Connect with us

California

The New ‘Right To Disconnect’ Bill Continues The Push For Career-Life Balance

Published

on

The New ‘Right To Disconnect’ Bill Continues The Push For Career-Life Balance


In a quest for work flexibility and work-life balance, five controversial trends—“coffee badging,” “shadow policies,” “quiet quitting,” “Chronoworking” and “NATO applying”—are afoot within the American workforce. These movements are natural segues into California’s groundbreaking “Right to Disconnect” bill, which further aims to redefine boundaries and enhance work-life balance, albeit amidst some executive resistance. If passed, the bill would make California the first state to legally protect employees from after-hour messages from work.

A Change Is Gonna Come

In the words of the old Sam Cooke song, “A Change is Gonna Come.” I reached out to Leapsome’s Luck Dookchitra, HR expert and VP of people to get an expert opinion on changes the law would bring. “As with any change, things will take time for people and companies to adjust to new habits and processes,” Dookchitra responded, noting that 74% of employees planning to leave their jobs cite poor work-life balance as a reason and how implementing this law will help employees achieve a better balance, boosting job satisfaction and retention.

Advertisement

“We know that stepping away from work and disconnecting helps replenish, recharge and re-motivate us, injecting new ideas and creativity into our work upon our return,” Dookchitra explains. “Never switching off—working after hours and on weekends—has the opposite effect and, ultimately, risks leading to burnout which will cost the individual, the team they’re a part of, and the company they work for a lot more.”

Dookchitra told me the underlying premise of the law is to provide employees with better health outcomes–alleviating stress and burnout which has become even more abundant following the last post-covid years and to rein in abusive employers and leaders who may be forcing workers to work beyond the clock, adding, “I imagine companies that already value flexibility and worker well-being will adapt readily to this law, regardless of state, and in fact, use it as an opportunity to clarify it’s practices, policies, and expectations.”

In my own digging, I found that, although the United States doesn’t have laws forbidding employers from contacting employees after work yet, the California bill isn’t the first efforts to try to stop companies from violating employees’ after-hours boundaries. It’s already the law in some countries. Employers can be in hot water for contacting employees after work hours in Portugal and France and that includes emails. In an effort to promote healthy work-life balance more countries are outlawing the practice of companies violating employee private boundaries after the workday is done. A similar bill has been debated in New York City to make it illegal to force employees to answer work communications outside of work hours.

Should After-Work Contact Be Illegal?

The new proposed law raises the question whether after-hour contact should be illegal. “We’re in such an interesting time where we lawmakers, employees and employers are redefining the future of work–some more begrudgingly than others,” Kookchitra points out. “The last few years have shown us there are very new and effective ways of getting work done and being productive versus the traditional work day/traditional office settings. I think the potential effects on productivity and workplace dynamics with this new law could be profound for workplaces and leaders that value worker well-being.”

Advertisement

The majority of employees who have been surveyed are onboard with Kookchitra. A 2022 survey of 1,000 employed Americans by Skynova found that nearly 70% of workers reported their employer contacts them outside of normal work hours at least once a week. Almost two in five employees said they work outside of scheduled hours because their boss expects it, and 63.3% believe it should be illegal for employers to contact them outside of working hours.

More recently, Clarify Capital surveyed 1,000 employees and business executives about the bill. Results detected a deep divide between employees and management.

  • 83% of employees support the “Right to Disconnect” bill.
  • Business executives are 75% more likely to oppose the “Right to Disconnect” bill.
  • Nearly three in five employees feel obligated to respond to work-related communications outside of work hours.
  • On average, two in five employees make themselves available to respond to work-related communications for nine or more hours per workday.
  • One in three business executives expect their employees to respond to work-related communications outside of work hours.

Dookchitra believes employers who embrace the law and consider it as added value for their employees and workplace will see more productivity, creativity and connection with their employees than companies who see it as another obstacle to be subverted.

“The important and interesting thing to note when it comes to this bill is there is a difference between working outside traditional office hours because that is an employee’s preference and doing so because their manager is contacting them and requiring them to respond,” she clarifies. “This new law would force businesses to revisit policies and procedures and clarify expectations. Businesses and leaders would need to more clearly define what is expected from the workday and set more realistic expectations. This clarity could lead to higher productivity and also higher quality. The change would also encourage workers to consciously create separation between work life and their personal lives. As we know, some people are always ‘switched on’ or tied to their workplace systems. Being forced to separate work and life would likely lead to more creativity and engagement at work in the long run.”

A Final Takeaway

In closing, Dookchitra points out that laws are already changing throughout the world as a result of the pandemic and the new lifestyle and caretaker responsibilities that modern life and technology have unearthed in recent years. “I believe there will continue to be a movement towards worker well-being and flexibility. I believe businesses will think both about the bottom line and ROI but also about the most important ways to keep top talent,” she posits, further predicting that the traditional way of working will continue to be turned on its side to test out new practices and policies and that there will continue to be interplay between laws, compliance and worker benefits and perks. “I believe these benefits and perks (including a flexible work schedule and remote work) will continue to factor in just as much as salaries and cash have in the past,” she concludes. “Companies will need to continually define their stance on these topics—even without external forces like state-based laws— because workers are demanding a new way of working.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

Signs of spring blooming at Antelope Valley California Poppy Reserve after wet, warm winter

Published

on

Signs of spring blooming at Antelope Valley California Poppy Reserve after wet, warm winter


It’s beginning to look a lot like spring!

The warm and wet weather this winter has led to the start of a dazzling super bloom at the Antelope Valley California Poppy Reserve.

“We had an unseasonably warm winter as well, so there’s actually a lot of growth,” said Callista Turney with California State Parks. “We’re having early wildflowers that are already at the park. So if you look at the poppy live cam, it shows a lot of orange already.”

The rain has helped the early blooms, but it’s actually the heat that accelerated the growth of the flowers.

Advertisement

“It will actually speed up the growth of the plants, so some of them were already blooming and that’s going to cause those blossoms to accelerate faster towards seed production. And the blossoms that are in the process of being formed, those are going to open up soon as well.”

We also sometimes see great super blooms in Death Valley National Park, Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, Joshua Tree and the Mojave National Preserve.

“It’s definitely a rare occurrence because we don’t always have the right conditions. It’s gotta be the weather, the wind, the rain, all coming together,” said Katie Tilford, Director of Development and Communications with the Theodore Payne Foundation.

If it continues to stay unseasonably warm, we’ll see a shorter bloom. The key to a longer season is milder weather.


Copyright © 2026 KABC Television, LLC. All rights reserved.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

California

Republican governor candidate Chad Bianco says he’s the ‘antithesis to California state government’

Published

on

Republican governor candidate Chad Bianco says he’s the ‘antithesis to California state government’


We are counting down to the California governor’s race. Chad Bianco, the sheriff of Riverside County, is one of the two biggest names running on the Republican ticket.

In a one-on-one interview with Eyewitness News political reporter Josh Haskell, Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco said, “I am the antithesis to California state government because I am going to take a nuclear bomb into that building and absolutely destroy everything that they do to us behind closed doors.”

Although he’s been elected by the voters twice, Bianco says he’s not a politician — which is why he believes his campaign for California governor is resonating, as reflected in the polls.

“President Trump, in one year, from 2025 when he took over, until now, did absolutely nothing to harm California. What’s harming California is 30 years of Democrat one-party rule that have created an environment here that no one can live in anymore. They’ve only been successful here in California because we vote D no matter what. You vote D or die. I mean, that’s it. Charles Manson would be elected in California if he was the only Democrat on the ballot,” Bianco said.

Advertisement

Bianco isn’t the only conservative Republican running for governor, and according to polling, he’s neck-and-neck with former Fox News host Steve Hilton.

SEE ALSO: CA governor candidate Steve Hilton says ‘everybody supports’ Trump’s immigration policies

Leading in some polls in the wide-open California Governor’s race as the June primary creeps closer is Republican and former Fox News host Steve Hilton.

“Steve has no chance of winning in November. The Democrats know that I’m going to win in November, and so they have to do everything they can to keep me out of that,” Bianco said.

When asked about the affordability crisis in the state, Bianco said, “Almost the entire issue of affordability in California is because of regulation, excessive regulation imposed by government. Every single regulation can be signed away with the governor’s signature.”

Advertisement

“It is a drug and alcohol addiction problem that, and a mental health problem,” he said about the homelessness crisis. “Every single bit of money that is going to these nonprofits that say ‘homeless,’ zero money. You’re getting absolutely nothing. I can’t tell you that we would end what we see in the homeless situation within a year, but I guarantee you we would never see it again after two years.”

When challenged on that prediction, pointing to how the state doesn’t have the facilities to treat the number of people living on our streets, Bianco responded, “We have been conditioned to believe that buildings take five years to build. It takes 90 days or less to build a house, but in California, it takes three to five years because the government won’t allow it. The regulations that are destroying this state are going to be removed with me as the governor.”

Bianco also said California jails shouldn’t have to play the role of treatment facilities.

Although he says he supports the Trump administration and wants the president’s endorsement, Bianco has been traveling the state — meeting not just with Republicans, but Democrats and independents as well. He says all of our state government officials have failed.

The primary election is June 2.

Advertisement

No clear front-runner in race for California governor, new poll shows

A new poll shows there’s still no clear front-runner in the race to replace Gov. Gavin Newsom.

Copyright © 2026 KABC Television, LLC. All rights reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

PlayOn Sports fined $1.1 million by California watchdog over student data violations

Published

on

PlayOn Sports fined .1 million by California watchdog over student data violations


California’s privacy watchdog has ordered PlayOn Sports to pay a $1.10 million fine and change how it handles consumer data after finding the company’s practices violated state law in ways that affected students and schools in the state.

The California Privacy Protection Agency Board issued the decision following a settlement reached by CalPrivacy’s Enforcement Division.

The decision is the first by the board to address privacy violations involving students and California schools.

Schools across the country use PlayOn Sports’ GoFan platform to sell digital tickets to high school sporting events, theater performances, and homecoming and prom dances, with attendees presenting tickets at the door on their mobile phones.

Advertisement

Schools also use PlayOn Sports’ platforms for other sports-related activities, including attending games, streaming them online, and looking up statistics about teams and players.

In California, about 1,400 schools contract with PlayOn Sports for these services.

[RELATED] X faces possible fines as EU probes Grok nonconsensual, sexualized deepfakes

GoFan is also the official ticketing platform for the California Interscholastic Federation, the governing body for high school sports.

According to the board’s decision, PlayOn Sports used tracking technologies to collect personal information and deliver targeted advertisements to ticketholders and others using its services.

Advertisement

The company allegedly required Californians to click “agree” to tracking technologies before they could use their tickets or view PlayOn Sports websites, without providing a sufficient opt-out option.

“Students trying to go to prom or a high school football game shouldn’t have to leave their privacy rights at the door,” said Michael Macko, CalPrivacy’s head of enforcement. “You couldn’t attend these events without showing your ticket, and you couldn’t show your ticket without being tracked for advertising. California’s privacy law does not work that way. Businesses must ensure they offer lawful ways for Californians to opt-out, particularly with captive audiences.”

The decision also describes students as a uniquely vulnerable population and warns that targeted advertising systems can subject students to profiling that can follow them for years, expose them to manipulative or harmful content, and develop sensitive inferences about their lives.

Instead of providing its own opt-out method, PlayOn Sports directed students and other users to opt out through the Network Advertising Initiative and the Digital Advertising Alliance, which the decision said violated the company’s responsibility to provide its own way for consumers to opt out. The company also allegedly failed to recognize opt-out preference signals and did not provide Californians with sufficient notice of its privacy practices.

“We are committed to making it as easy as possible for all Californians — from high school students to older adults, and everyone in between — to make the choice of whether they want to be tracked or not,” said Tom Kemp, CalPrivacy’s executive director. “Californians can opt-out with covered businesses, and they can sign up for the newly launched DROP system to request that data brokers delete their personal information.”

Advertisement

Beyond the $1.10 million fine, the board’s order requires PlayOn Sports to conduct risk assessments, provide disclosures that are easy to read and understand, and implement proper opt-out methods.

The order also requires the company to comply with California’s privacy law prohibiting the selling or sharing of personal information of consumers between 13 and 16 without their affirmative opt-in consent.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending