The Idaho Supreme Court on Monday heard oral arguments in a case where Idaho voter advocates are pushing for the court to allow them to appeal their challenge against two voter laws passed during the 2023 legislative session. 

In March, Babe Vote and League of Women Voters groups filed a lawsuit against the Idaho Secretary of State in response to the passage of House Bills 124 and 340. In their lawsuit, they allege that the laws violate young Idahoan’s constitutional right to equal protection and the right to suffrage under the Idaho Constitution.

An Ada County judge dismissed the case in October, so the voter advocacy groups filed an appeal and are asking the court to reverse the district court’s decision to dismiss the case. 

‘It’s not just about students,’ Babe Vote attorney says

Matthew Gordon, the attorney representing Babe Vote, said the laws give the Legislature “unlimited power” to shape the Idaho electorate. 

Additionally, Gordon said that the laws disproportionately impact students, senior citizens, people with disabilities and newly arrived Idaho residents.

While House Bill 340 created free ID cards to vote in the election, an option offered by the Idaho Transportation Department for people age 18 and older who have not had a driver’s license in the previous six months, Gordon said that the cards do not remedy for 17-year-olds who will turn 18 by election time, or for newcomers from out of state that do not have time to get an Idaho driver’s license.

Justice Gregory Moeller said that he understands the argument that the laws have made it more difficult for Idahoans to vote, and he asked if there was anyone that had fully lost the right to vote. 

In response, Gordon said some people living in nursing homes have lost their right to vote — particularly those who have not renewed their driver’s license because they can no longer drive and do not have transportation to get to the DMV to attain the free ID card. 

Gordon said he would like the lawsuit to proceed in district court again so they can share other instances where the new laws hindered people’s ability to vote. 

Sam Sandmire, a board member with Babe Vote, told the Sun that her team appealed this case to the Supreme Court because the laws “take away people’s fundamental right to vote.”

“We hope our challenge to these laws prevails so all legally eligible Idahoans’ fundamental right to vote is restored, and so we can get back to conducting voter registration drives where we can help these people complete their voter registration,” she said.

There’s always going to be ‘burden on the voter,’ Idaho attorney says

Joshua Turner, an attorney with the Idaho Attorney General’s Office on behalf of the secretary of state, argued that the laws are constitutional, and they address security and administrative consistency concerns. 

Turner said student IDs had always been an “outlier” in comparison to other forms of identification on Election Day. While there is no evidence of voter fraud from student identification, House Bill 124 is “preventative legislation” to that possibility, he said. 

Turner compared the voting laws to hunting and fishing regulations, noting that stricter regulations do sometimes make activities more difficult. In this case, he said the laws are meant to regulate how people can vote, but they are not restricting who can. 

“There’s always going to be some process, some burden on the voter to show ‘I’m a qualified elector, I can come and vote at this election because I’ve got the right to vote,’” he said. 

After the hearing, Secretary of State Phil McGrane told the Sun that he felt good with the district court’s decision to dismiss the case in October, and that despite the pending litigation, he is looking forward to helping Idahoans register to vote.

“With the 2024 election cycle, we’re just excited to start getting ready for the election and hopefully being able to work with organizations like the League of Women Voters and Babe Vote to help people get registered in advance of what’s coming,” he said.  

What’s next for House Bills 124 and 340? 

There are different possible outcomes of this case. 

Idaho voter registration lawsuits in limbo: Unraveling the latest in voting legal battles

If the Idaho Supreme Court sides with Babe Vote’s appeal to reverse the district court’s decision, then the case would be sent back to the district court for further proceedings. 

If the Idaho Supreme Court upholds the district court’s dismissal of the case, then the lawsuit will be fully dismissed. 

Starting January, student IDs will no longer be an acceptable form of identification upon voting in Idaho. 

However, there is pending litigation in federal court related to House Bills 124 and 340. In March, March for Our Lives Idaho, a student-led mobilization organization, filed a suit in federal court alleging the laws violate the 26th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which says people shall not be denied to vote because of their age.