Connect with us

Montana

Montana’s psychiatric hospital is poorly run and neglect has hastened patient deaths, lawsuit says

Published

on

Montana’s psychiatric hospital is poorly run and neglect has hastened patient deaths, lawsuit says


HELENA, Mont. — Montana’s state psychiatric hospital has been so poorly run for decades that patients are unsafe and not treated with dignity and respect, which combined with a pattern of understaffing, lack of training and neglect has hastened the deaths of two patients, a lawsuit filed this week states.

The families of Lucio DiMauro and David Patzoldt, and patient Lesley Jungers, filed a federal lawsuit in Butte on Tuesday alleging low-income residents with mental health issues are “systematically abused and neglected,” at the Montana State Hospital.

“This case is about holding those in power responsible and accountable for the entirely preventable damages to these Plaintiffs, and to force change so these tragedies don’t happen to others,” the lawsuit states.

The lawsuit names Gov. Greg Gianforte, the director of the Department of Public Health and Human Services, and the director of the state hospital along with the state and its health department.

Advertisement

State law prohibits any form of abuse or neglect of people admitted to a mental health facility, requires that their privacy and dignity be protected, that they have adequate supervision and medical treatment and live in a humane environment that is comfortable and safe. It also requires regular housekeeping and maintenance and that the facility be kept in good repair.

The Montana State Hospital violates those laws and its patients’ constitutional rights to dignity and due process, the lawsuit states. The facility is located in Warm Springs — a town of about 600 people about 23 miles (37 kilometers) northwest of Butte.

Spokespeople for the governor’s office and the health department said they generally don’t comment on ongoing litigation.

DiMauro, who suffered a traumatic brain injury in 2012, was admitted to the Montana State Hospital in September 2020. He was regularly overmedicated, suffered numerous falls that his guardian was not notified about, contracted COVID-19 and on Aug. 5, 2020 was diagnosed with colon cancer, according to the complaint. A doctor expected him to live for another three to six months, the complaint states.

Staff administered DiMauro the pain medication morphine and an anti-anxiety medication every three hours until his death — just 13 days later. As his health deteriorated his sister asked for the Catholic sacraments of Last Rites to be performed, but that did not happen, the lawsuit states. Staff also failed to treat a wound on his forehead that he suffered in a fall, the lawsuit states.

Advertisement

Patzoldt, then 75, was admitted to the Montana State Hospital on Oct. 19, 2021, after having behavioral disruptions at a memory care center. He had numerous health problems and mental health issues, including Alzheimer’s disease, diabetes and congenital heart failure.

Four months later, Patzoldt died of sepsis, COVID pneumonia and cellulitis — or deep skin infections. He also had pressure ulcers. A review of his records found his heart medication was not given to him for nearly three weeks in November 2021, the lawsuit states.

Jungers, a current patient, was admitted to the state hospital for treatment of bipolar 1 disorder, but escaped from her room several times, even when she was supposed to be under one-to-one supervision. She has been diagnosed with frontal lobe dementia as well, the complaint states.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services stopped paying the Montana State Hospital for patient treatment in April 2022, saying it was inadequately staffed, repeatedly put patients in jeopardy and that it failed to correct problems even after being told it was at risk of losing federal funding.

CMS said shortfalls contributed to the deaths of at least four patients, a severe assault and a COVID-19 outbreak — and that the death of a fifth patient was not adequately investigated. That patient had been told to stop being so dramatic and go back to her room when she complained that she couldn’t catch her breath. She was found dead 45 minutes later.

Advertisement

With its large budget surplus, the 2023 Montana Legislature, allocated a $300 million investment in the state’s behavioral health system. A commission is expected to make its recommendations by next July.

The health department has also hired a consulting firm to temporarily manage all of the state’s health care facilities and make recommendations for improvements.

The lawsuit asks a federal judge to order the state to provide a safe environment for state hospital patients, maintain the staffing needed to provide adequate treatment and for the basic needs of patients along with actual and compensatory damages.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Montana

Michigan State women's basketball continues undefeated season with blowout win over Montana

Published

on

Michigan State women's basketball continues undefeated season with blowout win over Montana


Michigan State women’s basketball is currently in Florida for the West Palm Beach Classic, and the Spartans continued their best start in program history, beating Montana by over 30 points on Thursday to advance in the classic. The Spartans won 69 to 38.

Michigan State is now 11-0 on the season, but will face a big challenge tomorrow when face 10-1 Alabama.

Julia Ayrault led the way in this one with 15 points, while Ines Sotelo, Theryn Hallock, and Grace VanSlooten all scored in double-figures as well.

Contact/Follow us @The SpartansWire on Twitter, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Michigan state news, notes, and opinion. You can also follow Andrew Brewster on Twitter @IAmBrewster.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Montana

Montana Supreme Court backs youth plaintiffs in groundbreaking climate trial

Published

on

Montana Supreme Court backs youth plaintiffs in groundbreaking climate trial


The Montana Supreme Court voted 6 to 1, affirming a lower court ruling that said the state’s fossil fuel friendly policies, along with a lack of action to address climate change, has violated the young people’s constitutional right to a clean environment. The decision means that state agencies must now consider the greenhouse gas emissions and climate impacts of any proposed development project.

Olivia Vesovich is one of the youth plaintiffs. She’s been involved with this case for the last 5 years.

“Hope is something we work towards, and that is what this case has been,” said Vesovich. “We have fought to have our voices heard. We have fought to have our case in the state and now that we got our voices heard by the Montana Supreme Court.”

Statements from the Governor and Attorney General’s spokespeople reiterated their arguments from the appeal that the young people lacked standing to bring this case and that climate change is beyond the scope of the courts.

Advertisement

Republican lawmakers called the decision an overstep from the court into the legislature’s role. Democratic leadership praised the decision. Environmental groups heralded the decision as a critical victory in the fight against climate change.

Montana is one of 6 states with environmental protections enshrined in its constitution.

Columbia University climate change law professor Michael Gerrard says although this ruling is specific to Montana, it sets an important precedent for other climate litigation.

“I think this kind of victory will embolden youth plaintiffs and others to bring similar cases in other parts of the country, and here the trial court, now referred by the state Supreme Court, upheld all the findings of the climate scientists. It’s going to be increasingly hard for anyone to challenge those scientific findings,” said Gerrard.

Given that the case is predicated on Montana’s Constitution, this ruling is the final decision. It cannot be appealed to a federal court.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Montana

Montana Supreme Court upholds landmark youth climate ruling

Published

on

Montana Supreme Court upholds landmark youth climate ruling


Montana’s Supreme Court has upheld a lower court’s decision that had sided with 16 young activists who argued that the state violated their right to a clean environment.

The lawsuit was brought by students arguing that a state law banning the consideration of climate when choosing energy policy was unconstitutional.

In a 6-to-1 ruling, the top court found that the plaintiffs, between ages five and 22, had a “fundamental constitutional right to a clean and healthful environment”.

Wednesday’s ruling came after a district court’s decision last year was appealed by the state. Similar climate lawsuits are ongoing across the US but this is first of its kind a from a state supreme court.

Advertisement

The lawsuit targeted a 2011 state law that made it illegal for environmental reviews to consider climate impacts when deciding on new projects, like building new power plants.

It cited a 50-year-old constitutional clause that guaranteed the “state and each person shall maintain and improve a clean and healthful environment in Montana for present and future generations”.

The ruling on Wednesday stated that the “plaintiffs showed at trial – without dispute – that climate change is harming Montana’s environmental life support system now and with increasing severity for the foreseeable future” .

Rikki Held, the lead plaintiff in the lawsuit, said in a statement that “this ruling is a victory not just for us, but for every young person whose future is threatened by climate change”.

Montana state officials expressed disappointment with the court’s decision.

Advertisement

Governor Greg Gianforte said his office was still assessing the ruling, but predicted the impact would be “perpetual lawsuits that will waste taxpayer dollars and drive up energy bills for hardworking Montanans”.

Western Environmental Law Center, which represented the young plaintiffs, said in a statement that the decision marks “a turning point in Montana’s energy policy”.

It said plaintiffs and their legal team “are committed to ensuring the full implementation of the ruling”.

Similar cases are scheduled to be heard in several other states, including Hawaii, Utah and Alaska, as well as in countries like Australia, New Zealand, Pakistan, Colombia and Uganda.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending