Benjamin Hoffman and Dana A. Braner
Hoffman, MD, is a pediatrics professor and medical director of the Doernbecher Damage Prevention Program at OHSU Doernbecher Kids’s Hospital. Braner, MD, is chair of the pediatrics division and doctor in chief at OHSU Doernbecher Kids’s Hospital.
Let’s begin with one thing we will all agree on: No youngster ought to ever be injured by a gun.
Too usually following horrific incidents, like the college capturing in Uvalde, Texas, heated political rhetoric takes maintain and overpowers the dialog round learn how to forestall these incidents from taking place once more. Because the reminiscence of those occasions fade, usually inside days, we settle again in to the established order and everybody strikes on. The cynical cycle continues till the following time a mass capturing shakes the nationwide psyche.
We should begin with the place we agree and put our youngsters first. As pediatricians at Oregon Well being & Science College, we, together with our colleagues throughout the state, are fielding questions from households asking us whether it is OK for them to drag their kids out of college as a result of they’re afraid it should occur right here. They concern that their kids would be the subsequent to be featured on the entrance web page of the newspaper because the tragic faces of an previous epidemic that continues to plague us.
Whereas withdrawing kids from faculty or society shouldn’t be the reply for safeguarding their well being and lives, the unhappy fact is that extra kids are killed in our nation by weapons than another trigger – greater than automobile crashes, greater than most cancers, greater than something. The variety of kids injured or killed by weapons within the U.S. yearly would fill greater than three faculty bus hundreds each week of the 12 months. And nearly each a type of gun accidents is preventable.
This isn’t a straightforward drawback, and there’s no easy reply. The options will likely be many, and they are going to be laborious. However we should begin someplace, as a result of the established order shouldn’t be OK. Youngsters are actually being caught within the crossfire.
This disaster has been brewing for a very long time, and its roots run deep. These roots stem from many locations: From racial and financial disparity, borne of centuries of systemic oppression and racism. From the behavioral well being emergency that we’ve seen coming, like a tsunami, overwhelming our youngsters, our colleges and our well being system. From zealous beliefs about weapons which have left us fearful and indignant, polarizing us, no matter perspective.
We can’t proceed to view this problem as an us versus them, pro-gun versus anti-gun. We should change our framework, and as an alternative have a look at it from the angle of Oregon’s kids, and the way we will defend them from hurt.
During the last decade, Oregon has been among the many states at the forefront of legislative motion to forestall gun violence. Our state Legislature, with the help of OHSU and plenty of others, has expanded background checks, instituted protected storage necessities, allowed colleges choices for prohibiting weapons on campus and stored weapons out of the fingers of home abusers and stalkers.
Nevertheless, extra should be executed, as a result of the established order shouldn’t be OK. Begin with what we will agree on. Legislators right here in Oregon have proven that’s doable: Simply a few years in the past, Republican State Sen. Brian Boquist partnered with Democrats to cross a pink flag regulation, which supplies regulation enforcement and the courts a way to briefly take away weapons from people who find themselves a menace to themselves or others. Current information present that the regulation is probably going saving lives, with greater than 400 orders because it took impact in 2018, eradicating weapons from individuals at excessive danger of committing violence, like faculty shootings.
As physicians, we depend on information and science to information our apply. Oregonians ought to do the identical when contemplating gun damage prevention insurance policies.
Knowledge from the Johns Hopkins Middle for Gun Violence Prevention and Coverage means that the only best strategy to stopping gun accidents are firearm licensing legal guidelines, and that funding in neighborhood violence prevention packages is efficient and obligatory.
We should handle the difficulty of navy–type assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. We should handle the difficulty of background checks, to make sure they’re efficient, accessible and honest, closing current loopholes. We should talk about the age at which an Oregonian should purchase a firearm. Wherever we begin and no matter we do, we should acknowledge the necessity to examine the impacts. We should spend money on analysis that’s each delicate and conscious of the distinctive wants of Oregonians. Change will likely be sluggish and we should measure, perceive and study from our progress.
We are going to all must compromise, however this isn’t about dogma, or profitable or shedding. That is about our youngsters and about their proper to dwell in communities that worth them, that defend them, and can put apart the rancor and rhetoric to do what is tough—as a result of it’s what is correct.
We have to begin someplace, as a result of no youngster ought to ever be injured by a gun.
Who’s with us?
Share your opinion
Submit your essay of 500-600 phrases on a extremely topical problem or a theme of explicit relevance to the Pacific Northwest, Oregon and the Portland space to commentary@oregonian.com. Please embrace your electronic mail and cellphone quantity for verification.
Tips to manage poor air quality
Smoke from wildfires is increasingly impacting the Willamette Valley. Here are a few tips to manage poor air quality.
Four Oregon lawmakers are calling on Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy to help stop a plan that would kill 450,000 barred owls in an effort to save endangered spotted owls over the next 30 years.
The entrepreneurs were named by President-elect Donald Trump to lead the so-called Department of Government Efficiency.
In a letter sent Tuesday, state Rep. Ed Diehl, R-Stayton, Rep. David Gomberg, D-Lincoln County, Rep. Virgle Osborne, R-Roseburg, and Sen.-elect Bruce Starr, R-Yamhill and Polk counties, asked the incoming Trump administration officials to stop the reportedly more than $1 billion project, calling it a “budget buster” and “impractical.”
Environmental groups Animal Wellness Action and the Center for a Humane Economy in late 2024 filed a federal lawsuit in Washington state to stop the planned killing of the barred owls.
Here is why the Oregon lawmakers are opposed to the plan, what the plan would do and why it is controversial.
In August 2024, after years of planning, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service came up with a proposal to kill a maximum of 450,000 invasive barred owls over 30 years as a way to quell habitat competition between them and the northern spotted owl.
Spotted owl populations have been rapidly declining due in part to competition from invasive barred owls, which originate in the eastern United States. Northern spotted owls are listed as a threatened species under the federal Endangered Species Act.
According to the USFWS plan, barred owls are one of the main factors driving the rapid decline of northern and California spotted owls, and with their removal, less than one-half of 1% of the North American barred owl population would be killed.
The plan was formally approved by the Biden administration in September 2024.
Shortly after it was announced, Animal Wellness Action and the Center for a Humane Economy immediately responded in opposition to the plan to kill barred owls. They argued the plan was both ill-conceived and that habitat loss is the main factor driving the spotted owls decline.
“Spotted owls have experienced significant population decline over decades,” a news release from the groups filing the lawsuit said. “This decline began and continues due to habitat loss, particularly the timber harvest of old growth forest. The plan is not only ill-conceived and inhumane, but also destined to fail as a strategy to save the spotted owl.”
In their complaint, the groups argued the USFWS violated the National Environmental Policy Act by failing to properly analyze the impacts of their strategy and improperly rejecting reasonable alternatives to the mass killing of barred owls, such as nonlethal population control approaches, spotted owl rehabilitation efforts and better protections for owl habitat.
The four Oregon lawmakers are siding with the environmental groups and calling for Musk and Ramaswamy to reverse the federal government’s plan to kill the barred owls. It was not immediately clear how the two could stop the plan.
The lawmakers letter stated the plan was impractical and a “budget buster,” with cost estimates for the plan around $1.35 billion, according to a press release by the two groups.
The letter speculates there likely isn’t an excess of people willing to do the killing for free: “it is expected that the individuals doing the shooting across millions of acres – including within Crater Lake National Park – will require compensation for the arduous, night-time hunts,” according to the press release.
“A billion-dollar price tag for this project should get the attention of everyone on the Trump team concerned about government efficiency,” Diehl said. “Killing one type of owl to save another is outrageous and doomed to fail. This plan will swallow up Americans’ hard-earned tax dollars for no good reason.”
USFWS says they aren’t trying to trade one bird for the other.
“As wildlife professionals, we approached this issue carefully and did not come to this decision lightly,” USFWS Oregon State Supervisor Kessina Lee said in announcing the decision in August. “Spotted owls are at a crossroads, and we need to manage both barred owls and habitat to save them. This isn’t about choosing one owl over the other. If we act now, future generations will be able to see both owls in our Western forests.”
Statesman Journal reporter Zach Urness contributed to this report.
Ginnie Sandoval is the Oregon Connect reporter for the Statesman Journal. Sandoval can be reached at GSandoval@gannett.com or on X at @GinnieSandoval.
A rebound basket with 3.5 seconds left in overtime allowed Santa Clara to escape with an 82-81 overtime win over Oregon State in men’s basketball Thursday night.
The Beavers, looking for their first road win of the season and their third since 2021, just missed when Tyeree Bryan’s tip-in with 3.5 seconds left was the difference.
Oregon State, leading 81-78, had two chances to rescue the win.
Adama Bal, fouled while shooting a three-pointer with 10 seconds remaining, made his first two free throws but missed the third. But Bal outfought OSU for the rebound, then kicked the ball out to Christoph Tilly, whose three-point shot glanced off the rim. Bryan then knifed between two Beaver rebounders, collecting the ball with his right hand and tipping it off the backboard and into the basket.
OSU (12-5, 2-2 WCC) came up short on a half-court shot at the buzzer.
The loss spoiled what was a 12-point second-half comeback for Oregon State, which led by as many as four points in overtime.
Parsa Fallah led the Beavers with 24 points and seven rebounds. Michael Rataj had a double-double with 16 points and 10 rebounds, while Isaiah Sy scored 12 points and Damarco Minor 11.
Elijah Maji scored 21 points for Santa Clara (11-6, 3-1), which has won eight of its last nine games.
The game was tied at 32-32 at halftime following a first half where OSU trailed by as many as 12 points. Fallah and Minor combined to score the final eight points as OSU finished the half on a 10-2 run.
The game began to get away from the Beavers again as Santa Clara built a 60-48 lead with 9:43 remaining. Sy got OSU going with a three-pointer, as the Beavers whittled away at the deficit. OSU eventually grabbed the lead at 67-65 with 5:19 left on another three by Sy. It was a defensive brawl for the rest of regulation, as neither team scored during the final 1:58.
Oregon State never trailed in overtime until the final three seconds. A Sy three with 1:29 left gave the Beavers a four-point cushion. After the Broncos later cut the lead to one, Fallah’s layup with 17 seconds left put OSU up 81-78.
Oregon State returns to action Saturday when the Beavers complete their two-game road trip at Pacific. Game time is 7 p.m.
–Nick Daschel can be reached at 360-607-4824, ndaschel@oregonian.com or @nickdaschel.
Our journalism needs your support. Subscribe today to OregonLive.com.
Cal Mukumoto answers to the Oregon Board of Forestry, a citizen board appointed by the governor that helps oversee and implement forest policy. His resignation was announced Thursday during a board meeting by Chair Jim Kelly.Sean Meagher/The Oregonian
Oregon State Forester Cal Mukumoto has resigned.
Mukumoto’s resignation was announced Thursday by Board of Forestry Chair Jim Kelly during a meeting of the board. Mukumoto answers to the board, a citizen panel appointed by the governor that helps oversee and implement forest policy.
If you purchase a product or register for an account through a link on our site, we may receive compensation. By using this site, you consent to our User Agreement and agree that your clicks, interactions, and personal information may be collected, recorded, and/or stored by us and social media and other third-party partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
These are the top 7 issues facing the struggling restaurant industry in 2025
The 25 worst losses in college football history, including Baylor’s 2024 entry at Colorado
The top out-of-contract players available as free transfers: Kimmich, De Bruyne, Van Dijk…
New Orleans attacker had 'remote detonator' for explosives in French Quarter, Biden says
Carter's judicial picks reshaped the federal bench across the country
Who Are the Recipients of the Presidential Medal of Freedom?
Ozempic ‘microdosing’ is the new weight-loss trend: Should you try it?
Ivory Coast says French troops to leave country after decades
