California
How Trump has an edge in California GOP primary after state rule change
The California GOP altered its rules for allocating delegates in the state’s presidential primary, a move that could give former President Donald Trump a significant edge over his opponents in the 2024 election.
Trump is the front-runner for the GOP presidential nomination. RealClearPolitics puts the former president at an average of 52.4%, an almost 40-point margin ahead of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-FL). Trump is close to 50% ahead of candidates like former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, and Gov. Doug Burgum (R-ND), among others.
REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES TEST HOW FAR THEY CAN GO IN CRITICIZING TRUMP
In California, a predominately Democratic state, the Republican Party has looked to secure a tighter red stronghold, aiming to flip Congressional seats and elect a viable GOP candidate for the presidency.
Now, with the GOP changing its delegate rules, California Republicans could be opening the door for Trump and potentially discouraging other GOP primary candidates from campaigning in the state.
What is the new GOP delegate rule?
On Saturday, the California Republican Party’s 100-member executive committee changed the way delegates are allocated in a 52-16 vote.
Now, if a Republican candidate wins over 50% of the vote in the primary on March 5, they will receive all 169 delegates from the state — more delegates than any state in the nation.
If no one reaches this threshold, then the delegates will be split up among candidates proportional to the statewide vote.
State GOP leaders argue this will attract candidates to compete in California.
“Today’s vote … was a massive victory for California Republicans who are eager to have a say in deciding who our Party’s 2024 presidential nominee will be,” state party Chair Jessica Millan Patterson said in a statement via Los Angeles Times. “Republican presidential candidates will not only be encouraged to spend real time campaigning in our state and making their case to voters, but Republican voters will equally be encouraged to turn out to support their chosen candidate to help them win delegates.”
If the GOP did not change the rules, the party would have lost half of its delegates to the Republican National Convention for not meeting delegate criteria.
Many state Republican parties had made similar changes to their primary rules ahead of the 2020 election, adding more winner-take-all contests and requiring a higher percentage of the vote to win delegates.
Why are some Republicans against this rule change?
The original system, which has been in place for two decades, allocated three delegates for each congressional district won. The system allowed a candidate to strategically campaign in a handful of areas in California instead of targeting the entire state.
Former state GOP executive director Jon Fleischman, who served in 2000 when the original system was adopted, said in an interview with the LA Times that the new rule would prevent this type of competition among candidates.
Fleischman said no GOP presidential candidate would be incentivized to come to California and campaign.
“The cost to advertise statewide is too great, and the impact of trying to motivate volunteers is too small,” Fleischman said. “So they will go to other states and ignore California in the primary, as they ignore California in the general election.”
Some Republican protesters have argued the decision should have been discussed with the over 1,400 party members at the fall convention, not just the executive committee. State GOP officials said that they were on a deadline to submit their new rules to the RNC to maintain the allotment of delegates.
Where do the top candidates stand on this rule change?
Trump’s team is in full support of the California GOP’s rule change while DeSantis’s team has blasted the state’s Republicans for ignoring voters who want a different GOP candidate in the 2024 general election.
An executive committee member told the Los Angeles Times that they spoke to Trump’s campaign and they supported the rule change, saying polling shows he can win more than 50% of primary voters in California.
Ken Cuccinelli, founder of the pro-DeSantis Never Back Down super PAC, blasted the state GOP’s decision to ignore a different proposal that could have favored the Florida governor.
Under that proposal, three delegates would have been awarded by congressional district, with two going to the winner in each district and the third going to the second-place finisher. With DeSantis maintaining a steady runner-up status in most polls, this method would have likely benefited him come primary time in March.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
“Smoke-filled back rooms do not reflect the will of or benefit voters in any state. Yet across the country, games are afoot to enhance the potential outcome of primary elections for one former president who half of the Republican electorate no longer wants as the party leader,” Cuccinelli said in a statement.
But “even with these asinine primary rules changes,” Cuccinelli added, “we remain confident Governor DeSantis will become the Republican nominee and 47th president of the United States.”
California
California College Data and Policy Project Awarded $200,000 Grant from College Futures Foundation to Study CalFresh Use by Students – California Policy Lab
January 28, 2025, Berkeley, California — A new grant from College Futures Foundation will support research to improve the take-up of CalFresh benefits by students in the state’s three main systems of higher education, including the University of California, the California Community College System, and the California State University.
This is the first external support for the research of the new California College Data and Policy Project. The Project is a joint initiative of the California Policy Lab and the Center for Studies in Higher Education, and is led by Professor Jesse Rothstein, the Carmel Friesen Chair in Public Policy and David Gardner Chair in Higher Education and a Professor of Public Policy and Economics at UC Berkeley.
“We’re thrilled to receive this grant, which will support our work with our partners to use enrollment, financial aid, and safety-net data to identify students who are eligible for these supports, and then target outreach with a goal of increasing the number of students who enroll,” explains Professor Rothstein. “We’re grateful to College Futures Foundation because this grant will also support our longer-term work to better measure if receiving CalFresh has an impact on student success outcomes like staying enrolled and graduating.”
CalFresh is California’s version of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and it provides a monthly benefit amount that can be used to purchase food. Research by the California Policy Lab has shown that among students who are likely eligible for CalFresh, only about 1 in 3 or 1 in 4 students enroll in the program.
Additional background
Student Supports Initiative
Across the country, many college students struggle to meet their basic needs while attending school. Public higher education institutions are well-situated to connect students to safety-net benefits, but data limitations have hampered previous efforts to quantify eligibility and take-up.
To address this, the California Policy Lab has partnered with the California Student Aid Commission (CSAC), the California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office (CCCCO), the California Department of Social Services (CDSS), the University of California Office of the President (UCOP), the California State University Office of the Chancellor (CSUOC), and the California Department of Education (CDE) to link anonymized data across these six agencies in order to help get more students the support they need to thrive at college.
This initiative has made it possible to link together data that had not previously been linked, which in turn allows the research team to unlock new insights about CalFresh and college students. This includes analysis showing how many students are eligible and enrolled in the UC and California Community College systems, testing outreach methods with partners, and more recently, showing the impact that temporary, COVID-era policy changes had on making more students eligible for CalFresh, and making benefits more generous. All of the research is available on the CCDPP web page.
The California College Data and Policy Project
The CCDPP is a new research initiative that brings together University of California researchers and government partners to advance equity and improve California’s world class higher education system.
CCDPP will generate new insights and research on what works to better support California students and their families as they transition through the education system. Initial CCDPP research will focus on student supports, college admissions, and transfer students.
California
Trio helps UCLA hold on down stretch to beat USC 82-76
Eric Dailey Jr. had 16 points, Sebastian Mack came off the bench to score 14 and Aday Mara blocked five shots on his way to a double-double as UCLA beat USC 82-76 on Monday night.
UCLA took the lead three minutes into the game and never trailed again. USC fell behind by double digits at the start of the second half. The Trojans battled back and had a chance to take the lead before missing 3 of 4 free throws. Wesley Yates III hit the second of two foul shots with 1:54 left to get USC within a point. Saint Thomas missed twice with 1:37 left and a chance for the lead.
Mack answered with a 3-pointer at the shot-clock buzzer and followed with two free throws to help UCLA prevail.
Dailey added six rebounds for the Bruins (15-6, 6-4 Big Ten Conference), who have won four in a row following a four-game losing streak. Dylan Andrews totaled 12 points and six assists. Aday Mara finished with 12 points and 11 rebounds for his first double-double this season.
Rashaun Agee led the Trojans (12-8, 4-5) with 21 points off the bench on 8-for-12 shooting. Yates made four 3-pointers and scored 19. Thomas totaled 13 points, eight rebounds and six assists. Desmond Claude pitched in with 12 points and six assists.
The Bruins played without leading scorer Tyler Bilodeau (13.9 points per game), who injured his ankle three minutes into a 65-60 road win over the Washington Huskies last time out.
UCLA will host No. 16 Oregon on Thursday in the first of three straight games at home. USC will host No. 7 Michigan State on Saturday.
California
What Southern California wildfire victims can expect from their insurance adjuster
LOS ANGELES — Even with flames still burning in parts of Los Angeles County, total insured losses from the wildfires this month are already estimated at more than $30 billion, according to Goldman Sachs.
Note: The video above is from related coverage.
The massive amount of damage dwarfs the previous record of $12 billion in insured losses caused by Northern California’s Camp Fire in 2018.
With over 15,000 structures already destroyed in the Palisades, Eaton and spate of smaller fires, according to state officials, some public insurance claim adjusters are warning that it may take years for claims to be resolved, and in some instances, homeowners may not have the coverage they thought they had.
A recent study from the University of Colorado Boulder of a 2021 wildfire in the state found that three-quarters of those who lost their homes were not fully covered for total losses.
MORE: Experts – How to get the most out of your insurance coverage after fire
Trying to figure out what to do next after surviving a disaster, contacting your insurance company should be one of the first things you do. But then what? United Policyholders is a non-profit whose mission is to assist you in getting the most out of your coverage.
As thousands of homeowners in Southern California file insurance claims to start the recovery process, they are meeting the one person who will determine how much the insurance company should pay for their loss — the insurance adjuster.
Each claimant is assigned an adjuster by the insurance company. It is the adjuster’s job to assess the damage, and in the case of the LA wildfires, prioritize the destroyed and severely damaged homes over those with minor damage.
California law requires that insurers immediately pay policyholders one-third of the estimated value of their belongings and a minimum of four months’ rent in the event they are completely displaced.
Gov. Gavin Newsom recently issued a one-year moratorium preventing insurance companies from canceling or issuing non-renewals for homeowners in the neighborhoods or adjoining ZIP codes affected by the Palisades and Eaton fires.
After the adjuster assesses the damage, they will determine how much the insurance company pays out for the claim.
Those who file may be given a settlement offer on the spot, but Amy Bach, executive director of the non-profit consumer advocacy group United Policyholders, tells ABC News that homeowners should resist the temptation to sign on the dotted line right away.
She recommends asking insurers for a copy of the policy and studying it for details about what level of coverage can apply.
“Give your insurance company a chance to do the right thing, but don’t be a pushover,” Bach said. “Understand reality — your insurer is a for-profit business, and you need to be pro-active to recover what you’re owed in full. Get informed on your rights and your insurer’s obligations and be politely assertive.”
MORE: These 2 types of insurance coverage will help rebuild after disaster
Most fire victims say they want to rebuild. They might have insurance, but is it going to be enough? Here are two types of coverage that experts say are key to help the rebuilding process.
Experts say if an insurer tells a homeowner that something is not covered, they should get a second opinion, including getting independent valuations of the replacement cost of the home and possessions.
“Chances are the insurer’s adjuster will use a software program to calculate what they owe you,” Bach said. “Computers don’t repair and rebuild homes — contractors and subcontractors do. So, it’s what they will charge that matters.”
If the homeowner disagrees with the insurance company’s assessment, they can appeal the decision and hire a public adjuster for a fee, according to Bach.
The public adjuster’s second opinion may help when negotiating with the insurance company, Bach added.
Public adjusters can be found through the California Department of Insurance website, and if homeowners are not being treated fairly — they can file a complaint for free with the same department.
Bach suggests keeping detailed notes of all conversations with the insurance company and adjuster including the dates and times of speaking, the names of those representatives, and a summary of what was said.
She also recommends sending a follow-up email after every conversation to document the progress.
Even if affected homeowners are insured, experts also recommend applying for disaster assistance from the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Copyright © 2025 ABC News Internet Ventures.
-
Culture1 week ago
Book Review: ‘Somewhere Toward Freedom,’ by Bennett Parten
-
Business1 week ago
Opinion: Biden delivered a new 'Roaring '20s.' Watch Trump try to take the credit.
-
News1 week ago
Judges Begin Freeing Jan. 6 Defendants After Trump’s Clemency Order
-
Business5 days ago
Instagram and Facebook Blocked and Hid Abortion Pill Providers’ Posts
-
News3 days ago
Hamas releases four female Israeli soldiers as 200 Palestinians set free
-
Politics4 days ago
Oklahoma Sen Mullin confident Hegseth will be confirmed, predicts who Democrats will try to sink next
-
World3 days ago
Israel Frees 200 Palestinian Prisoners in Second Cease-Fire Exchange
-
News1 week ago
A Heavy Favorite Emerges in the Race to Lead the Democratic Party