s too late. This section of the film is slow-moving, perhaps as an attempt to build dread, but so many characters involved in random mafia/yakuza movie-style politicking are introduced that it’s extremely hard to follow. Eventually, this doesn’t matter, as most of the extended cast are murdered horribly anyway. There’s a lot of death in Birth of Kitaro, probably unsurprising for a character that fans already know will be born from the corpse of his mother, as the last of his kind. (So, spoilers for the uninitiated… I guess?)
Kitaro himself only barely appears in this prequel – instead, the focus is on the horribly-out-of-his depth Mizuki who finds an ally in the mysterious, white-haired, googly-eyed interloper he named “Gegero”. (The Japanese sound “ge” typically means “creepy” or “icky”, and when repeated like “gegege” it adds emphasis.) Gegero is really Kitaro‘s father, Medama-oyaji, who is destined to become a talking, disembodied eyeball who resides in Kitaro‘s empty left eye socket.
Mizuki and Gegero investigate the creepy Ryuga family’s secrets to discover the truth of “Substance M,” an experimental blood product marketed by Mizuki’s employers. It doesn’t take a doctorate in hematology to intuit that the Ryuga are up to no good. Once all of the narrative pieces are in place (and various Ryuga family members are either impaled by trees or otherwise mutilated horrifically), the plot finally rushes headlong into batshit insanity. The final forty minutes or so are a relentless descent into stunningly animated violent hell, with some truly breathtaking action sequences. A particular highlight is Gegero’s battle with an army of armored ninja dudes atop a multi-leveled tower, depicted with stylish, fluid, incredibly kinetic animation. A final confrontation centered around a demonic underground tree almost reaches Evangelion-esque levels of surreal metaphysical nonsense.
Birth of Kitaro‘s ultimate antagonist is somewhat difficult to take seriously (the audience audibly laughed when they revealed themselves), but really isn’t that incongruous when viewed in the context of the often goofy manga. I do wonder that if there had been a bit more of that unselfconscious goofiness added to this film, it might have been more entertaining. Without author Mizuki’s more whimsical influence, at times Birth of Kitaro feels disappointingly like a more by-the-numbers anime horror without much personality of its own. Its overall seriousness meshes uncomfortably with its more outlandish character designs (such as the Mizuki-accurate cartoony undead, who appear later on), and its overly complex story really doesn’t amount to anything by the end, considering the literal mountain of corpses left in the film’s wake.
Japanese folklore fans will enjoy the glimpses of yokai, like the water-borne Kappa who briefly appear, while there are plenty of rich cultural references likely to fly over the heads of most Westerners. By the time Kitaro himself arrives, we’ve seen so much death and destruction that we’re almost numb to it, so his birth scene plays as more silly than tragic. That part is adapted more or less panel-for-panel from the original manga, even if the circumstances leading up to his birth are completely different. A bookending flash-forward epilogue re-contextualizes the odd prologue in a genuinely emotionally affecting way – but doesn’t make up for the tonal disconnect that makes the opening so off-putting. It would have been better to move the prologue to the end, uniting it with the epilogue.
While I enjoyed the action aspects of Birth of Kitaro, I can’t say it works that well as an entry point for new fans. Tonally, it’s completely different from both manga and TV shows, plus it’s also quite dull and plodding in its first half. Existing fans might get a kick out of this darker, more violent incarnation of the franchise, but I’d recommend newcomers start with the manga or 2018 TV series, which a lot more fun.
Movie Reviews
Wicked Movie Review
The opinions expressed in this article are the writer’s own and do not reflect the views of Her Campus.
This article is written by a student writer from the Her Campus at Augustana chapter.
During Thanksgiving week, I saw Wicked, starring Cynthia Erivo as Elphaba and Ariana Grande as Glinda. I went in thinking the movie would be just another cash grab that would be lifeless and mediocre. However, I was proven incredibly wrong, and for that, I am grateful. And I cannot wait for the second part coming next year. I will wait patiently, hoping it is as great as the first part.
Anyway, enough ranting; let’s get into the movie. Wicked is an adaptation of the Broadway musical of the same name, based on the book “The Life and Times of the Wicked Witch of the West” by Gregory Maguire, which is loosely based on L. Frank Baum’s novel “The Wizard of Oz.”
John Chu directed the movie, which delivers a dazzling cinematic experience. As I’ve stated before, the film is split into two parts. With stunning visuals and stirring performances, it explores the origins of Elphaba and Glinda while tying together themes of friendship, prejudice, and the cost of ambition.
The film is a sensory extravaganza with a vivid production design that captures Oz in stunning detail. Chu elevates the musical numbers with dynamic camera work and visual effects, fusing real-world sets with CGI to produce an incredible yet engaging atmosphere. However, there are some moments where the visuals drag. The lighting could often be better, which could take away from the visuals. Other than that, it is excellent.
Cynthia Erivo’s portrayal of Elphaba is especially remarkable because of her nuanced performance, which successfully captures the character’s vulnerability and strength. Her rendition of “Defying Gravity” is a cinematic high point, cementing her as the film’s heart. I felt euphoric and goosebumps, as though I were with her in that instant, defying gravity. In her portrayal of Glinda, Ariana Grande excelled at balancing her comedic charm and emotional depth, especially in her rendition of “Popular.” I laughed at times, which was surprising as it wasn’t advertised as a comedy. Unquestionably, Erivo and Grande have chemistry together, highlighting the complexity of their friendship.
Overall, Wicked was an excellent character-driven story. It was enjoyable with its lush visuals, unforgettable performances, and narrative. The ending perfectly sets the stage for part two. I know it left me wanting even more.
Movie Reviews
Pushpa 2: Social media user’s ‘brutal review’ of Allu Arjun movie goes viral, says ‘He uses his teeth to…’ | Today News
A social media user has given a ‘brutal’ review to the latest record-breaking movie, Pushpa 2. The user stated that the film lacks logic and that educated people will not appreciate it.
He especially pointed out a scene where the film’s lead actor, Allu Arjun, uses his teeth to fight the goons. He also mentioned that only uneducated people would appreciate this movie.
“Our fault is, despite being educated, we went to watch the film,” he said.
However, several social media users disagree with his review. Few users criticised the reviewer for questioning the educational qualification of the audience.
One of the users commented, “I always say that if you want to watch a South Indian Masala film, leave your brain at home and just watch the movie for entertainment. It’s not an intellectual activity.”
“I am a Chartered Accountant, so am I qualified to review or not?
I loved the movie, especially the action sequences.
The main aim of the picture is entertaining the audience, and it does.
Otherwise,if we judge by logical sense of action scenes, then most films would be rated 0,” another user added.
“Kon kon hai ye jo sun kr movie dekhne nh jaega (Who will not watch the movie after this review?),” one of the users commented.
Another added, “Movie is for entertainment if you didn’t like the film then criticise it but why are dragging people’s literacy here ? Why their education matters when it’s about entertainment ? Even if you defend these then what would you expect from a film which is set around a backward region.”
The Allu Arjun-Rashmika Mandanna starrer Pushpa 2: The Rule hit the theatres on December 5, and its collections are breaking many records. The action thriller is the sequel to Pushpa: The Rise, the 2021 blockbuster film.
Apart from Rashmika Mandanna and Fahad Faasil, the film is directed by Sukumar, with Pushpa (Allu Arjun) facing off against Shekhawat (Faasil). The film also stars Jagapathi Babu, Dhananjaya, Rao Ramesh, Sunil, and Anasuya Bharadwaj in prominent roles.
Movie Reviews
Johannes Grenzfurthner’s ‘Solvent’ (2024) Melds Obsession With Transcendence – Movie Review – PopHorror
After reading our interview with Filmmaker Johannes Grenzfurthner about his new project, Solvent, I decided I needed to check this film out. Anything involving missing Nazis, decrepit farmhouses, delusional filmmakers, and the director’s actual grandfather had to be awesome, right?
Here’s the synopsis:
While searching for Nazi documents in an Austrian farmhouse, a team of experts uncovers a hidden secret buried in its bowels. American expatriate Gunner S. Holbrook becomes obsessed with solving the mystery, and as his sanity wanes, he must confront an insatiable evil. Can he find redemption before it drains the life out of him?
Solvent (2024) was directed by Johannes Grenzfurthner (Masking Threshold 2022) from a script co-written by himself and Benjamin Roberts (Able Bodies 2022). The film also stars Grenzfurthner, Napoleon Dynamite’s Jon Gries, Polish actress Aleksandra Cwen (F Is For Freaks 2019), and Grenzfurthner’s late grandfather, who only appeared in photographs but played a major role in the story.
Solvent tells the story of guerrilla filmmaker Gunner S. Holbrook (Gries) as he films his investigation into the disappearance of Ernst Bartholdi’s (Grenzfurthner) grandfather, Wolfgang Zinggl (Otto Zuckerberg), a Nazi during the Second World War. He has a team of people working with him, including Bartholdi and his ex-girlfriend, Krystina (Cwen). Everyone is there for the adventure, at least at first. Searching the old man’s the dilapidated, mold-encrusted farmhouse proves to be quite the treasure hunt. Photos and documents are found under collapsed ceilings and inside the brittle pages of old books. The mood is almost jolly. Who knows what they’ll find in the next room?
When the filmmakers stumble on a partially hidden cave on the property, they see no reason not to continue on with their search. However, something terrible happens when Krystina goes into the cave alone, and her reaction to whatever it is has fatal consequences. Yet, despite the death of one member of his crew and the abject refusal of Ernst to allow Gunner back onto his grandfather’s property, the young filmmaker becomes obsessed with what’s lurking in this underground lair.
What Works
Not only does Solvent follow Gunner on his very personal journey through the mind of an insane madman, it takes place in a found footage, first person POV, only showing us what he sees and hears. We don’t get any information that doesn’t come straight from the American’s experiences. I haven’t seen such a clever and compelling use of this filmmaking style since Jozsef Gallai’s I Hear The Trees Whispering (2022). The viewer is chained to the mindset and visuals of the slowly deteriorating Gunner, with no way to look away from everything he experiences. And he makes sure to keep his camera on at all times.
“All life is a rebellion against faith…”
While there’s nothing particularly bloody about Solvent, there are some disturbing visuals, including a dead fish being stuffed into a bag, dozens of bottles of collected urine, a dead mouse in a glass jar that looked a little too real, and an extremely gory shot at the end of the film of a place no pipe inspection camera should ever go. These gruesome images are made worse by the off handed way they’re presented, as if these are just normal things that one does with their time.
I love the idea that what Zinggl has created is a sentient liquid, something that can leech through the ground, infecting anything it comes into contact with. Much like Vonnegut’s Ice-9, anything that this nefarious substance touches will be changed forever, and there is no way to return it to its natural form. No matter how innocent or undeserving, the receiver will always be contaminated. There is no escape and no cure. It’s solvent to both body and soul.
What Doesn’t Work
The voiceover of Jon Gries as Gunner could sometimes be a bit flat, not always reacting well to what was going on around him. This took me out of the film a few times. Although I realize that the countryside rambling and long-winded soliloquies were there to show Gunner’s state of mind, they could be a bit boring. Sometimes realism is not as entertaining as one might hope.
Final Thoughts
It’s obvious that Solvent is a very personal film for Grenzfurthner. The photos of his grandfather and the treasure hunt through his family’s actual abandoned farmhouse are a love letter to the filmmaker’s heritage, despite the fact that he made his affable familial patriarch into a antisemitic psychopath bent on eternal life in any form. The secondary characters are darkly funny and entertaining, proving to be an uneasy break away from Gunner’s increasing insanity. The multiple layers and subtext in Solvent alone make it worth a watch, and adding the bizarre visuals, creepy locations and contagious psychosis are the icing on the cake.
-
Technology1 week ago
Elon Musk targets OpenAI’s for-profit transition in a new filing
-
Sports1 week ago
One Black Friday 2024 free-agent deal for every MLB team
-
News1 week ago
Rassemblement National’s Jordan Bardella threatens to bring down French government
-
Technology1 week ago
9 ways scammers can use your phone number to try to trick you
-
World1 week ago
Georgian PM praises country's protest crackdown despite US condemnation
-
World6 days ago
Freedom is permanent for Missourian described as the longest-held wrongly incarcerated woman in US
-
Technology2 days ago
Struggling to hear TV dialogue? Try these simple fixes
-
Sports1 week ago
With F1 entry, General Motors has a shot to become America’s team on the grid