Connect with us

New Mexico

Monsoon offers promising start for New Mexico farmers

Published

on

Monsoon offers promising start for New Mexico farmers


After fretting for months about whether or not a much-needed monsoon would arrive, growers and water managers are exhaling a collective sigh of reduction.

Now they’re wanting skyward for his or her subsequent want: that the rains preserve coming.

Ever the realists, those that make their residing eyeing water flows or tilling the earth say the unusually early and heavy rains are a promising begin however there’s nonetheless an extended summer season rising season forward.

Advertisement

They know within the midst of a two-decade megadrought, reduction will be short-lived.

“It gave us a break; we had been simply operating out of water,” mentioned Glen Duggins, who owns a 400-acre farm in Lemitar, a village close to Socorro. “We’ve obtained an extended methods to go. We don’t know the longer term.”

The center Rio Grande Valley is a big a part of the state’s $3 billion agricultural trade, and final 12 months offers a stark illustration of how rapidly nature can flip towards growers.

After some first rate summer season rains final 12 months, the climate dried up and depleted river flows, compelling the Center Rio Grande Conservancy District to finish the irrigation season a month early on Oct. 1.

Duggins, who sits on the irrigation district’s board, was one in every of two members to vote towards the early shutdown. Two troublesome, dry years in a row have made him extra guarded.

Advertisement

The U.S. Drought Monitor exhibits the rains have eased the dry situations of a pair months in the past. However a lot of the state, together with the center valley, remains to be mired in excessive or distinctive drought.

Guarded optimism This 12 months, Duggins mentioned he’s rising solely chile and alfalfa, forgoing vegetable crops equivalent to corn, tomatoes, inexperienced beans and black-eyed peas. He’s reducing again his crop combine in response to a possible river water scarcity and a scarcity of obtainable area employees, he mentioned.

He can faucet groundwater as a backup supply, however operating the wells is rather more costly — costing him an extra $500 a day, he mentioned.

Water managers even have a wait-and-see angle however say they’re grateful for the advantages the monsoon has delivered to date.

The rainstorms have crammed the Rio Grande’s dry stretches shaped throughout an arid winter and spring introduced on by La Niña, a Pacific Ocean climate sample that pushes precipitation north, inflicting drier-than-normal situations within the Southwest.

Advertisement

This La Niña — the second in a row — dissipated in late spring, clearing the best way for atmospheric situations to funnel heavy moisture to New Mexico within the type of rainstorms that replenished the river.

“What a beautiful begin it’s,” mentioned Rolf Schmidt-Petersen, Interstate Stream Fee director, referring to the monsoon. “The river is again to being steady. General, very helpful to the panorama.”

The quantity of stormwater flowing into rivers is an indication the heavy rains — a minimum of for now — have dampened the dry soil that beforehand absorbed a lot of the runoff from snowpacks and rain, he mentioned.

Prolonged forecasts name for above-average rainfall over the following 14 days, which is encouraging, however the strong precipitation should preserve going into September, Schmidt-Peterson mentioned.

An irrigation water supervisor agreed, saying the great early soar has made him cautiously optimistic.

Advertisement

“That is good, however it would flip again the opposite method if the rain doesn’t proceed in some form of semi-regular foundation,” mentioned Jason Casuga, CEO and chief engineer for the conservancy district.

The rain doused crops, enabling farmers to attract much less water from the river to irrigate, Casuga mentioned. But when the rains cease for per week or two, the river will rapidly drop to a decrease degree, he mentioned.

Federal help falls quick

Casuga mentioned the district has consumed a lot of the federal water it expects to obtain this summer season to reinforce irrigation, so there’s nothing additional to assist carry it by means of.

He was referring to the San Juan-Chama water the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation allocates yearly to regional customers, together with irrigators, plus Santa Fe, Albuquerque and Native pueblos.

This water originates within the San Juan River basin and would movement into the Colorado River however is diverted to the Rio Grande by means of a posh system of dams and tunnels referred to as the San Juan-Chama Venture.

Advertisement

This water is supplemental for the conservancy district, which primarily depends on the Rio Grande’s pure or “native” water.

The district has obtained 9,342 acre-feet or roughly 3 billion gallons, based on Bureau knowledge. An acre-foot is sufficient to provide two or three households for a 12 months.

Casuga mentioned he would really like the district to obtain extra San Juan-Chama water as a cushion however will take what he can get.

Customers are receiving roughly 60 % of their full allocation attributable to depleted river flows. Researchers say human-driven local weather change is inflicting hotter, drier climate and elevated evaporation, compounding the Southwest’s megadrought.

The district additionally should wrestle with different ongoing challenges.

Advertisement

Reservoirs all through the state have reached critically low ranges after twenty years of drought, so there isn’t any reserve to faucet in a scarcity.

The district additionally has no place to retailer native water for backup — attributable to El Vado reservoir being closed through the dam’s renovation — and should funnel water downstream to repay a large debt to Texas and assist New Mexico meet its obligations below a multi-state water-sharing settlement generally known as the Rio Grande Compact.

New Mexico began the 12 months owing Texas 127,000 acre-feet of water — about 41 billion gallons.

Ideally, the rain will preserve falling in regular, reasonable doses and never within the heavy downpours that pelted the Center Rio Grande Valley prior to now week, Duggins mentioned.

“We began pumping water out,” he mentioned. “We had far more than we would have liked. It crammed our fields thrice.”

Advertisement

Extreme rain may cause “root rot” in crops, he mentioned, which doesn’t present up for a number of weeks. He hopes they drained the crops rapidly sufficient to stop this blight, he mentioned.

Duggins mentioned this 12 months he fallowed 35 acres by means of a program that paid him $425 for each acre he didn’t irrigate.

This 12 months, 190 irrigators fallowed about 2,554 acres — a big enhance from final 12 months’s 44 irrigators fallowing 720 acres, mentioned Casey Ish, the conservancy district’s water useful resource specialist.

The water that’s saved might be used to spice up river ranges to guard endangered species such because the silvery minnow, Ish mentioned.

The federal authorities paid $300 per acre, and the district chipped in $125 for this program, whose sole intention is aiding endangered species, Ish mentioned. Subsequent 12 months, the $15 million the Legislature accredited for fallowing might be used to extend the water despatched downstream to Elephant Butte Reservoir, the place Texas attracts its water below the settlement.

Advertisement

Though farmers have at all times relied on rain, they’ve discovered themselves relying on a monsoon extra typically in recent times to avert a looming disaster. Local weather analysis signifies the scenario is more likely to recur because the Southwest grows extra arid, prolonging droughts and rising their severity.

Schmidt-Petersen mentioned a minimum of 80 % of the rivers’ water originates within the excessive mountains — snowpack and alpine watersheds — and the remaining comes from the summer season monsoons.

These sources are producing much less water whereas the runoff soaks into the drought-parched panorama and evaporates extra, compounding points for the state’s already variable however principally dry local weather, Schmidt-Petersen mentioned.

Farmers might be among the many primary customers affected, he added.

“That’s a fairly vital hit,” he mentioned.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

New Mexico

New Mexico supreme court strikes down local abortion pill restrictions

Published

on

New Mexico supreme court strikes down local abortion pill restrictions


The New Mexico supreme court late on Thursday ruled against several local ordinances in the state that aim to restrict distribution of the abortion pill.

In a unanimous opinion, the court said the ordinances invaded the legislature’s authority to regulate reproductive care.

“Our legislature granted to counties and municipalities all powers and duties not inconsistent with the laws of New Mexico. The ordinances violate this core precept and invade the legislature’s authority to regulate access to and provision of reproductive healthcare,” the court wrote in its opinion by the justice Shannon Bacon.

It declined to address whether the ordinances violated the state’s constitutional protections.

Advertisement

Abortion is legal in New Mexico, which has become a destination for women seeking abortions from Texas, especially, and other states that have banned the procedure following the US supreme court ruling in 2022 ending a woman’s constitutional right to abortion and handing powers over the issue to individual states.

Following that ruling, leaders of New Mexico’s Roosevelt and Lea counties and the towns of Clovis and Hobbs, all on the Texas border, passed ordinances seeking to stop abortion clinics from receiving or sending mifepristone, a pill taken with another drug to perform a medication abortion, and other abortion-related materials in the mail. Medication abortions account for more than half of all US abortions. Last June the supreme court upheld access to the drugs.

The ordinances invoked the federal Comstock Act, a 19th-century “anti-vice” law against mailing abortifacients, which are drugs that induce abortion, and said that clinics must comply with the law.

Under Roosevelt county’s ordinance, any person other than a government employee could bring a civil lawsuit and seek damages of at least $100,000 for each violation of the Comstock Act.

The New Mexico supreme court admonished this, saying that creating a private right of action and damages award was “clearly intended to punish protected conduct”.

Advertisement

The state attorney general, Raúl Torrez, praised the court’s ruling on Thursday, saying that the core of the argument was that state laws pre-empted any action by local governments to engage in activities that would infringe on the constitutional rights of citizens.

“The bottom line is simply this: abortion access is safe and secure in New Mexico,” he said. “It’s enshrined in law by the recent ruling by the New Mexico supreme court and thanks to the work of the New Mexico legislature.”

The New Mexico house speaker, Javier Martínez, called access to healthcare a basic fundamental right in New Mexico.

“It doesn’t take a genius to understand the statutory framework that we have. Local governments don’t regulate healthcare in New Mexico. It is up to the state,” the Albuquerque Democrat said.

Opposition to abortion runs deep in New Mexico communities along the border with Texas, however, which has one of the most restrictive bans in the US.

Advertisement

But Democrats, who control every statewide elected office in New Mexico and hold majorities in the state house and senate, have moved to shore up access to the service.

In 2021, the New Mexico legislature repealed a dormant 1969 statute that outlawed most abortion procedures as felonies, ensuring access to abortion even after the Roe v Wade reversal.

And in 2023, the Democratic New Mexico governor, Michelle Lujan Grisham, signed a bill that overrides local ordinances aimed at limiting abortion access and enacted a shield law that protects abortion providers from investigations by other states.

In September, construction began on a state-funded reproductive health and abortion clinic in southern New Mexico that will cater to local residents and people who travel from neighboring states.

The new clinic should open in 2026 to provide services ranging from medical and procedural abortions to contraception, cervical cancer screenings and education about adoptions.

Advertisement

It was not immediately clear whether the ruling can be appealed in federal court. The New Mexico supreme court opinion explicitly declined to address conflicts with federal law, basing its decision solely on state provisions.

The Texas-based attorney Jonathan Mitchell, a former Texas solicitor general and architect of that state’s strict abortion ban, said he looked forward “to litigating these issues in other states and bringing the meaning of the federal Comstock Act to the supreme court of the United States”.

Reuters and the Associated Press contributed reporting



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Mexico

Alec Baldwin sues New Mexico prosecutors, investigators for civil rights violations

Published

on

Alec Baldwin sues New Mexico prosecutors, investigators for civil rights violations


play

Alec Baldwin, whose involuntary manslaughter case was dismissed last summer over suppressed evidence, is taking the fatal 2021 “Rust” set shooting back to the court room.

The actor on Thursday filed a civil lawsuit in Santa Fe County District Court alleging prosecutors violated his civil rights and defamed him. The defendants named in the filing included special prosecutor Kari Morrissey, personnel within the district attorney’s office for New Mexico’s First Judicial District and members of the Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Office.

Advertisement

The complaint detailed Baldwin’s claims that prosecutors and investigators “conspired to procure a groundless indictment against Baldwin” by not following the proper criminal process and also intentionally kept exculpatory evidence from the defense.

In a statement to USA TODAY, Morrissey said, “In October 2023 the prosecution team became aware that Mr. Baldwin intended to file a retaliatory civil lawsuit. We look forward to our day in court.”

USA TODAY has reached out to lawyers for Baldwin as well as the DA’s office for comment. The sheriff’s office declined to comment.

Last summer, Baldwin’s lawyer Alex Spiro forewarned the sheriff’s office and prosecutor in letters sent to the parties on July 12 to preserve evidence for “potential for future litigation,” according to copies obtained at the time by USA TODAY.

Advertisement

The actor and producer’s attorney advised Morrissey and Santa Fe County Sheriff Adan Mendoza to preserve all “devices, hard drives, emails, text messages, and other electronic communications” in addition to “documents, records, electronically stored information (‘ESI’), and other materials and data existing in any form whatsoever, that are actually or potentially relevant or relate in any way to the investigation(s) and/or prosecution(s) conducted by the State in connection with the death of Halyna Hutchins.”

The filing comes nearly six months after First Judicial District Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer abruptly dismissed the criminal case against Baldwin on the grounds that prosecutors and law enforcement withheld evidence that might be favorable to the actor’s defense. In October, she upheld her dismissal; though prosecutors appealed the judge’s decision in November, they withdrew the notice of appeal the following month.

Baldwin’s criminal charge stemmed from an Oct. 21, 2021, incident in which Baldwin’s prop gun, which he said he’d been told did not contain live ammunition, discharged during a rehearsal for the movie, killing 42-year-old cinematographer Halyna Hutchins and wounding director Joel Souza.

Advertisement

‘No verdict’ can ‘undo the trauma’ of criminal case against Alec Baldwin, lawsuit says

Baldwin’s legal complaint accused New Mexico investigators and prosecutors of being ” blinded by their desire to convict Alec Baldwin for all the wrong reasons, and at any cost, for the October 2021 accidental shooting of Halyna Hutchins.”

“Defendants sought at every turn to scapegoat Baldwin for the acts and omissions of others, regardless of the evidence or the law,” the filing continued.

Baldwin seeks a jury trial and an award of financial compensation for his “injuries suffered” as well as punitive damages against the defendants.

“Defendants must now be held accountable for their malicious and unlawful pursuit of Baldwin,” the lawsuit states. “Although no verdict in this civil case can undo the trauma the State’s threat of conviction and incarceration has inflicted, Alec Baldwin has filed this action to hold Defendants responsible for their appalling violations of the laws that governed their work.”

Advertisement

Why was Alec Baldwin’s involuntary manslaughter case dismissed?

The conclusion of Baldwin’s case with the state of New Mexico arrived more than two years after the on-set tragedy. Sommer dismissed the charge with prejudice, meaning prosecutors cannot refile the same claim.

Baldwin’s lawyers alleged in their filing that Santa Fe sheriffs and state prosecutors “concealed” evidence that could be linked to the source of the bullet that killed Hutchins. Prosecutors and sheriffs argued the evidence had no relevance or value to Baldwin’s case.

The judge reprimanded Morrissey and her team as “they have continued to fail to disclose critical evidence to the defendant.”

“The state’s willful withholding of this information was intentional and deliberate,” Sommer said. “If this conduct does not rise to the level of bad faith, it certainly comes so near to bad faith as to show signs of scorching.”

Advertisement

Testimony revealed withheld evidence in ‘Rust’ case

On July 12, Baldwin’s lawyers said the Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Office was in possession of live rounds they argued might be connected to the one that killed Hutchins but failed to list them as evidence in the “Rust” investigation file or disclose their existence to defense lawyers.

On July 11, testimony revealed Troy Teske, a friend of “Rust” armorer Hannah Gutierrez-Reed’s stepfather, had delivered Colt .45 live rounds to the sheriff’s office on March 6. Baldwin’s team claimed this was evidence that could have established a connection to Seth Kenney, the prop supplier for “Rust.”

Baldwin’s attorneys alleged the rounds were evidence that the bullet that killed Hutchins came from Kenney. Kenney has denied supplying live ammunition to the production and has not been charged in the case.

Baldwin’s team has blamed Gutierrez-Reed, who is serving 18 months in prison for involuntary manslaughter, and first assistant director Dave Halls for negligence that led to Hutchins’ death. Meanwhile, prosecutors argued Baldwin handled the gun irresponsibly, exhibited “bullyish behavior on set” and changed his story to cast blame on others.

Advertisement

Contributing: Andrew Hay, Reuters



Source link

Continue Reading

New Mexico

New Mexico Supreme Court Strikes Down Local Abortion Restrictions

Published

on

New Mexico Supreme Court Strikes Down Local Abortion Restrictions


By Jasper Ward (Reuters) – The New Mexico Supreme Court on Thursday ruled against several local ordinances in the state that aim to restrict distribution of the abortion pill. In a unanimous opinion, the court said the ordinances invade the legislature’s authority to regulate reproductive care. “Our …



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending