San Francisco, CA
Breed vetoes bill ending single-family zoning in San Francisco
SAN FRANCISCO – Single-family zoning lives on in San Francisco, as Mayor London Breed on Thursday vetoed laws that will have eradicated single-family zones to permit fourplexes in each neighborhood and 6 items on nook tons.
The fourplex laws was first launched by Supervisor Rafael Mandelman final yr and handed by the Board of Supervisors on June 28 and in a second studying on July 12 to finalize sending it to the mayor for consideration.
In a letter explaining her veto, Breed stated the fourplex ordinance failed to realize the purpose of making extra housing alternatives and addressing the town’s housing scarcity and lack of affordability.
“Whereas I assist the unique intent of the ordinance so as to add new desperately wanted housing choices for San Franciscans combating the excessive price of housing, particularly for our middle-income households, after many amendments, this ordinance not achieves the purpose meant to really produce extra housing,” she stated. “As an alternative, it’s truthful to say that this ordinance, as amended, will set again housing manufacturing.”
The unique model of Mandelman’s invoice sought to legalize fourplexes citywide, however the laws was weighed down by amendments that restricted who might use the legislation to construct new items. One of many amendments required landlords to have maintained possession of the constructing for 5 years earlier than growing it, which cuts builders who search to make the most of the brand new allowance.
“As an alternative of slicing forms and lowering mission prices, the Board added many new necessities and imposed new monetary obstacles that may make it even much less possible for brand new housing to be constructed below the ordinance’s provisions,” Breed continued within the assertion.
She additionally argued that the fourplex ordinance would evade the town’s obligation to adjust to state housing legal guidelines, particularly Senate Invoice 9. The invoice was signed into legislation final yr, requiring streamlined and ministerial approval of duplexes and lot splits in single-family residential zones.
Mandelman stated he was “profoundly disenchanted” within the Breed’s denial of the laws.
“Merely rejecting this measure with out providing any different places our shared housing objectives in jeopardy and is simply the most recent instance of Metropolis Corridor’s lack of ability to return collectively to get issues carried out for San Franciscans,” he wrote in a press release Thursday.
Mandelman stated he did not assist lots of the amendments to his unique ordinance. Nonetheless, he thought the most recent model handed by the Board not less than represented the proper path for the town’s housing reforms.
“Right now’s motion by the mayor is not going to be the ultimate phrase on this effort,” he stated.
California’s Division of Housing and Neighborhood Improvement stated in a letter that it supported the mayor’s choice.
The state housing company emphasised the town’s obligations below SB 9 and stated the ordinance would bypass state housing legal guidelines.
SB 9 comprises standards addressing environmental constraints, anti-displacement measures for renters and low-income households and safety of current historic sources.
“Furthermore, the ordinance would…impose extra onerous circumstances and necessities when in comparison with SB 9. Taken collectively, these regulatory hurdles will render such tasks financially infeasible to pursue, as the town’s personal evaluation famous,” the division wrote within the letter. Corey Smith, the chief director of Housing Motion Coalition, a nonprofit advocating for constructing extra reasonably priced housing within the Bay Space, stated his group applauded Breed’s vetoing of the ordinance.
“Mayor Breed’s veto demonstrates her dedication to enacting evidence-based options to San Francisco’s housing scarcity, displacement, and affordability disaster,” Smith wrote in an e mail.
He argued that the ordinance would do little to create new housing.
Breed harassed that she want to assist simpler proposals to realize state-mandated Housing Aspect plans to construct 80,000 new properties within the metropolis over the following eight years.
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco celebrates Christmas, first night of Hanukkah
San Francisco, CA
St. Anthony's Foundation serves Christmas Day meals in San Francisco
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco hotel workers agree pay rise after 3-month strike
What’s New
Hilton hotel workers in San Francisco voted on Christmas Eve to approve a new union contract after a 93-day strike, according to the Unite Here Local 2 union.
The union, which represents about 15,000 workers in the region, announced that the deal settles the last of the city’s 2024 hotel strikes, covering approximately 900 Hilton workers.
Newsweek has contacted Unite Here Local 2 and Hilton via email for comment.
Why It Matters
The new contracts after this year’s strikes establish significant improvements in wages, health care and workload protections for workers at Hilton, Hyatt and Marriott-operated hotels.
The agreements conclude months of labor unrest that involved thousands of workers and disrupted San Francisco’s hotel industry.
What To Know
Hilton workers voted 99.4 percent in favor of the agreement on Christmas Eve, which includes a $3 per hour immediate wage increase, additional raises, and protections against understaffing and increased workloads.
The four-year contract preserves affordable union health insurance and provides pension increases. The deal covers workers at Hilton San Francisco Union Square and Parc 55, with 650 workers having actively participated in the strike.
This agreement follows similar contracts reached with Hyatt workers on Friday and Marriott workers last Thursday, covering a total of 2,500 workers who had been on strike since late September.
What People Are Saying
Bill Fung, a housekeeping attendant at Hilton San Francisco Union Square for 29 years, said: “These 93 days have not been easy, and I’m so proud that my coworkers and I never gave up. We stood together through the rain and cold, and even though there were some hard days, it was all worth it. We will go back to work with our health care, good raises, and the confidence of knowing that when we fight, we win.”
Lizzy Tapia, President of Unite Here Local 2, said: “Hilton, Hyatt, and Marriott workers refused to give up their health care or go backwards – and we proved on the picket line that we’re not afraid of a tough fight. As contract talks begin with the city’s other full-service hotels in the new year, they should know that this is the new standard they must accept for their own employees.”
San Francisco Mayor-elect Daniel Lurie said on X: “All those that have been out on strike will be back to work, and just in time for Christmas. So, things are looking bright as we head into 2025.
What Happens Next
Unite Here Local 2 said it would push for other full-service hotels in San Francisco to adopt the same standards established by the Hilton, Hyatt, and Marriott agreements when contract negotiations resume in 2025.
-
Technology5 days ago
Google’s counteroffer to the government trying to break it up is unbundling Android apps
-
News6 days ago
Novo Nordisk shares tumble as weight-loss drug trial data disappoints
-
Politics6 days ago
Illegal immigrant sexually abused child in the U.S. after being removed from the country five times
-
Entertainment7 days ago
'It's a little holiday gift': Inside the Weeknd's free Santa Monica show for his biggest fans
-
Lifestyle6 days ago
Think you can't dance? Get up and try these tips in our comic. We dare you!
-
Technology1 week ago
Fox News AI Newsletter: OpenAI responds to Elon Musk's lawsuit
-
Technology2 days ago
There’s a reason Metaphor: ReFantanzio’s battle music sounds as cool as it does
-
News3 days ago
France’s new premier selects Eric Lombard as finance minister