Colorado
These Colorado school districts want their students back. So they’re adding online classes
Kurt Clay, assistant superintendent in the Delta County school district, was alarmed last year to learn that 138 students had left his western Colorado district for public online schools. With them went $1.6 million in state education dollars.
“That’s just funding that goes somewhere else,” Clay said. “It’s not staying here local.”
It wasn’t just about the money though. Clay and other district leaders believed they could offer something better: The flexible online classes students wanted with the added benefit of keeping them connected to district staff, school clubs, and special events like prom. That’s how the district’s online program — Empower Online — came to be last fall.
Delta County is among the dozens of Colorado districts that have recently started their own online programs or plan to soon, competing for students at a time when enrollment is declining statewide. Such school districts, which are contending with budget cuts and even school closures, are particularly wary of multi-district online schools, which they say draw students and state funding to districts hundreds of miles away.
Colorado has 44 multi-district online schools serving more than 30,000 students statewide. About half the schools get 90% or more of their students from outside their authorizing district, according to data from the Colorado Department of Education. Just a few entities authorize many of the schools.
More multi-district online schools could be on the way. While the State Board of Education unanimously rejected one in March, it will consider three more proposals on Thursday.
This group helps districts with online programs
Over the past year, a state-supported nonprofit called Colorado Digital Learning Solutions has helped many districts launch or plan new online programs. The group is not an online school. Rather, it provides asynchronous online classes taught by Colorado-licensed teachers to school districts and charter schools. Some of its teachers still teach in-person classes, and others are retired from Colorado classrooms.
The Weld RE-5J district in northern Colorado has used Colorado Digital Learning Solutions courses for years in its online program. Emma, a junior in the district, is taking algebra, English, and world history online through the group, plus four in-person classes at her high school in Johnstown.
Emma, who hopes to graduate a semester early, said she found all in-person classes a struggle because she has ADHD.
“I just have a really hard time focusing in class and being my whole present self,” she said.
“I chose hybrid because it still gives me a social aspect, but it also gives me that flexible aspect.”
Colorado Digital Learning Solutions was selected to provide online classes to Colorado schools after the passage of a 2016 state law that required increased investment in supplemental online courses. The law sought to ensure digital equity by providing assistance to school districts and charter schools that didn’t have the capacity to build their own online offerings.
Colorado Digital Learning Solutions receives about 20% of its budget from the state. Generally, school districts pay the group $250 per student per semester-long class.
About half of Colorado’s 180 school districts use the nonprofit to offer online classes — sometimes a full menu and sometimes a single course. For example, the small Lamar district on the Eastern Plains contracts with the group to provide a Latin class, taught by a Boulder teacher, to one student.
As more school districts seek to win students back from multi-district online schools — or prevent students from leaving in the first place — things have become contentious at times. Some multi-district online schools are pushing back against Colorado Digital Learning Solutions.
In a February letter on behalf of some multi-district online schools, attorney Brad Miller accused the group of causing “reputational harm” to the schools. He said the group’s promotional materials highlight the online schools’ low graduation rates without noting that their students tend to be highly mobile and behind academically.
Dan Morris, co-executive director of Colorado Digital Learning Solutions, said his group was reporting publicly available data.
Miller, who’s been involved in several high-profile lawsuits on behalf of conservative-leaning school districts, did not respond to requests for comment or to clarify which online schools he represents.
The online program pitch
Seventeen Colorado districts, most of them small and rural, started online programs in 2025. Colorado Digital Learning Solutions is working with 25-30 additional districts that want to start online programs next school year, Morris said.
Unlike multi-district online schools, online programs must have fewer than 100 full-time online students and no more than 10 from outside the district.
A key part of Morris’ pitch to districts is data. It’s in the presentation he’s given at state conferences: “Stop the Enrollment Drain: Build a Local Online Program that keeps students in-district.” He also shares detailed spreadsheets his team has compiled showing how many students school districts are losing to multi-district online schools.
That’s what convinced officials in the Durango district in southwestern Colorado to start an online program next year. They learned they’d lost more than 400 students — and about $5 million in state funding — to multi-district online schools.
Robert Aspen, Durango High School’s intervention coordinator, said they’ll start with up to 50 students, with plans to grow long term. The goal is to attract students who enrolled in multi-district online schools back to their home school.
While there are 44 multi-district onlines in Colorado, state data shows that most students are leaving their local districts for a few big names, authorized by just a few entities and often run by for-profit companies located out of state.
Byers Superintendent Tom Turrell, whose district authorizes eight multi-district online charter schools, said it’s no surprise that more districts are starting online options.
“We don’t view district on-line programs as competition,” he said by email. “Like Byers, other districts are innovating to better serve students and that’s great, that’s their job.”
Online learning is popular, not all options created equal
Educators say families seek online options for many reasons, including because students suffer from anxiety, have medical challenges, have experienced bullying, or have jobs or household responsibilities that conflict with a traditional school schedule. Competitive athletes also like the flexibility of online courses.
“I have a rodeo girl,” said Delaine Hudson, a former principal who runs the new online program in Delta County. “She spends her morning doing school work and then she’s either practicing or … she’s somewhere in the state doing rodeo.”
Forty students, mostly high schoolers, are enrolled in Delta County’s online program this semester, taking courses through Colorado Digital Learning Solutions with other students around the state. They take core classes, like English and science, and less common offerings like “History of the Holocaust.”
Hudson likes that there’s a real teacher available to message when students hit roadblocks. She checks in with students weekly, too, by phone, email, or text.
Most students are thrilled with the online program so far, she said. “And it’s rigorous. I don’t feel like we’re just pushing them through.”
Critics of some multi-district online schools question their quality. At 20 of the schools, so few students take state tests that state officials can’t calculate ratings, leaving the public in the dark about how they’re doing.
In addition, some of the biggest multi-district online schools routinely post low graduation rates. For example, the 2,600-student Astravo Academy Online High School, which is authorized by the Byers district, has a four-year graduation rate of 44%. At District 49’s GOAL High School, it’s 49%. The state average is about 86%, according to state data.
Supporters say the some multi-district online schools are helping at-risk students who’ve faced educational and personal challenges.
“We’ve taken on all of the kids who needed second and third and fourth and fifth chances in GOAL from the entire state,” said District 49 school board member Marie LaVere-Wright at a board meeting last June.
While GOAL is classified by the state as an “alternative education campus” — schools designed to serve high-risk students — more than 90 other Colorado schools, including many bricks and mortar schools, have the same designation.
District 49 officials declined to comment for this story.
This story was made available via the Colorado News Collaborative. Learn more at:
Colorado
Denver Art Museum workers ratify first union contract for Colorado museum employees
Denver Art Museum Workers United ratified a historic bargaining agreement on Saturday, becoming the first museum workers in the State of Colorado to have a union contract.
The contract is the result of nearly two years of negotiations between the union’s bargaining committee and museum management.
Pam Skiles, Senior Paintings Conservator, said, “It feels great to ratify our first contract and improve working conditions for our coworkers across the museum. We will only continue to build on these wins into the future.”
The union says the new three-year contract includes agreements on equitable pay, just cause rights, increased sick time, and updated policies on health and safety and parental leave.
The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, says this contract “sets the stage for further cultural organizing in the state.”
AFL-CIO said, “Now that DAMWU has a ratified agreement, the workers of the art museum join Jefferson County Public Library, as well as the more than 50,000 other cultural workers across the country who are building a national movement to raise employment standards in the cultural sector through AFSCME’s Cultural Workers United.”
Colorado
Leadville lawyer faces Summit County school board president in Democratic primary for seat in the Colorado House of Representatives
A Leadville lawyer will face the president of the Summit School District Board of Education in the Democratic primary for a seat in the Colorado House of Representatives.
Chris Floyd, of Leadville, is running against Consuelo Redhorse, of Silverthorne, in the race for House District 13, which includes Summit, Grand, Park, Lake, Chaffee and Jackson counties. The primary election is scheduled for June 30, with ballots being mailed to voters beginning June 8. Whoever wins in June will face Republican candidate Miguel Martinez in the November general election.
In interviews, Floyd and Redhorse described what voters should know about their experience, laid out their positions on issues from housing affordability to TABOR reform, and outlined what their top priorities would be if elected.
Floyd moved from Virginia more than a decade ago to open a law practice in Leadville and has served as the Lake County attorney and a municipal judge. She has been endorsed by outgoing House Speaker and District 13 Rep. Julie McCluskie, who is term-limited.
“One of the things I came to realize is that this district really needs a strong advocate,” Floyd said. “One of the reasons for that is most of what comes out of the state legislature is driven by the 11 largest counties on the Front Range — and they just aren’t like us. They aren’t like the communities that make up House District 13.”
Redhorse, a lifelong Coloradan and member of the Navajo Nation, is serving as president during her second term on the Summit School District Board of Education after first being elected in 2019. She has lived in Summit County for about 15 years and works as an accountant for a property management company.
Being on the school board, Redhorse has learned that “everything is connected” to decisions made in the Colorado legislature, and she hopes to build on her experience as an elected official in the statehouse.
“I’ve had a really great opportunity just being really integrated with the community, talking with families and students and teachers, in a time where people have so many experiences in public education,” Redhorse said. “I thought I could take that experience and really bring it forward to be able to represent more people and really look beyond the K-12 realm of leadership that I’ve experienced.”
Housing and affordability
Both candidates said housing affordability is a top issue for voters in District 13, and one they would prioritize if elected.
Redhorse said the state Legislature has made progress “cutting the red tape” to help streamline construction of affordable housing, but said she would focus on making it easier to redevelop existing properties for housing.
If elected, Redhorse said she would examine how land-use policies affect the ability to create affordable housing, while ensuring that “local governments really get the final say and making sure we’re not mandating too much.” She said that housing has to be affordable so that service industry workers whose jobs support the local economy can afford to live in the communities where they work.
Floyd said that while many housing efforts have focused on making single-family homes more affordable for first-time buyers, there hasn’t been enough focus on the affordability of rental housing. Noting that many jobs in resort communities are seasonal, she said someone may work at a ski resort in Summit County in the winter, then move down to Buena Vista for the summer rafting season, without necessarily looking to own a home.
“But many of them end up spending more than they would pay on a mortgage for a rental property — so that’s another thing,” Floyd said. “There are a lot of different aspects that we need to look at in terms of the housing issue.”
The two candidates also said that Coloradans in their district are facing affordability concerns at every turn — from gas and groceries to healthcare and property insurance.
Floyd noted that while Front Range residents have access to several healthcare providers, most mountain residents have only two main providers and higher rates of uninsured residents.
“If you don’t qualify for Medicare or Medicaid or some other type of assistance, your premiums are just absolutely outrageous,” she said. “So, we have so many people now that have dropped off of the healthcare rolls because they just can’t afford it.”
Redhorse agreed that mountain communities differ from the Front Range and need targeted strategies to address the higher cost of living. She said she would focus on finding “sustainable solutions” to reduce costs as residents balance rising expenses.
“Our prices have spiked — the cost of living, the cost of childcare,” Redhorse said. “Families are trying to make the choice between having food on their tables, paying for their basic utilities, paying for their mortgages, paying for childcare and trying to get to the places where they work.”
Candidates diverge on top priorities
Redhorse ranked protecting public lands and water among her top priorities, while Floyd said supporting small businesses is a top issue, though the candidates agreed that both issues are important.
Redhorse said low snowpack this winter highlighted the need to safeguard Colorado’s water supply and address federal staffing cuts at land management agencies, which she said have affected local governments, businesses and recreation areas.
“We experience it every day. In all of our communities, so much of our land is public land, and something that we need to keep protected for future generations,” Redhorse said. “What I’ve heard a lot is the need for responsible growth and making sure we’re not over loving our public lands, while also understanding that it’s such an important part of our economies up here.”
Redhorse noted that because so much recreation happens on public lands and waters, protecting them also protects local economies that rely on tourism. She said that small businesses in particular are being impacted by cuts to federal land management staff and ongoing drought.
Floyd said that main streets in mountain towns “are kept alive by our small businesses” and that she would work to expand broadband access and workforce training, including in the trades, for rural areas. Especially in winters with low snow or summers with low water, residents need opportunities to pivot to other work when tourism slows, she said.
“A lot of our younger workforce, I fear they’re leaving not only the area but the state, because there’s no opportunity for them here,” Floyd said. “So, I really think we need to invest more in workforce training.”
Over the past year, Floyd said that she has engaged with the Colorado Water Congress to learn more about the state’s water issues. She believes that District 13 communities need a strong negotiator to advocate to balance rural and urban water needs and she supports “having a very assertive approach to protecting Colorado’s water interest.”
State budget crunch and TABOR Reform
As Colorado’s legislature has faced budget deficits in recent years, both Floyd and Redhorse said they would support changes to the state’s Taxpayer Bill of Rights to allow the governments to keep more tax revenue.
Colorado’s Taxpayer Bill of Rights — or TABOR — limits the amount of revenue that state and local governments can collect and spend. Passed in 1992 as a constitutional amendment, it requires voter approval for all tax increases and places caps on government spending based on inflation and population growth. Democrats in the legislature have tried in recent years to change the TABOR cap through ballot measures, but voters have rejected those efforts.
“Colorado has grown so much that the TABOR formula, the way it’s structured — it just doesn’t work. It can’t work anymore,” Floyd said.
She said Colorado also needs to look at where it can reduce costs and operate state agencies more efficiently.
Redhorse also described TABOR as “outdated” and said it has limited the governments’ ability to provide services, especially as Medicaid costs have grown faster than the caps on state spending. She said, “it’s just arbitrary, the caps don’t truly show the increase in the cost of all the services Colorado is providing.”
Both Floyd and Redhorse said they support the “Cut the Ropes” ballot initiative, which will ask voters in the November election to change how much tax revenue the state and school districts can keep to spend on education.
Immigration, law enforcement and privacy
Both Democratic candidates said that they support Colorado laws that protect immigrants and limit local law enforcement participation in federal immigration enforcement.
Redhorse said she is concerned about what she described as “racial profiling” by the federal government, which affects both immigrants and U.S. citizens. She said she also believes that some local law enforcement agencies are cooperating with Immigration and Customs Enforcement in violation of Colorado law, eroding trust within their communities.
“The lack of trust that immigration enforcement has caused in so many of our communities, especially our Latino communities, is huge,” Redhorse said. “We have people out there that are victims of crimes or needing protection, who are too afraid to go to our local law enforcement, who are really there to serve the people and keep communities safe.”
Floyd said that she also believes that local law enforcement should focus on enforcing state laws and protecting communities, rather than assisting the federal government with immigration enforcement. She said she is particularly concerned that immigration enforcement has impacted “vulnerable individuals” and children.
“I absolutely reject any attempts to try to remove folks that have made a good pathway in this country,” Floyd said. “With that being said, I also support law enforcement and their duty to protect our communities. To the extent there are lawbreakers who don’t have legal status, I think there are current legal avenues to address that.”
Both candidates also expressed concerns with the Flock Safety cameras that law enforcement agencies across the state use, saying the license plate reader technology collects too much information and could violate Coloradans’ privacy rights. Both said they support reining in the use of the technology, after the state legislature rejected a bill that would have done so during this year’s session.
Colorado
Watch CBS Colorado’s GOP Governor Primary Debate
-
Utah3 minutes agoNBA Mock Draft Roundup: Who The Experts Think Utah Will Take
-
Vermont10 minutes agoPlay it again, Sam: A Vermont picture palace reels in new money with old movies – VTDigger
-
Virginia13 minutes agoVirginia Lottery Powerball, Pick 3 Night results for June 6, 2026
-
Wisconsin19 minutes agoWisconsin beats SEC powerhouses for class of 2027 defensive lineman
-
West Virginia25 minutes agoStrong wind at NCAA baseball tournament in West Virginia sends 5 people to the hospital
-
Wyoming28 minutes agoWyoming High School State Finals
-
Crypto33 minutes agoBitcoin’s Stumble Looks Graceful Next to Zcash’s Faceplant — Week in Review
-
Finance40 minutes agoHow this week’s inflation data and interest rates affect your money