Connect with us

San Diego, CA

La Jolla Shores board questions benefits of proposed UCSD banner district

Published

on

La Jolla Shores board questions benefits of proposed UCSD banner district


A proposal to establish a UC San Diego banner district, though pitched as a mutually beneficial project, was viewed by some La Jolla Shores Association board members last week as a one-sided and not-so-collaborative deal.

Erin Shepler, UCSD’s executive director of marketing, and Anu Delouri, senior director of local government and community relations, presented the proposal to the Shores Association on April 16.

Under the proposal, UCSD banners would be hung on light poles on streets near the university, including Genesee Avenue, Regents Road, La Jolla Village Drive, North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla Shores Drive and Torrey Pines Scenic Drive.

The plan first went before the La Jolla Traffic & Transportation Board last month before it was redirected to the Shores Association.

Advertisement

Former LJSA president Janie Emerson said at the T&T meeting that the proposal would more appropriately fall under LJSA’s jurisdiction because “that’s the community it’s going to impact most.”

T&T Chairman Erik Gantzel agreed, saying “It doesn’t, in my mind, impact what we are here to do,” since it doesn’t involve road or parking changes.

The project, though developed “in close partnership with the city” of San Diego, would be paid for and maintained by the university, Shepler told LJSA, and the banners would be installed at “low-impact times” to avoid disrupting traffic.

There are a total of 175 poles within the loop, but Shepler said that doesn’t mean each one will be used. Several factors would be considered, she said, including what the budget allows and which poles are obstructed or contain safety signs.

Shepler said the project is not promotional, political or for profit but instead is about “showing value to the community,” boosting local pride, creating a more welcoming environment, “establishing a sense of place” for where the UCSD campus starts and ends and showcasing the school to people just outside of it.

Advertisement

Emerson disputed a claim by the presenters that the banner district would not overlap with La Jolla Shores’ banner district. The area in question is on La Jolla Shores Drive adjacent to UCSD’s Scripps Institution of Oceanography.

A La Jolla Shores banner is shown on the corner of Biological Grade and La Jolla Shores Drive. (Janie Emerson)

Delouri said the university does not believe there is overlap but that it would remove any parts of its banner district that indeed cross over.

Shepler agreed that “it’s not a problem at all. Based on our conversations with the city, we were told that this is not a conflict, but we are happy to resolve that” if there is one.

Delouri said that because the banner district is proposed on city streets, it will require City Council action but not local action.

But, she said, council President Joe LaCava, whose District 1 includes La Jolla, “was very particular that we do bring it to the community and share with you.”

Advertisement
Anu Delouri, senior director of local government and community relations for UC San Diego, gives a presentation about a proposed banner district encompassing streets near the university. (Noah Lyons)
Anu Delouri, senior director of local government and community relations for UC San Diego, gives a presentation about a proposed banner district encompassing streets near the university. (Noah Lyons)

That caused some board members and others attending the meeting to question the collaborative aspect of the proposal.

“That’s not community partnership,” board member Mike McCormack said. “It’s not that I don’t support banners on La Jolla Shores Drive and their use. I support us having control over it so the university comes to us and asks us to make use of our banners.”

Others characterized the proposal as one-sided.

Emerson called the project “counterproductive” and added that “it takes people from our community and onto the campus and not into our community and our businesses.”

Board member Kathleen Neil inquired about UCSD’s maintenance of nearby trees and the poles’ light bulbs.

“Anything you can offer back in return to us becomes an incentive for us to support your request,” Neil said. “Otherwise, it feels more like taking.”

Advertisement

Delouri said the university will do its best but cannot take maintenance into its own hands.

Board member Ross Rudolph requested a corrected map before the board votes on the project.

“We’re not trying to be obstructive,” Emerson said. “We’re just trying to keep our community the way it needs to be, and I know you all are trying to enhance your community. So we can work together.”

Delouri and Shepler said the next step for UCSD is reconnecting with the city and confirming that there is no district overlap before the project moves forward. They said they “are happy to come back” to the Shores Association to share any adjustments and additional details.

After the meeting, Delouri told the La Jolla Light that portions of the proposed district, specifically light poles along the west side of North Torrey Pines Road and the south side of La Jolla Village Drive between Torrey Pines Road and Gilman Drive, are being reassessed to determine whether any adjustments are needed.

Advertisement

Other LJSA news

Swearing-in: LaCava swore in five newly elected board members during the April 16 meeting — three of them in person and two attending online.

They are Alina Mullen, Tracey Andreae, Dede Donovan, Angie Preisendorfer and Sharon Luscomb. Members Rudolph and Andi Andreae were termed out and Cindy Goodman, Brian Earley and Claudia Baranowski did not seek reelection.

John Pierce will remain president, with Mary Coakley Munk as first vice president, Karen Marshall as second vice president, Preisendorfer as secretary and Terry Kraszewski as treasurer.

Event planning: The Shores Association plans an event titled “Tides of Creativity,” highlighting local artists and authors, from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. Saturday, May 17.

LJSA received a $7,500 grant initiated by state Sen. Toni Atkins before she left office last fall and  administered by the city of San Diego in partnership with the area Business Improvement District Alliance.

Advertisement

Pierce said LJSA is working on permits with the city and that additional information will be available soon.

Next meeting: The La Jolla Shores Association next meets at 6 p.m. Wednesday, May 21, at the Martin Johnson House on the campus of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, 8840 Biological Grade. Learn more at lajollashoresassociation.org. ♦

Originally Published:



Source link

Advertisement

San Diego, CA

Guest Column: The black hole in the center of Poway

Published

on

Guest Column: The black hole in the center of Poway


Those of us who live near the City of Poway Town Center have experienced and continue to see a development project that has languished for over five years and now clearly can be defined as blight. 

It is a “black hole” that is anchored in the center of the city near the intersection of Poway and Community roads, one block from City Hall. The project is adjacent to the Poway shopping center plaza, a Section 8 apartment complex and the Poway Bernardo Mortuary.

Those of us who live in central Poway have this visual blight, which consists of a partially constructed vacant multistory building and an unfinished tiered underground parking structure. This incomplete project was approved by the City Council in 2018 as a mixed-use development project.

It sits on a one-and-a-half-acre infill site and was originally permitted for 53 residential units, a 40,000-square-foot commercial space, a 20,025-square-foot fitness center and a two-tiered underground parking structure.

Advertisement

Over the last five years it has transitioned through three different developers and multiple permit amendments. The current and final amended project is a significantly scaled-down project. It would take someone with a bachelor’s degree in city and urban planning to read the permit amendments and comprehend what the final project will consist of if and when it is completed.

Those of us who live in or near the Town Center district are aware the Poway Road Specific Plan was approved with City Council commitment that high-density development would be well planned and would consist of “efficient high-density development.”

A blighted development project that has not been completed and has remained vacant and unfinished for five years is not keeping with the Specific Plan. This project is a blemish on central Poway. The City Council has not implemented solutions to complete this unfinished project.

Further, other development projects in the same corridor have as a matter of practice during their construction phases posted signage on their respective construction fencing, advertising what the project consists of and when it is estimated to be completed. The “black hole” has no such signage on its construction fencing and the general public has no idea what this project consists of or when it will be completed.

Direct attempts and meetings to obtain information from previous and current city representatives have resulted in finger-pointing at the developer. Two developers have already walked away from this project and the third and current developer is under contract with a local general contractor.

Advertisement

The City Council approved, conditioned and permitted this project. I have to think that if this project was located in the “Farm” development area and stood half developed and vacant for over five years there would be a different level of urgency by the council to finding a solution to correct this unsightly development project.

The council has failed those of us who live in and near the Poway Town Center corridor. Stop blaming the developer and get this failed project completed.

Locke is a 22-year U.S. Marine Corp veteran and a longtime Poway resident. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

San Diego, CA

Frustrated teachers walk out of SBUSD meeting that decided to close Central Elementary

Published

on

Frustrated teachers walk out of SBUSD meeting that decided to close Central Elementary


Frustrations boiled over at Wednesday night’s South Bay Union School District meeting. Parents and teachers are upset that the district is going to shut down Central Elementary and possibly two others at a later time.

At one point in the meeting, teachers got so upset that they walked out. It came after the school board voted unanimously to approve an interim superintendent’s pay package for nearly $18,500 a month.

That payday comes at time when teachers rallied outside the meeting because they might strike since they’ve  been in contract negotiations for more than a year.

The board also voted unanimously to close Central Elementary at the end of this school year. Berry and Sunnyslope Elementary schools could close as well, at a later time. But that’ll be based on a review of enrollment and financial data going forward.

Advertisement

The district says declining enrollment and declining revenues are major problems and factors in its decision. It says keeping under enrolled schools open would increase maintenance costs, stretch limited resources and hamper the ability to deliver equitable services across all schools.

But teachers and parents say paying the interim superintendent that amount of money shows it’s a matter of allocation and priorities.

Hinting that district leaders are being scrooges, a group of teachers took a page out of “A Christmas Carol” and dressed as ghosts.

“By closing these doors, you destroyed the heart of community. Families see no future, pack their cars and  leave behind empty houses and desolate streets,” one teacher said.

While only Central is closing this year, Sunnyslope could close at the end of the 2028-2029 school year. Berry could close at the end of the 2031-2032 school year.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

San Diego, CA

Spring Valley Christian school teacher suspected of sexually abusing child

Published

on

Spring Valley Christian school teacher suspected of sexually abusing child


A 49-year-old teacher at Christian High School, suspected of sexually abusing a minor, was arrested Tuesday outside the Spring Valley school affiliated with Shadow Mountain Community Church.

Kevin G. Conover was booked at the San Diego Central Jail on suspicion of oral copulation with a victim under 18, aggravated sexual abuse of a child under 14,  three counts of lewd and lascivious acts with a child, and continuous sexual abuse of a child, according to the San Diego County Sheriff’s Office.

Deputies initially responded to a radio call regarding sexual assault allegations of a minor by a family member on Oct. 1, prompting an immediate investigation by Child Abuse Unit detectives, who later found probable cause to arrest Conover, sheriff’s officials said.

Conover was described as a teacher at the school in Tuesday’s statement from the sheriff’s office announcing his arrest. However, there were no references to him on the school’s website on Tuesday night.

Advertisement

The investigation remains ongoing by the Child Abuse Unit as investigators conduct a follow-up into the allegations.

Anyone with information regarding the alleged abuse was urged to call the Child Abuse Unit at 858-285-6112. Calls after business hours should be directed to 858-868-3200. Tipsters who remain anonymous can call Crime Stoppers at 888-580-8477.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending