Oregon
Oregon Business – How Governor Hopefuls Say They Would Shape Oregon’s Economy
Voting is underway for Oregon’s major election for governor, with ballots due Could 17.
There are 15 Oregon Democrats and 19 Republicans vying for governor, however solely 5 polled at or round 10% assist within the final two weeks.
For Democrats, former Oregon Home speaker Tina Kotek and former state treasurer Tobias Learn seem locked in a two-way contest, based on an April ballot by California-based FM3 Analysis, with each candidates polling at 20% or larger.
The Republican subject appears extra divided. Based on a survey carried out by Salem-based Nelson Analysis, 19% of probably Republican voters selected former Home minority chief Christine Drazan. Bob Tiernan, former Oregon Republican Social gathering chair, was second with 14%, and 2016 nominee Bud Pierce captured 9.5%, with the remainder being uncertain or saying they might vote for another person.
Oregon’s subsequent governor should handle the state’s rising inexpensive housing scarcity, its rising, state-subsidized inexperienced power sector, the consequences of local weather change, and Oregon’s ongoing homelessness disaster — all of which might have a major affect on Oregon’s financial future.
What follows is a abstract of the major-party candidates say they might deal with these points.
Betsy Johnson, who served as a State Legislator for 20 years however is searching for the governor’s workplace as an unaffiliated candidate. Her marketing campaign web page doesn’t embrace detailed positions on the next points, however does embrace guarantees to “get management of Portland’s homeless and public security disaster,” “cease taking jobs and job creators with no consideration” and “make Oregon extra inexpensive for working households.” Johnson has additionally been a vocal opponent of cap and commerce.
Housing
Based on the Oregon Workplace of Financial Evaluation, Oregon has an estimated scarcity of 111,000 properties, with the best scarcity being properties inexpensive to lower-income households. The development labor market can be tight, constraining development.
Excessive dwelling costs don’t solely hurt lower-income individuals. Based on a 2020 evaluate by OPB, excessive housing prices can worsen visitors, contribute to employee shortages and cut back shopper spending.
Christine Drazan
On her web site, Drazan blames Oregon’s “regulatory tax atmosphere” for Oregonian’s low shopping for energy, which has in her view lowered their capability to afford housing. Drazan pledges on her “points” web page to veto any new taxes, repeal “expensive” rules, and promote tax insurance policies which might “permit Oregonians to maintain extra of their cash in their very own pockets.”
Throughout a Q&A with Oregon Capital Chronicle, Drazan mentioned the state authorities had “repeatedly interfered” with the non-public sector by means of constructing rules, impeding their capability to satisfy the demand for housing.
Drazan says the state “should expedite the method to make buildable land obtainable, pace up the event of latest items, and decrease the price related to constructing new housing in Oregon.” She additionally helps defending some current packages, just like the mortgage curiosity deduction and first-time dwelling purchaser program, whereas holding down property taxes. She additionally claims inclusionary zoning and “regulatory complexities” drive up the price of constructing items.
Tina Kotek
Kotek posted a radical housing and homelessness plan on her web site. In her plan, Kotek says she’s going to associate with Enterprise Oregon to create a housing and transportation technique program and construct upon Governor Kate Brown’s development jobs workforce program. Kotek pledged to subject an govt order to create a multi-sector advisory group, and a 10-year plan to construct sufficient properties in city, suburban, and rural communities and to make this plan the highest precedence within the 2024 legislative session.
To encourage development, Kotek says she’s going to encourage “intergovernmental and personal sector partnerships” and go laws specializing in “Encouraging innovation, streamlining allow processes, and supporting housing builders to scale as much as construct these properties.”
Kotek has additionally made it a precedence to finish current fairness gaps in housing between white Oregonians and Oregonians of coloration by offering BIPOC Oregonians with mortgage and mortgage fee help and homeownership education schemes although culturally-specific organizations. She additionally helps group land trusts and shared fairness homeownership packages to shut the fairness hole.
Bud Pierce
Like Drazan, Pierce trusts the non-public sector to repair the housing disaster. He says he would decrease the price of land by modifying land-use planning restrictions to permit extra items to be constructed.
Pierce tells Oregon Capital Chronicle that by pursuing an agenda that “dramatically [reduces] charges, purple tape, and time the builders put money into constructing properties” and “loosening stringent constructing necessities that considerably improve the price of constructing a home” the state can overcome its housing disaster.
“Inexpensive housing may be constructed if we permit smaller constructions, decrease land costs by means of modifying our land use planning and restrict extreme rules which drive up costs,” he instructed KATU in a Q&A.
Tobias Learn
Learn instructed the Oregon Capital Chronicle there may be no answer to the housing disaster with out the non-public sector “working carefully with state and native governments.”
As governor, Learn says he’ll direct state companies to grant non-public development corporations entry to buildable land, put money into constructing infrastructure, and permit builders extra flexibility in Oregon’s land use planning system in change for developments that meet housing wants and local weather objectives.
As a way to construct giant, scalable housing items, Learn says he’ll streamline the allowing course of to be able to deploy funds already permitted by the state and Metro-area governments.
On his web site, Learn says he’ll create a statewide program to present Oregonians entry to low-interest loans to construct extra housing on single-family heaps.
Bob Tiernan
To unravel the housing disaster, Tiernan mentioned would name a housing summit, like then-Gov. Neil Goldschmidt did for employee’s compensation in 1989 to scale back costs in a Q&A with the Oregon Capital Chronicle.
Tiernan recommended a lock-in on the Oregon Fairgrounds for all concerned events to hammer out an answer.
Tiernan blames “overregulation for local weather change insurance policies, power effectivity guidelines, allow issues, and System Improvement Prices (SDCs)” for driving up prices for dwelling builders.
Tiernan says the “legal guidelines of provide and demand” typically work higher to resolve housing points. Nonetheless, Tiernan says he would use public-private partnerships to create extra inexpensive housing items, and helps a 50-acre extension of the city development boundary.
Inexperienced Financial system/Local weather Change
Over $9 billion of funding in renewable power has come to Oregon over the past 16 years, producing over $110 million in public income, based on the U.S. Power Info Administration. Wind power manufacturing within the state has elevated considerably within the final decade. There are practically 2000 wind generators in Oregon which generated 10.6% of the state’s electrical energy in 2019, up from 6.1% from 10 years in the past.
However the impacts of local weather change are already affecting Oregon farmers. Based on a 2021 research from Stanford College, county-level temperature traits have contributed $27 billion—or 19%—of the national-level crop insurance coverage losses over the 1991–2017 interval.
Christine Drazan
Drazan blasted Oregon’s low-carbon gas requirements and the creation of a cap-and-trade program in a Q&A with KATU and on her marketing campaign web site. Drazan’s web site doesn’t in any other case point out renewable power or the atmosphere.
Tina Kotek
On her web site, Kotek says that as speaker of the Oregon Home, she “put Oregon on a path to 100% clear electrical energy by 2040, together with a $50 million funding to jumpstart wind, photo voltaic and different group renewable power tasks that can create jobs in Oregon.”
Kotek praised Oregon’s Clear Fuels Program, and referred to as for “daring motion to match the size of the (local weather) disaster.” Kotek pledges to extend the usage of zero-emission automobiles and make investments extra in public transportation to decrease emissions by means of laws.
Kotek says she’s going to use her place as governor to transition the state away from fossil fuels in properties and business buildings and improve local weather resiliency for small farming communities and ranches, in addition to go stricter legal guidelines to guard staff throughout local weather occasions like warmth waves and wildfires.
Bud Pierce
Pierce is sharply towards environmental rules and authorities assist of renewable power.
On voting information web site ISideWith…, Pierce reported being towards new environmental rules to handle local weather change, and against authorities subsidies for wind power.
Tobias Learn
Learn’s web site says Oregon is well-positioned to be a frontrunner in addressing local weather change. Learn would assist Oregon’s inexperienced financial system by means of clear power investments, decarbonizing the transportation sector, lowering constructing power use by means of laws and creating local weather resiliency packages for farms and ranches throughout the state.
Learn says as governor, he would improve monetary incentives to scale back the price of renewable power and power storage, set up an offshore wind power fund to collect wind power on the Oregon coast, and improve financing, loans and grant alternatives for clear power applied sciences.
Bob Tiernan
Tiernan says that though he believes human exercise is inflicting the planet to heat, he instructed OPB the federal government should “watch out of the unintended penalties of Authorities actions on Oregonians’ livelihoods, pocket books, the power to warmth their properties, journey and luxuriate in their lives.”
Tiernan doesn’t assist cap-and-trade laws however says he desires to encourage the usage of electrical automobiles and different conservation measures, although he didn’t state whether or not or not he would go legal guidelines to take action.
Homelessness
Based on knowledge launched by Multnomah County, the quantity of individuals residing with out properties in Portland elevated roughly 50% since January 2019. As of January 2020, Oregon had an estimated 14,655 experiencing homelessness as reported by Continuums of Care to the U.S. Division of Housing and City Improvement (HUD).
Authorities packages have been proven to be making some progress. Nonprofits have reported getting 500 homeless individuals into housing since a brand new tax to boost cash for homeless providers took impact in mid-2021.
Christine Drazan
Drazan mentioned she would handle the “root causes” of homelessness – habit, psychological well being, and affordability – by working with nonprofits, the religion group, and native governments, in addition to “clarify” native governments have the “authority and obligation” to implement native ordinances.
Tina Kotek
Kotek pledges that inside 30 days in workplace, she would kind an emergency administration staff to handle the pressing wants of veterans, households with youngsters, unaccompanied younger adults and folks over age 65, and coaching housing navigators to seek out them locations to reside.
As Governor, Kotek pledges to handle homelessness by offering wraparound providers, comparable to psychological well being assist staff, to individuals residing on the streets, and work with cities and nonprofits to proceed creating new residing areas. She cites Challenge Turnkey, which acquires lodges and motels for homeless shelters, as a profitable instance of a state-run shelter program,
Kotek says holding individuals housed who’re on the point of homelessness can be important. Along with making a housing supplier council that consists of personal landlords, inexpensive housing suppliers, and tenant rights advocates, Kotek says she would direct the Public Utility Fee to implement an arrearage technique for unpaid utility payments, use the Secretary of State’s audit of the emergency lease help supply system to make enhancements, and provides courts flexibility to each mediate eviction circumstances and join tenants going through eviction to community-based providers to assist them keep housed
Bud Pierce
In the course of the Republican debate, Pierce mentioned he would declare a statewide “substance use dysfunction and homeless emergency” to start out fixing the homelessness subject.
Pierce says he would make it unlawful to camp on the streets, parks and on riverbanks. For individuals experiencing homeless who didn’t vacate, they might be positioned in both a “locked shelter or some type of incarceration till they are going to take part in bettering their lives or they discover non-public lodging.”
Pierce says his method to Oregon’s homelessness would additionally embrace habit and psychological well being therapy and ensure all individuals experiencing homelessness had entry to shelters, however offered few particulars on how this might be accomplished.
“Make no mistake, those that are homeless won’t have the choice to return to road residing when shelters and providers can be found,” reads his web site.
Tobias Learn
To cease homelessness from rising, Learn says he would go laws to forestall evictions for many who are susceptible to homelessness. Learn says that by repurposing vacant motels, lodges and workplace areas, and staffing the websites with assist providers, together with psychological well being and habit therapy, state companies will assist individuals experiencing homeless find long-term housing.
Learn says constructing a mixture of inexpensive housing, shelters, and transitional housing is important to combating Oregon’s homelessness disaster, and as soon as satisfactory housing and shelter choices can be found, “for many who are keen to simply accept assist” that it is going to be “time to start out imposing tenting bans in our parks and on our streets.”
Bob Tiernan
Tiernan instructed KATU as governor he would implement a “short-term answer that will get the homeless off the streets, parks, instantly” and set up “military-style” shelters on public or leased lands that “mirror shelters which might be established in time(s) of emergency, floods, hurricanes, tornados, or different disasters.”
Tiernan instructed OPB he would give homeless campers discover that they wanted to vacate public property, and if they didn’t achieve this throughout the time restrict, he would “transfer them off the road, and out of our parks (and) neighborhoods.”
Within the long-term, Tiernan mentioned he would set up an “motion drive” to create a extra everlasting answer. He additionally advocated the repeal of Measure 110 that decriminalized possession of most unlawful medication, which he says has not achieved its desired ends and has solely contributed to Oregon’s habit disaster.
To subscribe to Oregon Enterprise, click on right here.
Oregon
BeaversEdge Staff Predictions: Washington State vs Oregon State
BeaversEdge Staff Predictions: Washington State vs Oregon State
PROMO: Join BeaversEdge.com and get 30 DAYS FREE!
At the end of each game week, the BeaversEdge.com staff will give its predictions for Oregon State’s matchup!
With the Oregon State Beavers (4-6) set to square off with Washington State (8-2) on Saturday afternoon, BeaversEdge Publisher Brenden Slaughter, recruiting analyst Dylan Callaghan-Croley, and writers T.J. Mathewson and Ryan Harlan give their two cents on the matchup and who’s going to come out on top!
MORE: Recruit Scoop: Who Will Be Enrolling Early? | Beavers Set To Host Elite DE | Injury Report vs WSU | Beavers Hosting 4-Star TE | A Closer Look At WSU
T.J. MATHEWSON’S PICK
If you are coming to this prediction looking for optimism about Saturday’s senior day against Washington State, you’ve come to the wrong place.
One would think that if we knew who was starting at quarterback, it would be easier to predict. Would it? At this point of the Beavers season, we’ve seen all three quarterbacks suit up, and the offense has yet to look good with any of the three in the last month.
I’m done predicting who will start, I’ve been wrong enough. Do the Beavers have enough juice on defense to stop John Mateer and the Cougar offense?
They’ll play better at home, but these are two different calibers of teams on the field Saturday. The Beavers are going to have to show me something to change my tone.
PREDICTION: Washington State 35, Oregon State 14
TJ’s season record: 6-4
MORE: EDGE POD: Talkin’ Air Force, WSU, Senior Class | WATCH: Defense Talks Senior Day & MORE |How Beaver Commits Fared | Beavers In The NFL: Week 11 Recap
DYLAN CALLAGHAN-CROLEY’S PICK
At this point in the season, I think a lot of Oregon State fans just want it to come to an end. The last month or so has completely taken the wind out of the sails of the fanbase and it’s hard to say that it doesn’t look like it has done similar to the Beavers on the field as well.
That being said, Saturday presents a great opportunity for the Beavers seniors to finish their careers at Reser on a high note facing the top-25 ranked Cougars.
Unfortunately, I don’t see an upset in the cards for the Beavers on Saturday. Washington State still has a theoretical outside shot at a potential College Football Playoff berth if other factors break their way and still could be playing for a strong bowl game nonetheless.
The Cougars have been a great team all season and after a shocking loss last week, they’re going to look to bounce back in major fashion against a hapless Oregon State team. I’m taking Washington State in this one by 17.
PREDICTION: Washington State 31, Oregon State 14
Dylan’s season record: 8-2
BRENDEN SLAUGHTER’S PICK
Oregon
Oregon likely faces battle with next Trump administration • Oregon Capital Chronicle
During the just-concluded campaign for attorney general, Republican Will Lathrop dodged a question about whether he supported his party’s presidential candidate by saying he was “laser focused” on public safety issues in Oregon and not on national politics. National issues, he suggested, were not a major part of the job for an Oregon attorney general.
He was wrong.
What’s become obvious in the days since the election of Donald Trump as president is that the line between Oregon’s and national issues could be erased, and that courtrooms — and specifically those likely to be frequented by Oregon’s attorney general — will be a primary battleground over the broader subjects of safety and security.
Oregon’s next Democratic attorney general, Dan Rayfield, reflected as much immediately after his race was called. In some of his first remarks post-election, he said, “In light of this week’s election, our work to defend Oregon’s values and the rule of law against national attacks will be front and center like never before. As the last line of defense for the rights and freedoms of Oregonians, we will be prepared to stand firm against the unconstitutional and unlawful threats President-elect Trump promised on the campaign trail.”
Oregon statewide officials overall have been less strident than those in some other blue states with their responses to the incoming federal administration, but their comments have included warnings that offensive federal policies wouldn’t go unchallenged. Gov. Tina Kotek, for example, said, “While I seek to work with the incoming administration, I will not stand idly by as abortion access, environmental standards, civil liberties or other priorities come under attack from national partisan politics.”
Rayfield seems likely to ask the Oregon Legislature in coming weeks for more money to do battle with the Trump administration. And he’s likely to get it.
That would mirror most of the blue state attorneys general. Washington state, for example, situated much like Oregon, also has just elected a new AG with the incumbent, Bob Ferguson, a veteran of many battles with the prior Trump administration, moving up to governor.
A number of California-Oregon-Washington legal initiatives may be on the way.
Rob Bonta, California’s attorney general, said, “If Trump attacks your rights, I’ll be there.”
Washington’s incoming AG, Nick Brown, remarked that, “We will be prepared for whatever comes and do everything in our power to defend the rights of Washingtonians, the people of this great state, and to make sure that when there is an illegal action, that we look very closely to see if we can bring a case.”
Where might the battles be located?
You can start with some of the topics Trump emphasized in his campaign. Oregon’s protections for immigrants and transgender people are two likely targets. Education policy may shift dramatically, since there’s discussion of eliminating the U.S. Department of Education, though its reach is not as broad as some critics appear to think. The Affordable Care Act is again, as during the first Trump term, very much at risk.
Trump’s discussion of election fraud has faded since his win, but Oregon’s vote-by-mail process may become a target anyway.
But the meaningful list of battlefields is much longer.
In 2017 the Trump administration proposed to decrease the size of the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument, which had been expanded by President Barack Obama. The effort failed. But the effort did not happen because Trump made a personal push for it; the proposal came from Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke. In all presidencies, many administration proposals come from officials other than the president, and the list of those initiatives could be extensive.
Taken together, many changes in environmental rules and management could happen.
On the campaign trail, Trump indicated that California’s water woes could be solved by draining water from the Columbia River: “So you have millions of gallons of water pouring down from the north with the snow caps in Canada and all pouring down. And they have essentially a very large faucet. And you turn the faucet and it takes one day to turn it. It’s massive.”
This may have been nonsensical, but if Trump did decide to follow up, the legal battles over water could be heated.
Different approaches to policy, even when not outright or obvious reversals, could matter. Native American tribes have expressed concern about this, noting unwelcome changes in policy during the first Trump administration.
Policy clashes are likely, too, in areas like housing, where the state has begun efforts to ease housing shortages and pricing — but the next Trump administration is likely to push very different approaches.
The battle begins on Jan. 20. It will not end quickly.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.
Oregon
Oregon to reinstate ambitious climate program amid divided reactions from industries, environmentalists
Oregon’s ambitious carbon emissions reduction program is restarting once again.
The program is set to start for a second time in January — after a court of appeals invalidated the state’s first attempt at the Climate Protection Program late last year.
Most industries the program regulates are not happy with the new rules, while environmental organizations celebrated the reinstatement of the program, saying Oregon is now back on track to reduce emissions from the state’s largest polluters.
On Thursday, the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality’s commission voted to unanimously adopt a revamped version of the Climate Protection Program. The program’s main goal is to reduce 90% of carbon emissions from diesel, gasoline and natural gas companies by 2050. The first benchmark regulated entities must comply with is a 50% carbon emission reduction by 2035.
“Oregon is committed to acting boldly and consistently to do our part to protect our climate,” Gov. Tina Kotek said in a press statement. “The Climate Protection Program will keep polluters accountable and fund community investments that will reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Oregon.”
DEQ’s Climate Protection Program is one of the strongest emission reduction programs in the nation. Agency staff have touted the program as “foundational” in helping other state mandates, like electric utilities having net-neutral carbon emissions by 2040, “pick up the slack” to help reduce the state’s overall greenhouse gas emissions.
But the idea of a cap-and-trade program, like the CPP introduces, has been a controversial issue in the state for many years. Republican lawmakers shut down the Oregon Legislature two years in a row to stop majority Democrats from passing a cap-and-trade bill.
An earlier version of the program was also criticized, as fossil fuel groups regulated under the program sued to block it entirely in early 2022. The Oregon Court of Appeals invalidated the program last December, citing procedural technicalities.
Now, the program, which was updated after undergoing a second rulemaking process, is set to start once again in January, with a few changes.
Those include regulating heavy carbon emitters and direct natural gas users, working with the Oregon Public Utility Commission to monitor natural gas rates and adjusting compliance periods to give companies more flexibility.
“This program maintains Oregon’s commitment to addressing climate change, transitioning our economy to remain globally competitive, and investing in our most impacted communities across the entire state,” DEQ’s Environmental Quality Commissioner Chair Matt Donegan said in a statement.
Regulated entities will have three years, starting in 2025, to make adjustments to be in compliance with the new rules. After that, the compliance periods will be two years.
Hitting restart
After DEQ decided not to appeal the court decision that invalidated the program, the agency began a second rulemaking process in March. DEQ fast-tracked the process using the same framework that led to its previous rules. It took more than 20 months to develop the first attempt at a Climate Protection Program, which gathered more than 7,000 public comments and was guided by an advisory committee.
This time around, the agency received more than 10,000 public comments, the most the agency has ever received during any public comment period. That input, and a 26-member advisory committee, helped shape the new rules.
Oregon drafts a reboot of the state’s flagship climate program
But not everyone is happy with the result.
Bill Gaines, executive director of the Alliance of Western Energy Consumers, said there were meaningful discussions about the proposed changes to the program, but there needs to be more protections for consumers as well as businesses that compete regionally and globally.
In comments submitted to the agency from the group in late September, the AWEC wrote, “maintaining a vibrant, growth-oriented economy is not mutually exclusive with the policy of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The proposed CPP rules, however, will produce major, negative impacts on natural gas consumers, with the greatest impacts on the high-volume gas consumers that are the cornerstone of the State’s economic vitality.”
Gaines said although there was an improvement in the final draft rules for the recently added Energy Intensive Trade Exposed members, the new rules will be costly for Oregon’s natural gas customers. AWEC estimates companies that would be regulated under the new rules would have to pay millions of dollars to comply with the program to keep using natural gas at current rates. That could lead some businesses to leave Oregon, he said.
Gaines also said the group is still questioning whether DEQ has the authority to implement the program.
DEQ has said the agency has full authority to establish and enforce the program
Other regulated companies like NW Natural say it appreciates changes to delay program elements for a small percentage of their customers.
NW Natural was one of the fossil fuel companies that sued to halt the program in 2022.
But Spokesperson David Roy said “the overall negative cost impacts to Oregonians remain, as do our concerns about the accountability for this program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.”
Roy was referring to the Community Climate Investment carbon credit program. If regulated entities choose to not lower their emissions, they can buy credits at the cost of $129 per ton of greenhouse gas pollution.
DEQ to start over with Climate Protection Program after Oregon Court of Appeals decision
Under the new rules, DEQ will work with the Oregon Public Utility Commission to evaluate and mitigate significant rate increases many natural gas customers may see due to compliance costs.
Roy said higher carbon credit costs could still impact their customers like hospitals and schools, because they “are still stuck with the most expensive cost of carbon of any program in North America.”
But not all regulated entities are unhappy with the second version of the rules.
Mike Freese with the Oregon Fuels Association said the adjustments made to the final rules governing the transportation industry are workable.
“Oregon’s local fuel sector was critical in lowering greenhouse gas emissions below the aggressive greenhouse gas reduction goals under the prior CPP program,” he said. “We appreciate DEQ recognizing these investments in the rule to help ease impacts on consumers. While the recently adopted CPP rule is an improvement, lawmakers need to carefully monitor this program to ensure Oregonians have access to affordable fuel in all parts of the state.”
During the first two years of compliance under the first version of the Climate Protection Program, the regulated industries reported a reduction in their emissions beyond what was required under the program.
As DEQ underwent the second rulemaking process, the agency said that some industries, like fuels suppliers, were reducing their emissions to beyond what was required to meet the cap with the previous rule. So DEQ is granting those companies additional carbon credits that represent what they would have banked under the first version of the program.
‘Beacon of hope’
The reinstatement of the program puts Oregon back on track to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and invest in communities hit the hardest by climate change, a coalition of environmental groups said.
“Oregon’s actions today are a beacon of hope,” Oregon Environmental Council executive director Jana Gastellum said in a statement. “Every state deserves a program like the Climate Protection Program to not only cut pollution but also generate funds for community projects and business innovation. It’s a win for the people, especially those in frontline communities who’ve long been impacted by climate change.”
Oregon Court of Appeals finds state carbon reduction rules invalid
The Community Climate Investment credits would go toward projects like creating more renewable energy and retrofitting and weatherizing buildings, which would reduce carbon emission within the state’s most vulnerable communities. The program’s aim is to reduce air pollution and improve public health and help communities transition from fossil fuels to cleaner energy.
DEQ has refined what type of projects will be eligible, and the new rules ensure 15% of the funds received will benefit tribal communities in Oregon.
“This holds polluters accountable while uplifting community-led solutions,” Xitlali Torres, air quality and climate program coordinator at nonprofit environmental group Verde, said in a statement. “It directly addresses the harmful pollution that burdens low-income communities of color while building cleaner air, safer homes, and a livable future for all.”
But the implementation of the Community Climate Investment program, which was almost ready to launch when the first version of the Climate Protection Program was ruled invalid, will be delayed under the plan approved Thursday.
DEQ will restart the process of selecting an entity to implement the program and expects the program to be in place by the end of 2026.
-
Business1 week ago
Column: OpenAI just scored a huge victory in a copyright case … or did it?
-
Health1 week ago
Bird flu leaves teen in critical condition after country's first reported case
-
Business6 days ago
Column: Molly White's message for journalists going freelance — be ready for the pitfalls
-
World1 week ago
Sarah Palin, NY Times Have Explored Settlement, as Judge Sets Defamation Retrial
-
Science3 days ago
Trump nominates Dr. Oz to head Medicare and Medicaid and help take on 'illness industrial complex'
-
Politics5 days ago
Trump taps FCC member Brendan Carr to lead agency: 'Warrior for Free Speech'
-
Technology4 days ago
Inside Elon Musk’s messy breakup with OpenAI
-
Lifestyle5 days ago
Some in the U.S. farm industry are alarmed by Trump's embrace of RFK Jr. and tariffs