Michigan
Is Michigan’s 24-hour abortion waiting period legal? Judge to decide in new trial underway
A trial has begun in a case that challenges Michigan abortion-related laws, including a 24-hour waiting period, with testimony focused on whether they place an undue burden on women seeking the procedure in the state.
The bench trial is taking place in Michigan’s Court of Claims in Detroit, where Northland Family Planning Center is asking Judge Sima Patel to rule unconstitutional three abortion regulations in state law — a mandatory 24-hour waiting period to terminate a pregnancy; requiring those seeking an abortion to obtain counseling and read information from the state before getting the procedure; and a ban on advanced-practice clinicians like physicians assistants and nurses performing an abortion.
The legality of the regulations came under scrutiny after Michigan voters approved a constitutional amendment in November 2022 creating a state-level right to have an abortion.
“Because I worked with lobbying legislators in Lansing, my understanding was (these regulations were) to make it more difficult for women to get abortions (and) to delay abortions,” said Renee Chelian, the executive director of Northland Family Planning Center. “My observation was (their intent was that) it would deter women and when they read the materials it would change their mind.”
The state, represented by fire-walled attorneys within Attorney General Dana Nessel’s office, said it intervened in the lawsuit after Nessel, the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs signaled they would not defend the law against the challenge brought by Northland.
“The challenged statutory provisions do not unconstitutionally deny, burden, or infringe on an individual’s right to reproductive freedom under Michigan’s Constitution … and they do not discriminate in the protection or enforcement of this fundamental right,” the state’s attorneys said in their motion to intervene in the lawsuit.
Northland sued Nessel, LARA Director Marlon Brown and MDHHS Director Elizabeth Hertel. Nessel, Brown and Hertel said they would not defend the constitutionality of the laws.
Hertel said MDHHS did not have the legal authority to enforce the challenged laws, which is why the state intervened on behalf of the people of Michigan. Hertel said adding the state as a party was the only way for meaningful and complete relief for Northland.
The Reproductive Freedom For All Amendment requires the state not to “deny, burden, or infringe upon this freedom barring a compelling state interest to protect the health of the individual seeking care,” Patel wrote in her order granting a preliminary injunction in June.
“Additionally, any statute or regulation that does deny, burden, or infringe upon reproductive freedom must only do so in order to protect the patient’s health, achieve this goal by the least restrictive means, be consistent with accepted clinical standards of practice and evidence-based medicine, and not infringe upon an individual’s autonomous decision making.”
It appeared the laws Northland challenges, Patel wrote in her order, “are likely unconstitutional.” She will rule on the case after the trial, which is scheduled through Feb. 21.
Two people testified Thursday at the first day of the trial: Chelian and Dr. Charisse Loder, who works at the University of Michigan’s Women’s Clinic. None of the parties gave opening statements.
The law before the June preliminary injunction was granted required those pregnant to wait 24 hours to get an abortion after they received state-mandated informational materials. They either had to go to the clinic to get the materials or print them out themselves, both of which can cause hardship to people seeking an abortion, Chelian and Loder said.
Chelian and Loder said patients were often annoyed when they learned they could not have an abortion the day they made their appointment and would have to wait at least 24 hours for a new appointment.
“I observed people being frustrated, angry and upset that they had gotten a babysitter or a ride or taken a day off school or work, only to be turned away,” Chelian said. “They sometimes weren’t sure when they could come back, pushing them into another gestational limit or making it so they couldn’t get a medication abortion. … They couldn’t understand why the state had anything to do with this.”
The state argued that the 24-hour waiting period does not unduly burden access to abortion; instead it ensures people can exercise their right in an “informed, voluntary, and reflective manner.” Its attorneys asked Patel to affirm the laws and leave the question about any policy changes to the Legislature.
Appellate courts found that laws like the ones challenged by Northland did not constitute an undue burden on a woman’s right to reproductive freedom, the state wrote in its motion to intervene. The Michigan Court of Appeals found in 1992 that the objective of the laws was to ensure “a woman’s decision to obtain an abortion is informed, voluntary, and reflective.”
After the injunction, Chelian said employees at Northland spent less time on the phone talking about the state’s website with patients and can reduce waiting times for those who come in.
“It makes it much easier for them to get an appointment they want and have already made up their mind about,” Chelian said. “There’s no other medical procedure in this state where the patient is required to look at alternatives to the procedure they’re going to have.
“It’s biased, its unnecessary, it burdens the patient, there’s no reason for it. … It is not fair to make an assumption that they want something because you think it’s not a burden or someone else happens to think it’s not a burden.”
The delay and mandatory counseling were designed to pressure people into choosing to continue a pregnancy instead of having an abortion, the lawsuit said.
The lawsuit contended the law also forces patients to read irrelevant, misleading or stigmatizing information that may not apply to their circumstances for ending a pregnancy. Loder said the materials provided by the state are misleading, overplaying the risks of abortion and downplaying the risks of pregnancy.
“I don’t believe (the materials) help my patient make an autonomous decision,” Loder said.
The state argued that the informational materials also do not put an undue burden on abortion care, and is in keeping with the state’s interest to protect a patient’s health, as does the law limiting abortion providers to licensed physicians.
“Providing a patient with medically accurate information is not a burden to that patient, is it?” Assistant Attorney General Kendell Asbenson asked Loder.
“I don’t agree with that statement,” Loder said.
“It’s a burden to provide medically accurate information to a patient?” Asbenson said.
“I think it’s a burden to provide medically accurate information that is not relevant to the patient,” Loder said, saying it would not be helpful to provide Asbenson, a man, information about female reproductive health.
The trial continues Friday.
kberg@detroitnews.com
Michigan
Man arrested for firing shots outside Michigan domestic violence center
Michigan
I discovered anti-Zionism at the University of Michigan. I’m glad it lives on there
Pro-Palestinian demonstrators gather for a mock trial against the University of Michigan’s Board of Regents on the university’s campus in Ann Arbor, Michigan, on April 21, 2025. Photo by Jeff Kowalsky / AFP / Getty Images
At the University of Michigan’s recent commencement ceremony, history professor Derek Peterson delivered a five-minute speech in which he celebrated all those who have fought for justice at the university, my alma mater. Invoking our legendary sports-focused fight song, he asked the crowd to “sing” for suffragist Sarah Burger, who battled to get women admitted as students; for Moritz Levi, Michigan’s first Jewish professor; for all the students who fought for racial justice at Michigan as part of the Black Action Movement; and for the “pro-Palestinian student activists, who have over these past two years opened our hearts to the injustice and inhumanity of Israel’s war in Gaza.”
Peterson’s address was a historian’s invitation to every student and parent in the Ann Arbor stadium to recognize that the fight for Palestinian rights shares roots with our greatest movements for justice, including the struggle against antisemitism.
The backlash, predictably, was swift. The university’s president apologized; the speech was condemned by pro-Israel Jewish organizations and outlets; and I know it upset many college parents, my Gen X peers — we who were raised to believe with all our hearts that Jewish identity and Zionist identity are inextricable.
But to me, Peterson’s speech was a reminder of one of the most important lessons I took away from my time at the University of Michigan: that questioning Zionism is a necessary part of any Jewish life that aims to center justice.
I graduated from Michigan in 1989, and spent much of my last year in Ann Arbor ensconced at Hillel, where I edited a magazine for Jewish students. I’d grown up going to Young Judaea summer camps and had spent a college semester in Israel, where I’d witnessed the beginning of the first Intifada. I returned to find a shanty in the middle of campus that had been erected, a student organizer told our magazine, “to bring the uprising to the community. It is to show the conditions of the Palestinians and the brutal oppression of the Israeli army.”
The shanty evoked those then prevalent on campuses everywhere to symbolize the struggle of Black South Africans against settler colonialism and apartheid. The new shanty on our campus asserted that these words also applied to Israel.
While I was strongly against the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza — where Israel would not remove any settlements until 2005 — I was distressed and confused by the shanty’s silent, everpresent message about Israel’s past and present. Is Israel an apartheid state, I wondered?
So I put that question on the cover of our magazine.
The Hillel director called me into his office and somberly expressed his concern. But Hillel International had not yet officially clamped down on student activities that question Israel and Zionism.
So our cover story ran and we dropped our magazine in bundles across campus. At the time, I thought of myself as a liberal Zionist, and I secretly rooted for the student who tried to disprove the devastating charge. But as young journalists, my fellow magazine staffers and I were committed to exploring the views of those who erected the shanty, no matter their hostility to Zionism. We didn’t code the hostility as danger. No one thought we should report our ideological opponents — the kids who fell asleep on their books in the library just like we did — to the dean or to the government for arrest or deportation.
Over my time as an undergraduate, I’d come to recognize in these kaffiyeh-clad Palestinian, Arab, and Muslim students the same history-minded, righteous hope that animated me.
Decades later, in the spring of 2024, we all watched as pro-Palestinian student activists — including many Jewish students — set up campus encampments around the country to protest Israel’s assault on Gaza. At Michigan, the encampment was set up on the Diag, the university’s public square, where on the day of my own graduation I’d protested the university’s military research. As the mother of a recent college grad, I was humbled by the determination of these kids, who put up tents, organized teach-ins, and then suffered as police turned off their bodycams and used pepper spray against them. They were lawfully protesting for the university to divest from Israel as it bombed the people of Gaza, the children of Gaza — which is now home to the largest number of child amputees in modern history.
What I understand, and Professor Peterson understands, is that the student activists that he lauded at the commencement are fighting not against Jewish life but for Palestinians’ right to survive daily, as people, and as a people. These activists have asked us to understand, finally, that Zionism is what it does.
“It has been hard work to examine my own mind,” Tzvia Thier, a Jewish Israeli mother, wrote in an essay in the 2021 collection A Land With A People: Palestinians and Jews Confront Zionism. As a child, Thier immigrated to Israel from Romania in the wake of the Holocaust. In 2009, Thier accompanied her daughter to “protect” her while she joined an action to fight the evictions of Palestinians from their homes in the Jerusalem neighborhood of Sheikh Jarrah. Thier was 65, and realized that it was the first time in her life that she had had conversations with Palestinians. She understood then that “it was not my daughter who needed to be protected, but the Palestinians.”
“Many questions leave me wondering how I could have not thought about them before,” she wrote. “My solid identity was shaken and then broken. I have been an eyewitness to the systematic oppression, humiliation, racism, cruelty, and hatred by ‘my’ people toward the ‘others.’ And what you finally see, you can no longer unsee.”
When that shanty went up on Michigan’s campus in the late ’80s, I began to question all that I’d learned about Israel’s founding. I began to question the very idea of an ethnostate — in the name of any people, anywhere — that enshrines the supremacy of one group of people over another.
By the time I became a mother, I’d become anti-Zionist. I understood — with a grief that does not abate — that, as Jews, our history of oppression has become an alibi for Israel’s oppression of the Palestinian people.
We must reject the bad faith accusations of antisemitism that have emptied the word of meaning and enabled authoritarian repression. When students on campuses today charge Israel with apartheid and genocide, they are echoing reports from B’Tselem, Israel’s leading human rights organization. I ask the parents of my generation to read these reports and do as Thier did — to allow themselves to see what we have not wanted to see.
I stand with the more than 2,000 University of Michigan faculty, staff, students and alumni who have condemned the university’s response to the commencement address heard round the world.
For the sake of all of our children, I ask that we each do all we can to open our community’s heart to Palestinian history and humanity. That we each join the urgent struggle for the liberation of the Palestinian people.
This is the way that our Jewish college kids will find the deep and true safety of community: by leaving hatred, fear, and isolation behind; by honoring Jewish history by standing in solidarity with all who are oppressed; and by roaring in a stadium for freedom and justice, along with their entire generation.
You are surely a friend of the Forward if you’re reading this. And so it’s with excitement and awe — of all that the Forward is, was, and will be — that I introduce myself to you as the Forward’s newest editor-in-chief.
And what a time to step into the leadership of this storied Jewish institution! For 129 years, the Forward has shaped and told the American Jewish story. I’m stepping in at an intense time for Jews the world over. We urgently need the Forward’s courageous, unflinching journalism — not only as a source of reliable information, but to provide inspiration, healing and hope.
Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Michigan
Thumb Coast Electric earns Michigan 50 Companies to Watch honor
Thumb Coast Electric has been named a 2026 Michigan 50 Companies to Watch Award recipient, according to a community announcement recognizing high‑growth, second‑stage businesses across the state.
The Port Huron‑based electrical contractor was honored April 22 during the 22nd annual Michigan Celebrates Small Business Gala, where company representatives were recognized onstage alongside other awardees before an audience of more than 800 business owners and supporters.
The award is presented by Michigan Celebrates Small Business, which annually recognizes companies that demonstrate strong growth potential, sustainable competitive advantages and a commitment to their communities. Thumb Coast Electric is listed among the 2026 honorees in the Michigan 50 Companies to Watch category.
Recognizing second‑stage growth
The Michigan 50 Companies to Watch Award honors second‑stage companies — defined as businesses with six to 99 full‑time‑equivalent employees and annual revenue or working capital between $750,000 and $50 million — that are privately held and headquartered in Michigan.
“These companies represent the future of Michigan’s economy,” said Brian Calley, president and CEO of the Small Business Association of Michigan, which partners in the awards program. He said the designation recognizes businesses that combine consistent growth with strong workplace culture and community impact.
Judges from economic and entrepreneurship development organizations across the state select winners based on employee or sales growth, sustainable competitive advantage and other indicators of long‑term success. Award finalists also undergo a due‑diligence review before final selections are made.
Community and company culture
Thumb Coast Electric representative Erica Chisholm said the recognition reflects both employee dedication and community support.
“Receiving the Michigan 50 Companies to Watch award is a huge honor because it reflects the hard work our team puts in every day and the support we’ve had from our community,” Chisholm said, according to the announcement. She said the company has focused on sustainable growth, investing in its workforce and maintaining quality standards as it expands.
Michigan Celebrates Small Business launched the 50 Companies to Watch program in 2004 and has honored more than 1,200 businesses statewide over the past two decades.
This story was created by Dave DeMille, ddemille@gannett.com, with the assistance of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Journalists were involved in every step of the information gathering, review, editing and publishing process. Learn more at cm.usatoday.com/ethical-conduct.
-
Sports7 minutes agoPrep talk: Southern Section Division 1 semifinals features matchup of boys’ volleyball powers
-
World19 minutes agoEurope Day: 40 years of ties between Spain and the European Union
-
News49 minutes agoFrontier Airlines plane hits person on runway during takeoff at Denver airport
-
New York2 hours agoMan Dies in Subway Attack; Mamdani Orders Inquiry Into Suspect’s Release From Bellevue
-
Detroit, MI3 hours agoPatchy dense fog turns to stronger thunderstorms for Metro Detroit to start the weekend
-
San Francisco, CA3 hours agoWhere to watch Pittsburgh Pirates vs San Francisco Giants: TV channel, start time, streaming for May 9
-
Dallas, TX3 hours agoFC Dallas vs Real Salt Lake Preview: Lineups, Storylines & What to Watch
-
Miami, FL3 hours agoMiami Area Gets First New Manufactured Home Community in Decades