Disney
World
‘Grey’s Anatomy’ Boss on the Season 22 Finale: How Teddy and Owen Say Goodbye and That Surprising Meredith Twist
SPOILER ALERT: This interview contains major spoilers from “Bridge Over Troubled Water,” the Season 22 finale of ABC’s “Grey’s Anatomy.”
Doctors Owen Hunt (Kevin McKidd) and Teddy Altman (Kim Raver) have finally clocked out of Grey Sloan Memorial Hospital.
In the Season 22 finale of the ABC medical drama, Owen survives a bridge collapse on his way to work and, true to form, springs into action to save all four members of a family who were also caught in the wreckage. After being unable to reach Owen, who was unable to find a cell connection, Teddy begins to fear the worst, especially when the fire department found his truck abandoned in the water under the bridge.
Confiding in Richard (James Pickens Jr.), Teddy laments that her final conversation with Owen may have been a disagreement over whether she should take a new job offer in Paris. But while overseeing Blue’s (Harry Shum Jr.) care of a patient in the ER, Teddy notices that a key chain matching Owen’s own was used to perform a cricothyrotomy in the field, giving her a glimmer of hope that Owen had made it out alive. After operating on that patient with Kwan, Teddy walks into the OR next door and finds Owen working to save the father of the family he was treating.
Once they save him, Teddy tells Owen in the scrub room that she will turn down the job because he is “the only thing that makes me feel like home.” Owen tells her that she will take the job — because he and their kids will move to Paris for her. “We wanted to tell this story that beautifully answered what Teddy had done at the end of last season [by choosing herself],” showrunner Meg Marinis tells Variety. “She was presented with an opportunity, and for once, Owen follows Teddy.”
The finale — helmed by McKidd, who holds the record for directing most “Grey’s” episodes, at 49 — is filled with “a lot of Easter eggs” that “maybe only the most diehard Teddy/Owen fans will catch,” Marinis adds. “We really studied how each of their characters came onto the show, and what they came onto the show searching for, and we gave them the best ending that we could at this time.”
Owen was introduced in Season 5 as a rogue Army trauma surgeon who was honorably discharged following the death of his entire platoon. The following season, Owen enlisted his close friend Teddy, a cardiothoracic surgeon, to act as the new mentor of his love interest, Cristina Yang (Sandra Oh). This led to the first of multiple love triangles involving Owen and Teddy, with Owen marrying Cristina in Season 7 and Teddy departing at the end of Season 8 following the tragic death of her husband Henry (Scott Foley).
Shortly after Teddy returned in Season 14, she became pregnant with Owen’s child amid his separation from his second wife, Amelia Shepherd (Caterina Scorsone). Since then, Teddy and Owen found themselves in another love triangle with Tom Koracick (Greg Germann), got married and became parents to two children, and then grew apart after a failed attempt at an open marriage. But now, they will ride off into the sunset together. (For an interview with Kevin McKidd and Kim Raver, read this.)
In a wide-ranging chat, Marinis opens up below about the “painful” experience of saying goodbye to two characters who remain inextricably linked with the “Grey’s” legacy. She also unpacks protagonist Meredith Grey’s (Ellen Pompeo) surprising admission after nearly losing her partner Nick Marsh (Scott Speedman) in the same bridge collapse, and teases what to expect from the 23rd season. Despite reports that the show’s renewal in March will come with a significant budget cut or a reduced order, Marinis says that the exact number of episodes next season is still being worked out.
Can you walk me through your decision to write off Teddy and Owen this season?
It was a super painful decision, from the bottom of my heart. I’m very close to both of those characters and those actors. Kevin has directed double digits of episodes that I’ve written. So it was a very difficult episode to write, and it surprised me how difficult it was to even watch. But when we were faced with needing to exit [someone], it made the most sense for where their characters were in their lives. It felt like it was time. After the ups and downs of their relationship this season, I knew I wanted them to exit together. I thought they finally deserved to be happy, and it became clear to me that maybe they can’t be happy in Seattle — and that’s where the decision was made.
When did you make that decision?
Shortly after the new year. It’s no secret what’s happening with network shows, and we’re not an exception, unfortunately.
Courtesy of Disney/Anne Marie Fox
You have found some creative ways to keep “Grey’s” on the air for the last few years while facing the financial realities of the TV business — like not using every series regular in every episode — but it sounds like you reached a point where you had to let someone go.
Obviously, even though we do go through all of these budget conversations, we try to let the creative dictate the story. Some of our characters, even if they aren’t still married, have children together, so it’s very tricky how to exit characters and what the impact is going to be to the other. It is pretty tough to maintain a large ensemble, especially for 22 years, in today’s financial climate in the industry. If it were up to me solely, I wouldn’t be writing anybody off ever, but I have to see where the story goes and follow the story. Again, I can’t express how these have been some painful few months for the “Grey’s” family.
You once revealed that you, Kim and Kevin have a table at Joe’s Bar where you have story conversations while filming “Grey’s.” Was that also the case with their exits? Did you speak with them together?
Those conversations were all had separately. I didn’t want to have those as a group of three. It was important to me that the characters were also seen as separate characters, with their individual contributions to the show, and we all have separate relationships with each other. So those initial conversations were had between Kevin, Max Gao Shonda [Rhimes] and I, and then Kim, Shonda and I. They were difficult conversations from the very beginning, because all of us love the characters so much, and it’s been such a long journey and it’s hard to say goodbye. But the nice thing on this show is that we always have room for people to come back and visit.
How involved was Shonda in their departures?
I pitched her the storylines of how to do it. Anything that is big, I pitch it to her first. It’s her show. She deserves to know big moves like that. But she was involved in those initial conversations with Kim and Kevin.
You mentioned that you and your writers thought about what Owen and Teddy were each searching for when they arrived at this hospital. What were they searching for?
I think that Owen was searching for a home. After he lost his entire squad in war and he had that PTSD of what it is like to be the sole survivor, he came to Seattle looking for connection and for a home. He found that through Grey Sloan and the people that work there.
Teddy came to Seattle for Owen. He called her, and she thought she was coming to be with him and it was a surprise that he was with Cristina. In that first episode, she says, “Oh, I misread this.” So when she says that in the scrub room, that’s a callback. Owen quickly corrects her in this finale and says, “No, no, no, I’m coming with you.” So there are little things like that that we snuck in there and that Kevin was fully aware of as the director. There’s even some musical cues in there that, again, unless you’re a diehard Teddy/Owen fan, you might not catch. But for those of us who work on the show and love those characters, it was very meaningful to us.
For two characters who spent so much of their lives at this hospital, Teddy and Owen leave Grey Sloan pretty abruptly. Did you ever write any scenes of them saying goodbye to colleagues?
Well, they don’t make their decision until very late in the episode. I wanted to celebrate them, and sometimes when you have a bunch of goodbyes, it also becomes about the other characters and it feels like you’re not really concentrating on the character that you’re trying to write the exit for. Even though they were leaving together, I really wanted to celebrate the two of them individually, so it was very important to me also to show their [montages] separately.
Courtesy of Disney
I was personally surprised to hear how open Meredith is to the idea of getting married again, especially since Derek (Patrick Dempsey) was the first true love of her life. How did she reach the conclusion that she was actually willing to take that next step with Nick, whom she even calls her husband in the ER?
This was something that we planned out from the beginning of the season. I told Ellen that I wanted to end with a proposal. She wanted to see how it played out, but in that middle episode in the season this year when his sister came to visit, we learned more about Nick — and so did Meredith. Meredith learned that he had had this dream of having this marriage and this happy home life, and it got taken away from him.
Obviously, she’s always had a complicated relationship with marriage, even with Derek. She didn’t want to get married in the traditional sense. And after losing her husband in such a horrific way, she was like, “No way am I going to go through that again.” And when it almost happens again, she realizes, “Oh, it doesn’t matter if we’re married or not. It still hurts. So why not do this thing that I know that he wants?” He’s done so much for her. He’s moved multiple times. When she makes these big career decisions, he is still by her side. This is her trying to show him the love is the same from her. She loves him; she doesn’t want to live without him. She doesn’t have to get married and he won’t make her get married. But she’s going to, because why not give it to him if it doesn’t make a difference based on what she just went through?
Will Meredith and Nick’s wedding happen on screen next season, or are they going to elope between seasons?
I don’t know, because I don’t know if he’ll be “RJ Decker” again or not. [The fate of Speedman’s ABC P.I. drama has not yet been announced.] But I don’t think Meredith is a big traditional wedding girl. She kind of said as much, but we’ll see.
Will Ellen’s involvement with the show remain the same next season?
We still haven’t quite figured that out yet, but ideally, yes.
Jo (Camilla Luddington) admits to Link (Chris Carmack) that she did not take the OB exam she was studying for, and she confides in him that she doesn’t know if she wants to be an OB or even a doctor anymore. What exactly is going through her head at this point for her to reach that conclusion?
She’s going through a little bit of a postpartum emotional journey based on what she went through midseason. There’s so many characters on this show who have gone through health scares that pretty quickly recover, and two episodes later, they’re back to normal. That is not the case with women who have difficult deliveries and almost lose their lives and their babies’ lives. I didn’t want to just brush everything under the rug. I thought that was a disservice to the reality.
We have a maternal mortality crisis in our country right now. Everyone thinks it’s a happy ending when the mother and the baby survive, but it’s much more complicated than that, and we really wanted to tell that story. We’ve gotten so much feedback on how powerful women find this story and that they’re seeing their own stories in Jo. The difference for Jo — the reason that it’s related and mixed in with her career — is because her actual career is her trigger right now. She’s having to watch women go through this over and over again before her eyes as their doctor. It’s [about] whether or not she can get the help that she needs to be able to return to that — or is it better not to return to it? That’s what she’s looking at right now.
Courtesy of Disney/Anne Marie Fox
Link will support whatever decision Jo makes, but he is also not-so-secretly taking pills to treat the shoulder injury that he suffered in last season’s hospital explosion. Does Link have a pill-popping problem now? Are you going to be exploring addiction through him next season?
We will in a more nuanced way than the stereotypical thing of seeing someone popping pills every five minutes. What he’s grappling with right now is — Link is a traditional guy, in that he doesn’t want to show any weakness and he wants to take care of his wife and children. He sees that she’s going through this, so in his mind, it’s like, “I can’t go through something that she’s going through. I got to be there for her. I got to take care of her.” He’s going to have to figure out: Is he going to tell her, or is he going to power through? There might be a little bit of powering through before he says something to her, so we’ll have to see where that takes him.
Blue is officially fired for injecting a patient with an unapproved drug, and in a devastating twist, he is humiliated by and forced to give his badge back to Richard in front of Catherine (Debbie Allen). Is this the last we have seen of Blue?
We will have to see, but I am glad that it was devastating because that was the intent. We’ve always seen Richard soften, but we wanted to show a different story this time. If you look at Catherine’s face, she has this face of, “Was that the right decision that Richard just made?” So we’ll definitely pick that up when we return.
Courtesy of Disney/Anne Marie Fox
Why was Richard harder on Blue here? Bailey (Chandra Wilson) injected a patient with an unapproved drug over a decade ago, and Richard was more forgiving.
Richard’s lost the residency program before, and that is not that far back into the past. We don’t really talk about this so much on the show, but this residency program has essentially just gotten back on its feet with the class of Simone [Alexis Floyd], Lucas [Niko Terho], Blue and everyone. So he’s trying to protect the residency program — that’s where it’s coming from. It comes out much sterner, but we’ll get more into that when we return.
Bailey will likely fight for Blue’s reinstatement, but for now, she has just made the decision to pursue a masters in public health. Why was that the next step you wanted to take in her evolution?
I was interested in what it would look like if Bailey — the teacher of all teachers — became a student again. I also think that it’s nice to see her take a little page out of Ben’s [Jason George] book that you can do things at any point in your career. It’s OK to want more. So it’s nice to see those roles reversed, and we’re just going to have to see: Does she have the bandwidth to be the student at the same time as being the teacher, and what kind of obstacles come from that?
Speaking of Ben, he was just accepted into a new plastics fellowship with new attending Toni Wright (Jen Landon). What did you want to accomplish with his arc this season, and what does this promotion mean for him going forward?
Putting Ben in navy scrubs was in my season pitch to Shonda and the studio/network at the beginning of this year. It was really important to me to see that character grow and be at the level where he deserves to be, especially out of the shadow of Bailey. [I wanted] to see him really stand on his two feet as a surgeon and be looked at as someone who could potentially have a leadership role in the hospital.
In doing that, we introduced this mentor for him, and I love their dynamic. She is someone who doesn’t know his history at the hospital. So it’s allowing him to be free and shed all of those past mistakes or things that he’s done and just concentrate on the medicine and on the patient care and really stand up for what he believes in. The moment when she tells him about the fellowship in the episode that aired last week — it’s one of my favorite moments in the season. That look on his face is great! She says, “Welcome to the team,” and then you see him in the navy scrubs, and it’s well-deserved. It was a long time coming.
I love plastic surgery cases. I love that it’s a specialty where we see a lot of healing and repair and transforming to feel more like the person they are on the inside. The stories can be harrowing, hopeful, devastating. We haven’t done a lot of them since Jackson [Jesse Williams] was on the show, so I’m really excited to show Ben in that aspect and, now that he’s a fellow, to see him more on the same playing field as a lot of our attendings.
“Grey’s” being “Grey’s,” you have a lot of romantic entanglements to untangle at the start of next season. Let’s start with unpacking the Simone-Lucas-Wes (Trevor Jackson) love triangle.
Last season, we left a lot of people in physical danger. This season, my goal was we would know that people were physically OK, but all of their emotional lives would be like a different kind of explosion. We saw Lucas have a lot of character growth this season in his taking care of Katie [a patient who died due to the cancellation of her clinical trial amid medical research funding cuts]. Nico had some of the best performances too, and going through that made him realize what is important in his life.
He and Simone sleeping together was a mistake. It was a drunk mistake. But over the course of the day, he’s realizing, “Does it have to be? I’m in a different place. She’s in a different place.” I don’t think Simone thought it was an option. I also don’t think she thought Wes being more than something casual was an option. She just thought she had an ex over here that she had drunk sex with, and someone that she is sleeping with on this [other] side. I don’t think she had any idea that both of these guys were going to come to her at the end of this episode expressing that they wanted more.
You wanted to explore a different kind of subordinate-superior relationship with Winston (Anthony Hill) and Jules (Adelaide Kane), but now they have truly crossed that professional line into personal territory. They have done a decent job of hiding the fact that they’re sleeping together… until the end of the finale.
I know that some people want them to be together, some people don’t want them to be together. I find that their chemistry is great. I find them so charming together. He resisted for two seasons, because he was so scared of what the power dynamic would do to their careers and each other. And finally, he decided to follow his heart. And now what he’s scared of could possibly happen, because Ben definitely saw them — and Ben is definitely going to tell his wife!
Courtesy of Courtesy of Disney/Anne Marie Fox
Toni shows up at Amelia’s (Caterina Scorsone) front door and confesses that she has fallen for her — only for Toni to realize that Amelia just hooked up with Cass (Sophia Bush). Are you trying to set up another love triangle here? Or was Amelia’s hook-up with Cass more of a one-night stand?
We’ll always have to wait and see. But, for me, Amelia truly believed that Toni was going back to her wife, and she was brokenhearted about it and trying to make herself feel better. We know Cass is in a happy marriage, but it’s an open marriage. So I think that after being in Amelia’s orbit today with the Meredith and Nick of it all and having a difficult day at work with the bridge collapse, [Cass] was also looking to feel a little bit better, and they went and had coffee that we didn’t see, and it turned into something else. I think Toni is just devastated. We’re going to have to figure out: Can Amelia dig her way out of this hole? I think she wants to be with Toni; she just thought it wasn’t an option.
Lastly, I loved getting to see some old clips of Cristina in those final montages, because she was such a key part of Teddy and Owen’s arcs back in the day. Assuming that Cristina is still in Switzerland, do you think that she would meet up with Teddy and Owen again in Europe?
Of course! Call me to write that show! I’m a diehard “Grey’s” fan. Any kind of scene with Cristina Yang — again, I would love to. I don’t know what the future holds, but the door is always open for returning characters here to come visit and have those episodes. We’ve done it with others, and we’ll do it again.
This interview has been edited and condensed.
World
Shell plans $1 billion wind farm sales in latest renewables exit, Bloomberg News reports
World
UNRWA fires 70 Gaza staffers amid allegations of Hamas ties, says terminations not admission of guilt
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) fired 70 staff members working in Gaza after long-standing claims from Israeli authorities that the agency is a collaborator with the Hamas terrorist group.
“Today, the Commissioner-General ad interim of UNRWA, Christian Saunders, took the decision to terminate the employment of 70 UNRWA staff members in Gaza with immediate effect,” UNRWA wrote in a statement Friday.
UNRWA insisted its decision was not an admission of guilt but one taken “to mitigate safety and security risks for the refugees the Agency serves under its mandate and for UNRWA personnel and premises.”
The agency claims it has “repeatedly asked the Israeli authorities to provide information and evidence to substantiate allegations against individual UNRWA staff members in Gaza but has received no response to date.”
ISRAEL SAYS UN MISLEADS WORLD AS GAZA AID STOLEN AND DIVERTED FROM CIVILIANS
A Palestinian boy walks near a UNRWA school sheltering displaced people that was hit in an overnight Israeli strike in Gaza City July 5, 2025. (Dawoud Abu Alkas/Reuters)
“The dismissal of the staff is not part of a disciplinary process and does not constitute in any way a validation of the claims made against them,” the UNRWA statement read.
The firings follow a United States Agency for International Development (USAID) investigation that referred more than 100 UNRWA staff members for suspension or dismissal.
USAID’s investigation, the results of which the agency published June 5, assessed that a number of UNRWA’s employees were deeply enmeshed in Hamas’ civil society and military operations.
The investigation results included mention of “a deputy school principal serving as an al-Qassam deputy company commander in the Ain Gallout/5th infantry battalion, a deputy school principal serving as squad leader for the Khan Younis Brigade/2nd infantry battalion” and “a teacher with expertise as a sniper for Hamas.”
Al-Qassam Brigades, the military wing of Hamas, hands over Israeli hostages Omer Shem-Tov, Eliya Cohen and Omer Wenkert to the International Committee of the Red Cross in Nuseirat Refugee Camp, Gaza, on Feb. 22, 2025, as part of the seventh exchange under the Jan. 19 ceasefire deal. (Ashraf Amra/Anadolu)
The investigation also found numerous school teachers and principals it claimed to have participated directly in Hamas’ Oct. 7 terrorist attacks.
Israeli authorities have long charged UNRWA with being directly tied to Hamas.
“Since October 7, evidence of numerous incidents of Hamas exploiting UNRWA infrastructure and UNRWA employees being involved in terrorist activity has been exposed. Civilians in Gaza have even stated that UNRWA is Hamas,” the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) wrote in a January web post.
Israeli soldiers stand inside an evacuated United Nations Relief and Works Agency compound in Gaza City during a media tour organized by the Israeli army on Feb. 8, 2024. (Jack Guez/AFP)
Additionally, the IDF claimed, citing intelligence findings, that “among the 12,521 UNRWA employees in the Gaza Strip, at least 1,462 (12%) are members of Hamas or other designated terrorist organizations.”
UNRWA SCHOOLS ‘HIJACKED BY HAMAS,’ WATCHDOG REPORT WARNS
Israel’s Foreign Ministry pushed back on UNRWA’s defense framing and claims that Israel had not supplied evidence of employee-Hamas collaboration.
“UNRWA’s statement on the termination of 70 employees, while blaming the victim, Israel, and without even mentioning the word ‘Hamas,’ is a cynical cover-up,” the ministry wrote in a statement shared on X.
UNRWA’s headquarters in Gaza City, Gaza, Feb. 21, 2024. (Dawoud Abo Alkas/Anadolu)
“The responsibility to purge terrorism lies solely with the UN, yet Hamas membership remains simply acceptable within UNRWA’s ranks. By harboring terrorists and letting its facilities serve as Hamas headquarters, UNRWA has become an arm of Hamas.”
UNRWA, for its part, denies being an active collaborator with Hamas but insists working with the group is an operational necessity for distributing aid in Gaza.
“UNRWA, similar to other United Nations entities, does not have police or intelligence capacities and must rely on the cooperation and assistance of Member States, including the State of Israel as the Occupying Power, to protect its operations and neutrality amid high risks in the Occupied Palestinian Territory,” the agency wrote in its statement Friday.
In April, UNRWA’s Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS) announced the results of an investigation into 19 employees accused of participating in Oct. 7. UNRWA terminated 12 of the employees in January. Of the remaining seven cases, UNRWA had dismissed one, citing a lack of evidence. The remaining six cases were still under investigation as of April, according to the agency.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
President Donald Trump’s administration weighed levying terrorism-related sanctions against UNRWA in December.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio has also referred to UNRWA as “a subsidiary of Hamas.”
Fox News Digital contacted UNRWA and a spokesperson for the Israeli ambassador to the United Nations but did not immediately receive a response.
World
America250 vs Freedom 250: What to know about the US’s 250th anniversary
Washington, DC – There are fisticuffs on the White House lawn, soon to be followed by a high-speed race through the National Mall. What is going on in Washington, DC?
The United States capital has been transformed in honour of the country’s 250th anniversary.
list of 3 itemsend of listRecommended Stories
Events all around the country are planned to mark two and a half centuries since the signing of the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776.
The nationwide bash has been dubbed the “semiquincentennial” — meaning half of 500 — and not just because Congress loves long words. The US has a history of throwing itself a party every 50 years.
But US President Donald Trump has promised a particularly noteworthy event this year, though the proceedings have been marred by a cavalcade of controversies.
Here’s what to know:
What is the history of US semicentennial celebrations?
The first 50-year anniversary, in 1826, was a considerably more muted affair than the festivities to come.
At the time, some of the original signers of the Declaration of Independence were still alive, so the mayor of Washington, DC, invited them to attend the celebration in the capital.
Former Presidents John Adams and Thomas Jefferson both demurred, citing their failing health. They died within hours of each other on the day of the semicentennial.
Fifty years later, in 1876, the US would mark its 100th anniversary by hosting its first world’s fair, an exhibition featuring displays of art, culture and technology from around the globe.
The fair was held in Philadelphia, where the Declaration of Independence was signed, and the original document was put on temporary display in the city.
Another world’s fair arrived in Philadelphia for the country’s 150th anniversary in 1926, but it was not nearly as successful. Variety magazine called it “America’s greatest flop”.
Meanwhile, the modern template for having a yearlong, cross-country celebration was set on the 200th anniversary in 1976.
A train-mounted museum of documents and historical artefacts toured the lower 48 states for 21 months. Volunteers, meanwhile, used covered wagons to travel the width of the country.
The celebrations were generally received positively, although the sale of souvenirs — from umbrella hats to mugs — earned it the pejorative “the buy-centennial”.
What is happening this year?
While the US capital may be the centre of this year’s celebration, there will be a multitude of events across the country. They include:
- UFC Freedom 250, a mixed martial arts fight on the White House lawn on June 14
- the Great American State Fair, featuring booths representing all 50 states, presented on the National Mall from June 25 to July 10
- the Freedom 250 Grand Prix, which will see IndyCars race around capital monuments from August 22 to 23
- the World Cup Fan Zone in Washington, DC, from June 11 to July 16
- a fireworks display at Mount Rushmore in South Dakota on July 3
- concerts and exhibitions in cities like New York, Los Angeles and Boston
Mobile museums, known as Freedom Trucks, will also be travelling around the country.
Another initiative is America’s Block Party, an effort to encourage communities to engage in charitable works and host their own semiquincentennial parties.
So far, however, there appears to be no government programme in the works to tackle the holiday’s most vexing and far-reaching problem: how to make the traditional July 4 potato salad less bland.
What is the controversy over the UFC fight?
One of the most scrutinised events in the semiquincentennial calendar is UFC Freedom 250, which will take place on the White House lawn on Sunday.
The timing of the event is one of the details that have wiggled eyebrows. Sunday is a holiday known as Flag Day, but it also marks Trump’s 80th birthday.
The event is also being staged by one of Trump’s most prominent political donors: Dana White, the CEO of the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC).
White has described Sunday’s event as designed “to tell the story of America”. There will be two title fights: a lightweight bout between Ilia Topuria and Justin Gaethje and a heavyweight interim title fight between Alex Pereira and Ciryl Gane, as well as several smaller “undercard” matches.
Despite bearing the title “Freedom 250”, the UFC event is not being organised by the White House task force of the same name.
A Freedom 250 spokesperson clarified that the presidential group “has not been responsible for the operations, logistics or funding of the UFC White House event”.
That point has been central to ongoing debates about whether the fight represents a conflict of interest for Trump, who holds stock in UFC’s parent company.
On Friday, a federal judge rejected an emergency petition to stop the fight, on the premise that Trump was using government property to promote his private business interests.
White has told the ESPN sport broadcaster that his organisation was paying for the event.
What is the difference between Freedom 250 and America250?
There are two government-backed nonprofits organising festivities for the anniversary: Freedom 250 and America250.
The former is part of a White House task force, and the latter is a bipartisan organisation created in 2016 by the US Congress.
America250 was set up in 2016 to “plan and orchestrate the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence”, and it is led by private citizens.
The Freedom 250, meanwhile, is a public-private partnership within the National Parks Foundation, the charitable arm of the National Park Service, a federal agency.
It is ostensibly the public-facing side of the White House Task Force 250, which Trump established in 2025 “to plan, organize, and execute” the semiquincentennial. Trump is also the task force’s chair.
What is each side organising?
The two groups’ event-planning philosophies do not overlap much.
Freedom 250 focuses mostly on big, marquee functions, such as the IndyCar race, the World Cup Fan Zone and Sail4th 250, which will see an armada of tall ships and military vessels travel to US cities along the Atlantic coast.
The America250 organisation has been more focused on community participation through initiatives such as America’s Block Party and its Giving 4th programme, which aims to boost charitable giving on the July 4 holiday.
So Freedom 250 and America250 are not stepping on each other’s toes?
Not really, and they’re ostensibly playing nice, with America250’s chairwoman, Rosie Rios, lauding Freedom 250 as a way to advance presidential initiatives to “give the American people more ways they can celebrate America’s 250th birthday”.
But this is Washington, DC, so some elbows are being thrown.
The creation of White House Task Force 250 was widely viewed as a manoeuvre by Trump to seize control of the celebrations, outside of congressional oversight.
The launch of Freedom 250 came just two months after the appointee Trump picked to lead America250, Ari Abergel, was fired for “serious and repeated breaches” of his authority. Abergel has denied overstepping his mandate.
Who is financing the two groups?
Neither the congressionally created America250 nor the White House’s Freedom 250 are required to disclose its private donors.
But critics point out there are fewer guardrails with Freedom 250 than with America250.
America250’s parent commission is required to submit an annual report to Congress detailing funding and spending.
Freedom 250, meanwhile, lists some “sponsors” and “partners” online, but it is not subject to any independent oversight. That lack of transparency has been a recurring complaint.
In February, The New York Times reported that Freedom 250 was offering access to a reception hosted by Trump in exchange for large donations.
But the newspaper USA Today also pointed out that America250 offered packages that included invitations to events where government officials would be in attendance.
Both groups have been given taxpayer dollars. Congress appropriated $150m to the Department of the Interior for the celebrations, but it did not specify how the money was to be split between the groups.
The Interior Department allocated $100m to Freedom 250 (via the National Park Foundation) and $50m to America250, raising concerns that Trump was steering public funds away from the congressionally mandated organisation.
Critics have also questioned whether the Freedom 250 events are designed to celebrate US independence or promote Trump and his priorities.
Nearly $10m, for instance, went to supporting the Freedom Trucks, whose exhibits have been criticised for offering a whitewashed portrait of US history.
Has there been a backlash to Freedom 250?
The perception that Freedom 250 is a Trump organisation, rather than a nonpartisan one, has created snags for one of its tentpole events: the Great American State Fair.
Almost as soon as its musical lineup was announced in May, artists started dropping out. Several performers said they felt misled by the organisers’ claims that the event is nonpartisan.
Several state governments have also declined to take part, including Connecticut, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington state.
A spokesperson for Oregon said in part that the fair “is shaping up to be a more partisan affair than originally presented”.
But Freedom 250 has maintained that the fair will continue with all 50 states represented on the National Mall.
Trump, meanwhile, cancelled the concert, replacing it with a “Rally to end all Rallies”, at which he will give a speech. Country musician Lee Greenwood and tenor Christopher Macchio, as well as several military bands, will also be included in the lineup.
-
Minnesota4 minutes agoLynx rally falls short in Las Vegas
-
Mississippi11 minutes ago
What can you expect at Neshoba County Fair political speaking?
-
Missouri14 minutes agoStrafford High School graduate crowned Miss Missouri
-
Montana19 minutes ago
Montana Lottery Powerball, Lotto America results for June 13, 2026
-
Nebraska26 minutes agoHot Meals USA volunteers fed firefighters battling Nebraska grass fires
-
Nevada29 minutes agoMore resources available to Nevada entrepreneurs
-
New Hampshire34 minutes agoDistant Dome: The Politicization of the Judiciary
-
New Jersey41 minutes agoBrazil find that everything good flows through Viní of New Jersey




