LAS VEGAS (KTNV) — If you’ve driven on the streets of Las Vegas, you’ve seen people running red lights.
Whether it’s impairment, impatience or insolence, failing to stop has had real consequences, and sometimes deadly ones.
That’s one of the reasons a viewer named Nicole wrote to us to ask why Nevada doesn’t use red-light cameras, which snap a picture of scofflaws and send them a ticket in the mail.
It’s a common question, one that’s been asked many times, by locals and lawmakers alike.
Advertisement
KTNV
Questions? Let’s Talk.
Here’s the story:
Back in 1999, automated traffic cameras were banned in Nevada. Legislative committee minutes from that year show then-state Sen. Mark James, R-Clark County, warning about Big Brother.
“He urged the [Senate Transportation] committee to be careful to not set us on a path of compromising the civil liberties of our citizens,” the minutes read. “Senator James then stressed the need to recognize possible consequences to our actions if they, as legislators, were to permit law enforcement to infringe on our rights.”
James’s arguments carried the day, and the law he backed has remained undisturbed for a quarter century.
Advertisement
But not for lack of trying.
Lawmakers have considered bills to create exceptions or repeal the ban on automated traffic cameras no fewer than 11 times in the years since it was put in place.
Each time, the bill has failed to pass both houses of the Legislature, even when circumscribed to apply only to school zones, construction zones or railroad crossings. Restrictions, including requiring an officer to review each photo before a ticket is sent — and limiting the fine to between $50 and $100 — have failed to sway lawmakers in libertarian Nevada.
Until this year, that is.
In the 2025 Legislature, three bills were introduced. One would have allowed the cameras in construction zones, where workers face dangerous conditions, especially on freeways. Another would have allowed cameras in areas where traditional law enforcement methods have failed.
Advertisement
Both those bills were rejected, although the construction-zone bill passed the Assembly and made it to the Senate floor before dying.
Clark County Sheriff Kevin McMahill, who strongly supported the red-light camera bill in testimony before lawmakers, admitted he fell short in his October speech announcing his bid for re-election.
“And listen, I will fully admit to you that I went up to the Legislature this last session and testified in front of them on red-light cameras, and I literally got laughed out of the building,” McMahill said. “I don’t deny that. But what I will also tell you is that I’ll be back again next time. I’m going to come back with a better plan. And I’m going to continue to ask those other elected officials to have some level of responsibility for the ways people are dying in our community.”
But one bill carving out an exception to the ban did pass the Legislature: Assembly Bill 527 will allow cameras to be mounted on school buses, to catch people who speed by when red lights are flashing.
The Clark County School District said Monday that it is in the process of hiring a vendor to install the cameras, and expects to present a proposal to the board of trustees in January.
Advertisement
So while red light cameras won’t be used on Las Vegas streets, on freeways, in school zones or at railroad crossings, they will be used on buses starting next year, the first exception to the camera ban in decades.
LAS VEGAS (KSNV) — Nevada once again sprang forward on Sunday, losing an hour for Daylight Saving Time.
We are one of 48 states that still observe the practice, though it has faced scrutiny in recent years for the supposed health drawbacks that come from changing clocks.
An effort to end Daylight Saving Time in Nevada, effectively putting the state one hour behind other Pacific Coast states for most of the year, failed in the legislature last year.
Advertisement
JOIN THE CONVERSATION (2)
Do you want Nevada to continue observing Daylight Saving Time? Vote now in the News 3 poll.
As the Middle East conflict continues, politicians across the country are sharing their views on the situation.
On Sunday, Senator Mark Kelly (D-Arizona) paid a visit to Reno for a Democratic campaign fundraiser at the Neil Road Recreation Center.
At the event, he criticized the Trump administration’s actions.
“I think the president went into this conflict without having a strategic goal. Without having a plan and without having the timeline and what happens then is you don’t have a way to exit a conflict, so I’m really concerned about putting more Americans’ lives at risk with no explanation as to why,” said Kelly.
Advertisement
Nevada Gov. Joe Lombardo recently released a statement on the Iran attacks.
“Iran has long been a threat to the United States, Israel, and any hope of peace in the Middle East. They must never be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon,” Lombardo said. “Right now, my priority is the safety of all Nevadans. Increased police presence may be seen at certain locations as we continue to monitor and synchronize with partners as the situation evolves.”
And prices at the pump are skyrocketing here in northern Nevada, and around the country. It’s partially due to traffic stalling in the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway between Iran and Oman, which controls roughly 20% of the world’s oil supplies.
Energy Secretary Chris Wright aimed to ease concerns over rising costs.
“The world is very well supplied with oil right now. The United States is a net oil exporter, we’re a net natural gas exporter… We’re communicating with our allies abroad. The oil is there,” Wright said.
Advertisement
But Senator Kelly says gas prices could keep rising.
“This war in Iran is gonna drive up energy costs. Gasoline prices are gonna go up. Just driving down the road here, I noticed it was about $4.50 a gallon for a gallon of gasoline,” Kelly said.