California
How are California lawmakers tackling housing and homelessness this year?
Could reclassifying who is considered to be very low-income get more vulnerable people off the streets?
That’s what some lawmakers are saying as the state continues to face a homelessness crisis that only seems to have grown worse despite tens of billions of taxpayer dollars being spent trying to alleviate the problem.
According to the 2023 point in time count released in December, which details the nation’s homeless population on a single night, more than 180,000 people in California were experiencing homelessness, a roughly 6% increase from the prior year. Between a longer period of time, 2007 to 2023, California saw the largest absolute increase in the number of people experiencing homelessness, 30.5%.
And this week, Orange County unveiled its latest point in time count, which revealed a 28% increase from the previous count in 2022, despite the county upping the dollar amount allocated towards addressing homelessness.
The county reported 7,322 people approached in January said they were experiencing homelessness. The last count in 2022 tallied 5,718 people either living on the streets in Orange County or staying in shelters. Of those surveyed this year, 328 were veterans, 308 were young adults between 18 and 24 years old and 869 were seniors ages 62 or older.
So what are state legislators doing to tackle this issue in Sacramento this year, besides the usual allocation of funding for existing programs?
For one, a bill from by San Diego Assemblymember Chris Ward and co-authored by Sen. Catherine Blakespear, D-Encinitas — and recently backed by Gov. Gavin Newsom — would reclassify who is considered to be on the very low end of the income scale, which Newsom said would better equip local jurisdictions to meet the housing needs of a greater number of their population.
While the state-mandated Regional Housing Needs Allocation process categorizes those earning at or below 50% of the median income as very low income, the legislation would break out that group into three categories: Individuals earning between 30-50% of the median income would be classified as very-low income, 15-30% as extremely low-income and 0-15% as acutely low-income.
The RHNA is a process by which local governments determine the housing needs of a specific community, including the amount of new homes that have to be built and the affordability of those homes.
Being more specific about who falls under which income category will require local governments to include acutely low-income households in their housing plans as well as rezone a development site if it is not suited to fully accommodate for the acutely low- and extremely low-income households.
“Far too often, we’re attempting to address the issue of homelessness without the complete picture,” Ward said, adding that his bill would “ensure that our most vulnerable residents are included into the Regional Housing Needs Allocation so we can recognize and plan for the housing needs of those earning the lowest incomes in our state.”
Blakespear introduced similar legislation for the 2023-24 legislative session that seeks to require cities and counties to provide housing for people experiencing homelessness by including them in their zoning plans. The bill is still awaiting to be assigned to a committee.
Here are four other ways state legislators are working on housing issues this year.
Housing subsidies
Under legislation introduced by Assemblymembers Rick Zbur, D-Los Angeles, and Sharon Quirk-Silva, D-Fullerton, the state would establish a program to provide funding for counties to give housing subsidies to low-income people who meet at least one of the following criteria:
• A former foster youth who qualifies for the state’s independent living program,
• An adult 55 and older,
• An adult with a disability,
• An individual experiencing unemployment,
• An individual experiencing homelessness,
• A veteran, or
• An incarcerated individual who is likely to be unhoused after being released.
If passed, a two-year pilot program would be established in eight California counties, including Orange County, by Jan. 1, 2026.
Support for homeless students
Another bill introduced by Quirk-Silva aims to ensure resources for California’s foster and unhoused youth, including tutoring and college financial aid services, are readily available for the students who need them.
The legislation would create a new level of accountability for school districts, charters and county education offices to identify homeless students. It also would urge more collaboration between local educational agencies and programs that serve foster or unhoused youths.
“The whole goal here is to continue that liaison between foster care students and the local agencies,” she previously said.
Development in the Coastal Zone
One area of California where a lack of affordable housing is most apparent is the coastline, specifically the Coastal Zone, a geographic region that encompasses both land and water areas along the length of the California coastline from the Oregon border to the Mexico border, according to the California Coastal Commission.
That zone is exempt from California’s density bonus law, which allows developers to build additional homes above the dwelling units per acre allowed by the specific jurisdiction in exchange for reserving a percentage of the project for affordable homes.
Legislation from Assemblymember David Alvarez, D-San Diego, aims to do away with that exemption. Far less housing has been built in the state’s coastal areas than people demand, which upped the cost of housing in those areas and spilled over to inland regions, according to the Legislative Analyst’s Office.
“Wealthier areas along California’s coast need to do their part in building more housing,” Alvarez said. “The current law prevents housing along with denying access to California’s coast to the average citizen.”
Financial headwinds
Billions of dollars are spent annually in California in an attempt to put a roof over the heads of the unhoused and connect them to vital resources they need.
But a recent audit of those dollars found that the state has failed to adequately track whether that massive spending has been working, which has led to criticism of the administration from state legislators on both sides of the aisle.
A number of bills this year call for better accountability of state spending related to homelessness, including AB 2056, which would require the Department of Finance to create a public internet portal before July 1, 2025, that tracks and reports that spending.
Another bill aims to create a working group of all departments and agencies that receive homelessness funding and task the group with determining how to consolidate into one so that funding is no longer split across multiple state departments and agencies.
During a two-hour hearing this week of the Assembly’s Budget Subcommittee on Accountability and Oversight, legislators demanded data from several Newsom administration officials on the cost-effectiveness of major homelessness programs. But the officials who testified during the hearing said they could not present that data at this time.
Assemblymember Avelino Valencia, D-Anaheim, who chairs the committee, said the hearing is a testament to the urgency of the need to address the issue.
“Speed, efficiency, responsibility and the collaboration component is going to be key between our tribes, between our local, the county, the state, and of course, the state departments to ensure that we’re actually addressing the issue now and not kicking this can down the road any further,” he said.
Kaitlyn Schallhorn and Destiny Torres contributed to this report.
California
Warning against mushroom foraging in California after fatal poisoning
Officials in California are urging people not to forage for wild mushrooms after a rise in poisoning cases caused at least one death.
The California Poison Control System has identified 21 cases of amatoxin poisoning clustered in northern California, likely resulting from death cap mushrooms, the state’s department of public health said.
The poisoning resulted in severe liver damage in several people, including children, and at least one of the patients may need a liver transplant, the department said.
Death cap mushrooms can easily be mistaken for safe, edible mushrooms because of their similar taste, smell, and appearance.
The confirmed cases happened between mid-November and early December, a rainy season in the region that creates ideal conditions for the deadly variety to grow, mostly near oaks and hardwood trees like pine trees, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) said.
Though the cases are mostly in the Monterey and San Francisco Bay area of Northern California, the risk is statewide, the department warned.
“Death cap mushrooms contain potentially deadly toxins that can lead to liver failure,” Dr Erica Pan, CDPH Director and State Public Health Officer, said in a statement. “Because the death cap can easily be mistaken for edible safe mushrooms, we advise the public not to forage for wild mushrooms at all during this high-risk season.”
The death cap mushroom is never safe to eat, even if it is boiled, dried, frozen or cooked.
Eating the deadly mushrooms can cause watery diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and dehydration within six to 24 hours – and although symptoms may initially wane, severe or fatal liver damage can still occur up to eight days later.
“Only people with extensive training and experience should eat wild mushrooms that they have picked themselves,” Dr Edward Moreno, County of Monterey Health Officer, said in a statement.
California
1 killed, more than 20 poisoned by death cap mushrooms in California, officials say
SAN FRANCISCO — California officials are warning foragers after an outbreak of poisoning linked to wild mushrooms that has killed one adult and caused severe liver damage in several patients, including children.
The state poison control system has identified 21 cases of amatoxin poisoning, likely caused by death cap mushrooms, the health department said Friday. The toxic wild mushrooms are often mistaken for edible ones because of their appearance and taste.
“Death cap mushrooms contain potentially deadly toxins that can lead to liver failure,” Erica Pan, director of the California Department of Public Health, said in a statement. “Because the death cap can easily be mistaken for edible safe mushrooms, we advise the public not to forage for wild mushrooms at all during this high-risk season.”
One adult has died and several patients have required intensive care, including at least one who might need a liver transplant.
Officials advise against wild mushroom foraging
Wet weather fuels the growth of death cap mushrooms, and officials warn against any wild mushroom foraging to avoid confusion. Residents in central California’s Monterey County became ill after eating mushrooms found in a local park, according to county health officials. Another cluster of cases were in the San Francisco Bay Area, but state health officials warned that the risk is everywhere.
There were more than 4,500 cases of exposure to unidentified mushrooms logged at America’s Poison Centers in 2023, according to their National Poison Data System annual report. Roughly half were in young children, who experts warn may pick and eat a mushroom while playing outside.
California’s poison control system sees hundreds of cases of wild mushroom poisonings each year. The death cap mushroom and the “destroying angel” mushroom look and taste similar to edible mushrooms, so experts warn that a mushroom’s color is not a reliable way of detecting its toxicity. And whether it is eaten raw or cooked does not matter.
Symptom improvement is not an all-clear
People can have stomach cramping, nausea, diarrhea or vomiting within 24 hours after ingesting a toxic mushroom. Though gastrointestinal symptoms may improve, health officials warn that patients can still develop serious complications, including liver damage, that surface later.
People looking for guidance on diagnosing or treating mushroom poisoning can contact the poison control hotline at 1-800-222-1222.
Copyright © 2025 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.
California
Bold shapes and binoculars: Frank Gehry’s stunning California architecture
In Frank Gehry’s world, no building was left untilted, unexposed or untouched by unconventional material. The Canadian-American architect, who died in his Los Angeles home at 96, designed a career around defying what was predictable and pulling in materials that were uncommon and, as such, relatively inexpensive.
Gehry collaborated with artists to turn giant binoculars into an entryway of a commercial campus, and paid homage to a writer’s past as a lifeguard by creating a livable lifeguard tower. And while dreaming this up, he transformed American architecture along the way.
Below, take a look at how his work wrapped around and shaped the neighborhoods and urban centers of California.
Walt Disney Concert Hall
With its stainless steel waves rolling on a corner of Downtown Los Angeles, the Walt Disney Concert Hall has become an integral part of this urban center. Lillian Disney gifted the hall to the city and to pay tribute to her late husband’s commitment to the arts. Gehry built the music hall from the inside out, designing it around how music was to be heard within its walls with a team of acousticians.
While the hall’s exterior has free-forming waves and Gehry’s touch of unconventional geometry, the interior is surprisingly symmetrical – an intentional contrast. “The reason I made Disney Hall symmetrical was because I knew that I was a very suspect architect for a building like that by the general public,” Gehry told the Getty. “Everybody is going to think I’m going to do a Thing. So I decided to give them a comfort zone.”
Gehry house
Gehry pruned this Dutch colonial bungalow in Santa Monica down to its original wooden bones and, in 1978, built around it intricate layers of glass, exposed plywood, corrugated metal, and chain-link fencing. The home is considered one of his earliest works of deconstructivist architecture, with large tilting windows that allow the outside world to peer into the home’s internal, seemingly unfinished structure. Gehry continued to add to this residence until 1992.
Binoculars Building
First commissioned as a commercial office building in Venice for advertising agency Chiat/Day, this bold design has become one of Gehry’s most recognizable works in Los Angeles, thanks to its towering entryway that looks exactly like what it is: a giant pair of binoculars. This 44-foot feature was actually designed and created by his collaborators, artists Claes Oldenburg and Coosje van Bruggen. Gehry designed the 79,000 sq ft campus to have a tree-like metal canopy facade on the south of the binoculars, with a bright-white ship-like exterior to the north. Google has occupied the building since 2011, though it is currently on sale for the first time in 30 years for an undisclosed price.
Norton residence
When artists hire artists to design a home, places like the Norton residence pop into existence on Venice Beach’s famed Ocean Front Walk. Inspired by photos of his Santa Monica home, Lynn and William Norton, an artist and writer respectively, hired Gehry to bring this eclectic deconstructivist beachfront home to life in the 1980s. Gehry’s design plays with contrasting sizes of stucco and concrete boxes, heights and shapes, making chaos seem like a cohesive, colorful whole. At the forefront of the property is Gehry’s version of a lifeguard tower in the shape of a one-room studio standing on a single pillar, an apparent nod to William Norton’s former life as a lifeguard.
Loyola Marymount University Law School
Gehry was chosen to redesign the law school for Loyola Marymount University in 1979 because, unlike other architects who presented plans for a big building, Gehry proposed a collection of smaller buildings designed around a plaza. Robert Benson, a member of the committee who selected Gehry’s design, said the committee “squabbled” with the architect over his strange but signature choice of materials and angles, including sheet metal-wrapped Roman columns, chainlink fences or the peculiar angling of a building. Gehry won most of the squabbles, as Benson recalls it, and the result is a village-like complex of contemporary buildings, bold shapes, bright yellows and at least one oversized chainlink structure.
-
Alaska1 day agoHowling Mat-Su winds leave thousands without power
-
Politics5 days agoTrump rips Somali community as federal agents reportedly eye Minnesota enforcement sweep
-
Ohio4 days ago
Who do the Ohio State Buckeyes hire as the next offensive coordinator?
-
News5 days agoTrump threatens strikes on any country he claims makes drugs for US
-
World5 days agoHonduras election council member accuses colleague of ‘intimidation’
-
Texas2 days agoTexas Tech football vs BYU live updates, start time, TV channel for Big 12 title
-
Politics6 days agoTrump highlights comments by ‘Obama sycophant’ Eric Holder, continues pressing Senate GOP to nix filibuster
-
Politics7 days agoWar Sec Pete Hegseth shares meme of children’s book character firing on narco terrorist drug boat