Connect with us

San Francisco, CA

How San Francisco can tackle two of its biggest issues: office vacancies and housing

Published

on

How San Francisco can tackle two of its biggest issues: office vacancies and housing


San Francisco is going through its highest workplace emptiness price since 1993. Industrial actual property agency CBRE stated in a current report that 27.1 million sq. toes of a complete of 90 million sq. toes is at present vacant.

“The problem began with the pandemic,” stated Colin Yasukochi, CBRE’s govt director at its Tech Insights Middle. “Previous to the pandemic, within the metropolis of San Francisco, our workplace emptiness price was about 4%. Which meant that 4% of all of the area, the thousands and thousands and thousands and thousands of sq. toes of area that we had within the metropolis, had been vacant. As we speak, that quantity is extra like 26%.”

With distant work gaining reputation, the issue is simply anticipated to worsen. San Francisco has been known as the work-from-home capital of the US, with the American Neighborhood Survey discovering that 46% of staff in San Francisco labored from dwelling in 2021, up from 7% in 2019. 

To fight the rising variety of workplace vacancies, one native legislator is pushing to transform empty workplace buildings into residential buildings. Matt Haney, a Democratic state Meeting member, says tackling the empty workplace downside may assist town take the much-needed steps it wants to deal with the housing disaster. 

Advertisement

“What we won’t do is simply depart these buildings empty. That will be unhealthy for our metropolis’s downtown. It will be a complete waste,” Haney stated. “There are some apparent issues that we are able to have a look at, the place we are able to meet a number of the different wants that we have now and really clear up one other downside that we have now, and that is our housing disaster.” 

Underneath the Housing Component, the state of California is mandating that San Francisco construct 82,000 new models of housing, together with reasonably priced models meant for low-income residents, by 2031. In an effort to meet that objective, town must construct 10,000 models of housing per yr beginning subsequent yr. Nonetheless, San Francisco Mayor London Breed believes that activity is less complicated stated than finished as a result of lack of help from native legislators. 

“It is going to require that we make some main modifications that I do know our legislative physique isn’t going to be open to,” Breed stated. “But when they do not, what is going on to occur? State help for reasonably priced housing goes to be taken away. Tax credit and all of the issues that we get pleasure from to help the flexibility for us to construct housing within the first place in San Francisco goes to be taken away.”

The most recent CBRE report revealed in early December stated that workplace vacancies reached an almost 30-year excessive within the third quarter with a emptiness price of 25.5%. And people rising emptiness charges are having a serious influence on town’s economic system.

“We face an over $700 million funds deficit, principally because of this to the challenges round our empty workplace areas, in addition to we’re seeing companies closed within the monetary district,” Breed stated. 

Advertisement

CBRE information revealed that to this point in 2022 there have been 42 workplace conversion completions within the U.S., however solely 17% of these have been into multifamily properties, whereas 46% has been office-to-lab conversions. 

“The rents which you can get for a life sciences lab area are a lot increased than workplace area. So it makes that conversion financially viable,” stated Yasukochi. “We’ve excessive demand for residential nonetheless, however not on the worth that may be required for a developer to have the ability to try this from a monetary perspective.” 

Underneath present market situations, many builders lack incentives to construct housing, and strict housing insurance policies usually imply builders undergo prolonged processes that may flip a worthwhile undertaking into one which loses time and money. 

Nonetheless, in lots of circumstances builders are already at a degree the place they’re investing in pricey upgrades. Workplace conversion usually takes place in older, Class C buildings in want of main restore and transforming and infrequently in unfavorable places. Whereas an office-to-residential conversion might require the stripping of a constructing, most often it is nonetheless less expensive than constructing from the bottom up.

“An important factor from a developer standpoint is what makes essentially the most monetary sense,” stated Marc Babsin, president of Emerald Fund, an actual property growth firm that accomplished one of many largest office-to-residential conversions within the metropolis at 100 Van Ness Ave. 

Advertisement

“There’s a number of issues which are standing in the best way of changing workplace to residential. The most important one being that the numbers aren’t working right this moment as a result of development prices are so excessive. There are issues that the federal government may do to make it simpler,” Babsin stated. 

The San Francisco mayor stated the issue is that it takes a very long time to construct housing, particularly given all the necessities.

“We’ve so many legal guidelines on the books already by way of top limitations, by way of open area, by way of variety of models, by way of all the pieces that you need to do to construct,” Breed stated. “After which on prime of that, we make individuals undergo an insane course of which takes a particularly very long time.”

Whereas office-to-residential conversion is seen as a step in the fitting course to deal with San Francisco’s housing disaster, it’s years away from being an answer. Breed says town must construct extra housing in any method. 

“We simply want all housing,” she stated. “You realize reasonably priced housing sounds good, however once you undergo the method to try to get entry to reasonably priced housing on this metropolis, it’s arduous and it’s actually, actually difficult. And the system that we have now tried to restore beneath state and federal legislation has been very, very troublesome to work beneath. And so so far as I am involved, we have to be as aggressive as we are able to to get extra housing constructed.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

San Francisco, CA

What channel is Clemson vs San Francisco on today? Time, TV schedule

Published

on

What channel is Clemson vs San Francisco on today? Time, TV schedule


The Clemson Tigers suffered their first loss of the 2024-25 season the last time Brad Brownell’s team went out of state.

Despite a career-high 30 points from Chase Hunter, the Tigers fell 84-71 at Boise State in their first road trip of the season on Nov. 17. Clemson rebounded with a 79-51 win over Radford on Thursday behind Chauncey Wiggins’ game-high 16 points.

Next up for Clemson (4-1) is a quality mid-major opponent in the Sunshine Slam in Daytona Beach. The Tigers face the San Francisco Dons of the West Coast Conference. The Dons went 23-11 last season and were 11-5 in conference play, receiving an NIT bid and falling to the No. 2 seed Cincinnati Bearcats in a first-round game.

San Francisco (4-1) lost its first game of the season against Penny Hardway’s Memphis Tigers Thursday. According to ESPN’s Matchup Predictor, Clemson has a 63.4 percent chance of winning.

Advertisement

The winner of Monday’s game will face the winner of Penn State vs. Fordham in the winner’s bracket Tuesday. The loser of Monday’s games will play in a “consolation game” Tuesday.

Here’s how to watch today’s Clemson game, including time, TV schedule and streaming information.

What channel is Clemson vs San Francisco on today? Time, TV schedule

TV Channel: CBS Sports Network

Start time: 6:30 p.m. ET

Clemson vs. San Francisco will broadcast nationally on CBS Sports Network from Ocean Center in Daytona Beach.

Advertisement

Where to watch Clemson vs San Francisco on livestream

Streaming options for the game include FUBO and Paramount+.

For FUBO:

Watch Clemson vs San Francisco live on Fubo (free trial)

For Paramount+:

Watch Clemson vs San Francisco live on Paramount+

Advertisement

Clemson vs San Francisco odds and spread

ODDS: Clemson -2

O/U: 144 1/5

All College Basketball Odds via BetMGM.

Clemson schedule 2024

  • Nov. 4: vs Charleston Southern (W, 91-64)
  • Nov. 8: vs St. Francis, PA (W, 88-62)
  • Nov. 12: vs Eastern Kentucky (W, 75-62)
  • Nov. 17: at Boise State (L, 84-71)
  • Nov. 21: Radford (W, 79-51)
  • Nov. 25: vs San Francisco (Daytona Beach, Fla.)
  • Nov. 26 vs Penn State/Fordham (Daytona Beach, Fla.)
  • Nov. 29 vs Florida A&M
  • Record: 4-1

San Francisco schedule 2024

  • Nov. 5: vs Cal Poly (W, 86-78)
  • Nov. 9 vs Boise State (W, 84-73)
  • Nov. 13 vs Long Beach State (W, 84-54)
  • Nov. 16 vs Chicago State (W, 82-37)
  • Nov. 21 at Memphis (L, 68-64)
  • Nov. 25: vs Clemson (Daytona Beach, Fla.)
  • Record: 4-1

We occasionally recommend interesting products and services. If you make a purchase by clicking one of the links, we may earn an affiliate fee. USA TODAY Network newsrooms operate independently, and this doesn’t influence our coverage.

Gannett may earn revenue from sports betting operators for audience referrals to betting services. Sports betting operators have no influence over nor are any such revenues in any way dependent on or linked to the newsrooms or news coverage. Terms apply, see operator site for Terms and Conditions. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, help is available. Call the National Council on Problem Gambling 24/7 at 1-800-GAMBLER (NJ, OH), 1-800-522-4700 (CO), 1-800-BETS-OFF (IA), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN). Must be 21 or older to gamble. Sports betting and gambling are not legal in all locations. Be sure to comply with laws applicable where you reside.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

3 quick takeaways from the 49ers 38-10 loss to the Packers: Time to wrap up the season?

Published

on

3 quick takeaways from the 49ers 38-10 loss to the Packers: Time to wrap up the season?


The writing seemed to be on the wall heading into the weekend for the San Francisco 49ers when Brock Purdy, Nick Bosa, and Charvarius Ward were ruled out due to injury. Then, Trent Williams was deemed inactive after a pregame warmup.

Well, Sunday went exactly how many expected and even worse to a degree, as the 49ers suffered their ugliest loss of the season in a 38-10 defeat to the Green Bay Packers, dropping to 5-6 on the season.

Offensively, the 49ers couldn’t establish any form of a run game, while their passing game struggled to generate many explosives and finish drives.

Defensively, San Francisco was out-physicaled and looked gassed from the jump, struggling to contain the run without Bosa, leading to the blowout defeat.

Advertisement

Here are three quick takeaways from the 49ers 38-10 loss to the Packers on Sunday.

Establishing the run game

Coming into the game, with a key injury at quarterback and at left tackle, it was clear the 49ers weren’t going to muster enough offense without a consistent run game.

San Francisco had struggled to establish the run with Christian McCaffrey over the last two games, as the star rushed for just 3.7 yards per carry since returning from injury.

That didn’t improve on Sunday, as McCaffrey had just 31 yards on 11 carries, failing to muster any type of success on the day. In our three keys to win, I highlighted the need to give Jordan Mason more carries during a game where the 49ers absolutely needed an identity on the ground.

Mason got a 16-yard carry on his first touch on the first drive of the second half, but didn’t see much volume outside of that, with San Francisco relying more on their passing game after falling into a deficit early.

Advertisement

The 49ers just looked flat, so an extra boost of physicality from Mason could’ve helped. Instead, they rode McCaffrey hard again, who struggled on the ground, while fumbling the ball on his longest catch of the day.

Defensively, San Francisco allowed Green Bay to run the ball 42 times, gaining 169 yards and three touchdowns on the ground. Starter Josh Jacobs led the way with 106 yards and all three scores, powering through inside the red zone for a number of touchdowns.

The passing game was inconsistent for Green Bay, as Jordan Love completed just 13/23 passes for 163 yards. But, a strong rushing attack led the way en route to 38 points.

Big swing

One of the 49ers’ biggest chances in this game came to open up the second half. San Francisco had an abominable start, going three-and-out on consecutive possessions, while giving up scores on all three of Green Bay’s opening drives.

Down 17-7, the 49ers had a big chance to cut the game to a one-score lead, but opportunities were missed, as has been the case for much of the year.

Advertisement

Facing a 1st & 10 at the Green Bay 47-yard line, Brandon Allen had a deep ball to Jauan Jennings behind him, missing the open wideout who could’ve corraled the pass but wasn’t able to. Then, on 4th & 2, Allen had happy feet and was late dishing out an out-route, killing the drive.

After having a chance to pull within one score, the 49ers missed out, giving Green Bay a chance to improve their lead. But, the defense forced a quick three-and-out, giving San Francisco a chance to get within one score once again.

Well, as they did on the opening drive, San Francisco moved the ball, getting from their 10-yard line to the Green Bay 45-yard line. But, disaster struck again, as Brandon Allen had a pass intercepted off a dart to Deebo Samuel, which went through his hands and into those of Xavier McKinney.

Green Bay wouldn’t let that opportunity pass, as they swiftly put together a three-play, 26-yard touchdown drive to go up 24-7, never looking back from there.

In a game where so much was already going against them, the 49ers had a big chance to begin the second half. But, as they’ve done for much of the season, San Francisco was unable to capitalize.

Advertisement

Outlook of the stars

Coming into the season, it seemed like the 49ers were going to rely on their stars more than expected with the roster getting older and younger talent slowly getting integrated into the roster.

Well, 11 games through, San Francisco is 5-6 and their stars are a big reason for that.

Offensively, it starts at the top with Brock Purdy. The quarterback has been a positive for the season as he has utilized his legs more often, while overcoming other deficiencies. But, the question is: has he looked like a $60 million dollar quarterback?

Running back Christian McCaffrey missed the entire first half of the year as he rehabbed Achilles tendonitis, leaving San Francisco in a hole with arguably their best skill position player shelved. Brandon Aiyuk suffered a torn ACL early in the season, forcing rookies into action sooner rather than later at the receiver position. Then, Trent Williams started dealing with ankle issues, limiting his play and forcing him to miss a game.

Defensively, Nick Bosa has recently dealt with an oblique and hip issue, missing this past week. Javon Hargrave was ruled out early in the season with a triceps injury. Charvarius Ward has missed time. Fred Warner has not looked the same as his Defensive Player of the Year-level start. Talanoa Hufanga has also been out of the lineup for much of the year.

Advertisement

That has led to a talent depreciation on both sides of the ball, with certain players feeling like they’ve regressed, while the passion and fight in this team feel different than years past.

With the top players looking as they have over the first 11 games of the year, it’s questionable to see how this team can truly turn things around.



Source link

Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

San Francisco Giants Trade Idea Swaps Slugger For High-Risk, High-Reward Ace

Published

on

San Francisco Giants Trade Idea Swaps Slugger For High-Risk, High-Reward Ace


The San Francisco Giants need more pitching and seem to want to trade one of their sluggers — and they may be able to accomplish two tasks with one move.

With Buster Posey seemingly wanting to move on from LaMonte Wade Jr. while he still holds a bit of trade value, he will need to consider what they to get back in return.

One team that could be desperate to bring Wade in is the Houston Astros, long plagued by poor play at the plate from their first basemen. While most of their pitchers were injured last season, they do have a slight surplus of starting caliber players on their roster. They might just be the perfect trade partner.

A potential deal between the two squads could see the Giants ship Wade off to the Astros in exchange for right-handed starter J.P. France and pitching prospect Jackson Nezuh.

Advertisement

France is an interesting case, and would certainly be a risk, but does have the potential to be an impactful arm in the backend for the rotation.

He is a long way from someone that could replace Blake Snell, but could be an interesting innings eating starter or long-reliever depending on how he comes back from injury.

That is something that San Francisco wished they had last year during their flurry of pitching injuries.

The Houston righty struggled last year, but it was just a small sample size of five starts. The Giants would need him to find a way back to his surprisingly solid rookie campaign.

In 2023, he made 24 appearances (23 starts) and finished with a 3.83 ERA across 136.1 innings pitched.

Advertisement

France has a great breaking balls that helped him soar in the minor leagues. HIs changeup is especially effective.

Given that he is coming off of a shoulder injury, though, the Astros could need to add a mid-tier prospect as a bit of insurance.

Nezuh was a 14th-round selection in the 2023 MLB draft out of the Louisiana-Lafayette Ragin’ Cajuns.

He has always been more of potential guy than actual results, but he had a great first year in the Houston farm system. He had a 3.89 ERA with 11.3 K/9 across Single and High-A.

Wade was red-hot to start last season, but fell off hard. As he enters the final year of his career, Posey could be looking to maximize his trade value and help the roster out in a bigger spot of need.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending