Connect with us

Colorado

Colorado lawmakers advance immigrant protections bill while rejecting another measure to regulate police and ICE 

Published

on

Colorado lawmakers advance immigrant protections bill while rejecting another measure to regulate police and ICE 


After hours of debate that stretched into Tuesday evening, Colorado Democrats advanced a bill to extend protections for immigrants who may be subject to federal enforcement operations, while rejecting another measure that sought to regulate local law enforcement and federal agents. 

The two bills were introduced in the House last month as part of a legislative package in response to growing immigration crackdowns being carried out by the Trump administration. 

A third bill, introduced in the Senate on the first day of the legislative session, would allow federal immigration agents to be sued in state civil court. That bill passed the chamber in late February. 



The other measure lawmakers chose to advance on Tuesday, House Bill 1276, would expand existing limitations on how state and local officials interact with federal officers, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, as well as give more state oversight to detention centers. 

Advertisement

“We believe that, as we’re seeing attacks on our communities, that it’s important for Colorado to stand up and protect everyone that lives in our state,” lead bill sponsor Rep. Elizabeth Velasco, D-Glenwood Springs, said at Tuesday’s committee hearing. 



Both measures faced opposition from Republicans and law enforcement groups, who argued the bills would infringe on federal authority to carry out immigration enforcement and create public safety conflicts. 

“We recognize that these proposals come at a time of heightened public concern about federal immigration enforcement actions,” the Colorado Association of Chiefs of Police wrote in a statement Tuesday. “However, the legislation could create new safety risks for our peace officers and place them in legally conflicting situations, while imposing significant unfunded administrative burdens on local agencies that do not control federal operations. The bills also could make it harder for agencies to work together.”

Lawmakers say ‘Yes’ to detention center oversight, more limits on data sharing 

HB 1276, also led by Rep. Lorena Garcia, D-Adams County, would give the state more authority to inspect food, water quality and other conditions at immigration detention centers. The centers would be required to pay for the inspections. Detention centers would also need to submit data annually to the state on the health outcomes of detainees and pass an environmental impact study.

The bill also bans local and state government transit services, such as buses, trains and state-regulated airports, from knowingly transporting immigrants for detention purposes. Violating any of those provisions would result in a civil penalty worth up to $50,000.

Advertisement

Additionally, the bill would hold local and state agencies, not just their employees, liable for breaching data-sharing protections with ICE or other federal immigration officials. It would also require state agencies to announce when they received a federal subpoena related to immigration enforcement, and require that if state agencies comply with a subpoena, they notify the individuals whose information has been shared. 

An amendment added to the bill Tuesday also stipulates that ICE is not allowed to enter secure areas of jails unless they have a judicial warrant. Proponents say those measures come in response to gaps in existing state law that were exposed last year. 

That includes an incident wherein Gov. Jared Polis tried to force the then-director of the state’s labor department, Scott Moss, to comply with a federal subpoena seeking the information of 35 adult sponsors who were housing unaccompanied immigrant children. 

While a judge ruled that Polis could not force Moss or the employees he directly supervised to comply, he did not outright prevent Polis from finding other ways to get the information from the agency, though the governor has since abandoned the effort. 

Immigrant advocates on the Western Slope have also raised concerns over what they say are instances of law enforcement complying with ICE to facilitate detainments, including by giving ICE access to secure facilities of jails and assisting federal agents in apprehending and transporting people for detainments, which allegedly occurred in Garfield County

Advertisement

Velasco, the first Mexican-born state legislator in Colorado, represents Western Slope communities with large immigrant populations, who she says are “living in fear right now.” 

State Rep. Elizabeth Velasco, D-Glenwood Springs, speaks about a bill to regulate detention facilities and expand limits on data sharing with immigration officers during a news conference outside the Colorado Capitol on Feb. 2, 2026.
Robert Tann/Summit Daily News

“We’re seeing people hesitate to go to court or attend immigration appointments,” Velasco said. “Families worry that a loved one could be picked up at a work site or even the grocery store and not make it home, and communities are questioning whether public safety systems are there to protect them, or to harm them.” 

Rep. Matt Soper, R-Delta, said he understands that there are “many in our state who are fearful of federal immigration authorities knocking on their door and taking them in the middle of the night for deportation, heaven forbid, to a third-world country with absolutely no due process.” 

But Soper said he had concerns with the bill pitting Colorado against the federal government, which he said has “exclusive jurisdiction when it comes to immigration and immigration enforcement.” 

“I also want our law enforcement showing up to immigrant communities,” Soper added, “and I fear that if they were to show up and there happens to be ICE engagement going on at that particular time, that they would be chilled away from any sort of engagement to keep our friends and our neighbors safe.”

Advertisement

The House Judiciary Committee ultimately voted 6-5, mostly along party lines, to advance the bill to the House Finance Committee. 

Bill to regulate police interactions with ICE is rejected 

Lawmakers voted to kill a second measure, House Bill 1275, which would have required state and local law enforcement to arrest federal immigration officers who violate state law. 

Other provisions of the bill would have prohibited state and local law enforcement from concealing their identity in most circumstances and required that they receive training on state immigration law. 

Democrats who championed the bill said it was meant to hold federal agents accountable for unlawful and excessive conduct. They pointed to recent immigration operations in Minnesota in January, during which two U.S. citizens, Renee Good and Alex Pretti, were shot and killed by federal agents. 

“It’s not lost on me that it was the death of two U.S. citizens in the suburbs that was the catapult to our constituents begging us — crying out — for help and for justice,” said Rep. Meg Froelich, D-Englewood, who was a lead sponsor of the bill alongside Rep. Yara Zokaie, D-Fort Collins and Sens. Iman Jodeh, D-Aurora, and Mike Weissman, D-Aurora. 

Advertisement

The bill faced pushback from law enforcement groups, who argued it would put them in the crossfire of federal immigration actions. The Colorado Association of Chiefs of Police said the measure would put law enforcement in an “impossible constitutional conflict,” since federal officers operate under different legal authorities. 

One of the bill’s most controversial measures, which would have blocked current and former ICE and U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents from working as law enforcement officers in Colorado, was heavily amended in response to law enforcement concerns. 

Rather than including a blanket ban, the bill was changed to require current and former agents to submit records related to any internal investigations or use-of-force incidents, which may disqualify them from being hired under Colorado law. 

Republicans were uniformly opposed to the bill, and some Democrats also expressed concern that the requirements for local police to potentially intervene in federal enforcement could escalate, rather than reduce, conflicts. 

“I do not want armed confrontation between peace officers and federal agents in our streets,” said Rep. Chad Clifford, D-Centennial. 

Advertisement

Clifford and another Democrat, Rep. Cecelia Espenoza of Denver, joined all Republicans on the committee to reject the bill in a 6-5 vote. 





Source link

Colorado

Denver Art Museum workers ratify first union contract for Colorado museum employees

Published

on

Denver Art Museum workers ratify first union contract for Colorado museum employees


Denver Art Museum Workers United ratified a historic bargaining agreement on Saturday, becoming the first museum workers in the State of Colorado to have a union contract.

The contract is the result of nearly two years of negotiations between the union’s bargaining committee and museum management. 

Pam Skiles, Senior Paintings Conservator, said, “It feels great to ratify our first contract and improve working conditions for our coworkers across the museum. We will only continue to build on these wins into the future.”

Advertisement

The union says the new three-year contract includes agreements on equitable pay, just cause rights, increased sick time, and updated policies on health and safety and parental leave.  

The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, says this contract “sets the stage for further cultural organizing in the state.”

AFL-CIO said, “Now that DAMWU has a ratified agreement, the workers of the art museum join Jefferson County Public Library, as well as the more than 50,000 other cultural workers across the country who are building a national movement to raise employment standards in the cultural sector through AFSCME’s Cultural Workers United.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

Leadville lawyer faces Summit County school board president in Democratic primary for seat in the Colorado House of Representatives

Published

on

Leadville lawyer faces Summit County school board president in Democratic primary for seat in the Colorado House of Representatives


A Leadville lawyer will face the president of the Summit School District Board of Education in the Democratic primary for a seat in the Colorado House of Representatives.

Chris Floyd, of Leadville, is running against Consuelo Redhorse, of Silverthorne, in the race for House District 13, which includes Summit, Grand, Park, Lake, Chaffee and Jackson counties. The primary election is scheduled for June 30, with ballots being mailed to voters beginning June 8. ​​Whoever wins in June will face Republican candidate Miguel Martinez in the November general election.

In interviews, Floyd and Redhorse described what voters should know about their experience, laid out their positions on issues from housing affordability to TABOR reform, and outlined what their top priorities would be if elected.



Floyd moved from Virginia more than a decade ago to open a law practice in Leadville and has served as the Lake County attorney and a municipal judge. She has been endorsed by outgoing House Speaker and District 13 Rep. Julie McCluskie, who is term-limited.

Advertisement

“One of the things I came to realize is that this district really needs a strong advocate,” Floyd said. “One of the reasons for that is most of what comes out of the state legislature is driven by the 11 largest counties on the Front Range — and they just aren’t like us. They aren’t like the communities that make up House District 13.”



Redhorse, a lifelong Coloradan and member of the Navajo Nation, is serving as president during her second term on the Summit School District Board of Education after first being elected in 2019. She has lived in Summit County for about 15 years and works as an accountant for a property management company.

Being on the school board, Redhorse has learned that “everything is connected” to decisions made in the Colorado legislature, and she hopes to build on her experience as an elected official in the statehouse.

“I’ve had a really great opportunity just being really integrated with the community, talking with families and students and teachers, in a time where people have so many experiences in public education,” Redhorse said. “I thought I could take that experience and really bring it forward to be able to represent more people and really look beyond the K-12 realm of leadership that I’ve experienced.”

Housing and affordability

Both candidates said housing affordability is a top issue for voters in District 13, and one they would prioritize if elected.

Advertisement

Redhorse said the state Legislature has made progress “cutting the red tape” to help streamline construction of affordable housing, but said she would focus on making it easier to redevelop existing properties for housing.

If elected, Redhorse said she would examine how land-use policies affect the ability to create affordable housing, while ensuring that “local governments really get the final say and making sure we’re not mandating too much.” She said that housing has to be affordable so that service industry workers whose jobs support the local economy can afford to live in the communities where they work.

Floyd said that while many housing efforts have focused on making single-family homes more affordable for first-time buyers, there hasn’t been enough focus on the affordability of rental housing. Noting that many jobs in resort communities are seasonal, she said someone may work at a ski resort in Summit County in the winter, then move down to Buena Vista for the summer rafting season, without necessarily looking to own a home.

“But many of them end up spending more than they would pay on a mortgage for a rental property — so that’s another thing,” Floyd said. “There are a lot of different aspects that we need to look at in terms of the housing issue.”

The two candidates also said that Coloradans in their district are facing affordability concerns at every turn — from gas and groceries to healthcare and property insurance.

Advertisement

Floyd noted that while Front Range residents have access to several healthcare providers, most mountain residents have only two main providers and higher rates of uninsured residents.

“If you don’t qualify for Medicare or Medicaid or some other type of assistance, your premiums are just absolutely outrageous,” she said. “So, we have so many people now that have dropped off of the healthcare rolls because they just can’t afford it.”

Redhorse agreed that mountain communities differ from the Front Range and need targeted strategies to address the higher cost of living. She said she would focus on finding “sustainable solutions” to reduce costs as residents balance rising expenses.

A map shows the boundaries of Colorado House District 13, which includes Summit, Grand, Lake, Chaffee and Jackson counties. There are approximately 75,000 people who are of voting age in the district, according to the Colorado Secretary of State’s Office.
Colorado Secretary of State’s Office/Courtesy illustration

“Our prices have spiked — the cost of living, the cost of childcare,” Redhorse said. “Families are trying to make the choice between having food on their tables, paying for their basic utilities, paying for their mortgages, paying for childcare and trying to get to the places where they work.”

Candidates diverge on top priorities

Redhorse ranked protecting public lands and water among her top priorities, while Floyd said supporting small businesses is a top issue, though the candidates agreed that both issues are important.

Advertisement

Redhorse said low snowpack this winter highlighted the need to safeguard Colorado’s water supply and address federal staffing cuts at land management agencies, which she said have affected local governments, businesses and recreation areas.

“We experience it every day. In all of our communities, so much of our land is public land, and something that we need to keep protected for future generations,” Redhorse said. “What I’ve heard a lot is the need for responsible growth and making sure we’re not over loving our public lands, while also understanding that it’s such an important part of our economies up here.”

Redhorse noted that because so much recreation happens on public lands and waters, protecting them also protects local economies that rely on tourism. She said that small businesses in particular are being impacted by cuts to federal land management staff and ongoing drought.

Floyd said that main streets in mountain towns “are kept alive by our small businesses” and that she would work to expand broadband access and workforce training, including in the trades, for rural areas. Especially in winters with low snow or summers with low water, residents need opportunities to pivot to other work when tourism slows, she said.

“A lot of our younger workforce, I fear they’re leaving not only the area but the state, because there’s no opportunity for them here,” Floyd said. “So, I really think we need to invest more in workforce training.”

Advertisement

Over the past year, Floyd said that she has engaged with the Colorado Water Congress to learn more about the state’s water issues. She believes that District 13 communities need a strong negotiator to advocate to balance rural and urban water needs and she supports “having a very assertive approach to protecting Colorado’s water interest.”

State budget crunch and TABOR Reform

As Colorado’s legislature has faced budget deficits in recent years, both Floyd and Redhorse said they would support changes to the state’s Taxpayer Bill of Rights to allow the governments to keep more tax revenue.

Colorado’s Taxpayer Bill of Rights — or TABOR — limits the amount of revenue that state and local governments can collect and spend. Passed in 1992 as a constitutional amendment, it requires voter approval for all tax increases and places caps on government spending based on inflation and population growth. Democrats in the legislature have tried in recent years to change the TABOR cap through ballot measures, but voters have rejected those efforts.

“Colorado has grown so much that the TABOR formula, the way it’s structured — it just doesn’t work. It can’t work anymore,” Floyd said.

She said Colorado also needs to look at where it can reduce costs and operate state agencies more efficiently.

Advertisement

Redhorse also described TABOR as “outdated” and said it has limited the governments’ ability to provide services, especially as Medicaid costs have grown faster than the caps on state spending. She said, “it’s just arbitrary, the caps don’t truly show the increase in the cost of all the services Colorado is providing.”

Both Floyd and Redhorse said they support the “Cut the Ropes” ballot initiative, which will ask voters in the November election to change how much tax revenue the state and school districts can keep to spend on education. 

Immigration, law enforcement and privacy

Both Democratic candidates said that they support Colorado laws that protect immigrants and limit local law enforcement participation in federal immigration enforcement.

Redhorse said she is concerned about what she described as “racial profiling” by the federal government, which affects both immigrants and U.S. citizens. She said she also believes that some local law enforcement agencies are cooperating with Immigration and Customs Enforcement in violation of Colorado law, eroding trust within their communities.

“The lack of trust that immigration enforcement has caused in so many of our communities, especially our Latino communities, is huge,” Redhorse said. “We have people out there that are victims of crimes or needing protection, who are too afraid to go to our local law enforcement, who are really there to serve the people and keep communities safe.”

Advertisement

Floyd said that she also believes that local law enforcement should focus on enforcing state laws and protecting communities, rather than assisting the federal government with immigration enforcement. She said she is particularly concerned that immigration enforcement has impacted “vulnerable individuals” and children.

“I absolutely reject any attempts to try to remove folks that have made a good pathway in this country,” Floyd said. “With that being said, I also support law enforcement and their duty to protect our communities. To the extent there are lawbreakers who don’t have legal status, I think there are current legal avenues to address that.”

Both candidates also expressed concerns with the Flock Safety cameras that law enforcement agencies across the state use, saying the license plate reader technology collects too much information and could violate Coloradans’ privacy rights. Both said they support reining in the use of the technology, after the state legislature rejected a bill that would have done so during this year’s session.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Colorado

Watch CBS Colorado’s GOP Governor Primary Debate

Published

on

Watch CBS Colorado’s GOP Governor Primary Debate


CBS Colorado hosts two of the three candidates running for governor in a Voters Decide debate as the Colorado primary draws near. Barb Kirkmeyer and Scott Bottoms were both in attendance, Victor Marx declined to attend. Your Political Reporter Shaun Boyd moderates.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending