Idaho
Idaho Professors Sue Over Law Threatening Prison for Teaching About Abortion
On Tuesday, six Idaho university professors and two teachers’ unions that work across the University of Idaho, Boise State University, and Idaho State University filed a lawsuit against the state to challenge the No Public Funds for Abortion Act (NPFAA), which makes it a crime punishable with up to 14 years in prison to use public funds to “promote” or “counsel in favor of” abortion. In practice, that means that the NPFAA prohibits teaching, discussion, and even research and scholarship about abortion at publicly funded institutions, including public universities.
This has altered professors’ lessons plans, including one professor who has “removed an entire module from her bioethics course that covered abortion,” said Scarlet Kim, senior staff attorney with the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project and the lead attorney on the case. Kim has also heard from professors who are “declining to pursue research into abortion or abortion-related topics,” including maternal mortality. (In June, Idaho ended its maternal mortality review committee, months after a rural hospital shuttered its entire labor and delivery department as a consequence of state abortion laws.) While NPFAA first took effect in 2021, like other anti-abortion laws in the state, Kim told Jezebel that it’s had an especially chilling impact post-Roe.
According to the plaintiffs, the NPFAA violates both the First and 14th Amendments. It violates the First Amendment rights of faculty, the suit argues, because it broadly criminalizes any academic speech that may be interpreted as favorable to abortion. And it violates the 14th Amendment as it’s unconstitutionally vague and fails to define the terms “promote” or “counsel in favor of.”
In September, a letter from the University of Idaho to its faculty warned that teaching about abortion in class or even providing condoms “for purposes of birth control” (and not merely “for the purpose of helping prevent the spread of STDs”) could result in criminal charges. The letter, shared with Jezebel, stated that adherence to these new rules is necessary because it’s not clear what will or won’t land someone in prison in post-Roe Idaho. The state maintains several extreme anti-abortion laws, including the NPFAA and another law that makes it a felony to advertise contraception and abortion. In the September letter, the University of Idaho emphasized that its zealous new rules stemmed from uncertainty: “Since violation is considered a felony, we are advising a conservative approach here,” it states at one point, continuing: “Academic freedom is not a defense to violation of law, and faculty…must themselves remain neutral on the topic and cannot conduct or engage in discussions in violation of these prohibitions without risking prosecution.”
With the NPFAA, “the lack of clarity…exacerbates the chilling effect of the law, because when folks are unclear as to what’s prohibited, they’re going to steer clear of anything, especially when really harsh criminal penalties are at stake,” Kim said. “It naturally makes professors all the more fearful of what they can or can’t say in the classroom.”
The suit filed this week is specific to NPFAA, but Kim notes that, with the other laws, including the state’s aforementioned criminalization of merely advertising birth control for pregnancy prevention, Idaho has a statewide problem with policing speech where reproductive rights are concerned. Earlier this year, the state became the first in the nation to criminalize so-called “abortion trafficking”—that is, helping minors travel to access abortion care and providing them with information about abortion. And between blocking minors’ access to information about reproductive care and public universities barring classroom discussion of abortion, young people, in particular, are facing the brunt of the consequences.
Due to NPFAA, Kim expressed concern that students “won’t receive a vital political education about the issue of our time.” Similarly, in a press release shared with Jezebel, Martin Orr, president of the Idaho Federation of Teachers said the law “makes reasoned discussion impossible” in classrooms. Orr continued, “How can we teach about U.S. society without addressing abortion—one of the defining cultural and political issues of the day?”
Representatives for the University of Idaho, Idaho State University, and Boise State University didn’t immediately respond to Jezebel’s request for comment about the NPFAA’s impacts on their campuses.
In addition to the horrific ripple effects the fall of Roe has inflicted on the healthcare system, it’s also been catastrophic for free speech. In South Carolina, some lawmakers want to criminalize sharing information about self-managed abortion. Earlier this month, the ACLU and ACLU of Alabama filed a suit to prevent that state from prosecuting providers who help refer patients to out-of-state abortion care. Texas lawmakers introduced a bill to require internet providers to block websites that provide information on abortion. Surveillance, censorship, and criminalization—in our hospitals, homes, and certainly, our campuses—go hand-in-hand with the erosion of reproductive rights.
Idaho
A very wet holiday week lies ahead
After a short dry spell this past week, Idaho is gearing up for a wet holiday week ahead with plenty of precipitation to come.
It started off today with light snow falling in the mountains but not much making it to the valley floor in terms of rain. Tomorrow the Magic Valley will see some rain sweep through the region as a stray pattern will bring in early rain separate from the main systems later this week.
Monday night into Tuesday morning is wave #1, which will deliver precipitation to almost all of Idaho. Tuesday will see another wave pass through before things clear out just in time for Christmas Day.
Wednesday’s clear weather only lasts for a moment as more rain arrives on Thursday & Friday, with more to come next Saturday.
Happy Holidays everyone! Enjoy the season and stay dry this week!
Idaho
Idaho Fish and Game euthanizes mountain lion in central Idaho after it killed pet cat – East Idaho News
KETCHUM (KMVT) — Idaho Fish and Game said they euthanized a mountain lion after it killed a resident’s pet cat south of Ketchum on Wednesday.
A young female mountain lion grabbed the cat within minutes of the owners letting their pet outside into their fenced backyard, according to Fish and Game.
Fish and Game set up a trap at the residence to protect the safety of area residents and their pets. The lion was later trapped that day and euthanized by Fish and Game officers.
“As with any decision that we are faced with to trap and put an animal down, our staff have to make the hard call to protect area residents and their pets” said Craig White, regional supervisor of the Magic Valley Region. “We don’t take these decisions lightly, but ultimately, our responsibility is to protect public safety. When a mountain lion exhibits aggression toward people or their pets within the confines of a fenced yard we need to take appropriate actions.”
Fish and Game warned residents to keep pets on leashes, feed pets indoors, and make sure the yard is clear to help prevent predators like mountain lions from attacking.
Wildlife managers advise residents to never run away or turn your back on a mountain lion, according to Fish and Game. Slowly back away while maintaining eye contact and safety devices like bear spray can help.
Fish and Game also reminded residents to not feed wildlife or leave garbage outside and unsecured. Residents should call 911 immediately to report any encounter that results in an attack.
=htmlentities(get_the_title())?>%0D%0A%0D%0A=get_permalink()?>%0D%0A%0D%0A=htmlentities(‘For more stories like this one, be sure to visit https://www.eastidahonews.com/ for all of the latest news, community events and more.’)?>&subject=Check%20out%20this%20story%20from%20EastIdahoNews” class=”fa-stack jDialog”>
Idaho
The Day Four Lightbulbs Changed the World: Idaho’s Historic First Step in Nuclear-Powered Electricity
On a cold December afternoon in 1951, four ordinary 200-watt lightbulbs glowed in a modest brick building near Arco, Idaho. This seemingly small feat represented a monumental scientific achievement—the first generation of electricity from nuclear energy. Behind the unassuming scene stood the Experimental Breeder Reactor-I (EBR-I), a pioneering facility that helped lay the groundwork for the nuclear age.
Location and Origins: A Reactor in the Idaho Sagebrush
EBR-I was located on the Idaho National Reactor Testing Station (now the Idaho National Laboratory), a sprawling facility established by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) to develop and test nuclear reactor technologies. Situated in the remote southeast Idaho desert, the site offered isolation and security for these groundbreaking experiments.
Construction of the EBR-I began in 1949, spearheaded by scientists who had been instrumental in the Manhattan Project, the top-secret World War II initiative that developed the first atomic bombs. Among the key figures were Harold Lichtenberger, the project manager, Walter Zinn, a renowned nuclear physicist, and Aaron Novick, a specialist in reactor design. Their goal was ambitious: to demonstrate the viability of breeder reactors, which could revolutionize nuclear energy by producing more fuel than they consumed.
Breeder Reactors: Expanding the Potential of Nuclear Power
The concept of a breeder reactor was rooted in addressing the limited supply of uranium-235, the isotope crucial for sustaining nuclear reactions. Natural uranium is composed of about 99% uranium-238, a stable isotope that cannot undergo fission under standard conditions. Breeder reactors like EBR-I were designed to transform uranium-238 into plutonium-239, a fissionable material.
This transformation required a sophisticated sequence of nuclear reactions. In the EBR-I core, uranium-238 absorbed high-energy neutrons, resulting in the formation of neptunium-239, which quickly decayed into plutonium-239. The plutonium then served as fuel for sustained fission reactions, generating heat and additional neutrons to perpetuate the process.
A critical component of the reactor was its liquid metal coolant, a eutectic mixture of sodium (Na) and potassium (K) known as NaK. This alloy was chosen for its excellent thermal conductivity and low melting point, enabling efficient heat transfer within the reactor core. After absorbing heat from the nuclear reactions, the NaK coolant circulated to a secondary heat exchanger, where it transferred the thermal energy to a water-steam system. The resulting steam turned turbines to produce electricity.
The Moment of First Light: December 20, 1951
The culmination of years of design, construction, and testing came on December 20, 1951, at precisely 1:50 p.m. Inside the compact brick building, Harold Lichtenberger flipped a switch, allowing the electricity generated by the reactor to flow to four suspended lightbulbs. Witnesses, many of them seasoned physicists, observed the event with measured enthusiasm. The moment was significant but understated, reflecting the pragmatic focus of the team.
“When I turned the switch, I guess I was more interested in how the circuit breakers would function than I was in the significance of the test,” Lichtenberger later recounted. The real excitement for the team lay in verifying the reactor’s primary objective: demonstrating the efficacy of the breeder process and the conversion of uranium-238 into plutonium-239.
The following day, the EBR-I reactor achieved an output of 100 kilowatts, enough to power the building’s electrical systems. This marked another milestone, proving that nuclear power could provide practical amounts of energy beyond experimental conditions.
The Ebr-I Legacy: Laying the Foundation for Nuclear Energy
The success of the EBR-I experiment had far-reaching implications. By demonstrating the feasibility of breeder reactors, the project expanded the horizons of nuclear energy at a time when the world sought innovative solutions to growing energy demands. The reactor’s ability to produce more fuel than it consumed hinted at a sustainable nuclear future.
In 1953, EBR-I achieved another historic milestone: it became the first reactor to use plutonium as a fuel source. These breakthroughs underscored the versatility of nuclear technology and its potential applications.
Despite these advancements, interest in breeder reactors waned in the 1960s. The discovery of vast uranium deposits and the development of more efficient enrichment techniques reduced the urgency for breeder technology. Additionally, concerns about the proliferation risks associated with plutonium dampened enthusiasm for widespread adoption.
Today, EBR-I remains a landmark in the history of science and technology. Designated a National Historic Landmark in 1966, the facility stands as a museum open to the public. Visitors to the site can see the original reactor, its instrumentation, and the historic lightbulbs that marked the dawn of nuclear-generated electricity.
Got a reaction? Share your thoughts in the comments
Enjoyed this article? Subscribe to our free newsletter for engaging stories, exclusive content, and the latest news.
-
Politics1 week ago
Canadian premier threatens to cut off energy imports to US if Trump imposes tariff on country
-
Technology1 week ago
Inside the launch — and future — of ChatGPT
-
Technology1 week ago
OpenAI cofounder Ilya Sutskever says the way AI is built is about to change
-
Politics1 week ago
U.S. Supreme Court will decide if oil industry may sue to block California's zero-emissions goal
-
Technology1 week ago
Meta asks the US government to block OpenAI’s switch to a for-profit
-
Politics1 week ago
Conservative group debuts major ad buy in key senators' states as 'soft appeal' for Hegseth, Gabbard, Patel
-
Business6 days ago
Freddie Freeman's World Series walk-off grand slam baseball sells at auction for $1.56 million
-
Technology6 days ago
Meta’s Instagram boss: who posted something matters more in the AI age