Connect with us

Oregon

Outlining No. 1 Oregon’s path to a College Football Playoff championship

Published

on

Outlining No. 1 Oregon’s path to a College Football Playoff championship


The No. 1 seed in the College Football Playoff hardly comes with the easiest road to a championship.

Oregon learned its fate Sunday after the Ducks were awarded the No. 1 seed. Oregon’s potential path to winning the CFP title in Atlanta on January 20 could require wins over Ohio State, Texas and Georgia. Those are among the bluest of college football blue bloods.

To put it into context, Oregon (13-0) may need wins over teams that were among AP Top 25′s preseason top four – Georgia No. 1, Ohio State No. 2 and Texas No. 4. Oregon was No. 3.

The biggest perk as the No. 1 seed is a first-round bye. The Ducks know they’ll open the CFP in the quarterfinals at the Rose Bowl on January 1, facing the first-round winner of Ohio State-Tennessee.

Advertisement

Should Oregon survive, it’ll advance to the Cotton Bowl on Friday, Jan. 10. The Ducks’ CFP semifinal opponent is the Peach Bowl winner, where Arizona State faces a first-round winner between Texas-Clemson in the semifinals.

The championship game, Monday, Jan. 20 at Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta, could see the Ducks facing No. 2 Georgia or No. 3 Boise State.

Let’s look at each step:

QUARTERFINALS (Rose Bowl): The Ducks know they’re headed to Pasadena. They could face a familiar opponent in Ohio State (10-2), or in Tennessee (10-2), a team Oregon hasn’t played since 2013.

Oregon defeated Ohio State 32-31 on October 12 in Eugene, a back-and-forth game that the Ducks pulled out on an Atticus Sappington 19-yard field goal with 1:47 remaining.

Advertisement

The Ducks and Buckeyes have played 11 times, with Ohio State leading the series 9-2. However, Oregon has won the last two meetings. This would be the third Oregon-Ohio State Rose Bowl. The Buckeyes won both, 26-17 in 2010, and 10-7 in 1958.

Ohio State appeared on a collision to play Oregon in the Big Ten championship game before it was upset by rival Michigan 13-10 in the regular season finale.

It’s far from a sure thing the Rose Bowl will have one of its traditional matchups. Tennessee was a tough out in the SEC this season. The Volunteers’ best wins came over Alabama and Oklahoma, with losses to Georgia and Arkansas.

Oregon is undefeated in the Tennessee series, having won by blowout margins in 2010 and 2013 games.

SEMIFINALS (Cotton Bowl): One of three teams await Oregon should it advance from the Rose Bowl: No. 4 Arizona State (11-2), No. 5 Texas (11-2) or No. 12 Clemson (10-3) at the Cotton Bowl in Arlington, Tex.

Advertisement

At first blush, the worst matchup is Texas, as the Cotton Bowl means a Longhorns-heavy crowd. Texas’ only two losses this season came to No. 2 Georgia. The Longhorns were dominant at times during their 2024 campaign, including six double-digit wins against SEC competition.

Oregon and Texas have played six times, with the Longhorns leading the series 4-2. The last time they played was the 2013 Alamo Bowl, where the Ducks won 30-7.

Oregon will play a former Pac-12 foe should Arizona State win the Peach Bowl. The Ducks lead the 39-game series 21-18, having split the past four games. The last time Oregon and ASU played was 2023, when the Ducks hammered the Sun Devils 49-13 in Eugene. They’ve never played each other in a bowl game.

Arizona State has been a fan favorite in 2024. Just 3-9 in 2023, second-year coach Kenny Dillingham – a former Ducks offensive coordinator – led a remarkable rebuild as the Sun Devils won the Big 12 championship this season.

Arizona State, led by West Linn High grad Sam Leavitt at quarterback, won its final six games to claim a CFP berth. The Sun Devils had one of the most impressive conference championship game performances, burying Iowa State 45-19.

Advertisement

Clemson, the 12 seed, is the third Cotton Bowl option for Oregon. The Ducks and Tigers have never played. Clemson have the least impressive resume of the three possible semifinal opponents, its best win coming over SMU in the ACC championship game. Among the Tigers’ three losses was a 34-3 defeat to Georgia in the season opener.

