Connect with us

California

How Trump has an edge in California GOP primary after state rule change

Published

on

How Trump has an edge in California GOP primary after state rule change


The California GOP altered its rules for allocating delegates in the state’s presidential primary, a move that could give former President Donald Trump a significant edge over his opponents in the 2024 election.

Trump is the front-runner for the GOP presidential nomination. RealClearPolitics puts the former president at an average of 52.4%, an almost 40-point margin ahead of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-FL). Trump is close to 50% ahead of candidates like former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, and Gov. Doug Burgum (R-ND), among others.

REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES TEST HOW FAR THEY CAN GO IN CRITICIZING TRUMP

In California, a predominately Democratic state, the Republican Party has looked to secure a tighter red stronghold, aiming to flip Congressional seats and elect a viable GOP candidate for the presidency.

Advertisement

Now, with the GOP changing its delegate rules, California Republicans could be opening the door for Trump and potentially discouraging other GOP primary candidates from campaigning in the state.

What is the new GOP delegate rule?

On Saturday, the California Republican Party’s 100-member executive committee changed the way delegates are allocated in a 52-16 vote.

Now, if a Republican candidate wins over 50% of the vote in the primary on March 5, they will receive all 169 delegates from the state — more delegates than any state in the nation.

If no one reaches this threshold, then the delegates will be split up among candidates proportional to the statewide vote.

Advertisement

State GOP leaders argue this will attract candidates to compete in California.

“Today’s vote … was a massive victory for California Republicans who are eager to have a say in deciding who our Party’s 2024 presidential nominee will be,” state party Chair Jessica Millan Patterson said in a statement via Los Angeles Times. “Republican presidential candidates will not only be encouraged to spend real time campaigning in our state and making their case to voters, but Republican voters will equally be encouraged to turn out to support their chosen candidate to help them win delegates.”

If the GOP did not change the rules, the party would have lost half of its delegates to the Republican National Convention for not meeting delegate criteria.

Many state Republican parties had made similar changes to their primary rules ahead of the 2020 election, adding more winner-take-all contests and requiring a higher percentage of the vote to win delegates.

Why are some Republicans against this rule change?

Advertisement

The original system, which has been in place for two decades, allocated three delegates for each congressional district won. The system allowed a candidate to strategically campaign in a handful of areas in California instead of targeting the entire state.

Former state GOP executive director Jon Fleischman, who served in 2000 when the original system was adopted, said in an interview with the LA Times that the new rule would prevent this type of competition among candidates.

Fleischman said no GOP presidential candidate would be incentivized to come to California and campaign.

“The cost to advertise statewide is too great, and the impact of trying to motivate volunteers is too small,” Fleischman said. “So they will go to other states and ignore California in the primary, as they ignore California in the general election.”

Some Republican protesters have argued the decision should have been discussed with the over 1,400 party members at the fall convention, not just the executive committee. State GOP officials said that they were on a deadline to submit their new rules to the RNC to maintain the allotment of delegates.

Advertisement

Where do the top candidates stand on this rule change?

Trump’s team is in full support of the California GOP’s rule change while DeSantis’s team has blasted the state’s Republicans for ignoring voters who want a different GOP candidate in the 2024 general election.

An executive committee member told the Los Angeles Times that they spoke to Trump’s campaign and they supported the rule change, saying polling shows he can win more than 50% of primary voters in California.

Ken Cuccinelli, founder of the pro-DeSantis Never Back Down super PAC, blasted the state GOP’s decision to ignore a different proposal that could have favored the Florida governor.

Under that proposal, three delegates would have been awarded by congressional district, with two going to the winner in each district and the third going to the second-place finisher. With DeSantis maintaining a steady runner-up status in most polls, this method would have likely benefited him come primary time in March.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

“Smoke-filled back rooms do not reflect the will of or benefit voters in any state. Yet across the country, games are afoot to enhance the potential outcome of primary elections for one former president who half of the Republican electorate no longer wants as the party leader,” Cuccinelli said in a statement.

But “even with these asinine primary rules changes,” Cuccinelli added, “we remain confident Governor DeSantis will become the Republican nominee and 47th president of the United States.”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

California governor signs bills to protect children from AI deepfake nudes

Published

on

California governor signs bills to protect children from AI deepfake nudes


SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a pair of proposals Sunday aiming to help shield minors from the increasingly prevalent misuse of artificial intelligence tools to generate harmful sexual imagery of children.

The measures are part of California’s concerted efforts to ramp up regulations around the marquee industry that is increasingly affecting the daily lives of Americans but has had little to no oversight in the United States.

Earlier this month, Newsom also has signed off on some of the toughest laws to tackle election deepfakes, though the laws are being challenged in court. California is wildly seen as a potential leader in regulating the AI industry in the U.S.

The new laws, which received overwhelming bipartisan support, close a legal loophole around AI-generated imagery of child sexual abuse and make it clear child pornography is illegal even if it’s AI-generated.

Advertisement

Current law does not allow district attorneys to go after people who possess or distribute AI-generated child sexual abuse images if they cannot prove the materials are depicting a real person, supporters said. Under the new laws, such an offense would qualify as a felony.

“Child sexual abuse material must be illegal to create, possess, and distribute in California, whether the images are AI generated or of actual children,” Democratic Assemblymember Marc Berman, who authored one of the bills, said in a statement. “AI that is used to create these awful images is trained from thousands of images of real children being abused, revictimizing those children all over again.”

Newsom earlier this month also signed two other bills to strengthen laws on revenge porn with the goal of protecting more women, teenage girls and others from sexual exploitation and harassment enabled by AI tools. It will be now illegal for an adult to create or share AI-generated sexually explicit deepfakes of a person without their consent under state laws. Social media platforms are also required to allow users to report such materials for removal.

But some of the laws don’t go far enough, said Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascón, whose office sponsored some of the proposals. Gascón said new penalties for sharing AI-generated revenge porn should have included those under 18, too. The measure was narrowed by state lawmakers last month to only apply to adults.

“There has to be consequences, you don’t get a free pass because you’re under 18,” Gascón said in a recent interview.

Advertisement

The laws come after San Francisco brought a first-in-the-nation lawsuit against more than a dozen websites that AI tools with a promise to “undress any photo” uploaded to the website within seconds.

The problem with deepfakes isn’t new, but experts say it’s getting worse as the technology to produce it becomes more accessible and easier to use. Researchers have been sounding the alarm these past two years on the explosion of AI-generated child sexual abuse material using depictions of real victims or virtual characters.

In March, a school district in Beverly Hills expelled five middle school students for creating and sharing fake nudes of their classmates.

The issue has prompted swift bipartisan actions in nearly 30 states to help address the proliferation of AI-generated sexually abusive materials. Some of them include protection for all, while others only outlaw materials depicting minors.

Advertisement

Newsom has touted California as an early adopter as well as regulator of AI technology, saying the state could soon deploy generative AI tools to address highway congestion and provide tax guidance, even as his administration considers new rules against AI discrimination in hiring practices.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

PG&E warns customers of 13 California counties of possible power shutoffs

Published

on

PG&E warns customers of 13 California counties of possible power shutoffs


PG&E warned about 13,455 customers in 13 California counties that it may turn off power in some areas Monday due to elevated wildfire risk, the company said.

The utility is monitoring forecasts for breezy offshore winds and low humidity for possible Public Safety Power Shutoffs, according to a press release Saturday.

PG&E, which has paid millions in fines related to its role in wildfires, proactively cuts power in certain instances to reduce fire risk from energized power lines.

“These customers received notifications starting early Saturday and will be updated on Sunday morning,” the utility said. “Those notifications will inform customers of any changes in the forecast and how it will impact a possible Public Safety Power Shutoff.”

Advertisement

In the Bay Area, notices were sent to 346 customers in Alameda County, 286 in Contra Costa County, 140 in Napa County and 268 in Sonoma County, PG&E said.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

Laws combating California campus antisemitism receive wide support, despite JVP criticism

Published

on

Laws combating California campus antisemitism receive wide support, despite JVP criticism


New laws targeting campus antisemitism and ensuring K-12 education on the Holocaust and genocide will be signed into law by California Governor Gavin Newsom, his office announced this week. 

The policies, authored by Assembly members Laura Friedman and Josh Lowenthal, Senator Steve Glazer, and Senator Henry Stern respectfully, will see increased education on the Holocaust in K-12 classrooms and antisemitism training included in California colleges’ diversity, equity, and inclusion programs. 

Advertisement

The three new legislations were rated the highest priority by the Jewish Public Affairs Committee of California in light of growing antisemitism.  JPAC is also supporting several dozen other bills. To date, 16 have been signed into law. 

The new legislation

The deadline to submit or veto bills is September 30, meaning the legislation may still be turned down. Should bill AB 2925 pass, then, from January 1, Californian college campuses will be required to teach on antisemitism, and staff will be trained on how to combat discrimination against the five most targeted groups. This would likely see antisemitism training added to existing DEI policies.

Under SB 1287, the second of the three bills up for consideration, college campuses could be required to enforce and update student codes to prevent intimidation, harassment, and violence. Students would be given training on appropriate channels of civil discourse, allowing room for debates and discussions. 

Advertisement
A protest encampment is set up in support of Palestinians, at the University of California, Berkeley, in April. The problem with the eruption of the anti-Israel protests has been the involvement of many faculty members in reframing the notion of Palestine, the writer argues. (credit: CARLOS BARRIA / REUTERS)

Finally, under SB 1277, the California Teachers Collaborative on Holocaust and Genocide Education would become an official state program. This is led by the JFCS Holocaust Center in San Francisco, which brings together 14 genocide education institutions across the state to create curriculum and training materials for K-12 teachers. If implemented, the educational materials would reach one million students by 2027.

Campus life

The legislation comes in the wake of campus protests over the Israel-Hamas war. Some American universities saw pro-Palestinian groups set up illegal encampments on campus, preventing the free movement of students paying to attend the institutes.

Advertisement

In one such instance, at the California-based University of Berkeley, anti-Israel protesters allegedly firebombed buildings. In another, a pro-Palestinian group interrupted a private dinner being held at the home of a Jewish professor. Other incidents have seen students physically assaulted for supporting Israel.

Wide support for bills

All three of these bills faced fierce opposition from the Council on American-Islamic Relations and Jewish Voice for Peace, the governor’s office said. However, the bills have maintained strong bipartisan support – thanks in part to the advocacy efforts made by JPAC and a coalition of over 40 Jewish organizations.  Additionally, over 3,500 letters of support for the bill were sent to the governor.

However, they passed out the legislature with overwhelming, bipartisan majorities in both houses. JPAC led advocacy efforts throughout the legislative process – building a coalition of over 40 Jewish organizations – and organized over 3,500 letters to the Governor. These bills were also top priorities for the California Legislative Jewish Caucus.

Advertisement

Stay updated with the latest news!

Subscribe to The Jerusalem Post Newsletter


“In a post-October 7th world, our school and campus leaders need more tools to keep students safe and provide accessible educational opportunities for all,” said David Bocarsly, JPAC Executive Director. “This is true for both Jewish students and other targeted students. These bills meaningfully counter antisemitism and hate by creating greater empathy and understanding and ensuring all students feel safe on their campus. We are incredibly grateful to our partners and champions in the Legislative Jewish Caucus, led by Assemblymember Gabriel and Senator Wiener, and we thank Governor Newsom for signing these bills into law.”

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending