Belgium will ban the sale of disposable electronic cigarettes as of Jan. 1 on health and environmental grounds in a groundbreaking move for European Union nations.

Health minister Frank Vandenbroucke said the inexpensive e-cigarettes had turned into a health threat since they are an easy way for teenagers to be drawn into smoking and get hooked on nicotine.

“Disposable e-cigarettes is a new product simply designed to attract new consumers,” he said in an interview.

“E-cigarettes often contain nicotine. Nicotine makes you addicted to nicotine. Nicotine is bad for your health. These are fact,” Vandenbroucke added.

Because they are disposable, the plastic, battery and circuits are a burden on the environment. On top of that, “they create hazardous waste chemicals still present in what people throw away,” Vandenbroucke said.

The health minister said he also targeted the disposable e-cigarettes because reusable ones could be a tool to help people quit smoking if they cannot find another way.

Australia outlawed the sale of “ vapes” outside pharmacies earlier this year in some of the world’s toughest restrictions on electronic cigarettes. Now Belgium is leading the EU drive.

“We are the first country in Europe to do so,” Vandenbroucke said.

Trying to quit vaping can be challenging but not impossible. Here are five tips to better prepare you for success.

He wants tougher tobacco measures in the 27-nation bloc.

“We are really calling on the European Commission to come forward now with new initiatives to update, to modernize, the tobacco legislation,” he said.

There is understanding about Belgium’s decision, even in some shops selling electronic cigarettes, and especially on the environmental issue.

Once the cigarette is empty, “the battery is still working. That’s what is terrible, is that you could recharge it, but you have no way of recharging it,” said Steven Pomeranc, owner of the Brussels Vapotheque shop. “So you can imagine the level of pollution it creates.”

A ban usually means a financial loss to the industry, but Pomeranc said he thinks it will not hurt too much.

“We have a lot of alternative solutions which are also very easy to use,” he said. “Like this pod system, which are pre-filled with liquid, which can just be clipped into the rechargeable e-cigarette. So we will simply have a shift of clients towards this new system.”

___

Associated Press writer Raf Casert in Brussels contributed.

As the year comes to an end, we are reminded of the destruction caused to California’s piers battered by brutal storms since January.

The Ocean Beach Pier has remained closed since October 2023 with hope that it can be redesigned and rebuilt.

A San Diego lifeguard maneuvered high, rough waves off the Ocean Beach pier on Sunday morning, following an emergency call. It’s another example of the growing intensity of climate changes along the San Diego coastline. Winter storms and high surf shut down the pier just off Newport Avenue. It is one of California’s eighteen public piers damaged, destroyed, or that remained closed in 2024. 

“We are sticking something out into the largest ocean in the world, expecting it to stand up against huge waves,” said geologist Patrick Abbott. He is an expert on the erosion of California’s coast caused by increasing atmospheric rivers, storms, earthquakes and flooding. Ocean Beach is especially sensitive to climate changes.

The iconic Christmas tree near the pier has continued to lean over and weaken as the sand holding its roots disintegrates.

“As the ocean comes up farther. (The) tree is pulling up ever saltier water into its system. We’re fighting, shall we say, a greater amount of energy in the ocean. That means we have to build stronger piers to stand up to them, and even those will last for a relatively short time,” Abbott said.

The OB Pier first opened on July 2, 1966.

There is hope as the City of San Diego continues the process to reimagine the pier. It will build the pier back stronger and with more community purpose. There is $8.4 million dollars in state funding designated for the project that could build the structure stronger and with more community purpose. The City will pursue other state and federal grants. But, construction might not be completed for another four years.

It remains precariously positioned with the threat that it may not survive. It’s the same threat also facing piers up California’s coast, from Los Angeles to Santa Cruz.  

 “I think it’s an important piece of California culture that we’re losing if we don’t rebuild it,” said Drew Kiel. He and his girlfriend brought his mother to the beach for one last look, Sunday, before she returned home to Utah.

He said, “I think it’s a cultural touchstone for people here. It’s awesome. People who come here to fish and get food for their families. It’s (also) awesome for the tourists.”

Kiel’s mother, Jenn, agreed.

“Especially if you’re not a surfer or swimmer, you’re stuck on shore … well, on the pier you can walk all the way out …you can see it up close and feel more of its energy,” she said.

Nature’s energy could prove too much for its own good.

Re “Broken SANDAG needs a comprehensive overhaul” (Dec. 19): Author Don Billings perhaps is substantially correct in highlighting the goings-on at SANDAG. The South Bay section of State Route 125 is about the best maintained stretch of freeway in San Diego County. The problem is fixable in regards to toll collection. Unless the citizens of San Diego have it incorrect, this highway is self-funded.

Problematic, however, are the individual political agendas of the members of SANDAG. Micromanaging by the unqualified is a recipe for disaster. Not allowing for adequate administration of projects is wasteful.

— John H. Borja, Chula Vista

Originally Published: December 28, 2024 at 5:00 AM PST