Connect with us

Denver, CO

A Denver Olympics? Why landing Winter Games — at least for now — is unlikely | Special report

Published

on

A Denver Olympics? Why landing Winter Games — at least for now — is unlikely | Special report


Press play for a time machine into Colorado’s last real chance to host the Olympics.

The Denver Chamber of Commerce produced a 14-minute promotional video for hosting the 1976 Winter Games. It opens with grainy aerial views of the Rocky Mountains, cowboys on horseback, a Native American ceremony, skiers busting through powder, a cheesy soundtrack and a booming voice:

The Denver Olympic story starts in a land of Olympian proportions. The American West.

Advertisement

The pitch worked. In 1970, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) awarded Denver the ‘76 Winter Games on promises made in their application. The video continues:

Already, nearly 80 percent of the facilities necessary to hold the ‘76 games are constructed and ready. … The proposed site for the men’s and women’s slalom, and giant slalom, at Loveland Basin is only 45 minutes from downtown Denver by superhighway. … Nordic events will be held in the Evergreen area. … Figure skating and ice hockey events can be held at the Denver Coliseum. … Speed skating will take place at a new rink near the Olympic village. … We hope we’ll see you in ‘76.

Of course, none of that happened.

Colorado voters in 1972 overwhelmingly approved Amendment 8, a grassroots effort prohibiting the state from levying taxes or allocating funds for the ’76 Winter Games. They went to Innsbruck, Austria, instead. It marked the first time in Olympic history that a selected host site boycotted.

Advertisement

“It’s really rare that a city would invest this kind of capital and then not ensure that its voters are lined up behind it,” said Samuel Bock, a public historian and exhibit developer for History Colorado. “But I think it’s important to understand the gulf in terms of the optimism of the people promoting the bid and the actual reality on the ground.”

Has anything changed in 50-plus years?

The Denver Gazette sought to understand why Colorado rejected the ‘76 Winter Games — and determine if the state is ready for another push to host — ahead of the upcoming Paris Olympics.

Matthew Payne, executive director of the Denver Sports Commission, is ready for that conversation.

“Visit Denver and the Denver Sports Commission would be thrilled to evaluate and, if appropriate, support a future Olympic bid if the state and city residents supported it,” Payne said in a statement to The Denver Gazette.

Advertisement

Call it a second gold rush. The 1960s were transformational in Colorado mountain towns.

Ski resorts opened in Breckenridge, Steamboat Springs and Vail, coinciding with massive population booms across the Front Range. It’s no surprise industry leaders and local politicians sought to share their mountains and grow business opportunities on the Olympic stage.

It began in 1963, according to the Denver Public Library, when Gov. John Love mentioned the possibility during a speech delivered in Colorado Springs. Momentum grew in 1967 when the U.S. Olympic Committee picked Denver as its official candidate for the ‘76 Winter Games. In 1968, the Denver Organizing Committee (DOC) traveled to the Olympics in France and Mexico City to help bolster the city’s candidacy.

Yet the DOC failed to predict an undercurrent of public skepticism back home.

Advertisement

Richard Lamm, a state representative in the early 1970s, was not convinced a Colorado Olympics were a good idea. He organized the Olympic opposition effort — Citizens for Colorado’s Future — for collecting signatures to include Amendment 8 on the ballot.

As it turned out, major roadblocks existed between Denver and the ‘76 Winter Games.

The city oversold its hosting ability and undersold the financial commitment.

Your daily report on everything sports in Colorado – covering the Denver Broncos, Denver Nuggets, Colorado Avalanche, and columns from Woody Paige and Paul Klee.

Success! Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter.

• Having “nearly 80 percent” of all required venues constructed was overstated. Denver and its adjacent mountain communities lacked an Olympic ski jump, luge and bobsled tracks, a speedskating facility, media housing and a modernized downtown arena.

• The IOC required all venues be within 50 miles of the Athletes’ Village in Denver, eliminating Breckenridge, Steamboat Springs and Vail. Alternative locations at Mount Sniktau and Evergreen did not receive much snow. Proposed solutions? Helicopter travel for Alpine athletes or trucking in snow to lower-elevation events.

Advertisement

• The DOC initially proposed a price tag of $15 million to host the Winter Games. Their estimate later grew to $35 million. But the final number would likely be much higher. A fitting example: The 1976 Summer Games left the city of Montreal with more than $1 billion in debt, according to The Guardian. 

Lamm later served three terms as Colorado Governor (1975-87). He died in 2021 due to complications from a pulmonary embolism. He was 85.

“I was on the legislative audit committee back in the 1970s,” Lamm told Colorado Politics in 2019. “And that’s when I started evaluating the pros and cons of the Olympics. We fought it back in those days in 1972. The voters made a decision, and I was convinced it was the right one.” 

Lessons from the 1976 boycott remain as conversation shifts to the present day.

Colorado Springs is home to the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Training Center. Denver missed out as a host city for the 2026 World Cup. But it successfully held large-scale events like the 2008 Democratic National Convention and MLB, NHL, NBA all-star games.

Advertisement

But is the state ready to host a Winter Games?

Time for a reality check. The Olympics will not be held in Colorado, at the very earliest, until the 2040s.

The 2026 Winter Games are in Italy. It’s anticipated in 2030 the French Alps will host. Salt Lake City is the leading candidate for 2034.

Denver’s exclusion is not from a lack of effort.

Advertisement

In 2018, the city formed the Olympic & Paralympic Winter Games Exploratory Committee to “determine if hosting a future Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games could be done and should be done” for a potential 2030 bid.

Their conclusion: Yes. But with conditions.

The committee recommended the Olympics be privately financed, designed to prioritize existing or temporary venues instead of new construction, while being sensitive to traffic congestion and affordable housing. It should also be voted on by residents through a statewide initiative.

Their proposal, while innovative, ultimately didn’t sell. The United States Olympic Committee chose to nominate Salt Lake City over Denver for the Winter Games. Utah benefits from existing venues and facilities after the 2002 Winter Games in Salt Lake. Denver reimagined how the Olympics should operate.

It’s unclear when Colorado will re-enter the Olympics conversation. In 2019, Denver residents passed Initiative 302 to require a vote before the city spends public money on any future bid.

Advertisement

“The possibility of the Olympics being hosted in Colorado is a larger discussion that would require careful consideration from stakeholders across the state,” Colorado Springs mayor Yemi Mobolade told The Denver Gazette in a statement. “In the meantime, we will continue to champion the Olympic and Paralympic spirit and ideals as we showcase our city’s commitment to the movement and support for Team USA athletes.”

Colorado’s rejection of the ‘76 Winter Games shaped its trajectory for decades to come. The grainy Denver Chamber of Commerce promotional video is a glimpse into an unfulfilled vision of growth for the state. But at what real cost?

“The historian in me takes a look at the last 20 or 30 years and thinks: Who knows what would have happened if we had brought the Olympics here? We may not have really needed to,” Bock said. “It didn’t seem to be a bump in the road for anything. Because the state’s growth has been just meteoric.”



Source link

Advertisement

Denver, CO

Denver bans federal law enforcement officers from covering their faces, DHS says it won’t comply

Published

on

Denver bans federal law enforcement officers from covering their faces, DHS says it won’t comply


Denver city leaders unanimously passed a ban on all officers, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, from wearing face coverings while detaining or arresting people. That law also requires officers to wear visible identification.

It’s the second sweeping ordinance against federal officers in Denver in just a few days. Last Thursday, Mayor Mike Johnston signed an executive order banning federal immigration agents from operating on city property without a judicial warrant.

An federal immigration agent on Feb. 5, 2026 in Minneapolis.

Advertisement

Stephen Maturen / Getty Images


 It also directs Denver police, deputies and fire personnel to investigate reports of violence and criminal behavior.

The Department of Homeland Security responded calling the executive order “legally illiterate,” adding, “no local official has the authority to bar ICE from carrying out federal law on public property … and while Mayor Johnston continues to release pedophiles, rapists, gang members, and murderers onto their streets, our brave law enforcement will continue to risk their lives to arrest these heinous criminals.”

DHS didn’t mince words when responding to Denver’s new face coverings ban either, saying in part, “To be crystal clear: we will not abide by a city council’s unconstitutional ban. Our officers wear masks to protect themselves from being doxxed and targeted by known and suspected terrorist sympathizers. Not only is ICE law enforcement facing a more than 1,300 percent increase in assaults against them, but we’ve also seen thugs launch websites to reveal officers’ identity.”

On the other hand, the Denver City Council didn’t mince words when it approved the ban.

Advertisement

“It’s very disturbing to me, as an American, to see masked agents on the street,” said Councilman Kevin Flynn who represents District 2. “I don’t know what the best way is to enforce our immigration laws, but I think I know the worst way when I see it.”

“I said all along, this was a slam dunk,” added Councilman Darrell Watson of District 9.

Last month, a federal judge struck down a California law prohibiting federal agents from wearing masks. But, the city council says it made sure its ordinance is enforceable.

You have to treat all law enforcement the same,” said City Council President Amanda Sandoval. “So, our sheriffs can’t have masks. Our State Patrol can’t have masks. And federally you can’t have masks. And we delineate that within the ordinance which, that’s where California got the issue.”

Sandoval said she was monitoring the legal process and comparing the two ordinances to ensure they would be good to go.

Advertisement

Although the city council believes the ordinance is constitutional, the Denver Police Department says it’s still working to determine what implementation could look like, and provided this statement to CBS Colorado:

“Our Safety departments are working with the City Attorney and bill sponsors to determine what implementation could look like. Of utmost importance is discretion and prioritizing de-escalation when encountering these situations. Our goal is to apply this ordinance in a way that builds trust and transparency without putting officers, deputies, or the public at risk.”

Coupled with the city’s new executive order, Sandoval believes Denver now has the necessary guidelines in place.

“A map for residents to understand predictability, and that’s what I always want, is what can the residents be able to rely on.”

There are exemptions in place for the ban, for example: during an active undercover operation, when gear is required for physical safety, and for personnel performing SWAT duties.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Denver, CO

9NEWS

Published

on

9NEWS
KUSA (9NEWS Denver) is your source for breaking news, Colorado weather, traffic, and live coverage in Denver and across the Front Range. Get the latest updates from the 9NEWS team — from major local headlines and investigations to severe weather, community stories and the moments everyone’s talking about.
Watch live newscasts, stream breaking coverage and catch up on the top stories shaping Denver, Boulder, Aurora, Fort Collins and all of Colorado.
Subscribe for:
• Denver breaking news + live updates
• Colorado weather forecasts, snowstorms and severe weather alerts
• Investigations and accountability reporting
• Community stories across the Front Range
• Major events, sports and local explainers

KUSA / 9NEWS Denver — Colorado news and weather, live and on demand.

🔗 More: https://www.9news.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Denver, CO

Denver rally shows divided feelings over U.S.-Israel action against Iran

Published

on

Denver rally shows divided feelings over U.S.-Israel action against Iran


DENVER — More than 24 hours after the United States and Israel attacked Iran, Coloradans are continuing to express their feelings about what the attack means not only for the world, but here in our state.

For the second straight day, Coloradans expressed their opinions on the steps of the state Capitol about the attack by the US and Israel on Iran.

But instead of anger, as was the case on Saturday, the tone on Sunday was more cheerful.

“Today it’s a celebration about like getting our freedom back, and we would love to have people to be happy with us,” said Forzun Yalme, who helped organize the event with Free Iran Colorado.

Advertisement

For some Iranian-Americans, the news of the attack brings a new sense of hope that freedom is near.

“For me to be Iranian-American, in 47 years here, I learned about democracy and human rights and what I like,” detailed Amir Tosh, another member of Free Iran Colorado. “I want to transfer what your values are for democracy, human rights, freedom to my country, my motherland.”

Denver rally shows divided feelings over U.S.-Israel action against Iran

Advertisement

“My uncle and grandma, grandparents, they were all so happy about what happened, because we can, like, now feel the freedom,” explained Yalme.

But some Iranian-Americans are more cautious.

Colorado’s only Iranian-American state representative, Yara Zokaie, doubts the operation will have a significant impact to Iran’s leadership.

“I’m sympathetic to people who want regime change by any means necessary, but I think we also need to stop and realize what this actually means,” said Zokaie. “Regime change is not something that can happen in one airstrike.”

Zokaie admits she herself was elated to hear Iran’s supreme leader and other top officials were killed in the attack.

Advertisement

But she hopes Coloradans remember the innocent people who have already been killed and those who are more likely to come.

“I ask that we remember the humanity of people in the Middle East as this news unfolds. I ask that we call for a peaceful resolution that we empower Iranian people who will bring change from within, and that we call for no war with Iran,” said Zokaie.

Several people at today’s event at the Capitol approached our Denver7 team. They shared their gratitude for President Donald Trump, the US military, and the Israelis for their action in helping bring freedom to Iran.

They hope others will see that as well. They plan on being here for the next hour and a half or so.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending