Connect with us

Colorado

One-third of Colorado hasn’t tested for toxic “forever chemicals” in their water. Here’s who has.

Published

on

One-third of Colorado hasn’t tested for toxic “forever chemicals” in their water. Here’s who has.


About one-third of Colorado’s municipalities and counties have not tested for toxic “forever chemicals” in their water supply.

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or “PFAS,” can cause a host of health issues and CBS News Colorado has reported extensively on their impact and efforts throughout the state and country to limit their presence in drinking water.

About 300 water districts still haven’t started testing for PFAS, although the state says they have until 2026 to start testing, and 2029 to begin implementing solutions.

Additional Information from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment:

Advertisement

How many water districts across the state still have not contacted your office and/or even begun testing for PFAS yet? 

In Colorado, around 900 public water systems will be required to test for PFAS to comply with the new PFAS rule. To date, we have assisted over 600 public water systems with PFAS testing and will continue these proactive efforts in advance of the new rule’s implementation.

Is your department concerned about the districts who still have not gotten on the ball with this?

The fact that so many have tested is great. Most systems do not have PFAS values that exceed EPA’s new standards. Now that we have a final rule, we will be doing extensive outreach and training to help our water providers understand rule compliance and the benefits of testing early to access available state and federal funding sooner and have more time to implement solutions if needed. We can support water systems that haven’t been tested yet through our PFAS grant program. Our goal is to provide technical and financial assistance to as many public water systems as possible to help them comply with the rule before EPA’s deadline.  

I know for some smaller districts it’s going to be really tough to afford the mitigation measures necessary to filter out the PFAS. What supports are available for those districts?

Advertisement
  • Most water systems that have tested for PFAS do not have levels above the new standards set by EPA.
  • For those with issues, CDPHE developed the PFAS grant program and has assisted almost 30 impacted water systems with pilot testing or installing water treatment, providing emergency assistance for affected communities, and paying for water systems to test for PFAS. 
  • In 2022 and 2023, we awarded $7.6 million in grant funding to help our communities proactively identify and reduce public exposure to PFAS chemicals. 
  • In 2024, the department will award another $5-6 million in grant funding. The federal funding sources will provide additional resources to conduct pilot testing or treatment technologies, planning and design grants for treatment, and treatment infrastructure.
  • In addition, EPA awarded CDPHE $85 million dollars over two years in the Emerging Contaminants for Small and Disadvantaged Communities Grant program.
  • In addition to the Emerging Contaminants grant program mentioned above, federal funding under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law funding has awarded Colorado $106 million in drinking water revolving and water pollution control funds for 2024. These BIL funds support a range of activities that includes addressing emerging contaminant issues and PFAS-related projects through supplemental funding and State Revolving Fund direct project awards.  You can find more information on our website. 

Some water districts are having to pass costs on to customers to pay for PFAS mitigation tools. What efforts is the state taking to help minimize that from happening?

As mentioned above, different groups of funds are available to help water systems with PFAS treatment costs. 

How long do districts have until enforcement actions can be taken against them for not complying with the new regulations? What will happen to the districts who are not in compliance?

The new rule requires public water systems to test for PFAS beginning in 2026. Water systems must also provide the public with information on the levels of these PFAS in their drinking water. Public water systems have until 2029 to implement solutions (if necessary) to meet the new PFAS standards. After that, CDPHE will issue violations and take enforcement actions as needed to secure public health protection and compliance. CDPHE’s goal is to get ahead of this by utilizing the tools outlined above to help the water systems that need to take action now. 

What’s your message to residents who may be concerned about the safety of their water until their district tests and mitigates?

People concerned with possible PFAS levels in their communities can review our dashboard, which displays information about PFAS test results across Colorado. 

Advertisement

We have also developed numerous educational materials to help people understand and act on potential PFAS exposure. 

If you are concerned about PFAS, you can reduce exposure by using at-home water filters or using an alternate source of water for drinking and cooking.

  • While many at-home water filters exist, they haven’t all been certified to remove PFAS. Look for manufacturers that have demonstrated the water filter can remove PFAS to non-detectable levels. Examples to consider include: 
  • Look for bottled water that has been treated with reverse osmosis. CDPHE cannot verify that all bottled water is below PFAS health advisories. Reverse osmosis is a treatment that removes PFAS, so we suggest choosing a brand that includes this information on the label. 
    • Treating water with reverse osmosis removes fluoride, and bottled water usually does not contain it. If you choose bottled or treated water, talk to your dentist about other ways to get fluoride to protect oral health.
    • Bottled water negatively impacts the environment. 

At the end of the day, these districts are having to pay a lot of money to clean up someone else’s mess. Any comment or plans you can provide about future enforcement or regulation changes on facilities, industries, or businesses discharging waste containing PFAS?

We completed our stakeholder engagement effort and are now finalizing our 2024 PFAS Action Plan , which outlines how we will holistically address PFAS contamination moving forward. So far, we have taken many steps towards addressing PFAS contamination. 

  • The Water Quality Control Commission’s Policy 20-1 adds PFAS testing requirements and discharge limits to permits for facilities that discharge PFAS to lakes and streams.
  • We require that any releases of PFOA or PFOS at a facility under a hazardous waste permit or corrective action order be investigated, cleaned up, or otherwise remediated.
  • We developed regulations with stakeholders for anyone using firefighting foam containing PFAS to prevent new releases of PFAS in accordance with House Bill 22-1345.
  • Our PFAS Takeback Program has taken almost 18 thousand gallons of firefighting foam containing PFAS out of service from our fire departments so we can safely dispose of it and expanded the program to include our commercial service airports. 
  • We coordinate with the Department of Defense to determine the extent of PFAS contamination and ensure adequate protection of Colorado’s resources and impacted communities. We also support facilities doing voluntary testing and cleanup through our PFAS Grant Program and Voluntary Cleanup and Redevelopment Program.
  • The sales and distribution ban on certain products that contain PFAS from House Bill 22-1345 will decrease the public’s exposure to PFAS and lessen the amount of PFAS entering our state’s ecosystem. 



Source link

Colorado

Where to watch San Francisco Giants vs Colorado Rockies: TV channel, start time, streaming for July 4

Published

on

Where to watch San Francisco Giants vs Colorado Rockies: TV channel, start time, streaming for July 4


play

The 2026 MLB season has surpassed the quarter mark, and after each team’s first 40 games, there’s plenty of reasons to tune in all summer long.

Chicago White Sox slugger Munetaka Murakami has already proven doubters wrong by launching 17 home runs, Pittsburgh’s Paul Skenes consistently looks like the best version of himself on the mound and Milwaukee ace Jacob Misiorowski is throwing harder than any starter in the majors.

Advertisement

The MLB action continues on Saturday as the San Francisco Giants visit the Colorado Rockies.

Here’s everything you need to know to tune in for the first pitch.

See USA TODAY’s sortable MLB schedule to filter by team or division.

What time is San Francisco Giants vs Colorado Rockies?

First pitch between the Colorado Rockies and San Francisco Giants is scheduled for 8:10 p.m. (ET) on Saturday, July 4.

How to watch San Francisco Giants vs Colorado Rockies on Saturday

All times Eastern and accurate as of Saturday, July 4, 2026, at 6:10 a.m.

Advertisement

Watch MLB all season long with Fubo

MLB regional blackout restrictions apply

MLB scores, results

MLB scores for July 4 games are available on usatoday.com . Here’s how to access today’s results:

See scores, results for all of today’s games.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Colorado

Thousands forced to evacuate in Colorado as wildfire spreads

Published

on

Thousands forced to evacuate in Colorado as wildfire spreads


The Aspen Acres Fire, one of about 40 wildfires burning across western US, has destroyed homes and forced evacuations.

A fast-moving wildfire burning southwest of Denver has forced thousands of people to flee, as strong winds continue to drive flames across southern Colorado.

The blaze is one of about 40 large fires currently burning across the western United States.

Advertisement

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Dubbed the Aspen Acres Fire, the conflagration exploded in size, growing by 44 square kilometres (17 square miles) overnight to reach a total of 272sq kilometres (105sq miles) by Friday.

More than 160 structures have been destroyed in the fire. Experts say that months of dry weather and record-low snowfall in parts of the region – exacerbated by climate change – have created dangerous wildfire conditions.

Authorities have ordered the evacuation of about 2,200 people in Colorado City, along with residents of the nearby communities of Beulah, Rye and San Isabel.

Smoke from the fire has also disrupted travel, with Colorado emergency officials warning that visibility in parts along Interstate 25 has dropped to as little as a half a mile – or 0.8 kilometres.

As the fire continues to spread, about 50 Colorado National Guard soldiers were deployed to staff road checkpoints in Pueblo and Custer counties and help keep boats away from the Pueblo Reservoir, where crews were scooping water to battle the blaze.

Advertisement

Investigators have said the Aspen Acres Fire was caused by humans, but they have not yet released any other details.

The Aspen Acres Fire is only one of the blazes currently ravaging Colorado and its neighbouring states.

Firefighters, for instance, have contained only about 65 percent of the Snyder Fire on the western side of the Rocky Mountains, along the border between Colorado and Utah.

In Utah itself, another blaze — the Cottonwood Fire — had grown to more than 380sq kilometres (147sq miles) by Friday, while the Babylon Fire had reached 344sq kilometres (133sq miles).

COLORADO CITY, COLORADO - JULY 1: A firefighting plane prepares to drop fire retardant over the Aspen Acres fire on July 1, 2026 in Colorado City, Colorado. Over 35,000 acres and more than 100 structures have burned in the Aspen Acres fire, one of several blazes that are currently burning across the state after a warm and dry winter. Michael Ciaglo/Getty Images/AFP (Photo by Michael Ciaglo / GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA / Getty Images via AFP)
A firefighting plane prepares to drop fire retardant over the Aspen Acres fire on July 1, 2026, in Colorado City, Colorado [Michael Ciaglo/Getty Images/AFP]

The latest fires come less than a week after three firefighters were killed, and two others were injured after they were overtaken by flames while battling two fires, part of the Snyder complex.

Wildfire smoke advisories are in effect for parts of Colorado, and concerns about wildfires are also beginning to reshape local Fourth of July celebrations.

Advertisement

Colorado’s Division of Fire Prevention and Control said several professional firework displays have already been cancelled because of the extreme fire risk, with many counties now under fire restrictions.

The National Weather Service kept Red Flag Warnings in place across much of the state on Friday, saying that hot, dry conditions, low humidity and gusty winds would continue to create critical fire conditions.

While forecasters said moister weather over the weekend should help lessen the risks, they also warned that heavier rain could increase the possibility of flash flooding in recently burned areas.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Colorado

Suspect arrested after starting vehicle fire in Colorado Springs

Published

on

Suspect arrested after starting vehicle fire in Colorado Springs


COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. (KKTV) – Colorado Springs police arrested a suspect late Thursday night after he was suspected of starting a vehicle fire.

Colorado Springs police said at about 12:15 p.m., officers were called to the 2100 block of Vickers Drive, near North Academy Boulevard, to assist Colorado Springs firefighters with a vehicle fire.

During the investigation, police said officers learned that the suspect broke the front window and threw a lit object into the cab of the vehicle.

The vehicle was then engulfed in flames and was a complete loss, police said.

Advertisement

No one was in the parked vehicle at the time of the fire, police said.

At about 11 p.m., police said officers located and arrested the suspect, identified as 32-year-old Graison Dortch in the 4300 block of N Chestnut Street, near I-25 and Garden of the Gods Road.

Dortch was booked into the El Paso County Jail on charges of second-degree arson and use of an incendiary device, police said. Officers said both are class five felonies.

According to court records, as of Friday morning, Dortch is being held on no bond.

Copyright 2026 KKTV. All rights reserved.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending