Connect with us

Oregon

Bill banning rent increases higher than 10% clears final hurdle in Oregon House – Oregon Capital Chronicle

Published

on

Bill banning rent increases higher than 10% clears final hurdle in Oregon House – Oregon Capital Chronicle


Many Oregon tenants will see rent hikes capped at 10% in high-inflation years under a bill headed for Gov. Tina Kotek’s desk.

Senate Bill 611, which cleared the House on Saturday on a 32-18 vote with every Republican opposed, aims to prevent a repeat of the nearly 15% rent increases landlords were allowed to charge this year. A 2019 state law capped rent at 7% plus inflation, but high inflation last year resulted in tenants around the state seeing up to 14.7% increases. 

Rep. Andrea Valderrama, D-Portland, said the bill was necessary to help Oregon families stay in their homes. It would help renters immediately while the Legislature continues to work on long-term solutions to the housing crisis, she said. 

“This cannot be an either-or approach,” she said. “We can protect Oregonians from unreasonable rent increases and fix our housing supply crisis.”

Advertisement

Rep. Paul Evans, D-Monmouth, said he struggled over how to vote, but ultimately voted for the measure. It addresses a symptom of the housing crisis and a shrinking middle class, but not the cause, he said. 

“While I don’t believe this bill is actually going to help a whole lot, it might help a few,” he said. 

The debate highlighted the high rate of rental ownership in the state Capitol, where passive income from owning property makes it possible for lawmakers to afford to be in Salem for months each year on their $35,000 legislative salary. Portland Rep. Thuy Tran, one landlord, was one of only two Democrats who voted against the measure. 

“Let the market work itself out,” Tran said. 

But Rep. Janelle Bynum, D-Clackamas, described how she’s helping her college-aged children pay rent in Eugene and Atlanta at an unaffordable $1,400 and $1,700 per month. Bynum also owns four McDonald’s restaurants in the Portland area, and she has homeless people sleeping on her restaurant property.

Advertisement

“I believe to some extent in the free market, but I believe our market is broken,” Bynum said. 

The 2019 rent control law caused many landlords to choose to increase rent by the maximum allowed each year, said Rep. Kim Wallan, R-Medford. Wallan said she has only increased rent at the property she owns by $100 monthly during the past five years, she said. 

“I understand the impulse to do the simple thing,” Wallan said. “I understand the impulse just to get ourselves out of this emergency. But we got ourselves in this emergency.” 

Another lawmaker who owned rentals, Republican Rep. Virgle Osborne of Roseburg, said he sold his rental properties in March because of Oregon’s rental laws. He evicted his tenants to sell, and new owners listed the properties at 40% higher rents than Osborne charged, he said. 

Sen. Wlnsvey Campos, D-Aloha, introduced the measure to cap rent increases at no more than 8% or 3% plus inflation, whichever was lower. But strong objections from landlords resulted in a series of compromises, ending with an agreement that kept the status quo except for a 10% cap. 

Advertisement

The state’s rent control law only applies to buildings once they’re 15 years old, and it doesn’t apply to subsidized housing. Landlords can raise rent between tenants as high as they want.

Almost 40% of Oregonians rent their homes, according to U.S. census data. 

Rep. Kevin Mannix, R-Salem, said it sends a message to homebuilders and real estate investors that they’re going to have a hard time. Oregon already has land use laws that make getting permits for new homes or apartments expensive and time-consuming, he said, and builders have to pay high system development charges to cover infrastructure costs. 

“We’re going to tell the potential property owner ‘We’re going to put the screws to you, and make it harder for you to provide housing,’” Mannix said.

Advertisement

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Oregon

Progressive Oregon district attorney ousted by tough-on-crime challenger

Published

on

Progressive Oregon district attorney ousted by tough-on-crime challenger


A centrist district attorney candidate in Oregon has ousted his incumbent progressive opponent after running on a tough-on-crime platform.

Nathan Vasquez previously served as a deputy prosecutor to Multnomah County District Attorney Mike Schmidt. Vasquez won Tuesday’s nonpartisan primary election after returns showed him receiving more than 50% of the vote.

Vasquez, who was endorsed by several police groups, said Schmidt conceded the election during a Wednesday phone call. He was a prosecutor in the DA’s office for more than 20 years. 

“I want to thank him for his professionalism and service to our community,” Vasquez said in a post on his campaign Facebook page. “I look forward to working with my colleagues in the DA’s office, with community partners, and with the public to help build a safer Multnomah County for all of us.”

Advertisement

SUSPECTED PORTLAND SERIAL KILLER HAD TRIED TO CHOKE POLICE K-9, WAS RELEASED FROM PRISON EARLY: REPORT

Nathan Vasquez, left, has ousted Multnomah County District Attorney Mike Schmidt in Oregon. (Vasquez for DA; Getty Images)

Schmidt came into office days before the police killing of George Floyd in Minnesota and the calls for changes to the criminal justice system that came amid racial justice protests in Portland and other cities nationwide. Other DAs ushered into office in liberal bastions like San Francisco and Seattle around the same time have since faced setbacks amid frustrations from the public over crime.

Generally, those district attorneys have supported finding alternatives to imprisonment and have refrained from prosecuting low-level crimes to reduce incarceration rates and address social inequities in the criminal justice system.

Critics have said such policies enable criminals and public safety risks.  

Advertisement

PORTLAND SERIAL KILLER FEARS: VICTIMS’ PARENTS SPEAK OUT AFTER ‘CAREER CRIMINAL’ NAMED PERSON OF INTEREST

Mike Schmidt and Portland protests split image

Portland, Ore., right, one of the most reliably blue cities in the U.S., has ousted its incumbent district attorney, Mike Schmidt, left, with a former Republican in Nathan Vasquez [not pictured]. (Getty Images)

Shortly after taking office, racial justice demonstrations gripped Portland as chaos erupted on the streets nearly every night for months. Schmidt announced that his office wouldn’t prosecute protesters unless they were arrested for deliberate property damage, theft, or the use or threat of force against another person. Interfering with a police officer, disorderly conduct and criminal trespass were cited as examples of cases his office would decline.

Vasquez announced the policy, as well as Schmidt’s support for a 2020 voter-approved measure that decriminalized the possession of small amounts of drugs. Earlier this year, state lawmakers rolled back the law and restored criminal penalties for so-called “personal use” possession amid one of the nation’s largest spikes in overdose fatalities. 

Schmidt supported the move. 

Person drops off their vote-by-mail ballot at a dropbo

A person drops off their vote-by-mail ballot at a dropbox in Pioneer Square during primary voting in Portland, Ore.  (AP Photo/Jenny Kane)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

In his message, Vasquez said he was “committed to ending open-air drug dealing and drug use while helping connect individuals to treatment, to rebuilding the broken relationships between the DA’s office and the community, and to ensuring that victims are the number one priority of my office.”

Fox News Digital has reached out to Schmidt’s campaign. 

The Associated Press contributed to this report.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Oregon

Bend losing, Portland and Eugene winning: Large Oregon districts see mixed results from school levies

Published

on

Bend losing, Portland and Eugene winning: Large Oregon districts see mixed results from school levies


Ballots are processed at the Washington County Elections Office in Hillsboro, Ore., May 21, 2024.

Kristyna Wentz-Graff / OPB

Three of Oregon’s largest school districts had measures on the May ballot to either establish or renew levies in their communities.

Portland Public and Eugene appeared to have gotten a “yes” from voters. But others weren’t so lucky.

Advertisement

According to initial results this week, voters in the Bend-La Pine School District are rejecting a new tax levy that district leaders say is needed to maintain class sizes and staffing, add career technical education programs and more.

Bend-La Pine administrators warned voters before the election that if the levy didn’t pass, they’d have to eliminate up to 180 positions over the next two years, and average class sizes would likely increase by four students. They said counseling and support services would be stretched thin, and there would be a 30% reduction in building budgets.

Scott Maben, director of communications for the district, told OPB it’s too early to say if the school board will go back to voters any time soon.

“Superintendent [Steven] Cook will discuss the outcome of this election with the board at an upcoming board meeting,” he wrote in an email Wednesday, “possibly June 18.”

Maben said the district needs time to analyze the results of the election and listen to feedback from voters who did not support the levy request. He said there may be a variety of reasons it didn’t pass, and they want to look into that closely.

Advertisement

However, he acknowledged it wasn’t close. Results as of Wednesday morning showed about 57% of the votes cast were in opposition.

“That’s a clear message that voters are not in favor of adding a local option levy in our district at this time,” Maben said. “We certainly are disappointed in these results, as we believe the priorities we had identified for levy funding are important and deserving of additional investment.”

Local taxes have become a key source of funding for many Oregon schools. That’s especially important this year as districts across the region face tens of millions of dollars in budget deficits. Educators are losing their jobs, and in some cases, entire schools or districts are at risk of being closed.

It’s often easier for districts to renew existing levies — such as those in Portland and Eugene — than to introduce a new tax. In some parts of the state, passing taxes to support schools may fail repeatedly before a district is able to win the support of a majority of voters, as happened in the small Gervais district this election.

Maben said leaders in Bend-La Pine are also focusing their efforts on securing adequate state funding for the 2025-27 biennium.

Advertisement

“We are already deeply engaged in communicating with state leaders regarding the challenges of meeting the needs of our students with the current state of education funding in Oregon,” he wrote. “We will intensify these efforts as we approach the next legislative session.”

Maben said the future financial difficulties caused by the failed levy are separate from current budget conversations.

The school district has already built its proposed budget for the 2024-25 school year, which, like many districts across the state, reduces staffing and other spending. That budget will go to the school board next month for final approval.

The budget for the upcoming school year eliminates close to 60 positions across the district by eliminating vacant positions — rather than through layoffs. Maben said additional cuts may be necessary for the following 2025-26 school year as a result of the vote, but those conversations will be part of the budget process starting next January.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Oregon

THIRTEEN conservative counties in Oregon approve ballot measures for SECESSION vote that would see them join non-woke Idaho – as they issue list of demands

Published

on

THIRTEEN conservative counties in Oregon approve ballot measures for SECESSION vote that would see them join non-woke Idaho – as they issue list of demands


  • 13 liberal Oregon counties support moving to Conservative Idaho
  • Crook County became latest to approve Greater Idaho Measures on Tuesday
  • Supporters want to escape progressive politics and high taxes  

Advertisement

Thirteen fed-up counties in liberal Oregon have voted in support of measures to start negotiations to secede from the state and join conservative Idaho.

Crook County became the latest to approve the ‘Greater Idaho Measure’ following a vote on Tuesday.

The proposal seeks to move the Oregon border 200 miles to the west, meaning that 14 counties and several partial counties would fall under Idaho state lines.

Organizers behind the Greater Idaho movement say east Oregonians are being alienated by the state’s progressive policies which they blame for high crime rates.

They claim a move to Idaho would allow residents to take advantage of lower taxation and provide better representation and governance.

Advertisement

More than a dozen fed-up liberal counties in eastern Oregon have voted in support of measures to start negotiations to secede from the state and join conservative Idaho 

 ‘The Oregon/Idaho line was established 163 years ago and is now outdated,’ the movement’s website states.

‘It makes no sense in its current location because it doesn’t match the location of the cultural divide in Oregon.

‘We want an economy that is not held back by Oregon regulations and taxes, including environmental regulations. 

‘We’ll still have federal and Idaho regulations, and that’s plenty. Idaho knows how to respect rural counties and their livelihoods.’

Measure 7-86, as it was known, passed by 53 percent in Crook County in the latest boost to the Greater Idaho campaign.

Advertisement

However, the vote is not legislatively binding and just means residents are in favor of informing state and federal representatives that they support negotiations to annex part of Oregon.

‘The voters of eastern Oregon have spoken loudly and clearly about their desire to see border talks move forward,’ Greater Idaho Executive Director Matt McCaw said.

 ‘With this latest result in Crook County, there’s no excuse left for the Legislature and Governor to continue to ignore the people’s wishes.

The proposal, pictured, seeks to move the Oregon border 200 miles to the west, meaning that 14 counties and several partial counties would fall under Idaho state lines

The proposal, pictured, seeks to move the Oregon border 200 miles to the west, meaning that 14 counties and several partial counties would fall under Idaho state lines

Organizers behind the Greater Idaho movement say east Oregonians are being alienated by the state's progressive policies, which they blame for high crime rates

Organizers behind the Greater Idaho movement say east Oregonians are being alienated by the state’s progressive policies, which they blame for high crime rates

‘We call on the Governor, Speaker of the House, and Senate President to sit down with us and discuss next steps towards changing governance for eastern Oregonians, as well as for the legislature to begin holding hearings on what a potential border change will look like.’

‘For the last three years we’ve been going directly to voters and asking them what they want for their state government,’ President Mike Carter added. 

Advertisement

‘What they’re telling us through these votes is that they want their leaders to move the border. 

‘In our system, the people are the ones in charge, and it’s time for the leaders representing them to follow through.’

The last time the Oregon state line was moved was 1958, although it was a minor adjustment.

According to NewsNation, a recent poll found that people in Idaho also strongly support the proposal.

Similar schemes have been proposed elsewhere in the country, including in Texas where last year a state senator introduced a bill to allow for a vote on Texit.

Advertisement
Crook County became the 13th to approve the Greater Idaho Measure following a vote on Tuesday

Crook County became the 13th to approve the Greater Idaho Measure following a vote on Tuesday

Within the state itself, the wealthy Austin enclave of Lost Creek, saw an overwhelming majority of 91 percent of residents vote to break away from the city during a May 4 election. 

Meanwhile, several counties in Illinois have previously voted to move to another state and parts of Colorado have expressed interest in joining Wyoming. 

Last year Georgia representative Marjorie Taylor-Green tweeted that the US needed a ‘divorce’ between blue and red states.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending