Connect with us

Nevada

Rural Nevada bets big on cloud seeding, pitting fears of drought against doubts in the science

Published

on

Rural Nevada bets big on cloud seeding, pitting fears of drought against doubts in the science


Open this photo in gallery:

A cloud-seeding generator sits in the dry landscape of Nye Country, Nevada, where local officials hope to generate their own rain to keep up with growing demand for water.Nathan VanderKlippe/The Globe and Mail

When the conditions are just right – winds blowing in the correct direction, temperatures of -5 degrees Celsius aloft and clouds filled with subfreezing water droplets – the generators southwest of Nevada’s Spring Mountains come to life. Burners ignite, sending skyward particles of silver iodide. As they rise into the clouds passing over the Pahrump Valley, those particles can act as what scientists call “ice-forming nuclei,” causing the suspended droplets to freeze into crystals, which are then able to grow into snowflakes big enough to tumble to earth in the nearby mountains.

Cloud-seeding may evoke science fiction, but as a technology it predates the jet age. American chemists and defence scientists began attempting to wring more moisture from the heavens soon after the end of the Second World War.

Now, drought has brought it back to the fore. In the Spring Mountains, local water authorities hope they can prove that cloud-seeding works well enough to provide a dependable new source of water.

Advertisement

Silver iodide particles

provide an additional

surface for cloud moisture

Advertisement

to freeze, causing ice

crystals to form at

high altitudes

-20 to -5˚C

Advertisement

cloud region

The ice crystals

become large and

dense, falling as

Advertisement

snow, hail, or rain

depending on

conditions

Silver iodide is

Advertisement

released from

cloud-seeding

generators in

updrafts below

cloud base

Advertisement

john sopinski/the globe and mail, Source: desert research institute;

open snow; comptroller.texas.gov

Advertisement

Silver iodide particles

provide an additional

surface for cloud moisture

to freeze, causing ice

Advertisement

crystals to form at

high altitudes

-20 to -5˚C

cloud region

Advertisement

The ice crystals

become large and

dense, falling as

snow, hail, or rain

Advertisement

depending on

conditions

Silver iodide is

released from

Advertisement

cloud-seeding

generators in

updrafts below

cloud base

Advertisement

john sopinski/the globe and mail, Source: desert research institute;

open snow; comptroller.texas.gov

Advertisement

Silver iodide particles

provide an additional

surface for cloud moisture

to freeze, causing ice

crystals to form at

Advertisement

high altitudes

-20 to -5˚C

cloud region

Advertisement

The ice crystals

become large and

dense, falling as

snow, hail, or rain

depending on

Advertisement

conditions

Silver iodide is

released from

cloud-seeding

Advertisement

generators in

updrafts below

cloud base

john sopinski/the globe and mail, Source: desert research institute;

Advertisement

open snow; comptroller.texas.gov

Water scarcity threatens livability and livelihoods across the southwestern U.S., an area with a vital agricultural sector that is home to tens of millions. A drought contingency plan for states in the upper Colorado River basin – Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming – lists weather modification as one of its three main responses to the rapidly declining water levels in key reservoirs such as Lake Mead.

The effectiveness of such efforts remains a matter of considerable debate – one scientist has ridiculed “ersatz” successes in the field, while Israel recently abandoned cloud seeding because of its poor results.

Advertisement

But it’s a technology that has crossed the globe: China, its most active practitioner, has boasted construction of a system to generate artificial rain and snow over an area four times the size of Quebec.

The four generators in the shadows of the Spring Mountains form a considerably smaller installation.

Elsewhere in the southwest, water authorities have overseen sophisticated programs to dramatically cut water use.

Nye County, where the Pahrump Valley is situated, has chosen a different path. It has set out to prove that cloud seeding works well enough that the county can be credited with finding a reliable new supply and ultimately secure permission to use more water.

“If this community is going to keep growing, we’re going to have to find more water,” says Dann Weeks, general manager of the Nye County Water District, which includes the Pahrump Valley.

Advertisement
Open this photo in gallery:

Groundwater is running low in parts of the Pahrump Valley, and cloud seeding’s advocates see the process as one of the few affordable options to stop that.Nathan VanderKlippe/The Globe and Mail

The Pahrump Valley occupies a closed basin bereft of rivers to deliver water or carry it away. Instead, some of the precipitation that falls on the area’s fractured rocks percolates down into underground aquifers.

Underground water levels in some parts of the valley have fallen by nearly five metres since 2004, a source of anxiety in an area where life and livelihoods depend on 11,000 domestic wells. Water rights in the area have been issued for three times what can be sustainably used.

The county, with a population of 52,000, has few options to secure more. It cannot rely on hydroelectric dams. A water pipeline could not be built without regulatory resistance and great cost.

So the county’s board of commissioners agreed to spend US$260,000 to extract new water from the sky.

Advertisement

“This is a test program to see what kind of increase can be generated into our groundwater basin,” said Helene Williams, who chairs the county water district governing board.

Cloud seeding is “probably the quickest, easiest solution that any community can look to,” she said.

Open this photo in gallery:

The generators emit particles of silver iodide that, high in the atmosphere, can serve as the foundations for ice crystals.Nathan VanderKlippe/The Globe and Mail

The Pahrump Valley has never been short on ambition. Natural springs in the area drew humans for thousands of years; settlers irrigated cotton fields on the arid flatlands before the valley bottom was carved into tens of thousands of lots in the 1970s by a Florida development corporation. It employed boiler-room hucksters to lure buyers with free slot machine spins. They made gilded promises of life in a desert “breadbasket” that would one day become the third-largest city in the state, complete with a golf course. The pitch: “This is going to be an oasis in the middle of the desert,” said Mr. Weeks, a former journalist.

“None of that ever happened.”

Advertisement

A half-century later, the unincorporated town of Pahrump has yet to crack the state’s top 10 population centres, although it has continued to grow. It’s the place where voters in 2018 elected brothel owner Dennis Hof to the state legislature with 63 per cent of the vote, despite Mr. Hof being dead. A casino stands where cotton was once ginned.

For its cloud-seeding program, the county turned to Nevada’s Desert Research Institute, which has worked in cloud seeding since the 1960s. At the institute, meteorologists work around the clock from November until the end of winter, monitoring local weather stations, satellite radar and computer models to determine the right time to initiate the generators.

Nevada, the driest state in the U.S., has dozens of mountain areas that could be cloud-seeded, said Frank McDonough, a scientist at the research institute, and a growing number of places desperate for water. Among them are rural areas dependent on irrigation, where water withdrawals are exceeding resupply.

“Some of these basins are hitting the point where they’re pulling more than they’re recharging,” he said.

Open this photo in gallery:

A woman dances at sunset on the shores of the Great Salt Lake in Magna, Utah, this past June, at a celebration of snow melt that raised the water level from a record low. Utah’s water-management plans include US$5-million a year on cloud seeding.Rick Bowmer/The Associated Press

Advertisement

Colorado, Wyoming and Utah all have active winter cloud-seeding programs, too (programs distinct from hail suppression that uses similar technology in places like southern Alberta). Utah, which spends US$5-million a year on cloud-seeding, boasts extracting five to 15 per cent more precipitation over seeded areas.

Last year, the state of Nevada agreed to provide US$1.2-million to the Desert Research Institute for two years of cloud-seeding work.

Cloud seeding, Mr. McDonough said, tends to yield “on the order of 10 per cent more precipitation seasonally.” A preliminary report he submitted to the Nye County last year, after its first winter in operation, showed that 156 hours of seeding in the first year of the program had secured an estimated 6,653 acre-feet (8.1 million square metres) of additional precipitation.

That’s equivalent to fully one-third of the total allowable water use in the Pahrump Valley basin – and a figure large enough to support a considerable increase in population.

“In a subdivision, for every acre-foot of water I can build three houses,” said Mr. Weeks, the Nye County water district general manager. With the cost of operating the program, that works out to less than $70 an acre-foot, a tenth the price in other parts of the state.

Advertisement

“You can’t find cheaper water,” he said.

Cloud seeders in the United Arab Emirates fly over the city of Al Ain this past January, using water-attracting salt flares instead of silver iodide. Parched Middle Eastern countries have had decades of experience in cloud seeding, with mixed results; Israel eventually gave up on it.

Andrea DiCenzo/Getty Images

But there is reason for skepticism.

Israel, too, was an early adopter of cloud seeding, although it abandoned its program after 38 years of operations when researchers found it increased precipitation by just 1.8 per cent.

Cloud seeding can show results in certain times and places, but many “projects around the world are carried out under the (essentially untested) assumption that the cloud-seeding method is efficacious,” said Michael Manton, an emeritus professor of mathematical sciences at Monash University in Australia who specializes in cloud physics.

Even after seven decades of operational cloud seeding, the scientific community remains deeply conflicted about how well it works. Arthur Rangno devoted part of his career as a research scientist at the University of Washington to questioning studies of the technology.

Advertisement

“The problem throughout this field’s murky history is this: ‘No one ever got a job saying cloud seeding doesn’t work,’” he said in an e-mail.

That is not to say that cloud-seeding is a chimera invented by the thirsty. Wintertime seeding, like that being used by Nye County, can produce a 2 to 3 per cent increase in precipitation, said William Cotton, a professor emeritus of meteorology at Colorado State University.

Studies that tracked an airplane scattering silver iodide particles through the right clouds have yielded “eye-catching” results, with a vivid radar signature as crystals form, said Bart Geerts, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Wyoming.

In perfect conditions, seeding can double the snowfall from a particular storm, he said. But such conditions are hard to find, and other storms will show no impact whatsoever. Assessing overall results requires “an average of wildly varying numbers,” he said.

Natural precipitation is fickle, too, making it difficult to assess whether higher snowfall in one area is due to technological intervention or merely the vagaries of weather. Prof. Geerts calls cloud seeding, despite its long history, “exploratory.”

Advertisement
Open this photo in gallery:

Snowy weather – like this day in the Spring Mountains west of Las Vegas – can be unpredictable, making it hard to prove whether cloud seeding caused it or not.Nathan VanderKlippe/The Globe and Mail

Still, water in dry places is so costly that even a 1 per cent increase in snowfall can be economically attractive. Take the Pahrump Valley, where the alternative is a water pipeline that would cost well over $100-million.

Nye County set out to find new water, instead, and with cloud seeding “we did,” said Debra Strickland, who chairs the county’s board of commissioners.

“Now we have to prove it with the science.”

What the county hopes to do is deliver that proof to the Nevada Division of Water Resources, which determines how much water the county can withdraw. First, though, it will have to convince Adam Sullivan, the Nevada state engineer who is administrator of water resources division.

Advertisement

“It’s a real long shot,” he said in an interview. “I don’t see it as something that’s even on my horizon.”

Never before has the state considered whether it can credit weather modification with bringing more water. Mr. Sullivan is a hydrologist, and says the question goes beyond how much snow cloud-seeding can deliver. More importantly, it’s whether that snow can meaningfully help water supplies.

In Nevada, “the vast majority of snow up in the mountains either sublimates or it’s lost or consumed through evapotranspiration.” On average, just 5 per cent of snowfall recharges water supplies.

There are, Mr. Sullivan said, far more reliable ways to boost water supplies.

“If you’ve got the money, you’re probably better off investing in conservation – in ways that we know work,” he said. “Just use less and live within your means.”

Advertisement
Open this photo in gallery:

Despite the Pahrump Valley’s aridity, people here use more water per capita than in Las Vegas.Nathan VanderKlippe/the Globe and Mail

But conservation has proven difficult even in the face of drought, not least in the Pahrump Valley, a deeply conservative rural area whose rules provide few constraints to water use. Per capita water use is nearly three times higher than it is in an hour’s drive away in Las Vegas, where water managers have used a combination of fines and incentives to dramatically cut use.

Not so in Nye County, which only recently launched a rebate program to encourage the adoption of low-flow toilets. Its budget: US$10,000, a fraction of the cloud-seeding budget.

Decorative ponds in the county cannot exceed 400 square feet, but “there’s no limitation on your swimming pool,” said Mr. Weeks. Lawns can be maintained at any size. “There are no restrictions,” Mr. Weeks said.

“Some people think that’s crazy,” he acknowledges. “Some people ask me, ‘why aren’t you doing something about that?’”

Advertisement

His response: “We’re working on it.”

Water and climate change: More from The Globe and Mail

Meet the young Canadian farmers adapting agriculture to climate change

To save Great Salt Lake, Utah explores radical options – and other water-starved states are taking notes

Dominican Republic’s cocoa farmers race to adapt to drying jungles

Scientists’ quests to save the all-American front lawn from climate change

Advertisement



Source link

Nevada

2026 lunar eclipse visible in Nevada. How to watch

Published

on

2026 lunar eclipse visible in Nevada. How to watch


play

A lunar eclipse will be in Nevada skies late Monday night — or, more accurately, early Tuesday morning, March 3.

The downside is the hour: you’ll have to be up very late or very early, depending on your perspective.

Advertisement

Unlike a solar eclipse, which occurs when the moon passes between the Earth and the sun, a lunar eclipse happens when Earth casts its shadow on the moon, creating a rusty red hue.

If you’re looking to see the lunar eclipse, here’s everything you need to know about viewing it in Nevada.

What eclipse is in 2026?

If you live in the U.S., you will be able to see the lunar eclipse starting at 12:44 a.m. PST Tuesday, March 3, 2026, according to NASA. During the night, you’ll see the moon in a reddish hue, or a blood moon.

Totality lasts for a little more than an hour before the moon begins to emerge from behind Earth’s shadow, according to the popular site timeanddate.com. As the moon moves into Earth’s shadow, also known as the umbra, it appears red-orange or a “ghostly copper color,” hence its name: blood moon, NASA says.

Advertisement

“During a lunar eclipse, the moon appears red or orange because any sunlight that’s not blocked by our planet is filtered through a thick slice of Earth’s atmosphere on its way to the lunar surface,” NASA says. “It’s as if all the world’s sunrises and sunsets are projected onto the moon.”

Countdown clock to the 2026 total lunar eclipse

If you live in the U.S., you will be able to see the eclipse starting at 12:44 a.m. PST Tuesday, March 3, 2026.

The entire eclipse will last about six hours. People in Nevada can see the lunar eclipse during the early morning hours of Tuesday, March 3, 2026. The total lunar eclipse will be visible in North America, South America, Eastern Europe, Asia, Australia and Antarctica.

Everything will be over by 6:23 a.m. PST on March 3, 2026. Below is a countdown clock for the 2026 total lunar eclipse.

Where are the best places to see the lunar eclipse near Reno?

Though the Biggest Little City has an abundance of light pollution, darker skies are less than an hour from Reno.

Advertisement
  1. Fort Churchill State Park: The park provides a dark night sky ideal for evening astronomical events among the ruins of Fort Churchill. Park entrance costs $5 for Nevada residents and $10 for nonresidents.
  2. Pyramid Lake: A popular spot for Renoites seeking a night of stargazing, the lake is less than an hour from The Biggest Little City. It offers beautiful natural wonders and dark skies that give a clear view of the lunar eclipse.
  3. Lake Tahoe: Multiple locations around the lake are excellent for stargazing that are less than an hour from Reno.
  4. Cold Springs or Hidden Valley still get light pollution from the Biggest Little City, but have clearer skies than the middle of town.
  5. Driving down the road on USA Parkway will likely also give you the dark skies to see the lunar eclipse without having to make a significant drive outside of town.

Carly Sauvageau with the Reno Gazette Journal contributed to this report.



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

How the strikes on Iran could impact gas prices in northern Nevada

Published

on

How the strikes on Iran could impact gas prices in northern Nevada


The United States and Israel launched targeted attacks on Iran on Saturday. The move brought new uncertainty into global energy markets, as northern Nevadans could be paying more at the pump in the coming weeks.

Following the strikes, oil prices increased. Brent crude, the international benchmark, jumped to roughly $73 a barrel, while the national benchmark, West Texas Intermediate, traded above $67.

Much of the concern centers around the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway between Iran and Oman. which carries about a fifth of the world’s oil supplies.

Patrick de Haan, head of petroleum analysis with GasBuddy, a price tracking company, spoke on the current questions in the region.

Advertisement

“The known would reduce oil prices if there becomes clarity, but it’s the unknown that is stoking fears…. If there is some sort of clarity in the days ahead, whether from Iran, the United States, or Israel, on how long this would last. We’d be able to put potentially an end date for the potential impacts that we’re seeing,” said de Haan.

Experts say for every $5 to $10 increase in oil prices, drivers could pay 15 to 25 cents more per gallon.

According to Triple-A, the average price of a gallon of gas in Nevada on Sunday comes in at $3.70, which comes in above the national average of roughly $2.98.

Over at the Rainbow Market on Vassar Street, prices sat just below four dollars a gallon on Sunday. Reno resident Abran Reyes talked about gas prices potentially going up.

“Whether it’s to work, to maybe run errands, to do stuff that helps you, gas is essential…. That gas price really hits, especially in today’s economy, where gas prices are extraordinary…. I just hope everyone’s safe. I hope our soldiers and all of our troops can be okay,” said Reyes.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

Nevada debuts public option amid federal health care shifts

Published

on

Nevada debuts public option amid federal health care shifts


More than 10,000 people have enrolled in Nevada’s new public option health plans, which debuted last fall with the expectation that they would bring lower prices to the health insurance market.

Those preliminary numbers from the open enrollment period that ended in January are less than a third of what state officials had projected. Nevada is the third state so far to launch a public option plan, along with Colorado and Washington state. The idea is to offer lower-cost plans to consumers to expand health care access.

But researchers said plans like these are unlikely to fill the gaps left by sweeping federal changes, including the expiration of enhanced subsidies for plans bought on Affordable Care Act marketplaces.

The public option gained attention in the late 2000s when Congress considered but ultimately rejected creating a health plan funded and run by the government that would compete with private carriers in the market. The programs in Washington state, Colorado, and Nevada don’t go that far — they aren’t government-run but are private-public partnerships that compete with private insurance.

Advertisement

In recent years, states have considered creating public option plans to make health coverage more affordable and to reduce the number of uninsured people. Washington was the first state to launch a program, in 2021, and Colorado followed in 2023.

Washington and Colorado’s programs have run into challenges, including a lack of participation from clinicians, hospitals, and other care providers, as well as insurers’ inability to meet rate reduction benchmarks or lower premiums compared with other plans offered on the market.

Nevada law requires that the carriers of the public option plans — Battle Born State Plans, named after a state motto — lower premium costs compared with a benchmark “silver” plan in the marketplace by 15% over the next four years.

But that amount might not make much difference to consumers with rising premium payments from the loss of the ACA’s enhanced tax credits, said Keith Mueller, director of the Rural Policy Research Institute.

Advertisement

“That’s not a lot of money,” Mueller said.

Three of the eight insurers on the state’s exchange, Nevada Health Link, offered the state plans during the open enrollment period.

Insurance companies plan to meet the lower premium cost requirement in Nevada by cutting broker fees and commissions, which prompted opposition from insurance brokers in the state. In response, Nevada marketplace officials told state lawmakers in January that they will give a flat-fee reimbursement to brokers.

The public option has faced opposition among state leaders. In 2024, a state judge dismissed a lawsuit, brought by a Nevada state senator and a group that advocates for lower taxes, that challenged the public option law as unconstitutional. They have appealed to the state Supreme Court.

Federal Policy Impacts

Recent federal changes create more obstacles.

Advertisement

Nevada is consistently among the states with the largest populations of people who do not have health insurance coverage. Last year, nearly 95,000 people in the state received the enhanced ACA tax credits, averaging $465 in savings per month, according to KFF, a health information nonprofit that includes KFF Health News.

But the enhanced tax credits expired at the end of the year, and it appears unlikely that lawmakers will bring them back. Nationwide ACA enrollment has decreased by more than 1 million people so far this year, down from record-high enrollment of 24 million last year.

About 4 million people are expected to lose health coverage from the expiration of the tax credits, according to the Congressional Budget Office. An additional 3 million are projected to lose coverage because of other policy changes affecting the marketplace.

Justin Giovannelli, an associate research professor at the Center on Health Insurance Reforms at Georgetown University, said the changes to the ACA in the Republicans’ One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which President Donald Trump signed into law last summer, will make it more difficult for people to keep their coverage. These changes include more frequent enrollment paperwork to verify income and other personal information, a shortened enrollment window, and an end to automatic reenrollment.

In Nevada, the changes would amount to an estimated 100,000 people losing coverage, according to KFF.

Advertisement

“All of that makes getting coverage on Nevada Health Link harder and more expensive than it would be otherwise,” Giovannelli said.

State officials projected ahead of open enrollment that about 35,000 people would purchase the public option plans. Of the 104,000 people who had purchased a plan on the state marketplace as of mid-January, 10,762 had enrolled in one of the public option plans, according to Nevada Health Link.

Katie Charleson, communications officer for the state health exchange, said the original enrollment estimate was based on market conditions before the recent increases in customers’ premium costs. She said that the public option plans gave people facing higher costs more choices.

“We expect enrollment in Battle Born State Plans to grow over time as awareness increases and as Nevadans continue seeking quality coverage options that help reduce costs,” Charleson said.

According to KFF, nationally the enhanced subsidies saved enrollees an average of $705 annually in 2024, and enrollees would save an estimated $1,016 in premium payments on average in 2026 if the subsidies were still in place. Without the subsidies, people enrolled in the ACA marketplace could be seeing their premium costs more than double.

Advertisement

Insights From Washington and Colorado

Washington and Colorado are not planning to alter their programs due to the expiration of the tax credits, according to government officials in those states.

Other states that had recently considered creating public options have backtracked. Minnesota officials put off approving a public option in 2024, citing funding concerns. Proposals to create public options in Maine and New Mexico also sputtered.

Washington initially saw meager enrollment in its Cascade Select public option plans; only 1% of state marketplace enrollees chose a public option plan in 2021. But that changed after lawmakers required hospitals to contract with at least one public option plan by 2023. Last year the state reported that 94,000 customers enrolled, accounting for 30% of all customers on the state marketplace. The public option plans were the lowest-premium silver plans in 31 of Washington’s 39 counties in 2024.

A 2025 study found that since Colorado implemented its public option, called the Colorado Option, coverage through the ACA marketplace has become more affordable for enrollees who received subsidies but more expensive for enrollees who did not.

Colorado requires all insurers offering coverage through its marketplace to include a public option that follows state guidelines. The state set premium reduction targets of 5% a year for three years beginning in 2023. Starting this year, premium costs are not allowed to outpace medical inflation.

Advertisement

Though the insurers offering the public option did not meet the premium reduction targets, enrollment in the Colorado Option has increased every year it has been available. Last year, the state saw record enrollment in its marketplace, with 47% of customers purchasing a public option plan.

Giovannelli said states are continuing to try to make health insurance more affordable and accessible, even if federal changes reduce the impact of those efforts.

“States are reacting and trying to continue to do right by their residents,” Giovannelli said, “but you can’t plug all those gaps.”

Are you struggling to afford your health insurance? Have you decided to forgo coverage? Click here to contact KFF Health News and share your story.

KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF — an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending