Oregon
Opinion: An ‘all-of-the-above’ approach to Oregon’s affordable housing crisis
Wlnsvey Campos and Andrea Valderrama
Campos represents Senate District 18-Aloha within the Oregon Legislature. Valderrama represents Home District 47- East Portland within the Oregon Legislature. Each are Democrats.
We’re in a homelessness and inexpensive housing emergency, and inflation is barely making it worse. Oregonians already struggling to make ends meet are going through as much as a 14.6% lease improve this yr. Households paying the median lease in Portland, $1,795, are seeing will increase of as much as $260 per thirty days or $3,120 per yr.
Most individuals can’t afford an sudden $400 expense, so it’s no shock that we’re listening to from renters throughout the state that lease will increase are forcing them from their properties. There’s a direct relationship between rising rents and rising homelessness. If we don’t get these rising rents stabilized, extra individuals are going to finish up homeless.
It takes time to construct housing, and now we have to maintain Oregonians of their properties within the meantime. Hire stabilization can instantly handle rising prices of dwelling and supply reduction for households selecting between prescription drugs and holding a roof over their heads. This can’t be an “both or” strategy – we will defend Oregonians from unreasonable lease will increase and repair our housing provide disaster.
Whereas there are some cities and states which have taken a extra aggressive strategy by implementing lease management ordinances, we’re taking a extra measured strategy that can assist stabilize lease, whereas offering landlords flexibility and responding to the market. As amended, the Hire Inflation Emergency Aid invoice (Senate Invoice 611) establishes a common sense annual lease improve cap of 5% plus inflation with a ceiling of 10%. The invoice additionally maintains the 15-year exemption for brand spanking new development, giving builders leeway to cowl their constructing prices.
On the identical time, by way of laws handed earlier this session – the Inexpensive Housing and Emergency Homelessness Response package deal – we’re taking main steps to ramp up our housing manufacturing and work with native cities and counties to construct extra, quicker. The package deal invests hundreds of thousands in revolutionary, Oregon-built housing options like modular properties and funds rental help, which offers safety to renters and housing suppliers alike. We’re working to draw housing suppliers and encourage them to put money into extra items in our state. The payments mirror a complete strategy to addressing our disaster.
Critics of lease stabilization would have you ever consider that now we have to decide on between constructing extra housing and holding lease affordable, however that is merely not the case. A College of Southern California 2018 assessment of earlier analysis discovered that reasonable lease stabilization doesn’t affect new housing development.
Sure, we have to construct extra housing, however whereas we do, we can’t ignore individuals like Robin McMain – a renter from Brookings whose 55+ cell residence park pooled cash to ship her to Salem to testify in assist of the lease stabilization invoice. Their lease has elevated by 14.6% this yr. Robin informed us what number of of her neighbors are retired on mounted incomes, forgoing warmth, groceries, prescribed drugs and different fundamental requirements to pay lease, however are nonetheless on the verge of shedding their properties.
Failure to deal with lease inflation will make the homelessness disaster worse, placing additional pressure on the funds for our social security web and costing housing suppliers cash once they lose tenants. Holding individuals of their properties isn’t simply the fitting factor to do — it would save everybody cash and liberate funds to construct extra housing.
It’s time we reject the false alternative between constructing extra housing and holding rents affordable. We will, and should, do each.
Share your opinion
Submit your essay of 500-600 phrases on a extremely topical concern or a theme of explicit relevance to the Pacific Northwest, Oregon and the Portland space to commentary@oregonian.com. Please embrace your e-mail and telephone quantity for verification.
Oregon
Powerball ticket worth $328.5 million sold in Oregon
Powerball, Mega Millions jackpots: What to know in case you win
Here’s what to know in case you win the Powerball or Mega Millions jackpot.
Just the FAQs, USA TODAY
The first Powerball jackpot of 2025 was sold in Oregon and is worth $328.5 million, according to lottery officials.
The winner purchased the winning ticket in Beaverton on Thursday, Jan. 17, the Oregon Lottery said. The retail location will not be revealed until a winner has come forward.
The winning numbers for the Saturday drawing were: 14, 31, 35, 64 and 69 and Powerball 23.
The winner has a year to claim their prize, Oregon Lottery spokesperson Melanie Mesaros said. After the winning ticket is presented, “it will take time before a winner can be identified due to security and payment processes.”
Oregon lottery winners, with few exceptions, cannot remain anonymous, Mesaros said.
The winner will have a choice between an annuitized prize of $328.5 million or a lump-sum payment of $146.4 million, according to lottery officials, which are both options before taxes.
Last year, the largest Powerball prize won in Oregon — a $1.3 billion jackpot — was split between a Portland man, his wife, and friend.
Before Saturday, the most recent Powerball jackpot was sold in December in New York and was worth $256 million.
Powerball is a multi-state jackpot operated by 44 states, plus the District of Columbia, the U.S. Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico.
Fernando Cervantes Jr., a news reporter for USA TODAY, contributed to this story.
Cherrill Crosby is the executive editor of the Statesman Journal and The Register-Guard. Reach her at crosbyc@gannett.com
Oregon
Oregon’s Dan Lanning visits 5-star recruit Cantwell, top TE Premer during Midwest run
Oregon head football coach Dan Lanning has been a busy man.
But when you’re the man tasked with running one of the top college football programs in the country, burning jet fuel to shake hands and take photos is a big part of the gig. And Lanning was doing plenty of that last week.
A native of Kansas City, Mo., Lanning returned home last week on a two-day tear recruiting some of the top 2026 prospects in the country.
Lanning’s known stops included Lee’s Summit on Jan. 16, where the Tigers have 2027 interior line prospect Zach Harsha (6-5, 260) and 2028 tight end Max Trillo (6-4, 225).
He was even busier the following day. He had stops at Raymore-Peculiar, where he visited with and offered four-star uncommitted running back DeZephen Walker (6-0, 205) who is believed to be heavily considering Kansas and Nebraska.
He also headed to Illinois, where he swung by Lincoln-Way East to visit with quarterback Jonas Williams, who agreed with the Ducks on Aug. 3, 2024,
A trip to the Springfield, Mo. area was also on the docket, as Lanning traveled to Nixa High School to again meet with the country’s No. 1 2026 offensive lineman, Jackson Cantwell, on Jan. 16. The 6-8, 315 offensive tackle has offers from just about everyone in the country, though he has spoken highly of Lanning and his relationship with the Ducks coach – making Oregon one of the favorites for his services.
Cantwell was honored by the Kansas City Chiefs on Jan. 18 during their AFC Divisional playoff game against the Houston Texans after he was selected to represent the Chiefs at the ‘Nike Ones’ showcase during Super Bowl weekend in New Orleans.
Lanning concluded his trip with a little basketball in Hutchinson, Kan., where he watched Great Bend tight end Ian Premer (6-6, 215) – the top tight end in the 2026 class – take on Hutchinson. Premer, a three-sport star in football, basketball and baseball, impressed with 22 points in the game.
The Midwest swing adds to a busy month for Lanning, who also has been spotted with Utah No. 1 athlete Salasi Moa and recently secured a visit with top 2026 quarterback and Nashville native Jared Curtis.
Oregon
People with disabilities are extra vulnerable in major disasters like wildfires, says Oregon advocate
Jake Cornett, Executive Director and CEO of the advocacy group Disability Rights Oregon, says he will forever be haunted by Ashlyn Maddox’s death during the 2021 Oregon heat wave.
The Portland woman, 36, was disabled and living in a group foster home. She was dropped off by a medical transport company, but the company didn’t make sure she made it safely into her air-conditioned home. She ended up wandering around for hours in the heat, and died only 50 feet from safety.
Cornett says, “These deaths are preventable with the right planning, the right strategy for mitigation, the right preparedness and a response plan that complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act and respects the needs of people with disabilities.”
Cornett spoke with “All Things Considered” host Geoff Norcross about Oregon’s ability to help people with disabilities during a natural disaster, such as the deadly wildfires burning in the Los Angeles area.
This conversation has been edited for clarity and length.
Geoff Norcross: If we were to transport those fires in Southern California here, would we see a similar catastrophe for people with disabilities?
Jake Cornett: Surely, we fear that the same disasters we’ve seen play out in the catastrophes in the lives of people with disabilities in LA would play out right here in Oregon as well. And I don’t think this is just a theoretical question. It’s only a matter of time before we have major wildfires along Highway 20, very close by in Portland and in other major cities throughout our state.
Norcross: What is the obligation of local governments to provide for people with disabilities when disaster strikes? I guess I’m asking if the Americans with Disabilities Act applies here.
Cornett: Absolutely. The Americans with Disabilities Act requires that cities, counties, the state and the federal government are taking into account what the needs are of people with disabilities, and providing accommodations for those needs when engaging in disaster planning.
Norcross: Getting information out to people quickly in a disaster is so critical, especially for something that’s as fast-moving as the LA wildfires. For people who are deaf or blind, can you talk about how that’s extra complicated?
Cornett: Absolutely. You know, emergency response notification systems that happen on your phone are a great tool if you have a phone, or if you have the technology to make your phone provide you the information you need. And that’s particularly important for folks who are blind.
I think about a blind person who may not have the same visual access to information as others. If police run around your neighborhood and put a notice on your door that says “get out of town, there’s an evacuation order, you’re under wildfire threat,” that notice on your door might not be enough because you can’t access that information.
And this is where cities, counties and the state really have an obligation to adjust to how they communicate so that it’s effective for all people with disabilities.
Norcross: And again, when you say obligation, you mean a legal obligation, not just because it’s the right thing to do.
Cornett: Absolutely. There’s a legal obligation to do that under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Norcross: Even if an evacuation order gets to affected people quickly, there’s this expectation that most people will get in their car and they will leave. How does that expectation leave people with disabilities in even greater danger?
Cornett: Yeah, that’s another huge issue for people with disabilities, especially when it happens quickly like the LA fires. People think evacuating is getting in the car, driving quickly away to safety.
But many people with disabilities don’t have access to a car, or they can’t physically drive a vehicle. They’re totally reliant on others to transport them to safety. So just providing that notice is not an adequate way to ensure that we are saving the lives of people with disabilities in the way it needs to be done.
Norcross: Is there an event here in Oregon that you can point to that shows us how situated we are to help people with disabilities when disaster strikes, good or bad?
Cornett: Here in Oregon, we’ve seen hundreds die or have serious injuries because of heat in the past few years. Climate change is real. We live in a warming environment, and it’s having a really disproportionate impact on seniors, on people with disabilities and people with underlying medical conditions.
And I’ll forever be haunted by a story of a 30-something year old woman who was dropped off by a medical transport company, but didn’t wait in their air-conditioned van to make sure that she got inside her home where there was air conditioning. Instead, they took off. She wandered around for hours before dying of heat, just 50 feet from her adult foster home.
These deaths are preventable with the right planning, the right strategy for mitigation, the right preparedness, and a response plan that complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act and respects the needs of people with disabilities.
-
Science1 week ago
Metro will offer free rides in L.A. through Sunday due to fires
-
Technology1 week ago
Amazon Prime will shut down its clothing try-on program
-
Technology1 week ago
L’Oréal’s new skincare gadget told me I should try retinol
-
Technology4 days ago
Super Bowl LIX will stream for free on Tubi
-
Business6 days ago
Why TikTok Users Are Downloading ‘Red Note,’ the Chinese App
-
Technology2 days ago
Nintendo omits original Donkey Kong Country Returns team from the remaster’s credits
-
Politics1 week ago
Trump to be sentenced in New York criminal trial
-
Culture2 days ago
American men can’t win Olympic cross-country skiing medals — or can they?