Oregon
Oregon’s unemployed say they’re ‘stuck in limbo’ as state officials struggle following website transition
The Oregon Employment Department’s new website is supposed to make it easier to communicate with the agency. But some Oregonians seeking unemployment insurance benefits are frustrated over long wait times to resolve application issues and difficulties communicating with the department.
The Oregon Employment Department launched their new online platform, Frances Online, on September 6, 2022.
Alex Hasenstab / OPB
Among them is Harvest Rich. She applied for unemployment benefits in January before the agency completed a multi-year, $106 million website upgrade. Rich used to live in La Grande before her spouse’s health issues led them to move out of state. Because her most recent job was an administrative position with Oregon Health and Science University, she is claiming benefits in Oregon.
Rich believes she and her husband meet all the eligibility requirements for unemployment benefits. Rather than having their application approved — or denied — both of their claims were flagged for further investigation. She still doesn’t know why, and neither have received benefits.
“It puts you in this state of limbo,” Rich told OPB. “You don’t know if you’re going to be denied, if you might be expecting a check in the next week or two — you know nothing.”
The upgrade to Frances Online is supposed to alleviate some of the issues related to communicating with the agency. However, transitioning to the new site has meant jammed customer service phone lines as staff and the public get used to the new technology. OPB has spoken with multiple claimants who are in a similar position as the Riches: they believe they qualify for unemployment benefits, but either their initial claim or a subsequent weekly claim is flagged for a potential eligibility issue.
The Riches and other applicants told OPB they haven’t been able to get through to anyone able to provide information about what’s holding up applications.
In Oregon, a flagged claim goes into an internal research process called adjudication. Representatives with the state employment department say because of the migration to the new online system, they do not know how many claims are waiting to get looked at by an adjudicator. They also lack information on how long it’s taking for claims in adjudication to get resolved.
Overall, the department receives around 30,000 weekly unemployment claims. The agency has 98 adjudicators and nearly 170 employees in the general claims category.
“The new system that we have, it’s not just new technology, it’s also a new process in terms of how we are handling the work,” David Gerstenfeld, director of the Oregon Employment Department, told reporters on Wednesday. “It means that the old reports that we had can’t just transfer over and give us the same kind of insights.”
Gerstenfeld said the agency is working on generating reports with data related to the adjudication process, but was not able to provide a timeline of when those reports will be available. He said the agency will make that information public.
OPB reached out to multiple state legislators in areas with higher than average unemployment or in large population areas. Many reported a small bump in emails about frustrations with the employment department since the website rollout was completed in March.
Rep. Anessa Hartman, D-Oregon City, said her office has heard from at least 10 constituents about issues connected to the employment department. Like Gerstenfeld, Hartman says the problems aren’t with the new website.
“OED’s previous filing system was notoriously outdated, and I’m optimistic that the new Frances Online system will streamline the process for Oregonians, despite initial hiccups for some people with their identity verification,” Hartman wrote in an email to OPB. “However, the vast majority of complaints from my constituents have not been about the online system, but rather the wait times in communications with OED staff or the adjudication process.”
Hartman points to staffing shortages and lack of federal funding as causes for the lengthy adjudication process. In the 2024 session, Oregon lawmakers approved more than $10 million for the employment department to add staff, but those funds won’t flow to the agency until June.
“The kinds of issues that adjudicators process when they’re looking at issues on claims can vary in complexity from things that are pretty simple to things that are highly complicated and involve multiple parties,” Sara Cromwell, deputy director for OED’s unemployment insurance division, said.
Officials with the agency have repeatedly pointed to understaffing and underfunding as part of the reason for long waiting times for cases in adjudication. It was among the issues brought to the surface during the pandemic when thousands of Oregonians suddenly found themselves out of work, applying for benefits and dealing with an outdated computer system and understaffed agency.
“We understand how important it is to have the unemployment insurance benefits to help replace income when people are between jobs, and we don’t take that lightly,” Cromwell said. “We’re working our hardest to provide folks with the services that they need and expect, and constantly striving to do better.”
Director Gerstenfeld told reporters he’s confident things will improve when they are able to add staff members with the state funding expected in June.
Meanwhile, folks like Rich are still in limbo.
“When people qualify for the benefits, they need to be paid in a timely manner,” Rich said. “And if for some reason you are unable to do that, then communicate clearly the reasons why and provide a timeline.”
Oregon
Keizer city councilor fined $500 by Oregon ethics commission
What does the Oregon Government Ethics Commission do?
The Oregon Government Ethics Commission is responsible for enforcing Oregon Government Ethics Law, Lobby Regulation Law and Public Meetings Law.
The Oregon Government Ethics Commission voted March 6 to fine Keizer City Councilor Soraida Cross $500 after an investigator found she tried to use her position to avoid a criminal citation.
In a stipulated final order signed by Cross, an OGEC investigator detailed a May 14, 2025, incident in which Cross attempted to call Marion County Sheriff Nick Hunter on his personal cellphone when police responded to a domestic dispute at the home Cross shared with her ex-husband.
During the incident, first reported by Keizertimes, a woman accused Cross of pushing her off a barstool.
Salem Police responded to the 911 call in Keizer to avoid a possible conflict of interest. Video footage obtained by Keizertimes shows Cross telling the officer she is a city councilor, played golf with Keizer Police Chief Andrew Copeland and is friends with Hunter.
The body camera footage was later shared on social media by Marion County Democrats.
Paige Barton, chair for Marion County Democrats, filed a complaint against Cross with the ethics commission.
When Cross told the officer she was a councilor, she attempted to “use her official position to avoid the financial detriment associated with a criminal citation,” according to the order.
The order said Cross “used confidential information in an attempt to obtain a personal gain” when she called Hunter on his personal cellphone to involve him in the Salem Police investigation.
“The personal phone number of Mr. Hunter is not publicly available information, such that any member of the public may contact him when dealing with law enforcement matters,” the order said.
The criminal citation for harassment was forwarded to the Polk County District Attorney’s Office due to a possible conflict of interest. The office declined to prosecute.
Cross told OGEC that she did not willingly or intentionally violate Oregon ethics law.
“She further asserts that she is a victim of domestic violence and that the police were called to her home on May 14, 2025, by her ex-husband as a form of retaliation and that was not the only time,” officials said in the order. “Ms. Cross further contends that on the evening of May 14th, she needed to call her friends, which is why she contacted Marion County Sheriff Nick Hunter whom she called for advice out of fear and there was no malicious intent.”
Commission investigator Daniel Pacheco said in a preliminary investigation that Cross appeared to try to use her position to avoid financial detriment, such as legal fees associated with a criminal charge.
The commission voted 5-0 in October to find a substantial objective basis for believing Cross violated Oregon law. A more in-depth investigation ensued.
In the order, OGEC officials said the results of the investigation pointed to a preponderance of evidence that Cross violated Oregon ethics law.
Cross signed the stipulated final order on Feb. 17, waiving her right to a contested hearing and judicial review. She will pay a $500 civil penalty to settle the matter.
The commission approved accepting the final order in a 6-0 vote with one abstention.
For questions, comments and news tips, email reporter Whitney Woodworth at wmwoodworth@statesmanjournal.com, call 503-910-6616 or follow on X at @wmwoodworth
Oregon
Oregon Lottery Pick 4 results for March 5
The Oregon Lottery offers several draw games for those aiming to win big.
Here’s a look at March 5, 2026, results for each game:
Winning Pick 4 numbers from March 5 drawing
1PM: 6-6-8-1
4PM: 7-4-6-0
7PM: 5-6-5-2
10PM: 3-5-4-4
Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.
Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results
When are the Oregon Lottery drawings held?
- Powerball: 7:59 p.m. on Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
- Mega Millions: 7:59 p.m. on Tuesday and Friday.
- Pick 4: 1 p.m., 4 p.m., 7 p.m. and 10 p.m. daily.
- Win for Life: 7:30 p.m. on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
- Megabucks: 7:29 p.m. on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by an Oregon editor. You can send feedback using this form.
Oregon
Where Oregon Ducks rank in industry recruiting rankings for 2027 class
With the winter evaluation period of high school football recruiting now behind us, we’ve seen some of the top recruiting sites update their rankings over the past few weeks and start to reset their boards for the 2027 class. In February, On3 shifted players around after getting fresh looks at the class, and 247Sports did the same earlier this week.
So with Oregon’s handful of commits getting new ratings, where does the Ducks’ class rank nationally in this cycle?
If you look at sites individually, it looks different, with 247Sports having Oregon sitting at No. 13 in the nation. At Rivals, though, they take the industry ranking, which factors in their own rankings, plus an average from 247Sports and ESPN.
In the industry rankings, Oregon sits at No. 9 in the nation, with five commitments.
Going into the summer months, the Ducks are in a great spot, leading or among the top schools for a handful of the top prospects in the nation, like 5-star QB Will Mencl or 5-star WR Dakota Guerrant. We will see what movement Oregon can make in the coming months after official visits take place early in the summer.
Contact/Follow @Ducks_Wire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Oregon Ducks news, notes, and opinions.
-
World1 week agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Wisconsin5 days agoSetting sail on iceboats across a frozen lake in Wisconsin
-
Massachusetts4 days agoMassachusetts man awaits word from family in Iran after attacks
-
Massachusetts1 week agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Maryland6 days agoAM showers Sunday in Maryland
-
Florida5 days agoFlorida man rescued after being stuck in shoulder-deep mud for days
-
Denver, CO1 week ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Oregon1 week ago2026 OSAA Oregon Wrestling State Championship Results And Brackets – FloWrestling