California
What’s next for sports betting in California?
By Dan Walters
In the principle, those that promote California poll measures determine some downside — actual or imagined — and try to steer voters that their proposals would resolve it.
Propositions 26 and 27, nonetheless, sharply diverge from that sample. As a substitute, they need California voters to create new methods to waste their cash by wagering on sports activities occasions.
There’s no grassroots clamor for such alternatives. If there’s any enthusiastic constituency for betting on sports activities it’s most likely younger males, who’re the chief patrons of on-line fantasy sports activities video games.
The weak demand for sports activities playing, plus the uber-confusing saturation adverts for and towards the 2 measures explains why each are nearly sure to be rejected within the Nov. 8 election.
Final week, the Public Coverage Institute of California launched a brand new statewide ballot that discovered simply 34% of possible voters favor Proposition 26 whereas even fewer, 26%, would vote for Proposition 27.
The polling confirmed that if there may be any constituency for sports activities wagering, it’s younger adults — however they’re additionally among the many demographic subgroups least more likely to solid ballots.
Sensing that it had no likelihood of passage, the web betting companies that sponsor Proposition 27 started scaling again their marketing campaign a number of weeks in the past. Taking no possibilities, the casino-owning Indian tribes that positioned Proposition 26 on the poll are nonetheless operating anti-Proposition 27 spots, however the lack of an efficient pro-Proposition 26 marketing campaign seems to doom it as nicely.
So, assuming each are rejected after greater than a half-billion {dollars} having been spent on dropping campaigns, what occurs subsequent?
A short assessment of what occurred earlier than this yr’s high-dollar campaigns is likely to be instructive.
In 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court docket invalidated legal guidelines that prohibited sports activities wagering and since then 35 states have legalized it in some kind. Naturally, the companies that promoted it in different states solid their eye on California, the nation’s most populous state and due to this fact its largest potential market.
Some efforts had been made within the Legislature, however the casino-owning tribes, which now have a near-monopoly on authorized playing within the state, adamantly opposed having anybody else acquire entry to gamblers’ wallets.
With legislative efforts going nowhere, the tribes proposed an initiative that ultimately grew to become Proposition 26, requiring sports activities bets to be made personally of their casinos or at 4 designated horse racing tracks.
The net wagering companies, led by FanDuel and DraftKings, then sponsored a rival measure which grew to become Proposition 27, permitting bets to be positioned through pc or cellphone.
Some tribes briefly floated a 3rd measure that will permit on-line betting they managed, however that was dropped in favor of concentrating sources on defeating Proposition 27.
Rejection of the 2 measures would return the scenario again to the place it was a number of years in the past. The legislative route could also be reactivated, but it surely’s tough to see a pathway to success so long as on line casino tribes insist on sustaining their monopoly.
Nevertheless, the problem is not going to merely go away as a result of sports activities wagering in California is probably a multi-billion-dollar enterprise, so it’s fully potential, and even possible, that new measures will likely be proposed for the 2024 poll.
The tribes would most likely dump the in-person wagering idea of Proposition 26 and search a monopoly on on-line betting, much like this yr’s short-lived measure. It’s additionally possible that the on line casino tribes would search some lodging with rural tribes that don’t have casinos and would have benefited from Proposition 27.
Given the potential California market, any tribal measure would most likely generate one other company effort as nicely. In different phrases, we could also be subjected to competing campaigns over again.
Initially printed in CalMatters
California
Caitlyn Jenner says she'd 'destroy' Kamala Harris in hypothetical race to be CA gov
SAN FRANCISCO – Caitlyn Jenner, the gold-medal Olympian-turned reality TV personality, is considering another run for Governor of California. This time, she says, if she were to go up against Vice President Kamala Harris, she would “destroy her.”
Jenner, who publicly came out as transgender nearly 10 years ago, made a foray into politics when she ran as a Republican during the recall election that attempted to unseat Gov. Gavin Newsom in 2021. Jenner only received one percent of the vote and was not considered a serious candidate.
Jenner posted this week on social media that she’s having conversations with “many people” and hopes to have an announcement soon about whether she will run.
Caitlyn Jenner speaks at the 4th annual Womens March LA: Women Rising at Pershing Square on January 18, 2020 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Chelsea Guglielmino/Getty Images)
She has also posted in Trumpian-style all caps: “MAKE CA GREAT AGAIN!”
As for VP Harris, she has not indicated any future plans for when she leaves office. However, a recent poll suggests Harris would have a sizable advantage should she decide to run in 2026. At that point, Newsom cannot run again because of term limits.
If Jenner decides to run and wins, it would mark the nation and state’s first transgender governor.
California
Northern California 6-year-old, parents hailed as heroes for saving woman who crashed into canal
LIVE OAK — A six-year-old and her parents are being called heroes by a Northern California community for jumping into a canal to save a 75-year-old woman who drove off the road.
It happened on Larkin Road near Paseo Avenue in the Sutter County community of Live Oak on Monday.
“I just about lost her, but I didn’t,” said Terry Carpenter, husband of the woman who was rescued. “We got more chances.”
Terry said his wife of 33 years, Robin Carpenter, is the love of his life and soulmate. He is grateful he has been granted more time to spend with her after she survived her car crashing off a two-lane road and overturning into a canal.
“She’s doing really well,” Terry said. “No broken bones, praise the Lord.”
It is what some call a miracle that could have had a much different outcome without a family of good Samaritans.
“Her lips were purple,” said Ashley Martin, who helped rescue the woman. “There wasn’t a breath at all. I was scared.”
Martin and her husband, Cyle Johnson, are being hailed heroes by the Live Oak community for jumping into the canal, cutting Robin out of her seat belt and pulling her head above water until first responders arrived.
“She was literally submerged underwater,” Martin said. “She had a back brace on. Apparently, she just had back surgery. So, I grabbed her brace from down below and I flipped her upward just in a quick motion to get her out of that water.”
The couple said the real hero was their six-year-old daughter, Cayleigh Johnson.
“It was scary,” Cayleigh said. “So the car was going like this, and it just went boom, right into the ditch.”
Cayleigh was playing outside and screamed for her parents who were inside the house near the canal.
I spoke with Robin from her hospital bed over the phone who told us she is in a lot of pain but grateful.
“The thing I can remember is I started falling asleep and then I was going over the bump and I went into the ditch and that’s all I remember,” Robin said.
It was a split-second decision for a family who firefighters said helped save a stranger’s life.
“It’s pretty unique that someone would jump in and help somebody that they don’t even know,” said Battalion Chief for Sutter County Fire Richard Epperson.
Robin is hopeful that she will be released from the hospital on Wednesday in time to be home for Thanksgiving.
“She gets Thanksgiving and Christmas now with her family and grandkids,” Martin said.
Terry and Robin are looking forward to eventually meeting the family who helped save Robin’s life. The family expressed the same feelings about meeting the woman they helped when she is out of the hospital.
“I can’t wait for my baby to get home,” Terry said.
California
California may exclude Tesla from EV rebate program
California Gov. Gavin Newsom may exclude Tesla and other automakers from an electric vehicle (EV) rebate program if the incoming Trump administration scraps a federal tax credit for electric car purchases.
Newsom proposed creating a new version of the state’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program, which was phased out in 2023 after funding more than 594,000 vehicles and saving more than 456 million gallons of fuel, the governor’s office said in a news release on Monday.
“Consumers continue to prove the skeptics wrong – zero-emission vehicles are here to stay,” Newsom said in a statement. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future – we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”
The proposed rebates would be funded with money from the state’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which is funded by polluters under the state’s cap-and-trade program, the governor’s office said. Officials did not say how much the program would cost or save consumers.
NEBRASKA AG LAUNCHES ASSAULT AGAINST CALIFORNIA’S ELECTRIC VEHICLE PUSH
They would also include changes to promote innovation and competition in the zero-emission vehicles market – changes that could prevent automakers like Tesla from qualifying for the rebates.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who relocated Tesla’s corporate headquarters from California to Texas in 2021, responded to the possibility of having Tesla EVs left out of the program.
“Even though Tesla is the only company who manufactures their EVs in California! This is insane,” Musk wrote on X, which he also owns.
BENTLEY PUSHES BACK ALL-EV LINEUP TIMELINE TO 2035
Those buying or leasing Tesla vehicles accounted for about 42% of the state’s rebates, The Associated Press reported, citing data from the California Air Resources Board.
Newsom’s office told Fox Business Digital that the proposal is intended to foster market competition, and any potential market cap is subject to negotiation with the state Legislature.
Ticker | Security | Last | Change | Change % |
---|---|---|---|---|
TSLA | TESLA INC. | 338.59 | -13.97 | -3.96% |
“Under a potential market cap, and depending on what the cap is, there’s a possibility that Tesla and other automakers could be excluded,” the governor’s office said. “But that’s again subject to negotiations with the legislature.”
Newsom’s office noted that such market caps have been part of rebate programs since George W. Bush’s administration in 2005.
Federal tax credits for EVs are currently worth up to $7,500 for new zero-emission vehicles. President-elect Trump has previously vowed to end the credit.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
California has surpassed 2 million zero-emission vehicles sold, according to the governor’s office. The state, however, could face a $2 billion budget deficit next year, Reuters reported, citing a non-partisan legislative estimate released last week.
-
Science1 week ago
Trump nominates Dr. Oz to head Medicare and Medicaid and help take on 'illness industrial complex'
-
Politics1 week ago
Trump taps FCC member Brendan Carr to lead agency: 'Warrior for Free Speech'
-
Technology1 week ago
Inside Elon Musk’s messy breakup with OpenAI
-
Lifestyle1 week ago
Some in the U.S. farm industry are alarmed by Trump's embrace of RFK Jr. and tariffs
-
World1 week ago
Protesters in Slovakia rally against Robert Fico’s populist government
-
Health4 days ago
Holiday gatherings can lead to stress eating: Try these 5 tips to control it
-
News1 week ago
They disagree about a lot, but these singers figure out how to stay in harmony
-
Health2 days ago
CheekyMD Offers Needle-Free GLP-1s | Woman's World