CFP CHAMPIONSHIP (Atlanta): If Oregon gets this far, the most likely foe is Georgia (11-2). The No. 2 Bulldogs drew a decidedly easier route to the January 20 championship game than Oregon, as its side of the bracket includes No. 3 Boise State, No. 6 Penn State, No. 7 Notre Dame, No. 10 Indiana and No. 11 SMU.

Oregon has played two of the six championship game possibilities this season in Penn State (won 45-37 in Big Ten championship game) and Boise State (won 37-34 in Eugene).

With so many potential championship-game opponents, let’s focus on a No. 1 vs. 2 matchup. It won’t be lost on anyone that the last time Oregon and Georgia played, it was Dan Lanning’s 2022 UO debut, where the Bulldogs won 49-3 in Mercedes-Benz Stadium. Said Georgia coach Kirby Smart of Lanning, his former defensive coordinator: “He’s going to do a really good job at Oregon. He’s relentless, and they’ll bounce back from this. He knows that we’ve got better players. He’ll never says it, but he knows we’ve got better plays, and I respect how he works.”

Georgia has an impressive resume, with two wins over Texas, and a 31-17 win over Tennessee. The Bulldogs’ losses were 41-34 to Alabama, and 28-10 to Mississipppi.

Advertisement

Of the remaining possibilities, Boise State is most appealing. The Broncos’ only loss this season came to the Ducks, an incredibly competitive game where Oregon had to score the game’s final 10 points to win 37-34. The Broncos have running back Ashton Jeanty, who is battling Colorado’s Travis Hunter for the Heisman Trophy as college football’s most outstanding player.

–Nick Daschel can be reached at 360-607-4824, ndaschel@oregonian.com or @nickdaschel.

Our journalism needs your support. Subscribe today to OregonLive.com.





Source link

Advertisement

Oregon

Former Oregon corrections officer receives lifetime hunting ban, fined over $114K

Published

on

Former Oregon corrections officer receives lifetime hunting ban, fined over 4K


PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) — A former Oregon corrections officer received a lifetime hunting ban on Wednesday after pleading guilty to several poaching-related charges.

Christopher Mason, 49, of Umatilla, was sentenced in two separate court cases to 24 months of probation and 300 hours of community service. He was also fined over $114,000 and was required to forfeit his firearms.

Multiple big game hunting items were seized from Christopher Mason’s possession (OSP)

Oregon State Police said they began investigating Mason in 2024 after receiving information that he had been poaching big game animals.

“In February 2025, OSP served a search warrant, and multiple big game animals and firearms were seized as evidence. Sixty-seven criminal charges were referred for prosecution,” officials said. “The charges spanned multiple counties.”

Advertisement

Mason pleaded guilty to four counts of unlawful take of buck deer and three counts of unlawful take of black bear on June 18. In a separate case on June 26, he pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a short-barreled rifle, unlawful possession of a silencer, unlawful possession of multiple wildlife and unlawful take of mule deer.

“This is another example of serial poaching which rises to the level of felony conduct based solely on the repeated poaching conduct and impact of one individual on Oregon’s game mammals,” prosecutor Jay Hall said. “The conduct across the several counties amounts to one of the highest damage amounts done to Oregon wildlife by any singular actor.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Oregon

Strict fire restrictions in effect on BLM lands in Washington, Oregon ahead of July 4

Published

on

Strict fire restrictions in effect on BLM lands in Washington, Oregon ahead of July 4


With national firefighting resources already stretched to their limits, statewide fire restrictions remain in effect for all Bureau of Land Management public lands throughout Washington and Oregon, with some local regions also implementing additional emergency closures.

As the Independence Day holiday weekend approaches, officials warned that people responsible for starting wildfires could face up to $100,000 in fines, 12 months in prison, and liability for all firefighting suppression costs.

SEE ALSO | Washington braces for earlier wildfire season due to low snowpack: ‘Worse than normal’

“There are serious consequences for starting a wildfire, including fines and possibly imprisonment, which we hope everyone can avoid through careful choices,” said Josh O’Connor, Northwest Geographic Area Fire Chief for the U.S. Wildland Fire Service. “We have already experienced excruciating loss this season. I cannot stress the gravity of the situation enough. Please help protect our firefighters and communities.”

Advertisement

Officials urged visitors to research their destinations in advance, noting that local restrictions can determine when power tools may be used, what kinds of stoves or campfires are allowed, and what safety equipment is required.

The BLM said the following items remain strictly prohibited on all BLM lands in Oregon and Washington: fireworks and sky lanterns; exploding or metallic targets; tracer or incendiary devices; and steel component ammunition, including core or jacket.

“Lighting a firework or leaving a smoldering campfire creates significant wildland fire risk. Under the right conditions, they easily start wildfires,” said Kim Prill, BLM Oregon/Washington acting state director. “Don’t risk it. Let’s work together to prevent every wildfire possible.”

More information on seasonal fire restrictions and fire closures is available HERE.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Oregon

What the Supreme Court’s transgender sports ruling means for Oregon

Published

on

What the Supreme Court’s transgender sports ruling means for Oregon


The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld state laws in Idaho and West Virginia that bar transgender girls and women from competing on girls’ and women’s school sports teams.

The decision could influence future policy debates in Oregon, but does not immediately change the state’s rules.

Oregon continues to allow students to participate in school sports, physical education, and other school activities in accordance with their gender identity.

The Oregon School Activities Association, which oversees high school sports statewide, said it is reviewing the ruling with legal counsel.

Advertisement

“The Oregon School Activities Association is reviewing today’s Supreme Court ruling with our legal counsel. The association will work with the Oregon Department of Education on the ruling’s impacts on state law and OSAA policy in order to provide updated guidance to member schools as needed. The OSAA remains committed to ensuring interscholastic activities remain a safe and welcoming environment for all student-athletes,” a spokesperson said in a statement.

While Tuesday’s ruling leaves Oregon’s current policy in place, political scientists say it could reshape the legal landscape surrounding future proposals.

“This particular decision, coupled with a federal push, may end up altering the landscape of opportunities in states that affirm trans athletic participation,” said Allison Gash, chair of the Department of Political Science at the University of Oregon.

SEE ALSO | Supreme Court ruling preserves Oregon law protecting late-arriving mail ballots

Gash said the Supreme Court’s decision itself does not require Oregon to change its policies.

Advertisement

Instead, she said the more immediate question is how the Trump administration chooses to respond.

“Where we could see some required movement on the part of Oregon or where it may impact Oregon directly is how the federal government determines what it wants to do in light of today’s ruling,” said Gash.

According to Gash, the administration has argued that schools should separate sports teams based on biological sex under its interpretation of Title IX.

“One of the several efforts that the federal government is taking to ensure that all states bar trans female athletes in particular from participating in women’s sports is to tie the provision of federal funding to essentially a ban,” she said.

She added that the Supreme Court’s ruling could make the administration “more muscular in those efforts because now the court has essentially upheld that interpretation.”

Advertisement

Oregon leaders respond

House Republicans unsuccessfully pushed legislation during the 2025 legislative session that would have required school sports teams to be separated based on biological sex, but the bill failed in the Democratic-controlled House.

The bill was sponsored by then state representative Christine Drazan, the 2026 Republican candidate for Governor.

In a news release Tuesday, Drazan welcomed the ruling, calling it “a victory for fairness, for common sense, and for progress.”

“Girls and young women across Oregon are still competing on an unfair and unsafe playing field. I have always supported women’s right to compete, and as Governor, I will do everything in my power to make sure that women’s sports are protected and girls across our state get their shot to compete and win,” said Drazan.

KATU asked Governor Tina Kotek whether she supports legislative or executive action to maintain Oregon’s current policy following the ruling.

Advertisement

The governor’s office had not responded by publication.

Meanwhile, Oregon Senate Democrats said in a news release that the decision does not change students’ rights in Oregon, and they vowed to continue to protect the policy in effect today.

“Nobody wins when states deny children the right to play sports. Sports have the power to unify, but today’s SCOTUS decision will lead to dangerous gender harassment of athletic girls. States banning access to sports are feeding the same regime that is trying to divide and control,” said State Senator Courtney Neron-Misslin.

She continued, “Oregonians must keep our eye on the ball. We must stay focused on addressing actual problems, protecting rights, addressing affordability, and investing in education. Today’s decision erodes LGBTQ+ rights and the rights of women across our country. Here in Oregon, we will continue to stand up to injustices and defend our most vulnerable from Trump-style attacks.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending