Connect with us

Nevada

Some 2024 General Election takeaways: Bad for libraries, good for Gov. Veto • Nevada Current

Published

on

Some 2024 General Election takeaways: Bad for libraries, good for Gov. Veto • Nevada Current


The presidential election was far from the only thing being decided by Nevada voters last week. Here’s a look at some other takeaways that have emerged as the dust settled on the 2024 general.

Lombardo remains Gov. Veto

Democrats appear to have slipped further from obtaining a veto-proof supermajority, though they remain in healthy control of the Nevada State Legislature, unofficial election results show.

Going into the general election, Democrats had a supermajority in the Assembly and were one seat shy of a supermajority in the Senate.

In the Nevada State Senate, where 10 of 21 seats were up this year, the makeup will remain the same as it was going into Election Day.

Advertisement

Democrats successfully flipped Senate District 15. Democrat Angie Taylor, who served one term in the state Assembly, defeated Republican Mike Ginsburg for a seat formerly represented by Republican Heidi Seevers O’Gara (formerly Seevers Gansert), who opted not to run for re-election.

That gain appears to have been offset by Senate District 11. As of Monday morning, the Associated Press, which the Nevada Current uses for race projections, had not yet called the SD11 race between Democratic incumbent Dallas Harris and Republican challenger Lori Rogich. But Harris was trailing Rogich by around 850 votes.

State Sen. Carrie Buck, a Republican seen as vulnerable in competitive Senate District 5, fended off her Democratic challenger.

If current results hold, Democrats will be two seats shy of a supermajority in the upper chamber.

In the Nevada State Assembly, Republicans appear to have successfully broken the Democratic supermajority by defending their 14 seats and flipping one seat red.

Advertisement

Republican Rebecca Edgeworth defeated Democrat Sharifa Wahab in Assembly District 35, according to the AP. Edgeworth, who raised significantly more funding than Wahab, was part of a cadre of candidates backed by Gov. Joe Lombardo.

AD35 was previously represented by Democrat Michelle Gorelow, who opted not to run for re-election amid controversy about her ‘yes’ vote on a funding bill that benefitted a nonprofit she later took a job with.

Other competitive open seats will see new representatives but not switch parties. Republicans failed to flip Assembly District 29. There, Democrat Joe Dalia defeated Republican Annette Dawson Owens. Similarly, Democrats failed to flip Assembly District 4. There, Republican Lisa Cole defeated Democrat Ryan Hampton.

Republican Assemblywoman Heidi Kasama and Democratic Assemblywomen Elaine Marzola, Selena La Rue Hatch, and Shea Backus all successfully defended their competitive seats from challengers.

Meanwhile, Democratic Majority Floor Leader Sandra Jauregui appears to be on track to squeak out a win over Republican challenger Rafael Arroyo in Assembly District 41. The race has not been called by the AP but Jauregui is up by around 350 votes.

Advertisement

Jauregui’s race is one of two Assembly races the AP had not called as of Monday morning. The other, Assembly District 12, is between Democratic incumbent Max Carter and Republican challenger Nancy Roecker. Carter is up by less than 300 votes.

If current results hold, Democrats will be one seat shy of a supermajority in the Assembly.

According to Ballotpedia, Nevada is one of a dozen states with a divided government, meaning neither major political party controls both chambers of the state legislature and the governorship.

Moms for Liberty headed to school board

The Clark County School Board will soon have two trustees associated with Moms for Liberty — an advocacy group known for protesting vaccine mandates, advocating against diversity equity and inclusion policies, and pushing anti-trans narratives.

Lorena Biassotti, who co-founded the Moms for Liberty Clark County chapter, and Lydia Dominguez, a former member of the chapter who left the group in the weeks before the general election, were both elected to the nonpartisan board. Both defeated former teachers — Kamilah Bywaters and Eileen Eady, respectively.

Advertisement

Biassotti and Dominguez will be sworn in as trustees in early January.

Joining them will be political newcomers Emily Stevens and Tameka Henry. Stevens expressed some conservative positions on educational issues like charter and private schools but is not associated with Moms for Liberty and did not campaign on cultural issues like banning books and trans athletes. Henry, a vocal critic of Moms for Liberty backed by progressive groups, ousted School Board President Evelyn Garcia Morales.

The Clark County School Board has seven voting members and four appointed members. The newly seated school board will almost immediately be thrust into the process of selecting Clark County School District’s next superintendent.

Applications for the district’s top job are being accepted until Feb. 5, according to a timeline posted by CCSD. The school board is expected to conduct its first round of interviews on Feb. 17, with semi-finalists interviewed on March 5 and the top two candidates selected on March 13.

Final interviews are scheduled for the week of March 17, with the official hiring scheduled for March 27.

Advertisement

Also in education…

  • Biassoti and Dominguez secured victories in the general election, but a third Moms for Liberty candidate fell far short of being elected. Tim Underwood, who told the Current that his trans child’s death by suicide solidified his decision to fight trans-inclusive policies within public schools, lost to Tricia Braxton in the Nevada State Board of Education District 1.
  • Danielle Ford, who served one term as a Clark County School Board trustee before losing re-election, won a seat on the State Board of Education. Ford defeated Rene Cantu in District 3. Cantu currently represents District 2 on the board but due to redistricting that took place after the last election now lives in District 3.
  • Nevada Question 1, which asked voters to remove the Board of Regents from the state constitution, failed — 55% no, 45% yes.

Bad day for libraries

The Washoe County Library System is set to lose about a quarter of its current funding after voters in the county rejected a countywide ballot question there.

The library system is anticipating a $4.5 million budget cut, according to News 4, leading to the elimination of 23 staff positions, the system’s entire $1.4 million book budget, and $200,000 of the system’s technology budget in June. Libraries are likely to reduce their weekend and evening hours.

The  ‘Renew Washoe Libraries’ initiative would have continued the dedication of a small percentage of existing tax revenue to public libraries. The failure of the ballot question will not decrease what residents pay, it will simply de-obligate the money to be spent elsewhere.

The shortfall and cuts could be offset by the Washoe County Commission in its general fund budget. An online petition calling for just that is already being circulated.

Meanwhile, voters in Henderson rejected Henderson Library District Question Num. 1, which would have raised property taxes by 2 cents per $100,000 of assessed value to be used to operate and maintain libraries, as well as to build new facilities in newly developed areas of the city.

Advertisement

Henderson residents also rejected additional funding for firefighters.

No, yes, no, yes, yes, yes, yes

Nevada Question 3, which would have switched the state to an open primary/ranked choice system of voting, received more total votes than any of the other six statewide ballot questions, according to unofficial vote totals as of Monday morning.

This year, Question 3, which failed, was the most voted-on ballot measure, receiving more total votes than other high-profile questions on voter identification requirements and abortion rights. Question 3 received 1.372 million total votes, about 3,000 more than Question 7, the voter ID measure which passed and received 1.369 million total votes.

The Nevada State Republican Party took strong positions on both questions, opposing Question 3 and supporting Question 7.

Question 6, which proposes enshrining abortion rights in the state constitution and passed, received the third most total votes. Voters will have to approve it again in 2026 before it becomes part of the constitution.

Advertisement

Question 1, which sought to remove the Board of Regents from the state constitution, failed. The question, which was criticized for being confusing to voters, received the fewest number of total votes. About 55,500 fewer people voted on Question 1 than Question 3.

The remaining three ballot questions — two on removing antiquated language from the state constitution and one exempting diapers from sales tax — all passed.

Voters are not required to weigh in on every race or ballot measure, and many voters opt not to. For comparison, Nevada’s presidential race saw approximately 68,600 more total votes than the most voted-on ballot question.

Every vote matters

Only 63 votes separate incumbent North Las Vegas City Councilwoman Ruth Anderson Garcia and her challenger Robert “Twixx” Taylor in the nonpartisan race, according to unofficial election results posted by the state. That’s equivalent to about one third of 1 percent of votes.

That North Las Vegas City Council race appears to be the closest among this year’s municipal elections. However, it is larger than the 15-vote difference that separated two candidates in the nonpartisan Reno City Council Ward 1 primary earlier this year.

Advertisement

Nevada does not have automatic recounts, no matter how close the election results. Recounts must be requested and paid for by the candidate. They rarely, if ever, result in election results being reversed.



Source link

Nevada

Outdoor tourism grows in Nevada despite Las Vegas Strip visitor decline

Published

on

Outdoor tourism grows in Nevada despite Las Vegas Strip visitor decline


LAS VEGAS (FOX5) — While Strip tourism declined this year, outdoor recreation across Nevada continues to grow, with some areas seeing increased business and new facilities opening to accommodate visitors.

Valley of Fire State Park reached 1 million visitors this year and recently opened a new $30 million visitors center. Lake Mead National Recreation Area also continues to draw tourists, including those taking holiday-themed rafting tours through Black Canyon.

Chad Taylor, director of operations for the Hospitality Division of Guest Services and Hoover Dam Rafting Adventures, calls outdoor recreation an “enormous” boost for the state economy.

Last month, the Nevada Division of Outdoor Recreation (NDOR) released an Economic Impact Analysis finding that outdoor recreation is a $24 billion industry in Nevada, generating $13.7 billion in total economic output, supporting more than 75,000 jobs, and contributing $8.8 billion to the state’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

Advertisement

NDOR reports outdoor recreation has officially surpassed the mining industry in GDP contribution and is rapidly becoming a cornerstone of Nevada’s economic diversification strategy.

The Hoover Dam Rafting Adventure, which has operated for more than four decades, saw slightly lower numbers this year for its 12-mile Colorado River tours starting at the base of the dam. Taylor said the rafting business typically follows Las Vegas tourism trends.

“As Las Vegas tourism increases or decreases, we typically see the same out here for the tour specifically,” Taylor said.

However, other outdoor properties showed growth. Taylor said Lake Mead properties, including Callville Bay, Cottonwood Cove, and Temple Bar, saw increased business this year.

Taylor, who sits on the governor’s advisory board for outdoor tourism, said the state is investing heavily in outdoor recreation infrastructure. Nevada is building Adventure Centers in Northern Nevada and Southern Nevada.

Advertisement

The Southern Nevada Adventure Center, under construction in Boulder City, will serve as a one-stop shop for booking outdoor activities. The facility is expected to open in summer 2026.

“Not only at the federal level, but the state level, the amount of energy and effort that they’ve put into outdoor recreation over the last few years, especially when it comes to the two new adventure centers that they’re building in Northern Nevada and Southern Nevada, they’re doubling down on outdoor recreation,” Taylor said.

The Hoover Dam rafting company continues its holiday-themed tours with Santa through Christmas Eve.

The Hoover Dam rafting company continues its holiday-themed tours with Santa through Christmas Eve.(FOX5)

Reservations can be made at hooverdamraftingadventures.com or by calling (800) 455-3490.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

Bill by Nevada’s Amodei to ramp up mining on public land passes House

Published

on

Bill by Nevada’s Amodei to ramp up mining on public land passes House


The U.S. House passed a bill Thursday put forward by Nevada Rep. Mark Amodei that would reinvigorate mining activity on federal lands.

Amodei, a Republican who represents the state’s top half, described the bill as strengthening the nation’s mineral supply chain and helping to counter China’s dominance with minerals.

“Western states are sitting on a wealth of resources and a critical opportunity to break our dangerous reliance on foreign adversaries while powering our own economy,” he said in a statement.

“The Mining Regulatory Clarity Act … gives domestic mining operations the certainty they need to compete aggressively and win.”

Advertisement

The bill passed 219 to 198. Republicans voted 210 in favor, 1 opposed and 9 not voting. Democrats voted 9 in favor, 197 opposed and 7 not voting. It was one of the House’s last actions before adjourning for the year.

Nevada delegation split on mining bill

Amodei was joined by Las Vegas Democrat Steven Horsford, who co-sponsored the bill in the House.

“Streamlining the hardrock mining process will create good jobs and strengthen our energy sector,” Horsford said.

The state’s other two House members — Democrats Susie Lee and Dina Titus — voted in opposition.

Advertisement

Titus spokesperson Dick Cooper told the Reno Gazette Journal that the congresswoman voted no because the bill would allow for increased dumping of mine waste on public lands.

“It would also allow mining companies to gain permanent rights to occupy public lands and preclude other uses including recreational and cultural uses,” he added.

It now heads to the Senate, where Nevada Democrat Catherine Cortez Masto will work to get it passed.

“This bill is common sense, and it’s key for communities across Nevada that count on mining for their livelihoods,” Cortez Masto said in a social media post.

Sen. Jacky Rosen of Nevada, a Democrat, also supports it. She helped introduce the Senate companion version of Amodei’s bill.

Advertisement

“Nevada is one of the few places in the United States with an abundance of critical minerals and a robust hardrock mining industry,” Rosen said. “The responsible mining of these minerals supports thousands of jobs and will help to strengthen our domestic manufacturing and clean energy supply chains.”

What does Amodei’s Mining Regulatory Clarity Act do?

The bill is a response to a 2022 decision by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals involving the Rosemont Copper Mine in Arizona.

The decision basically meant that mining companies must prove valuable minerals exist on a piece of land before they can dump waste material on it. Called the “mineral validity” requirement, it disrupted decades of precedent.

Amodei’s bill would reverse that and allow the practice to resume of using nearby land for mining waste without proving the land contains commercial deposits — something mining companies say is essential for operating on federal land.

Advertisement

“This legislation ensures the fundamental ability to conduct responsible mining activities on federal lands,” said Rich Nolan, National Mining Association president and CEO, in a statement. “Regulatory certainty, or the lack thereof, will either underpin or undermine efforts to decisively confront our minerals crisis.”

The bill also creates an “Abandoned Hardrock Mine Fund.” Some fees related to mining claims will be used to fund a program to inventory, assess and clean up abandoned hardrock mines.

Environmental groups blast House vote on Mining Regulatory Clarity Act

Some environmental groups campaigned against the bill and described it as choosing corporate interests over people, Native Americans’ rights and the environment.

Lauren Pagel, policy director for Earthworks, said the bill “will remove already-scarce protections for natural resources and sacred cultural sites in U.S. mining law.”

The Center for Biological Diversity said the bill surrenders public lands to mining conglomerates.

Advertisement

“The so-called Mining Regulatory Clarity Act would bypass the validity requirement and grant mining companies — including foreign companies — the statutory right to permanently occupy and indiscriminately use public lands upon approval of a company’s self-written plan of operations,” said the nonprofit conservation organization in an online post.

Mark Robison is the state politics reporter for the Reno Gazette Journal, with occasional forays into other topics. Email comments to mrobison@rgj.com or comment on Mark’s Greater Reno Facebook page.



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

California school district near Nevada caught up in a dispute over transgender athlete policies – WTOP News

Published

on

California school district near Nevada caught up in a dispute over transgender athlete policies – WTOP News


SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — A Lake Tahoe school district is caught between California and Nevada’s competing policies on transgender student…

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — A Lake Tahoe school district is caught between California and Nevada’s competing policies on transgender student athletes, a dispute that’s poised to reorder where the district’s students compete.

High schools in California’s Tahoe-Truckee Unified School District, set in a mountainous, snow-prone area near the border with Nevada, have for decades competed in the Nevada Interscholastic Activities Association, or NIAA. That has allowed sports teams to avoid making frequent and potentially hazardous trips in poor winter weather to competitions farther to the west, district officials say.

But the Nevada association voted in April to require students in sex-segregated sports programs to play on teams that align with their sex assigned at birth — a departure from a previous approach allowing individual schools to set their own standards. The move raised questions for how the Tahoe-Truckee district would remain in the Nevada association while following California law, which says students can play on teams consistent with their gender identity.

Advertisement

Now, California’s Department of Education is requiring the district to join the California Interscholastic Federation, or CIF, by the start of next school year.

District Superintendent Kerstin Kramer said at a school board meeting this week the demand puts the district in a difficult position.

“No matter which authority we’re complying with we are leaving students behind,” she said. “So we have been stuck.”

There are currently no known transgender student athletes competing in high school sports in Tahoe-Truckee Unified, district officials told the education department in a letter. But a former student filed a complaint with the state in June after the board decided to stick with Nevada athletics, Kramer said.

A national debate

The dispute comes amid a nationwide battle over the rights of transgender youth in which states have restricted transgender girls from participating on girls sports teams, barred gender-affirming surgeries for minors and required parents to be notified if a child changes their pronouns at school. At least 24 states have laws barring transgender women and girls from participating in certain sports competitions. Some of the policies have been blocked in court.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, California is fighting the Trump administration in court over transgender athlete policies. President Donald Trump issued an executive order in February aimed at banning transgender women and girls from participating in female athletics. The U.S. Justice Department also sued the California Department of Education in July, alleging its policy allowing transgender girls to compete on girls sports teams violates federal law.

And Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has signedlaws aimed at protecting trans youth, shocked party allies in March when he raised questions on his podcast about the fairness of trans women and girls competing against other female athletes. His office did not comment on the Tahoe-Truckee Unified case, but said Newsom “rejects the right wing’s cynical attempt to weaponize this debate as an excuse to vilify individual kids.”

The state education department said in a statement that all California districts must follow the law regardless of which state’s athletic association they join.

At the Tahoe-Truckee school board meeting this week, some parents and one student said they opposed allowing trans girls to participate on girls teams.

“I don’t see how it would be fair for female athletes to compete against a biological male because they’re stronger, they’re taller, they’re faster,” said Ava Cockrum, a Truckee High School student on the track and field team. “It’s just not fair.”

Advertisement

But Beth Curtis, a civil rights attorney whose children attended schools in Tahoe-Truckee Unified, said the district should fight NIAA from implementing its trans student athlete policy as violating the Nevada Constitution.

Asking for more time

The district has drafted a plan to transition to the California federation by the 2028-2029 school year after state officials ordered it to take action. It’s awaiting the education department’s response.

Curtis doesn’t think the state will allow the district to delay joining CIF, the California federation, another two years, noting the education department is vigorously defending its law against the Trump administration: “They’re not going to fight to uphold the law and say to you at the same time, ‘Okay, you can ignore it for two years.’”

Tahoe-Truckee Unified’s two high schools with athletic programs, which are located about 6,000 feet (1,800 meters) in elevation, compete against both California and Nevada teams in nearby mountain towns — and others more distant and closer to sea level. If the district moves to the California federation, Tahoe-Truckee Unified teams may have to travel more often in bad weather across a risky mountain pass — about 7,000 feet (2,100 meters) in elevation above a lake — to reach schools farther from state lines.

Coleville High School, a small California school in the Eastern Sierra near the Nevada border, has also long been a member of the Nevada association, said Heidi Torix, superintendent of the Eastern Sierra Unified School District. The school abides by California law regarding transgender athletes, Torix said.

Advertisement

The school has not been similarly ordered by California to switch where it competes. The California Department of Education did not respond to requests for comment on whether it’s warned any other districts not in the California federation about possible noncompliance with state policy.

State Assemblymember Heather Hadwick, a Republican representing a large region of northern California bordering Nevada, said Tahoe-Truckee Unified shouldn’t be forced to join the CIF.

“I urge California Department of Education and state officials to fully consider the real-world consequences of this decision—not in theory, but on the ground—where weather, geography, and safety matter,” Hadwick said.

Copyright
© 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, written or redistributed.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending